Skip to main content
Log in

The neoliberal moment: Communicative interaction and a discursive analysis of the global political economy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Politics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article is motivated by two trends in international relations (IR): the general trend toward global neoliberalism, and the discursive turn in IR scholarship. Neoliberalism, while not fully practised anywhere, has become the dominant discourse and normative measure of economic policy ideas around which policy debates coalesce. This all is the more noticeable among the lesser-developed countries. This article attempts to explain this gradual shift in the global political economy where most discussions centre around a core set of ideas and beliefs about how the system ought to function. Given that evidence of this ideational/discursive shift predates the end of the Cold War and changed out of step with the steady growth in economic interdependence, new approaches are warranted. What is argued here is that the study of social interaction among states will shed considerable light onto how the international system has developed into its current state.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For a similar perspective within rational choice theory, see Denzau and North (1994). They argue that shared mental models help make sense of the world by providing an ‘event space’ in which to interpret the world. In essence, inter-subjectively held models of reality shape learning by reducing uncertainty and providing a framework of rationality.

  2. For example, though labour and capital classes inhabit the same meta-life-world, each will hold divergent interpretations of society based on their place in the social structure and daily experience within it.

References

  • Adler, E. and Haas, P. (1992) Conclusion: Epistemic communities, world order, and the creation of a reflective research program. International Organization 46 (Winter): 367–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alfred, T. (1999) Peace, Power, Righteousness: An Indigenous Manifesto. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archarya, A. (2004) How ideas spread: Whose norms matter? Norm localization and institutional change in Asian regionalism. International Organization 58 (Spring): 239–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biersteker, T. (1992) The triumph of neoclassical economics in the developing world: Policy convergence in bases of governance in the international economic order. In: J. Rosenau and E. Czempiel (eds.) Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratton, M., Mattes, R. and Gyimah-Boadi, E. (2005) Public Opinion, Democracy, and Market Reform in Africa. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comaroff, J. and Comaroff, J. (1986) Christianity and colonialism in South Africa. American Ethnologist 13 (1): 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, N. (2002) Argument and Change in World Politics: Ethics, Decolonization, and Humanitarian Intervention. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Denzau, A. and North, D. (1994) Shared mental models: Ideologies and institutions. Kyklos 47: 3–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Der Derian, J. and Shapiro, M. (1989) International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings in World Politics. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1978) Writing and Difference, Translated by A. Bass. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobar, A. (1995) Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge: And the Discourse on Language. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1973) The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (1992) Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. In: C. Calhoun (ed.) Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (1995) Politics, culture, and the public sphere: Toward a postmodern conception. In: L. Nicholson and S. Seidman (eds.) Social Postmodernism: Beyond Identity Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadzey, A. (1995) The political economy of centralization and delayed capitalism in sub-Saharan Africa. In: M. Dorraj (ed.) The Changing Political Economy of the Third World. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1979) Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984) The Constitution of Society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Group of 77. (1964) Joint Declaration of the Seventy-seven Developing Countries Made at the Conclusion of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development; 15 June, Geneva, Switzerland.

  • Group of 77. (1967) First Ministerial Meeting of the Group of 77: Charter of Algiers; 10–25 October, Algiers, Algeria.

  • Group of 77. (1975) Declaration and Plan of Action on Industrial Development Cooperation. Algiers, Algeria, 15-18 February.

  • Group of 77. (1989) Caracas Declaration of the Ministers of Foreign Affairs of the Group of 77 on the Occasion of the Twenty-Fifth Anniversary of the Group; 21–23 June, Caracas, Venezuela.

  • Group of 77. (2000) Group of 77 South Summit: Havana Programme of Action; 10–14 April, Havana, Cuba.

  • Haas, P. (1990) Saving the Mediterranean: The Politics of International Environmental Cooperation. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, P. (1992a) Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization 46 (Winter): 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haas, P. (1992b) Banning chlorofluorocarbons: Epistemic community efforts to protect stratospheric ozone. International Organization 46 (Winter): 187–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1984) The Theory of Communicative Action, Translated by T. McCarthy Boston. MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halberstam, J. (1998) Female Masculinity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzscheiter, A. (2005) Discourse as capability: Non-state actors’ capital in global governance. Millennium 33 (3): 723–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P.T. (2006) Civilizing the Enemy: German Reconstruction and the Invention of the West. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Journal of the Group of 77. (1997) 10(March/April).

  • Journal of the Group of 77. (2003) Non-alignment movement summit closes with call for a new global human order. Journal of the Group of 77, 16(January–March): 7–8.

  • Kratochwil, F. (1989) Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, R. and Jackson, P.T. (2007) Twisting tongues and twisting arms: The power of political rhetoric. European Journal of International Relations 13 (1): 35–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milliken, J. (1999) The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods. European Journal of International Relations 5 (2): 225–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitzen, J. (2005) Reading habermas in anarchy: Multilateral diplomacy and global public spheres. American Political Science Review 99 (3): 401–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nandy, A. (2002) The beautiful, expanding future of poverty: Popular economics as a psychological defense. In: M.K. Pasha and C. Murphy (eds.) International Relations and the New Inequality. New York: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Connor, J. (1994) Is sustainable capitalism possible. In: M. O’Connor (ed.) Is Capitalism Sustainable. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onuf, N. (1989) World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porpora, D. (1993) Cultural rules and material relations. Sociological Theory 11 (2): 212–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New York. (1963) Joint declaration of the developing countries made at the eighteenth session of the United Nations General Assembly. 11 November.

  • Rancière, J. (1999) Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy, Translated by J. Rose. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risse, T. (2000) Let's argue!: Communicative action in world politics. International Organization 54 (1): 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, J. (2006) Why is there no international historical sociology? European Journal of International Relations 12 (3): 307–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, R. (1977) The Weak in the World of the Strong: The Developing Countries in the International System. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, R. (1979) Global Bargaining: UNCTAD and the Quest for a New International Economic Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. (1985) Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, B.A. and Elkins, Z. (2004) The globalization of liberalization: Policy diffusion in the international political economy. American Political Science Review 98 (1): 171–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, M. (1981) Language and Political Understanding: The Politics of Discursive Practices. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, M. (2002) Social science, geophilosophy and inequality. In: M. Pasha and C. Murphy (eds.) International Relations and The New Inequality. New York: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, R. (2004) The political economy of IMF lending in Africa. American Political Science Review 98 (4): 577–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, I. and Nel, P. (2002) New Africa, globalisation and the confines of elite reformism: Getting the rhetoric right, getting the strategy wrong. Third World Quarterly 23 (1): 163–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Industrial Development Organization (1975) Lima Declaration and Plan of Action on Industrial Development and Cooperation. Lima, Peru 12–26 March.

  • Wavell, B. (1986) Language and Reason. New York: M De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weldes, J. (1999) Constructing National Interests: The United States and the Cuban Missile Crisis. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987) Our Common Future. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Žižek, S. (2009) Twenty Years of Collapse New York Times. 9 November.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Becker, D. The neoliberal moment: Communicative interaction and a discursive analysis of the global political economy. Int Polit 47, 251–268 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2010.1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2010.1

Keywords

Navigation