Skip to main content
Log in

From Woodrow Wilson in 1902 to the Bush doctrine in 2002: Democracy promotion as imperialism

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Politics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The secular notion of American exceptionalism divorced from explicit racial or religious expression and based on governmental institutions and civic virtue – America as ‘the last, best hope of earth’ (Lincoln), America as ‘the ark of the liberties of the world’ (Melville) – goes back to the American Revolution. Nevertheless, before Wilson the conceptual framework that could explain the rightness of American global expansion in terms of bringing democratic government to others had not been well formulated. With Wilson, by contrast, the United States for the first time could present in secular terms, concepts argued from a cultural and historical perspective that made the expansion of American influence around the globe legitimate, not only in terms of national security but to the benefit of all mankind. Here is the key, I would propose, to the self-confidence and self-righteousness, which has been the hallmark of American foreign policy for a century now. Democracy promotion (associated with open markets economically and multilateralism) reflected America's cultural superiority (inherited from racial thinking), as well as its mission to help others (descended from its religious background). In Wilson's hands, an enduring framework for American foreign policy was born, one that remains with us to this day.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. On race, see Horsman (1981) and Jacobson (2000); on religion, see Mead (2001).

  2. Smith (1994c). It might be objected that under the terms of the Reagan Doctrine, the United States did return to forceful democracy promotion in Central America.

  3. For the genealogy of liberal internationalism from Wilson to the 1990s, see Smith (2007).

  4. The points here are developed at more length in Chapters 4–6.

  5. Niebuhr (1952), reprinted in 2008, pp. 73–75.

  6. Marshall (2006), with essays by Kenneth Pollack, Anne-Marie Slaughter, Larry Diamond, Ronald Asmus, Michael McFaul and Michael O’Hanlon, among others.

References

  • Baker, R.S. and Dodd, W.E. (1926) The New Democracy: Presidential Messages, Addresses and Other Papers, 1913–1917, Vol I. Harper and Brothers, p. 111f.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, G.W. (2002) The National Security Strategy of the United States. September.

  • Calhoun, F.S. (1993) Uses of Force and Wilsonian Foreign Policy. Kent State University Press, p. 107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J.M. (2009) Review of G. John Ikenberry et al. In: H-Diplo Roundtable Review The Crisis in American Foreign Policy: Wilsonianism in the Twenty-first Century. Princeton University Press, Vol. July/August, p. 27, http://www.h-net.org/~diplo/roundtables.

  • Diamond, L. (2003) Can the Whole World Become Democratic? Democracy, Development and International Policies. Irvine, CA: University of California. CSDS Paper, March.

  • Franck, T. (1992) The emerging right to democratic governance. American Journal of International Law 86: 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horsman, R. (1981) Race and Manifest Destiny: The Origins of American Racial Anglo-Saxonism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikenberry, G.J. and Slaughter, A.-M. (co-directors) (2006) Forging a world of liberty under law. The Princeton Project on National Security. The Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. (2001) The Responsibility to Protect. Canada: Canadian government.

  • Jacobson, M.F. (2000) Barbarian Virtues: The United States Encounters Foreign Peoples at Home and Abroad, 1876–1917. New York: Hill and Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, R. (2008) Neocon nation. World Affairs 170 (Spring): 13–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knock, T. (1992) To End All Wars: Woodrow Wilson and the Quest for a New World Order. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 39ff, 81ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, A. (1949) The New Freedom. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, p. 386f.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, A. (1960) Wilson: The Struggle for Neutrality, 1914–1915. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, p. 501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, A. (ed.) (1968a) The modern democratic state. The Papers of Woodrow Wilson, Vol. 5. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 54f, 65f.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, A. (1968b) Papers of Woodrow Wilson, Vol. 35, pp. 111f, 118f.

  • Link, A. (1982) Papers of Woodrow Wilson, Vol. 37, pp. 36f, 265.

  • Marshall, W. (2006) With All Our Might: A Progressive Strategy for Defeating Jihadism and Defending Liberty. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, W.R. (2001) Special Providence: American Foreign Policy and How it Changed the World. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, A. (1997) Taking preferences seriously: A liberal theory of international politics. International Organization 51 (4): 513–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niebuhr, R. (1952) The Irony of American History. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1999) The Law of Peoples, Chapter 5. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russett, B. and Oneal, J. (2001) Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. (1994a) America's Mission: The United States and the Worldwide Struggle for Democracy in the Twentieth Century, Chapter 2. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. (1994b) America's Mission: The United States and the Worldwide Struggle for Democracy in the Twentieth Century, Chapter 3. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. (1994c) America's Mission: The United States and the Worldwide Struggle for Democracy in the Twentieth Century, Chapters 4–10. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. (2007) A Pact with the Devil: Washington's Bid for World Supremacy and the Betrayal of the American Promise, Chapter 3. New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. (2008) Obama vs. McCain on foreign policy. The American Conservative 22 September.

  • Stephanson, A. (1995) Manifest Destiny: American Expansion and the Empire of Right. New York, NY: Hill and Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W. (1889) The State: Elements of Historical and Practical Politics, Chapter II, Sections 1171–1181 Boston, MA: D.C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W. (1902) The ideals of America. The Atlantic Monthly December.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, T. From Woodrow Wilson in 1902 to the Bush doctrine in 2002: Democracy promotion as imperialism. Int Polit 48, 229–250 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2011.11

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2011.11

Keywords

Navigation