Skip to main content
Log in

Between freedom and fear: Explaining the consensus on terrorism and democracy in US foreign policy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Politics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Why have two successive US administrations concluded that fighting terrorism must involve democracy promotion? This assumption became prevalent in US political discourse following the events of September 11 despite the fact that the empirical evidence linking democracy and terrorism is weak or ambiguous. More strikingly, it has persisted even after the missions to establish democracies in Afghanistan and Iraq have led to increasing violence, including a worldwide increase in terrorist attacks. This article argues that the link between democracy and terrorism was established by the combined effect of three factors: (a) the framing of the September 11 attacks in a way that increased the receptivity to this conceptual opposition between freedom and fear; (b) the ideological influence of the Wilsonian tradition, as manifested today in an unusual consensus between modern neo-conservatives and liberal internationalists on the desirability of democratic reform as a means of changing foreign policy behaviour; and (c) a powerful bipartisan domestic constituency in favour of democracy promotion. Owing to these three factors, the contraposition of democracy and terrorism in American political discourse is effectively over-determined because it mirrors the dominant ideological and political preferences of American elites. This fixed preference for democracy promotion explains why the Obama Administration has remained wedded to the binary distinction between freedom and fear in its public statements despite its efforts to break in style and substance with the policies of its predecessor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For a thoughtful account of such a wave of devastating attacks might affect American society, see Ignatieff (2004).

  2. As Robert Jervis notes, contradictory assumptions can often be held simultaneously by individuals, often without recognizing the apparent contradiction (2009).

  3. President Clinton has been forceful in rebutting these claims, see Grunwald (2006).

  4. In an interview with the New York Times, Senator Kerry argued that the United States should aim to return terrorism to more of a ‘nuisance’ than an existential security threat. This view was repeatedly attacked by the Bush campaign and arguably contributed to the failure of his presidential campaign, see Bai (2004).

  5. For a noted exception that injects a note of caution on exporting democracy, see Barber (2003).

  6. The term epistemic community is defined here as Peter Haas uses the term ‘a network of professionals with recognized expertise and competence in a particular domain and an authoritative claim to policy-relevant knowledge within that domain or issue area’ (1992).

References

  • Al Jazeera. (2004) Full Transcript of Bin Laden's Speech. 1 November.

  • Asmus, R.D., Diamond, L., Leonard, M. and McFaul, M. (2005) A transatlantic strategy to promote democratic development in the broader Middle East. The Washington Quarterly Spring.

  • Bai, M. (2004) Kerry's undeclared war. The New York Times 10 October.

  • Baker, P. (2010) Obama's war over terrorism. The New York Times 4 January.

  • Barbash, F. (2003) Bush: Iraq part of ‘global democratic revolution’. The Washington Post 6 November.

  • Barber, B. (2003) Fear's Empire: War, Terrorism and Democracy. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • BBC News. (2005) Kerry blames defeat on Bin Laden. 31 January, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/4222647.stm, accessed 19 March 2010.

  • Beinart, P. (2006) The Good Fight – Why Liberals – and Only Liberals – Can Win the War on Terror and Make America Great Again. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, W. (2002) Why We Fight: Moral Clarity and the War on Terror. Washington, DC: Regenry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, P. (2003) Terror and Liberalism. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boot, M (2001) The case for empire. The Weekly Standard 7 (5), 15 October.

  • Boyle, M. (2004) Utopianism and the Bush foreign policy. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 17 (1): 81–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, M. (2008) The war on terror in American grand strategy. International Affairs 84 (2): 191–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, D. (2007) Obama, Gospel and Verse. The New York Times 26 April.

  • Bush, G.W. (2001) We’re fighting to win – And we will win. Remarks by the President on the USS Enterprise, Pearl Harbor Day, 7 December, http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2001/12/20011207.html, accessed 13 March 2010.

  • Bush, G.W. (2002) State of the Union address. 29 January.

  • Bush, G.W. (2005) Second inaugural address. The White House, 20 January.

  • Carothers, T. (2007a) A quarter century of promoting democracy. Journal of Democracy 18 (4): 112–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carothers, T. (2007b) US democracy promotion during and after Bush. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington, DC, pp. 1–34.

  • Clarke, R. (2004) Against all Enemies. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, J.K. (2007) Militarized patriotism: Why the US marketplace of ideas failed before the Iraq War. Security Studies 16 (3): 489–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daalder, I. and Lindsay, J. (2003) America Unbound: The Bush Revolution in Foreign Policy. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBartolo, D.M. (2008) Perceptions of US Democracy Promotion: Part Two American Views. Washington, DC: Project on Middle East Democracy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desch, M. (2008) America's liberal Illiberalism: The ideological origins of overreaction in US foreign policy. International Security 32 (3): 7–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deuck, C. (2006) Reluctant Crusaders. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggen, D. and Mintz, J. (2004) 9/11 panel critical of Clinton, Bush. The Washington Post 24 March.

  • Epstein, S.B., Serafino, N. and Miko, T. (2007) Democracy Promotion: Cornerstone of US Foreign Policy? CRS Report for Congress, 26 December.

  • Feith, D. (2008) War and Decision: Inside the Pentagon at the Dawn of the War on Terrorism. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, T. (2001) World War III. The New York Times 13 September.

  • Fukuyama, F. (2006) After the Neocons: America at the Crossroads. London: Profile.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. and McFaul, M. (2007) Should democracy be promoted or demoted? The Washington Quarterly 31 (1): 23–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaddis, J.L. (2002) A grand strategy of transformation. Foreign Policy November/December: 50–57.

  • Gause, F.G. (2005) Can democracy stop terrorism? Foreign Affairs 84 (5): 62–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, A. (2008) Making the world safe for partial democracy. International Security 33 (2): 120–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grunwald, M. (2006) A combative Clinton defends record on fighting terrorism. The Washington Post 24 September.

  • Haas, P. (1992) Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization 46 (1): 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halper, S. and Clarke, J. (2004) America Alone: The Neo-conservatives and the Global Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, B. (2006) Inside Terrorism. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, K.R. (2006) Spreading freedom around the world. The Heritage Foundation, 26 April, http://www.heritage.org/Research/WorldwideFreedom/hl937.cfm.

  • Ignatieff, M. (2004) Lesser evils. The New York Times 2 May.

  • Ikenberry, G.J. (1999) Why export democracy?: The ‘hidden grand strategy’ of American foreign policy. The Wilson Quarterly 23 (2): 56–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikenberry, G.J., Knock, T., Slaughter, A.M. and Smith, T. (2008) The Crisis of American Foreign Police: Wilsonianism in the Twenty-first Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jervis, R. (2009) Understanding beliefs and threat inflation. In: A.T. Thrall and J.K. Cramer (eds.) American Foreign Policy and the Politics of Fear. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P. (2010) Calling it ‘war’ President Obama pegs Christmas Day attack to al Qaeda. The Christian Science Monitor.

  • Katulis, B. (2009) Democracy Promotion in the Middle East and the Obama Administration. Washington, DC: The Century Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, C. (2004) Threat inflation and the marketplace of ideas: The selling of the Iraq War. International Security 29 (1): 5–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keinon, H. (2010) New US envoy to Syria a mistake. The Jerusalem Post 22 February.

  • Krauthammer, C. (2003) Holiday from history. The Washington Post 14 February.

  • Krauthammer, C. (2004) Democratic realism: An American foreign policy for a unipolar world. 2004 Irving Kristol Lecture, 10 February.

  • Krebs, R. (2005) Correspondence: Selling the market short? The marketplace of ideas and the Iraq War. International Security 29 (4): 196–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristol, I. (2003) The Neo-conservative Persuasion. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristol, W. (2004) The 9/11 election. The Weekly Standard 1 November.

  • Lehman, N. (2002) The next world order. The New Yorker 1 April, http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2002/04/01/020401fa_FACT1, accessed 18 March 2010.

  • Lewis, B. (2002) What Went Wrong: Western Impact and Middle Eastern Response. New York: Phoenix.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieven, A. (2006) Wolfish Wilsonians: Existential dilemmas of the liberal internationalists. Orbis Spring: 243–257.

  • Marshall, W. (ed.) (2006) With All Our Might: A Progressive Strategy for Defeating Jihadism and Defending Liberty. New York: Rowan and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, R. (2009) The brave new world of democracy promotion. Foreign Service Journal January: 34–39.

  • Mead, W.R. (2004) Power, Terror, Peace and War: America's Grand Strategy in a World of Risk. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monten, J. (2005) The roots of the bush doctrine: Power, nationalism, and democracy promotion in US strategy. International Security 29 (4): 112–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, J. (2005) Six rather unusual propositions about terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence 17 (4): 487–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muravchik, J. (2004) Bringing democracy to the Arab world. Journal of Current History January: 8–10.

  • National Endowment for Democracy. (2006) The Backlash against Democracy Promotion: A Report Prepared by the National Endowment for Democracy for Senator Richard Lugar, Chairman, Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate. Washington, DC, 8 June.

  • Obama, B. (2007) The war we need to win. Remarks in Washington, DC, 1 August, http://www.barackobama.com/2007/08/01/the_war_we_need_to_win.php, accessed 15 March 2010.

  • Obama-Biden campaign. (2008) Strengthening our common security by investing in our common humanity. Fact sheet, http://www.barackobama.com/pdf/issues/Fact_Sheet_Foreign_Policy_Democratization_and_Development_FINAL.pdf, accessed 13 March 2010.

  • Obama, B. (2009a) Remarks by the president on a new beginning Cairo, Egypt. 4 June, http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Remarks-by-the-President-at-Cairo-University-6-04-09/, accessed 15 March 2010.

  • Obama, B. (2009b) Nobel Lecture. 10 December, http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/2009/obama-lecture_en.html, accessed 14 March 2010.

  • Pew Trusts. (2005) The global spread of anti-Americanism. Trends 2005: 20 January, Washington DC.

  • Piazza, J. (2007) Draining the swamp: Democracy promotion, state failure and terrorism in 19 Middle Eastern countries. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 30: 521–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posen, B. (2001) The struggle against terrorism: Grand strategy, strategy and tactics. International Security 26 (3): 39–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Progressive Policy Institute. (2003) Progressive internationalism: A democratic national security strategy. Washington, DC: Progressive Policy Institute, 30 October, http://www.ppionline.org/documents/Progressive_Internationalism_1003.pdf, accessed 28 March 2010.

  • Ranstorp, M. (1998) Interpreting the broader context and meaning of Bin Laden's fatwa. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 21 (4): 321–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reuters. (2009) Obama team drops ‘War on Terror’ rhetoric. 31 March.

  • Rice, C. (2005) The promise of democratic peace. The Washington Post 11 December.

  • Schlesinger, A. (1986) The Cycles of American History. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slevin, B. (2011) Obama's Middle East Democracy Problem. Foreign Policy, 5 March.

  • Smith, T. (2007) A Pact with the Devil: Washington's Bid for World Supremacy and the Betrayal of American Promise. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannenhaus, S. (2003) Interview with Deputy Secretary Wolfowitz. Vanity Fair 9 May, http://www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/transcript.aspx?transcriptid=2594.

  • Tenet, G. and Harlow, B. (2007) At the Center of the Storm: My Years at the CIA. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrall, A.T. and Cramer, J.K. (eds.) (2009) American Foreign Policy and the Politics of Fear. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walt, S.M. (2001) Beyond Bin Laden: Reshaping US foreign policy. International Security 26 (3): 56–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Washington Times. (2009) White House: War on terrorism is over. 6 August.

  • Western, J. (2005) The war over Iraq: Selling war to the American public. Security Studies 14 (1): 99–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White House. (2002) The National Security Strategy of the United States. Washington, DC.

  • White House. (2003) President Bush discusses freedom in Iraq and the Middle East. Remarks by the President on the 20th anniversary of the National Endowment for Democracy, US Chamber of Commerce, 6 November, http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/11/20031106-2.html.

  • Windsor, J.L. (2003) Promoting democratization can combat terrorism. Wilson Quarterly 26 (3): 43–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wollack, K. (2004) Statement of President of National Democratic Institute for International Affairs, Before the Committee on International Relations, Subcommittee on International Terrorism, Non-proliferation and Human Rights, U.S. House of Representatives, 7 July.

  • Wray, R. (2002) New York counts cost of 9/11. The Guardian 5 September.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author is grateful for comments and critique from Faye Donnelly, Karin Fierke, Emma Leonard and Tony Lang.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boyle, M. Between freedom and fear: Explaining the consensus on terrorism and democracy in US foreign policy. Int Polit 48, 412–433 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2011.1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2011.1

Keywords

Navigation