Abstract
A new era in international politics is gradually taking shape in which the legacy of the Cold War is gradually fading, but in which new lines of division are emerging. The major institutions of the Cold War period are undergoing a long decay although the political processes associated with them are becoming increasingly dysfunctional. New forms of multi-polarity are taking shape accompanied by the struggle between defenders of the status quo and those ready to adapt to the structural revisionism inherent in the new pattern of international politics. In all of this, Russia acts as the bellwether, developing as a distinct and separate pole in the international system rather than joining the Western constellation, as was anticipated after the end of the Cold War. Russia's great power identity in the international system is accompanied by domestic systemic specificities, which reinforce differentiation at the structural level. Russia's neo-revisionism does not repudiate the present balance in international order, but seeks to create what it considers to be a more comprehensive and equal system. This can be seen in its various forms of interaction and modes of engagement with ‘the international’. In methodological terms, the attempt to analyse these changes through a Cold War lens is a categorical error that perpetuates anachronistic paradigms. By disaggregating Russia's engagement with the international into a number of distinct processes, we can delineate more clearly the interaction of structural and systemic factors that sustain Russia's neo-revisionism.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adler, E. and Pouliot, V. (2011) International practices. International Theory 3 (1): 1–36.
Avgerinos, K.P. (2009) Russia's public diplomacy effort: What the Kremlin is doing and why it's not working. Journal of Public and International Affairs 20 (Spring): 115–132.
Bigo, D. (2011) ‘Pierre Bourdieu and international relations: Power of practices, practices of power’, in special issue ‘Bourdieu and the international’. International Political Sociology 5 (3): 225–258.
Blum, D.W. (ed.) (2008) Russia and Globalization: Identity, Security and Society in an Era of Change. Washington DC: Woodrow Wilson Centre Press.
Bull, H. (1995) The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, originally published in 1977.
Burgess, J.P. (2007) The evolution of European union law and Carl Schmitt's theory of the Nomos of Europe. In: L. Odysseos and F. Petitio (eds.) The International Political Thought of Carl Schmitt, pp. 185–201.
Chernyak, E.B. (1996) Tsiviliografiya: nauka o tsivilizatsii. Moscow, Russia: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.
Deyermond, R. (2007) Security and Sovereignty in the Former Soviet Union. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Draft of the European Security Treaty. (2009) 29 November, http://eng.kremlin.ru/news/275.
Geuss, R. (2008) Philosophy and Real Politics. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Golubovskii, D. (2009) Zagovor bankirov. Moscow, Russia: Eksmo Algoritm.
Gong, G.W. (1984) The Standard of ‘Civilisation’ in International Society. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Gracheva, T.V. (2009) Nevidimaya khazariya: Algoritmy geopolitiki i strategii tainykh voin mirovoi zakulisy. Ryazan, Russia: Zerna.
Granatova, A.A. (2010) Operatsiya ‘Gorbi’. Moscow, Russia: Algoritm.
Haukkala, H. (2008) A norm-maker or a norm-taker? The changing normative parameters of Russia's place in Europe. In: T. Hopf (ed.) Russia's European Choice. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 35–58.
Hopf, T. (2010) The logic of habit in international relations. European Journal of International Relations 16 (4): 539–561.
Katzenstein, P.J. (ed.) (2010) Civilizations in World Politics: Plural and Pluralist Perspectives. London and New York: Routledge.
Kliuchnikov, B.F. (2009) Mirovoi krizis kak zagovor. Moscow, Russia: Algoritm/Eksmo.
Kokoshin, A. (2006) Real’nyi suverenitet v sovremennoi miropoliticheskoi sistemy, 3rd edn. Moscow, Russia: Evropa.
Koselleck, R. (1988) Critique and Crisis: Enlightenment and the Pathogenesis of Modern Society. Oxford: Berg.
Kratochwil, F. (2007) Rethinking the ‘inter’ in international politics. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 35 (3): 495–511, and other articles in the special issue of the journal devoted to an examination of contemporary theories of ‘the international’.
Neumann, I.B. and Sending, O.J. (2007) ‘The international’ as governmentality. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 35 (3): 677–701.
Neocleous, M. (2011) The police of civilization: The war on terror as civilizing offensive. International Political Sociology 5 (2): 144–159.
Neumann, I. and Pouliot, V. (2011) Untimely Russia: Hysteresis in Russian–Western relations over the past millennium. Security Studies 20 (1): 105–137.
Nye, J.S. (2011) The Future of Power: Its Changing Nature and Use in the Twenty-first Century. New York: Public Affairs.
Odysseos, L. and Petitio, F. (eds.) (2007) Introduction: The international political thought of Carl Schmitt. In: The International Political Thought of Carl Schmitt: Terror, Liberal War and the Crisis of Global Order. London: Routledge, pp. 1–17.
Panarin, I.N. (2006) Informatsionnaya voina i geopolitika. Moscow, Russia: Pokolenie.
Prokhanov, A. (2002) Gospodin Geksogen: Roman. Moscow, Russia: Ad Marginem.
Prokhanov, A.A. (2010) Tsena izmeny: Sbornik statei. Moscow, Russia: Eksmo/Algoritm.
Reus-Smit, C. (2001) Constructivism. In: S. Burchill et al (eds.) Theories of International Relations. London: Palgrave, pp. 209–230.
Rosenberg, J. (2005) Globalization theory: A post-mortem. International Politics 42 (1): 2–74.
Sakwa, R. (2011) ‘Russia and Europe: Whose society?’, Special issue, Ioannis Stivachtis and Mark Webber (eds.), ‘Europe After Enlargement. The Journal of European Integration 33 (2): 197–214.
Schechter, J.L. (1998) Russian Negotiating Behavior: Continuity and Transition. Washington DC: United States Institute of Peace.
Schmitt, C. (2006) The Nomos of the Earth in the International Law of the Jus Publicum Europaeum, Translated and annotated by G.L. Ulmen. New York: Telos Press Publishing.
Sheiko, K. and Brown, S. (2009) Nationalist Imaginings on the Russian Past: Anatolii Fomenko and the Rise of Alternative History in Post-Communist Russia. Stuttgart, Germany: Ibidem.
Surkov, V. (2006) Suverenitet – eto politicheskii sinonim konkurento-sposobnosti. In: N. Garadzha (ed.) Suverinitet. Moscow, Russia: Evropa, pp. 43–79.
Surkov, V. (2008a) Suverenitet: politicheskii sinonim konkurentosposobnosti. In: V. Surkov (ed.) Teksty 97–07. Moscow, Russia: Evropa, pp. 143–147.
Surkov, V. (ed.) (2008b) Natsionalizatsiya budushchego. In: Teksty 97–07, Moscow, Russia: Evropa, pp. 43–57.
Suzuki, S. (2008) Seeking ‘legitimate’ great power status in post-cold war international society: China's and Japan's participation in UNPKO. International Relations 22 (1): 45–63.
Tsygankov, A.P. (2007) Finding a civilisational idea: ‘West’, ‘Eurasia’, and ‘Euro-East’ in Russia's foreign policy. Geopolitics 12 (3): 375–399.
Tunander, O., Baev, P. and Einagel, V.I. (eds.) (1997) Geopolitics in Post-Wall Europe: Security, Territory and Identity. London: Sage.
Vinokurov, V.I. (2011) Istoriya voennoi diplomatii, Vol. 4, Voennaya diplomatiya na sovremennom etape. Moscow, Russia: Inzhener, Peremeny.
Wendt, A. (1999) Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, UK.
Yakunin, V., Bagdasaryan, B. and Sulakshin, S. (2010) Zapadnya: Novye tekhnologii bor’by s rossiiskoi gosudarstvennost’yu. Moscow, Russia: Eksmo.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sakwa, R. The problem of ‘the international’ in Russian identity formation. Int Polit 49, 449–465 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2012.10
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2012.10