Abstract
President Barack Obama's choice of toughened sanctions as the means to prevent Iran achieving nuclear weapons status is discussed. It is argued that that choice is explained less by any belief in their likely effectiveness than by the unattractive and risky nature of the alternatives. The use of force would not eliminate Iran's nuclear programme and risks pitching the region into even deeper turmoil; the ‘Grand Bargain’ with Iran advocated by others would alienate allies and domestic interests and undermine the administration's wider objectives in the Middle East. The attraction of sanctions, in contrast, is that though unlikely to work they pose little threat to US interests while allowing the Obama administration to stave off demands to adopt high risk alternatives and creating a breathing space for the administration to consider the future evolution of its Iran policy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
An Additional Protocol provides the IAEA with more information on a state's nuclear programme and increased rights of access for inspectors.
Iran wants the fuel rods for the Tehran Research Reactor (TRR) which they use to produce isotopes for medical research.
Although it is beyond the scope of this article to provide a detailed comparison, the failure of US and UN sanctions to prevent North Korea's development of nuclear weapons reinforces the argument being made here (Frank, 2006; Kim and Chang, 2007; Noland, 2009).
The study has been through three editions, with further case studies added in the second and third editions, but the claimed one-third success rate has remained consistent in each volume.
Kimberley Ann Elliott responded to Pape's critique but, if anything, her attempt to defend the conclusions of HSE only serves to reinforce Pape's claims. Her response rested primarily on the claim that HSE's criteria were whether sanctions make military force more effective, rather than whether they were a viable alternative to force. As Pape pointed out, that was not in fact what was originally claimed in HSE and if it had been it would have amounted to quitting of the field of combat before it started, since the fundamental basis upon which sanctions have been advocated is precisely as a viable alternative to the use of force (Elliott, 1998; Pape, 1998).
The United States is viewed by the Iranian government as an inherently hostile state bent on toppling the Iranian republic. Nor is this reasoning without foundation given the American role in the 1953 coup in Iran, its rejection of the Islamic Revolution, aiding of Saddam Hussein's regime during the Iran-Iraq War, the shooting down of an Iranian Airbus in 1988, 30 years of sanctions and more or less veiled threats to invade or attack by the George W. Bush administration. American support for the overthrow of Colonel Gadaffi in 2011 has also confirmed that abandoning a nuclear programme will not stop the United States from supporting regime change.
A policy of containment, which is advocated by some, obviously implies an acceptance that Iran will develop nuclear weapons.
The GCC states are Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates.
It is not the only tool, however. The United States is also engaged in a campaign of espionage designed to slow the Iranian nuclear programme. The Stuxnet virus that infected Iranian centrifuges in 2010 was almost certainly a product of that effort (Broad et al, 2011). Whether the Obama administration has had anything to do with the assassinations of Iranian nuclear scientists (Dehghan, 2011), however, is unknown.
References
Aarts, P. and van Duijne, J. (2009) Saudi Arabia after US-Iranian détente: Left in the lurch? Middle East Policy 26 (3): 64–78.
Addis, C.L. (2009) Iran's 2009 Presidential Elections. CRS Report for Congress, 6 July.
AIPAC. (2006) Proceed with caution if engaging Iran and Syria. 6 December. http://www.aipac.org/~/media/Publications/Policy%20and%20Politics/AIPAC%20Analyses/Issue%20Memos/2006/12/AIPAC_Memo_Proceed_with_Caution_if_Engaging_Iran_and_Syria.pdf, accessed 10 November 2011.
AIPAC. (2010a) AIPAC supports increased EU and US sanctions on Iran. 17 June. http://www.aipac.org/~/media/Publications/Policy%20and%20Politics/Press/AIPAC%20Statements/2010/06/AIPAC_stmt_US_and_EU_Iran_sacntions_6_17_10.pdf, accessed 10 November 2011.
AIPAC. (2010b) AIPAC applauds new UN sanctions on Iran. 9 June. http://www.aipac.org/~/media/Publications/Policy%20and%20Politics/Press/AIPAC%20Statements/2010/06/aipac_applauds_6th_UNSCR_on_Iran_6_9_10.pdf, accessed 10 November 2011.
Arms Control Today. (2006) History of official proposals on the Iranian nuclear issue. Factsheet. http://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/Iran_Nuclear_Proposals, accessed 15 September 2010.
Baldwin, D.A. (1985) Economic Statecraft. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Barber, J. (1979) Economic sanctions as a policy instrument. International Affairs 55 (3): 367–384.
BBC. (2012) Q and A: Iran sanctions, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-15983302, accessed 20 April 2012.
Ben-Meir, A. (2010) An Iranian bombshell: How Israel can and will respond. Harvard International Review 32 (1): 12–17.
Bertram, C. (2008) Rethinking Iran: From Confrontation to Cooperation. European Union Institute for Security Studies, Chaillot Paper no 110, August.
Biden, J. (2009) Remarks by the Vice-President at the Annual Policy Conference of the America Israel Public Affairs Committee. 5 May. http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/remarks-vice-president-annual-policy-conference-american-israel-public-affairs-comm, accessed 10 September 2010.
Biden, J. (2010) Remarks by Vice-President Biden: The enduring partnership between the United States and Israel. 11 March. http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/remarks-vice-president-biden-enduring-partnership-between-united-states-and-israel, accessed 10 September 2010.
Blanchard, J.M.F. and Rispman, N. (1999) Asking the right questions: When do economic sanctions work best? Security Studies 9 (1): 219–253.
Bolton, J. (2009) Iran's axis of nuclear evil. The Wall Street Journal, 21 March. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123595269921905155.html, accessed 15 November 2010.
Borger, J. and McGreal, C. (2012) Iran raises hopes of nuclear trade-off the halt oil sanctions. The Guardian, 14 April. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/apr/13/iran-nuclear-trade-oil-sanctions, accessed 20 April 2012.
Broad, W.J. and Sanger, D.E. (2005) Relying on computer: US seeks to prove Iran's nuclear aims. The New York Times, 13 November. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/13/international/middleeast/13nukes.html?_r=2&pagewanted=print&oref=slogin&oref=slogin, accessed 20 October 2010.
Broad, W.J., Markoff, J. and Sanger, D.E. (2011) Israeli test on worm called crucial in Iran nuclear delay. The New York Times, 15 January. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/16/world/middleeast/16stuxnet.html?pagewanted=all, accessed 10 November 2011.
Chicago Council on Global Affairs. (2010) Constrained internationalism: Adapting to new realities. Results of a 2010 National Survey of Public Opinion. www.thechicagocouncil.org.userfiles/File/POS_Topline%20reports/POS20%2010/Global%20Views%202010.pdf, accessed 10 November 2010.
Clifton, E. (2012) Conflicting poll results offer insights into US public opinion on Iran attack. 10 February. http://thinkprogress.org/security/2012/02/10/423084/conflicting-polls-iran-air-strike/?mobile=nc, accessed 23 April 2012.
Clinton, H. (2010) Remarks on United States foreign policy. Council on Foreign Relations, Washington DC, 8 September. www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2010/09146917.htm, accessed 15 October 2010.
Cooper Drury, A. (1998) Revisiting economic sanctions reconsidered. Journal of Peace Research 35 (4): 497–508.
Cooper, H. and Bronner, E. (2011) Netanyahu gives no ground in Congress speech. The New York Times, 24 May.
Crail, P. (2009) World powers invite Iran to nuclear talks. Arms Control Today, May. http://www.armscontrol.org/act/2009_5/world_powers_invite_Iran, accessed 10 October 2010.
Dashti-Gobson, J., Davis, P. and Radcliff, B. (1997) On the determinants of the success of economic sanctions. American Journal of Political Science 41 (2): 608–618.
Dehghan, S.K. (2011) Man pleads guilty to assassinating Iranian nuclear scientist. The Guardian, 23 August. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/aug/23/iran-nuclear-scientist-assassination-trial, accessed 10 November 2011.
Dershowitz, A. (2006) A reply to the Mearshimer-Walt working paper. 6 April. www.web.htcs.harvard.edu/publications/workingpapers/, accessed 5 March 2010.
Devi, S. (2007) Jordan considers nuclear programme. The Financial Times, 20 January.
Dobbins, J. (2009) Iran sanctions: Options, opportunities and consequences. Testimony before the Subcommittee on National Security and Foreign Affairs of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, 15 December. www.oversight.gov/images/stories/hearings/National_Security/ 12.15.09_Iran/dobbins.pdf, accessed 10 June 2010.
Dobbins, J. (2010) Negotiating with Iran: Lessons from personal experience. The Washington Quarterly 33 (1): 149–163.
Doxey, M.P. (1980) Economic Sanctions and International Enforcement. London: Oxford University Press.
Drezner, D.W. (2003) The hidden hand of economic coercion. International Organization 57 (3): 643–659.
Ebadi, S. and Sahimi, M. (2006) Link the nuclear programme to human rights in Iran. International Herald Tribune, 19 January.
Eiland, G. (2010) Israel's military option. The Washington Quarterly 33 (1): 115–130.
Elliott, K.A. (1998) The sanctions glass: Half full or completely empty. International Security 23 (1): 50–65.
Frank, R. (2006) The political economy of sanctions against North Korea. Asian Perspective 30 (3): 5–36.
Friedman, G. (2010) Rethinking American options on Iran. Stratfor, 31 August. http://app.response.stratfor.com/e/es.aspx?s=1483&e=9381 &elq=1065aa24e4dc450793d165a12f546c1f, accessed 24 October 2010.
Gallup. (2012) Iranians split 45% to 35% on nuclear military power. 15 February. http://www.gallup.com/poll/152633/Iranians-Split-Nuclear-Military-Power.aspx, accessed 23 April 2012.
Galtung, J. (1967) On the effects of international economic sanctions, with examples from the case of Rhodesia. World Politics 19 (3): 378–416.
Goldberg, J. (2010) The point of no return. The Atlantic Monthly, September. http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/09/the-point-of-no-return/8186/, accessed 10 November 2010.
Goldberg, J. (2012) Israelis grow confident strike on Iran's nukes can work. Bloomberg.com, 19 March. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-03-19/israelis-grow-confident-strike-on-iran-s-nukes-can-work.html, accessed 20 April 2012.
Green, J. (1983) Strategies for evading economic sanctions. In: M. Nincic and P. Wallensteen (eds.) Dilemmas of Economic Coercion: Sanctions in World Politics. New York: Praeger, pp. 61–85.
Greenwald, G. (2009) Both parties cheerlead still more loudly for Israel's war, www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2009/01/08/israel.
Hafezi, P. (2011) Leaderless Iranian opposition seen lacking strategy. Reuters, 25 September. http://uk.reuters.com/article/2011/09/25/uk-iran-opposition-idUKTRE78O1BB20110925, accessed 23 April 2012.
Haass, R.N. and Indyk, M. (2009) Beyond Iraq: A new US strategy for the Middle East. Foreign Affairs 88 (1): 41–58.
Hovi, J., Huseby, R. and Sprinz, D.F. (2005) When do (imposed) economic sanctions work? World Politics 57 (4): 479–499.
Hufbauer, G.C., Schott, J.J., Elliot, K.A and Oegg, B. (2007) Economic Sanctions Reconsidered, 3rd edn. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics.
IAEA. (1970) Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, INFCIRC/140. 22 April. http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Infcircs/Others/infcirc140.pdf, accessed 10 November 2011.
IAEA. (2004) Implementation of the Nuclear Safeguards Agreement in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Report of the Director General, 15 November (GOV/2004/83). http://www.iaea.org/publications/documents/board/2004/gov2004-83.pdf., accessed 20 April 2010.
IAEA. (2006) Implementation of the NPT safeguards agreement in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Resolution adopted 4 February (GOV/2006/14). http://www.iaea.org/publications/documents/board/2006/gov2006-14.pdf, accessed 20 April 2010.
IAEA. (2011) Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement and relevant provisions of Security Council resolutions in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Report by the Director General (Gov/2011/65), 8 November. http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Board/2011/gov2011-65.pdf, accessed 20 April 2012.
Jerusalem Post. (2010) Congress shows Israel support. 9 June. www.jpost.com/international/article.aspx?id=177917.
Jewish Virtual Library. (2007) American public opinion toward Iran. January. http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/US-Israel/poiran.html, accessed 4 March 2010.
Kaye, D.D. and Wehrey, F.M. (2007) A nuclear Iran: The reactions of neighbours. Survival 49 (2): 111–128.
Kagan, R. (2009) Obama, siding with the regime. Washington Post, 17 June.
Katzman, K. (2009) The Iran Sanctions Act (ISA). CRS Report for Congress, 4 June.
Kim, S.H. and Chang, S. (eds.) (2007) Economic Sanctions Against a Nuclear North Korea: An Analysis of United States and United Nations Actions since 1950. London: McFarland.
Koch, C. (2009) The GCC's dilemma on how to deal with Iran's nuclear programme. The Race for Iran. www.raceforiran.com/the-gccs-dilemma-on-how-to-deal-with-Irans-nuclear-programme, accessed 6 March 2010.
Kuperman, A.J. (2009) There's only one way to stop Iran. The New York Times, 23 December.
Lacey, D. and Niou, E. (2004) A theory of economic sanctions and issue linkage: The role of preferences, information and threats. Journal of Politics 66 (1): 25–42.
Leverett, F. and Leverett, H.M. (2008) The Grand Bargain. The Washington Monthly, August/September/October.
Leverett, F. and Leverett, H.M. (2010a) Iran's Green movement approaches irrelevance: Why does Washington continue to gamble on it? www.raceforiran.com/2010/03/page/2, accessed 8 August 2010.
Leverett, F. and Leverett, H.M. (2010b) Israel's perspective on Iran: Insights from the AIPAC conference. 24 March. www.raceforiran.com/2010/03, accessed 5 July 2010.
Lewis, B. (2006) Does Iran have something in store? The Wall Street Journal, 8 August. http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=l10008768, accessed 8 October 2010.
Lindsay, J.M. (1986) Trade sanctions as policy instruments: A reexamination. International Studies Quarterly 30 (2): 153–173.
Linzer, D. (2007) Iran asserts expansion of nuclear operation. The Washington Post, 10 April.
Lustick, I. (2010) US policies toward Israel and Iran: What are the linkages? MEPC Hill Forum, 13 July. www.mepc.org/hill-forums/us-policies-toward-Israel-and-Iran-what-are-the-linkages?transcript, accessed 5 October 2010.
Lynch, M. (2010) Striking Iran is unwarranted and it would mean disaster. The Atlantic Monthly, 23 August. www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2010/08/striking-iran-is-unwarranted-and-it-would-mean-disaster/61886/, accessed 1 November 2010.
Maloney, S. (2010) Sanctioning Iran: If only it were so simple. The Washington Quarterly 33 (1): 131–147.
Martin, L.L. (1992) Coercive Cooperation: Explaining Multilateral Economic Sanctions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Massing, M. (2006) The storm over the Israel lobby. New York Review of Books, 8 June.
Mattair, T.R. (2010) The United States and Iran: Diplomacy, sanctions and war. Middle East Policy XVII (2): 52–61.
Mearshimer, J.J. and Walt, S. (2007a) The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.
Mearshimer, J.J. and Walt, S. (2007b) A reply to our critics. Alternet, 10 May. www.alternet.org/story/35925.
Milani, M. (2009) Tehran's take. Foreign Affairs 88 (4): 46–62.
Milhollin, G. (2010) The futility of an Israeli air strike against Iran's nuclear sites. The Atlantic Monthly, 18 August. www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2010/08/the-futility-of-an-israeli-air-strike-against-irans-nuclear-sites/61669/, accessed 1 November 2010.
Muravchik, J. (2009) Resolution: America cannot tolerate a nuclear Iran and must go to any lengths to prevent it. Miller Center of Public Affairs, National Discussion and Debate Series, 25 March. http://millercenter.org/public/debates/iran.
Noland, M. (2009) The (non-) impact of UN sanctions on North Korea. Asia Policy 7 (January): 61–88.
Obama, B. (2008) Speech in Sderot. Israel, 23 July. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/23/us/politics/23text-obama.html, accessed 10 November 2010.
Obama, B. (2009) President Obama's remarks delivered in Prague. 5 April. http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/remarks-president-barack-obama-prague-delivered, accessed 10 November 2010.
Obama, B. (2010) Remarks by the President on United Nations Security Council Resolution on Iran sanctions. 9 June. www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/remarks-president-united-nations-security-council-iran-sanctions, accessed 10 November 2010.
Obama, B. (2012) Remarks by the President at AIPAC policy conference. 4 March. http://www.whitehouse.gov/photos-and-video/video/2012/03/04/president-obama-2012-aipac-policy-conference#transcript, accessed 23 April 2012.
Pape, R.A. (1997) Why economic sanctions do not work. International Security 22 (2): 90–136.
Pape, R.A. (1998) Why economic sanctions still do not work. International Security 23 (1): 66–78.
Parker, R.W. (2000) The problem with scorecards: How (and how not) to measure the cost-effectiveness of economic sanctions. Michigan Journal of International Law 21: 235–242.
Pickering, T.R., Parsi, T., Katzman, K. and Mattair, T.R. (2009) The United States and Iran: What are the prospects for engagement. Middle East Policy 16 (2): 1–25.
Richman, A. (2009) American and foreign publics’ attitudes toward Iran and its nuclear program. Paper presented at the ISA Conference New York; 18 February.
Rogers, E.S. (1996) Using economic sanctions to control regional conflicts. Security Studies 5 (4): 43–72.
Rubin, J. (2011) Lawmakers introduce human rights into Iran sanctions debate. Washingtonpost.com, 4 May. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/post/lawmakers-introduce-human-rights-into-iran-sanctions-debate/2011/03/29/AFc1IMpF_blog.html, accessed 10 November 2011.
Ryan, R. (2005) Iran resumes uranium enrichment. The Guardian, 8 August.
Seznec, J.-F. (2010) Why Saudi Arabia does not support a strike on Iran. The Race for Iran, 8 March. www.raceforiran.com/2010/03/page/3, accessed 20 October 2010.
Sick, G., Parsi, T., Takeyh, R. and Slavin, B. (2008) Iran's strategic concerns and US interests. Middle East Policy 15 (1): 1–18.
Sneh, E. (2006) Remarks at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. 16 September. www.washingtoninstitue.org/templateCO7.php?CID=306, accessed 10 November 2010.
Takeyh, R. (2009) In the face of protests, Iran's leaders are at an impasse. Washington Post, 31 December.
The Guardian. (2010a) US Embassy cables: Iran bent on nuclear bomb, Israel warns, www.guardian.co.uk/world/embassy-cables-documents/235361, accessed 11 July 2010.
The Guardian. (2010b) US Embassy cables: Jordan wary of US engagement with Iran, www.guardian.co.uk/world/embassy-cables-documents/200230, accessed 11 July 2010.
The Guardian. (2010c) US Embassy cables: UAE fret over Iranian meddling, www.guardian.co.uk/world/embassy-cables-documents/249925, accessed 10 July 2010.
The Guardian. (2010d) US Embassy cables: UAE Prince fears logic of war, www.guardian.co.uk/world/embassy-cables-documents/247936, accessed 10 July 2010.
The Guardian. (2010e) US Embassy cables: Saudi officials warn Gulf states may go nuclear, www.guardian.co.uk/world/embassy-cables-documents/189229, accessed 10 July 2010.
The Guardian. (2010f) US Embassy cables: Israeli optimism erodes in the face of regional enemies, www.guardian.co.uk/world/embassy-cables-documents/91784, accessed 10 July 2010.
The Guardian. (2010g) US Embassy cables: Israel sees Iran's uranium enrichment as ‘point of no return’, www.guardian.co.uk/world/embassy-cables-documents/29037, accessed 10 July 2010.
The Hill.com. (2010) Cornyn, Brownback introduce legislation to back regime change in Iran. 14 February. http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/81061-cornyn-brownback-introduce-bill-to-support-regime-change-in-iran, accessed 11 November 2011.
Ulrichsen, K.C. (2009) Internal and external security in the Arab Gulf states. Middle East Policy 16 (2): 39–58.
United Nations. (2006a) UNSCR 1696. 31 July. http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOCgen/N06/450/22/pdf/NO645022.pdf?openelement, accessed 15 September 2010.
United Nations. (2006b) UNSCR 1737. 26 December. http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOCgen/N06/681/42/PDF/N0668142.PDF?OpenElement, accessed 15 September 2010.
United Nations. (2008) UNSCR 1803. 3 March. www.iaea.org/NewsCenter/Focus/IAEA/Iran/unsc_res1803-2008.pdf, accessed 15 September 2010.
United Nations. (2010) UNSCR 1929. 9 June. http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2010/sc9948.doc.htm, accessed 15 September 2010.
UPI. (2007) GCC-IAEA agree to study nuclear power. 23 February.
USA Today. (2006) Iran rebuffs request to suspend enrichment. 14 April. http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2006-04-13-iran-nuclear_x.htm, accessed 10 August 2010.
Varadarjan, S. (2009) Barack Obama's Myopic Iran policy. The Hindu, 30 November.
Warrick, J. (2010) US steps up arms sales to Persian Gulf allies. The Washington Post, 31 January.
World Public Opinion.org. (2006) A majority of Americans reject military threats in favor of diplomacy with Iran. 7 December. www.worldpublicopinion.org/pipa/articles/brunitedstatescanadara/286.php?lb=brusc&pnt=286&nid=&id=, accessed 12 October 2010.
World Public Opinion.org. (2009) Two-thirds of Iranians ready to preclude developing nuclear weapons in exchange for lifting sanctions. 22 September. www.worldpublicopinion.org/pipa/articles/brmiddleeastnafrica /640.php, accessed 12 October 2010.
World Public Opinion.org. (2010) Analysis of multiple polls finds little evidence Iranian public sees government as illegitimate. 3 February. www.worldpublicopinion.org/pipa/articles/brmiddleeastnafrica/652.php? lb=brme&pnt=652&nid=&id=, accessed 12 October 2010.
World Public Opinion.org. (2012) American public opposes Israel striking Iran. 13 March. http://www.worldpublicopinion.org/pipa/articles/brunitedstatescanadara/712.php?nid=&id=&pnt=712&lb=&gclid=CKrqs53Myq8CFQITfAodhDmhZg, accessed 23 April 2012.
Wright, R. (2009) Iran's Green movement. Iran sanctions: Options, opportunities and consequences. Testimony before the Subcommittee on National Security and Foreign Affairs of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, 15 December. www.oversight.gov/images/stories/hearings/National_Security/ 12.15.09_Iran/wright.pdf, accessed 10 June 2010.
YouGov. (2012) YouGov-Cambridge survey results. February. http://cdn.yougov.com/cumulus_uploads/document/lgp701c6r2/YGS-Archives-Iran-Allcountries-060212.pdf, accessed 23 April 2012.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank the participants at the American Politics Group conference in Oxford, January 2011 and the anonymous referees for the journal for their comments on earlier drafts of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hurst, S. Obama and Iran. Int Polit 49, 545–567 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2012.20
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2012.20