Skip to main content
Log in

Liberal internationalism, the practice of special responsibilities and evolving politics of the security council

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Politics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Liberal internationalism represents a package of evolving and contending commitments, and this article traces the development within it of one practice with a longer history, namely the allocation of special responsibilities. Responsibilities are those things for which actors are held accountable and, internationally, these have negotiated between sovereign equality and material inequality, in search of a means of more effectively dealing with global problems. The definition of these responsibilities generates an intense politics and these are reviewed through the remit of the Security Council. The article considers the basis for the allocation of traditional special responsibilities for security to the Council and then tracks their extension in recent years to the issue of humanitarian protection. The vehicle for this has been the transformation of a practice about the use of the veto, towards one that calls for its non-use in humanitarian cases. This analysis of special responsibilities unsettles the separation between order and justice, and points to the challenges currently facing liberal internationalism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abizadeh, A. and Gilabert, P. (2008) Is there a genuine tension between cosmopolitan egalitarianism and special responsibilities. Philosophical Studies 138 (3): 349–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M. and Duvall, R. (2005) Power in global governance. In: M. Barnett and R. Duvall (eds.) Power in Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, S. (2011) Legitimacy in intergovernmental and non-state global governance. Review of International Political Economy 18 (1): 17–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blatter, A. and Williams, P.D. (2011) The responsibility not to veto. Global Responsibility to Protect 3 (3): 301–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blum, Y.Z. (2005) Proposals for UN Security Council reform. American Journal of International Law 99 (3): 632–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosco, D.L. (2009) Five to Rule Them All: The UN Security Council and the Making of the Modern World. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bukovansky, M., Clark, I., Eckersley, R., Price, R. and Wheeler, N.J. (2012) Special Responsibilities: Global Problems and American Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bull, H. (1977) The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Citizens for Global Solutions. (2010) The Responsibility not to Veto: A Way Forward. Washington, DC: Global Solutions.

  • Clark, I. (2001) The Post-Cold War Order: The Spoils of Peace. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, I. (2007) International Legitimacy and World Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, I. (2009) Democracy in international society: Promotion or exclusion? Millennium 37 (3): 563–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, I. (2011) Hegemony in International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cohrs, P.O. (2006) The Unfinished Peace after World War I: America, Britain and the Stabilisation of Europe 1919–1932. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, B. and Hurd, I. (eds.) (2008a) Introduction. In: The UN Security Council and the Politics of International Authority. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, B. and Hurd, I. (eds.) (2008b) Conclusion: Assessing the council's authority. In: The UN Security Council and the Politics of International Authority. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnemore, M. (2008) Paradoxes in humanitarian intervention. In: R. Price (ed.) Moral Limit and Possibility in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, W.T.R. (1945) Collective enforcement of peace and security. American Political Science Review 39 (5): 970–981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodin, R.E. (1985) Protecting the Vulnerable: A Reanalysis of Our Social Responsibilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodrich, L.M. and Hambro, E. (1949) Charter of the United Nations. London: Stevens and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinbecker, P. (2004) Kosovo. In: D.M. Malone (ed.) The UN Security Council: From the Cold War to the 21st Century. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, I. (2007) After Anarchy: Legitimacy and Power in the United Nations Security Council. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurrell, A. (2003) Order and justice in international relations: What is at stake? In: R. Foot, J.L. Gaddis and A. Hurrell (eds.) Order and Justice in International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. (2000) The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B., Pascual, C. and Stedman, S.J. (2009) Power and Responsibility: Building International order in an Era of Transnational Threats. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koechler, H. (2001) Security council reform: A requirement of international democracy. International Seminar on ‘Reforming the United Nations: Democracy, Justice and Security in the Age of Globalization’, Center for the Study of Federalism, Turin, 8 June, www.hanskoechler.com.

  • Krisch, N. (2008) The security council of the great powers. In: V. Lowe, A. Roberts, J. Welsh and D. Zaum (eds.) The United Nations Security Council and War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, D.H. (2011) Some concerns about the ‘responsibility not to veto’. Global Responsibility to Protect 3 (3): 323–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, V., Roberts, A., Welsh, J. and Zaum, D. (eds.) (2008) Introduction. In: The United Nations Security Council and War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luck, E.C. (2005) The UN Security Council: Reform or enlarge? Paper prepared for ‘The UN: Adapting to the 21st Century’ Conference; 3–5 April, 2005, Waterloo, Ontario; Centre for International Governance Innovation.

  • Luck, E.C. (2006) UN Security Council: Practice and Promise. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardin, T. (2005) Justice and coercion. In: A.J. Bellamy (ed.) International Society and its Critics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Open-Ended Working Group. (2008) Report of Task Force. 11 June.

  • Peters, A. (2010) Towards a UN Security Council obligation to intervene in R2P situations, Conference on ‘The Responsibility to Protect: From Principle to Practice’; 8–11 June, Amsterdam Center for International Law, Linköping University.

  • Thakur, R. (2004) United Nations Security Council reform. African Security Review 13 (3): 67–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thakur, R. (2006) The United Nations, Peace and Security: From Collective Security to the Responsibility to Protect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, A. (2009) Channels of Power: The U.N. Security Council and U.S. Statecraft in Iraq. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN. (2009) Implementing the Responsibility to Protect. Report of the UN Secretary-General. UN Document A/63/677, 12 January.

  • Van Oudenaren, J. (2009) Effectiveness and Ineffectiveness of the UN Security Council in the Last Twenty Years: A US Perspective, Conference on ‘Effective Multilateralism: The European Union and the reform of the United Nations’; 12–13 November, Rome. www.effectivemultilateralism.info/library/Oudenaren.pdf.

  • Vincent, R.J. (1990) Order in international politics. In: J.D.B. Miller and R.J. Vincent (eds.) Order and Violence: Hedley Bull and International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waxman, M.C. (2009) Intervention to Stop Genocide and Mass Atrocities: International Norms and U.S. Policy. New York: Council on Foreign Relations. Special Report No. 49, October; www.cfr.org.

  • Welsh, J. (2008) The Security Council and humanitarian intervention. In: V. Lowe, A. Roberts, J. Welsh and D. Zaum (eds.) The United Nations Security Council and War: The Evolution of Thought and Practice since 1945. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerwelle, G. (2001) Statement by German Foreign Minister. Guido Westerwelle, 2 January, www.german-info.com.

  • Wheeler, N.J. (2000) Saving Strangers: Humanitarian Intervention and International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian Clark.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clark, I., Reus-Smit, C. Liberal internationalism, the practice of special responsibilities and evolving politics of the security council. Int Polit 50, 38–56 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2012.27

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2012.27

Keywords

Navigation