Skip to main content
Log in

The crisis of liberal peacebuilding and the future of statebuilding

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Politics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The perception that liberal peacebuilding is in ideological decline has prompted some observers to argue that a reduction in the willingness of the world’s major governments and international organisations to engage in statebuilding will follow. It is argued that such arguments are misconceived because they locate statebuilding in the narrow context of peace operations. The nature of, and impetus for, contemporary statebuilding is only explicable when viewed against the backdrop of long-term historical processes emanating from the intervening states, leading to the emergence of regulatory forms of statehood and associated risk management rationalities. Statebuilding interventions further facilitate state transformation within both intervened and intervening states. The future of statebuilding is therefore the future of statehood. As the conditions that have given rise to statebuilding remain in place, it is likely to outlast the apparent decline of liberal peacebuilding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Although linked, the ‘liberal peace thesis’ is distinct to the so-called ‘democratic peace theory’. The latter is principally focused on the foreign policies of states and their propensity to engage in war (see Doyle, 1983a, 1983b). The former, on the other hand, primarily concerns the relationship between liberalism and internally peaceful societies. The literature on the democratic peace theory is vast, often employing large-n methods to confirm or disconfirm its assumptions (for example, Gartzke and Weisinger, 2013), and engaging it is well beyond the scope of this article.

References

  • Agnew, J. (2009) Globalization and Sovereignty. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1999) World Risk Society. Malden, MA: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (2002) The terrorist threat: World risk society revisited. Theory, Culture and Society 19 (4): 39–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, A., Williams, P. and Griffin, S. (2004) Understanding Peacekeeping. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickerton, C.J. (2007) State-building: Exporting state failure. In: C.J. Bickerton, P. Cunliffe and A. Gourevitch (eds.) Politics without Sovereignty: A Critique of Contemporary International Relations. London: University College Press, pp. 93–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boutros-Ghali, B. (1992) An Agenda for Peace: Preventive Diplomacy, Peacemaking and Peace-Keeping: Report of the United Nations Secretary-General. A/47/277 - S/24111. New York: United Nations.

  • Carroll, T. (2010) Delusions of Development: The World Bank and the Post-Washington Consensus in Southeast Asia. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, D. (2012) Resilience and human security: The post-interventionist paradigm. Security Dialogue 43 (3): 213–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coker, C. (2009) War in an Age of Risk. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, N. (2007) Review article: On the crisis of the liberal peace. Conflict, Security and Development 7 (4): 605–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of the Army. (2006) Counterinsurgency, US Army field manual 3-24 and Marine Corps warfighting publication 3-33.5. December, Washington DC.

  • Dodge, T. (2009) Coming face to face with bloody reality: Liberal common sense and the ideological failure of the bush doctrine in Iraq. International Politics 46 (2): 253–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, M. (1983a) Kant, liberal legacies, and foreign affairs, part one. Philosophy and Public Affairs 12 (3): 205–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, M. (1983b) Kant, liberal legacies, and foreign affairs, part two. Philosophy and Public Affairs 12 (4): 323–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffield, M. (2001) Global Governance and the New Wars: The Merging of Development and Security. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffield, M. (2007) Development, Security and Unending War: Governing the World of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eley, G. (2002) Forging Democracy: The History of the Left in Europe, 1850–2000. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU. (2003) A Secure Europe in a Better World: European Security Strategy. Paris: The European Union Institute for Security Studies.

  • Evans, G. (2008) The responsibility to protect: an idea whose time has come … and gone? International Relations 22 (3): 283–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gartzke, E. and Weisinger, A. (2013) Permanent friends? Dynamic difference and the democratic peace. International Studies Quarterly 57 (1): 171–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagmann, J. and Dunn Cavelty, M. (2012) National risk registers: Security scientism and the propagation of permanent insecurity. Security Dialogue 43 (1): 79–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hameiri, S. (2010) Regulating Statehood: State Building and the Transformation of the Global Order. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hameiri, S. and Jayasuriya, K. (2011) Regulatory regionalism and the dynamics of territorial politics: The case of the Asia-Pacific region. Political Studies 59 (1): 20–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2005) A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heathershaw, J. (2008) Unpacking the liberal peace: The dividing and merging of peacebuilding discourses. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 36 (3): 597–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heng, Y.K. (2006) War as Risk Management: Strategy and Conflict in an Age of Globalised Risks. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • High-Level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change. (2004) A More Secure World: Our Shared Responsibility. New York: United Nations Department of Public Information.

  • Hobsbawm, E. (1994) The Age of Extremes: The Short Twentieth Century, 1914–1991. London: Michael Joseph.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm, H. (2001) A disaggregated world order in the making: Policy towards failed states as an example. International Politics 38 (3): 357–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C., Rothstein, H. and Baldwin, R. (2001) The Government of Risk: Understanding Risk Regulation Regimes. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. (1968) Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarstad, A.K. and Belloni, R. (2012) Introducing hybrid peace governance: Impact and prospects of liberal peacebuilding. Global Governance 18 (1): 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayasuriya, K. (2001) Globalization and the changing architecture of the state: The regulatory state and the politics of negative co-ordination. Journal of European Public Policy 8 (1): 101–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayasuriya, K. (2004) The new regulatory state and relational capacity. Policy and Politics 32 (4): 487–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayasuriya, K. (2006) Statecraft, Welfare and the Politics of Inclusion. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jayasuriya, K. (2010) The strange death of the international liberal order. Economic and Political Weekly 55 (23): 75–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (2009) Avoiding traps, rescaling states, governing Europe. In: R. Keil and R. Mahon (eds.) Leviathan Undone? Towards a Political Economy of Scale. Vancouver, Canada: UBC Press, pp. 87–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kappler, S. and Richmond, O. (2011) Peacebuilding and culture in bosnia and herzegovina: Resistance or emancipation? Security Dialogue 42 (3): 261–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilcullen, D. (2009) The Accidental Guerrilla: Fighting Small Wars in the Midst of a Big One. Melbourne, Australia: Scribe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabbett, D. (2010) The regulatory rescue of the welfare state. The Jerusalem Papers in Regulation and Governance. Working Paper No. 28. Jerusalem: Hebrew University.

  • Mac Ginty, R. (2011) Hybrid peace: How does hybrid peace come about? In: S. Campbell, D. Chandler and M. Sabaratnam (eds.) A Liberal Peace? The Problems and Practices of Peacebuilding. London and New York: Zed Books, pp. 209–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M. and Owen, T. (2010) The second generation of human security: Lessons from the UN and EU experience. International Affairs 86 (1): 212–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayall, J. (ed.) (1996) Introduction. In: The New Interventionism, 1991–1994: United Nations Experience in Cambodia, Former Yugoslavia and Somalia. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–24.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, E., Paris, R. and Richmond, O. (eds.) (2009) Introduction. In: New Perspectives on Liberal Peacebuilding. Tokyo and New York: United Nations University Press, pp. 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, R. (2004) At War’s End: Building Peace after Civil Conflict. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Paris, R. (2009) Understanding the ‘coordination problem’ in postwar statebuilding. In: R. Paris and T. Sisk (eds.) The Dilemmas of Statebuilding: Confronting the Contradictions of Postwar Peace Operations. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 53–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, R. (2010) Saving liberal peacebuilding. Review of International Studies 36 (2): 337–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paris, R. and Sisk, T. (eds.) (2009) Introduction: Understanding the contradictions of postwar statebuilding. In: The Dilemmas of Statebuilding: Confronting the Contradictions of Postwar Peace Operations. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, M.V. (2007) The Risk Society at War: Terror, Technology and Strategy in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, O. (2005) The Transformation of Peace. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, O. (2009) Beyond liberal peace? Responses to ‘backsliding’. In: E. Newman, R. Paris and O. Richmond (eds.) New Perspectives on Liberal Peacebuilding. Tokyo and New York: United Nations University Press, pp. 54–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, J. (1982) International regimes, transactions, and change: Embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order. International Organization 36 (2): 379–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabaratnam, M. (2011) The liberal peace? An intellectual history of international conflict management, 1990–2010. In: S. Campbell, D. Chandler and M. Sabaratnam (eds.) A Liberal Peace? The Problems and Practices of Peacebuilding. London and New York: Zed Books, pp. 13–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabaratnam, M. (2013) Avatars of Eurocentrism in the critique of the liberal peace. Security Dialogue 44 (3): 259–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sbragia, A.M. (2000) Governance, the state, and the market: What is going on? Governance 13 (2): 243–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selby, J. (2013) The myth of liberal peace-building. Conflict, Security and Development 13 (1): 57–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, A. (2004) A New World Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, W. (2011) The crises of democratic capitalism. New Left Review 71 (September– October): 5–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suhrke, A. (2007) Reconstruction as modernisation: The ‘post-conflict’ project in Afghanistan. Third World Quarterly 28 (7): 1291–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Leeuwen, M., Verkoren, W. and Boedeltje, F. (2012) Thinking beyond the liberal peace: From utopia to heterotopias. Acta Politica 47 (3): 292–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vibert, F. (2007) The Rise of the Unelected: Democracy and the New Separation of Powers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • White House. (1998) A National Security Strategy for a New Century. Washington DC: White House.

  • White House. (2002) National Security Strategy of the United States. Washington DC: White House.

  • Williams, M.J. (2008) NATO, Security and Risk Management: From Kosovo to Kandahar. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, B. (2008) The War Within. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2011) The World Development Report 2011: Conflict, Security and Development. Washington DC: World Bank.

  • Zaum, D. (2012) Review essay: Beyond the ‘liberal peace’. Global Governance 18 (1): 121–32.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank the reviewers and editors of International Politics, as well as Lee Jones, Caroline Hughes, Kelly Gerard, Garry Rodan, David Chandler, Roland Paris, Simon Chesterman and Outi Keranen for their comments on earlier versions of this article. The responsibility for the final version is solely mine. I also gratefully acknowledge generous funding for this research provided by the Australian Research Council Discovery Project (DP130102273). ‘The politics of public administration reform: capacity development and ideological contestation in international state-building’.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hameiri, S. The crisis of liberal peacebuilding and the future of statebuilding. Int Polit 51, 316–333 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2014.15

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2014.15

Keywords

Navigation