Skip to main content
Log in

Challenging ‘evil’: Continuity and change in the drug prohibition regime

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Politics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The 1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs is unique among UN conventions for the appearance of the term ‘evil’ in the document. Among all the possible wrongdoing and bad things that exist in the world, it is slightly counterintuitive that drugs are the only one to be labelled as ‘evil’ in international law. Adopting a ‘conceptual politics’ approach, the article will examine how drugs came to be identified in this manner, with a specific focus on the drafting of the 1961 Single Convention. The latter part of the article focuses on the contemporary relevance of this framing, considering how it contributes towards a much more restrictive environment in which serious change to the drug prohibition regime has proven to be a very difficult task. For those seeking reform it is not enough to demonstrate that the system does not work, they also must successfully challenge the idea of drugs as something evil and a threat to humanity. In concluding it is suggested that by returning to the Single Convention, one finds not only the language of ‘evil’, but also a more flexible position that allowed for revising the way drugs are dealt with. To bring about change in drugs prohibition regime, reformers will need to recover this more open and balanced approach to understanding drugs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This term is taken from Nadelmann (1990) and is used throughout. The treaty was meant to be about controlling rather than prohibiting drugs, but it has been the latter approach that has largely prevailed.

  2. There are signs this consensus is now beginning to fracture, which is considered in more detail later.

  3. The outline provided here is one that will be limited by the specific concerns of the article. The historical development of the international prohibition regime has been covered in detail elsewhere. For example, see: Bewley-Taylor (1999), Buxton (2010), McAllister (2000).

  4. It is worth noting that the 2013 UNODC report still uses the antiquated term ‘mankind’ (UNODC, 2013, p. iii).

References

  • Abdel-Nour, F. (2004) An international ethics of evil? International Relations 18 (4): 425–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht, H. (2001) The international system of drug control: Developments and trends. In: J. Gerber and E. Jensen (eds.) Drug War, American Style: The Internationalization of Failed Policy and Its Alternatives. New York: Garland Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, R. (2005) The Abuse of Evil: The Corruption of Politics and Religion Since 9/11. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bewley-Taylor, D.R. (1999) The United States and International Drug Control, 1909–1997. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bewley-Taylor, D.R. (2003) Challenging the UN drug control conventions: Problems and possibilities. International Journal of Drug Policy 14 (2): 171–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bewley-Taylor, D.R. and Jelsma, M. (2011) Fifty Years of the 1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs: A Reinterpretation, Amsterdam: Transnational Institute Series on Legislative Reform of Drug Policies, p. 12.

  • Bruun, K., Pan, L. and Rexed, I. (1975) The Gentlemen’s Club: International Control of Drugs and Alcohol. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buxton, J. (2010) The historical foundations of the narcotic drug control regime. In: P. Keefer and N. Loayza (eds.) Innocent Bystanders: Developing Countries and the War on Drugs. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso, F.H. et al (2011) Report of the Global Commission on Drug Policy. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Global Commission on Drug Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinchilla-Miranda, L. (2013) Statement by the President of Costa Rica. General Assembly of the United Nations. New York, 24 September.

  • Collins, J. (ed.) (2012) Executive summary. Governing the Global Drug Wars. London: LSE Ideas Special Report SR014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, A.M. (2008) Making Drug Control ‘Fit for Purpose’: Building on the UNGASS Decade. Vienna, Austria: UNODC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courtwright, D. (2001) Forces of Habit: Drugs and the Making of the Modern World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R. (1984) Rights as trumps. In: J. Waldron (ed.) Theories of Rights. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedotov, Y. (2011) A new strategy and new partnerships for drug control. Commission on Narcotic Drugs 54th Session; 21 March, Vienna.

  • Herschinger, E. (2011) Constructing Global Enemies: Hegemony and Identity in International Discourses of Terrorism and Drug Prohibition. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, C. and Kurki, M. (eds.) (2012) Introduction. In: The Conceptual Politics of Democracy Promotion. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffery, R. (2008) Evil and International Relations: Human Suffering in an Age of Terror. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jelsma, M. (2004) Diverging trends in global drug policy. In: M. Vellinga (ed.) The Political Economy of the Drug Industry. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensema, E. (2013) Human rights and drug policy. Transnational Institute, 11 October, http://www.tni.org/briefing/human-rights-and-drug-policy, accessed 5 November 2013.

  • Ki-moon, B. (2013) Remarks at Special event on the International Day against Drug Abuse and Illicit Trafficking. UN Headquarters, 26 June.

  • Lines, R. (2010) ‘Deliver us from evil’? – The single convention on narcotic drugs, 50 years on. International Journal on Human Rights and Drug Policy 1: 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAllister, W.B. (2000) Drug Diplomacy in the Twentieth Century: An International History. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAllister, W.B. (2012) Reflections on a century of international drug control. In: J. Collins (ed.) Governing the Global Drug Wars. London: LSE Ideas Special Report SR014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molina, O. (2013) Statement by the President of Guatemala. General Assembly of the United Nations, New York, 26 September.

  • Nadelmann, E. (1990) Global prohibition regimes: The evolution of norms in international society. International Organization 44 (4): 479–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, R. (1972) Radio address on crime and drug abuse, 15 October.

  • Palonen, K. (2003) Quentin Skinner: History, Politics, Rhetoric. Cambridge, MA: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolles, S., Murkin, G., Powell, M., Kushlick, D. and Slater, J. (2012) The Alternative World Drug Report. Transform Drug Policy Foundation.

  • Santos, J.M. (2013) Statement by the President of Colombia. General Assembly of the United Nations, New York, 24 September.

  • Schmitt, C. (2007) The Concept of the Political. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, J. (2001) The History and Development of the Leading International Drug Control Conventions. Report prepared for the Senate Special Committee on Illegal Drugs, Parliament of Canada.

  • Skinner, Q. (1973) The empirical theorists of democracy and their critics: A plague on both their houses. Political Theory 1 (3): 287–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Q. (2002) Visions of Politics. Volume 1: Regarding Method. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spillane, J. (2012) Historians and harm: Towards a more thoughtful appraisal of policy consequences. In: J. Collins (ed.) Governing the Global Drug Wars. London: LSE Ideas Special Report SR014.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (1962) Protocol for Limiting and Regulating the Cultivation of the Poppy Plant, the Production of, International and Wholesale Trade in, and Use of Opium. New York: United Nations.

  • United Nations. (1964a) United Nations Conference for the Adoption of a Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs Official Records, Vol. 1. New York: United Nations.

  • United Nations. (1964b) United Nations Conference for the Adoption of a Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs Official Records, Vol. 2. New York: United Nations.

  • United Nations. (1971) Convention on Psychotropic Substances. New York: United Nations.

  • United Nations. (1972) Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961, as Amended by the 1972 Protocol Amending the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961. New York: United Nations.

  • United Nations. (1988) Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances. New York: United Nations.

  • United Nations International Drug Control Programme. (1998) A Drug-Free World, We Can Do It. General Assembly Twentieth Special Session, 8–10 June.

  • United Nations. (2004) League of Nations Treaty Series, Vol. 1. New York: United Nations.

  • United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (1965) Bulletin on Narcotics. Issue 1.

  • United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (1971) Bulletin on Narcotics. Issue 3.

  • United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (1972) Bulletin on Narcotics. Issue 2.

  • United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2008) Organized Crime and Its Threat to Security: Tackling a Disturbing Consequence of Drug Control. Vienna, Austria: UNODC.

  • United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2013) World Drug Report 2013. Vienna, Austria: UNODC.

  • United Nations Treaty Collection. (2013) Status of Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961. http://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=VI-18&chapter=6&lang=en#1, accessed 5 November 2013.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hobson, C. Challenging ‘evil’: Continuity and change in the drug prohibition regime. Int Polit 51, 525–542 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2014.17

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2014.17

Keywords

Navigation