Skip to main content
Log in

Breaking into the blackbox: Trend following, stop losses and the frequency of trading – The case of the S&P500

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Asset Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, we compare a variety of technical trading rules in the context of investing in the S&P500 index. These rules are increasingly popular, both among retail investors and CTAs and similar investment funds. We find that a range of fairly simple rules, including the popular 200-day moving average (MA) trading rule, dominate the long-only, passive investment in the index. In particular, using the latter rule we find that popular stop-loss rules do not add value and that monthly end-of-month investment decision rules are superior to those which trade more frequently: this adds to the growing view that trading can damage your wealth. Finally, we compare the MA rule with a variety of simple fundamental metrics and find the latter far inferior to the technical rules over the last 60 years of investing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Note that the ‘filter rules’ of Alexander (1961) and Fama and Blume (1966) were of a similar purpose but did not yield superior returns.

  2. Lo et al (2000) provide evidence that algorithms implementing other popular patterns of technical analysis can provide incremental information for returns. Here, we concentrate on strategies that can be given a precise analytic form.

  3. From Shiller’s Website www.econ.yale.edu/~shiller/data.htm.

References

  • Acar, E. and Satchell, S. (2002) Advanced Trading Rules. 2nd edn. London, UK: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, S. (1961) Price movements in speculative markets: Trends or random walks. Industrial Management Review 2: 7–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annaert, J., Van Osselaer, S. and Verstraete, B. (2009) Performance evaluation of portfolio insurance using stochastic dominance criteria. Journal of Banking and Finance 33 (2): 272–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ap Gwilym, O., Seaton, J., Suddason, K. and Thomas, S. (2006) International evidence on the payout ratio, earnings, dividends, and returns. Financial Analysts Journal 62 (1): 36–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ap Gwilym, O., Clare, A., Seaton, J. and Thomas, S. (2010) Price and momentum as robust tactical approaches to global equity investing. Journal of Investing 19 (3): 80–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asness, C., Moskowitz, T. and Pedersen, L. (2009) ‘Value and Momentum Everywhere’, University of Chicago and AQR Capital Management. Working Paper.

  • Campbell, J. and Shiller, R. (1998) Valuation ratios and the long-run stock market outlook. Journal of Portfolio Management 24 (2): 11–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clare, A., Thomas, S. and Wickens, M. (1994) Is the gilt-equity yield ratio useful for predicting UK stock returns? Economic Journal 104 (2): 303–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, J. and Kaul, G. (1998) An anatomy of trading strategies. Review of Financial Studies 11 (3): 489–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dybvig, P. (1988) Inefficient dynamic portfolio strategies, or how to throw away a million dollars in the stock market. Review of Financial Studies 1 (1): 67–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faber, M. (2007) A quantitative approach to tactical asset allocation. Journal of Wealth Management 4.

  • Fama, E. and Blume, M. (1966) Filter tests and stock market trading. Journal of Business 39 (1): 226–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gollier, C. (1997) On the inefficiency of bang-bang and stop-loss portfolio strategies. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 14 (2): 143–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurst, B., Ooi, Y.H. and Pedersen, L. (2010) ‘Understanding Managed Futures’, AQR. Working Paper.

  • Hurst, B., Ooi, Y.H. and Pedersen, L. (2012) ‘A Century of Evidence on Trend-Following Investing’, AQR. Working Paper.

  • Ilmanen, A. (2011) Expected Returns. London, UK: John Wiley & Sons.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jegadeesh, N. and Titman, S. (2001) Profitability of momentum strategies: An evaluation of alternative explanations. Journal of Finance 54 (2): 699–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaminski, K. and Lo, A. (2008) ‘When Do Stop-Loss Rules Stop Losses?’, SIFR Research Report Series 63, Institute for Financial Research.

  • Korajczyk, R. and Sadka, R. (2004) Are momentum profits robust to trading costs? Journal of Finance 59 (3): 1039–1082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei, A.Y. and Li, H. (2009) The value of stop loss strategies. Financial Services Review 18 (1): 23–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesmond, D., Schill, M. and Zhou, C. (2004) The illusory nature of momentum profits. Journal of Financial Economics 71 (1): 349–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo, A., Mamaysky, H. and Wang, J. (2000) Foundations of technical analysis: Computational algorithms, statistical inference, and empirical implementation. Journal of Finance 55 (4): 1705–1770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miffre, J. and Rallis, G. (2007) Momentum strategies in commodity futures markets. Journal of Banking & Finance 31 (6): 1863–1886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moskowitz, T., Ooi, Y.H. and Pedersen, L. (2010) ‘Time Series Momentum’, University of Chicago. Working Paper.

  • Park, C.H. and Irwin, S. (2005a) ‘The Profitability of Technical Trading Rules in US Futures Markets: A Data Snooping Free Test’, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Working Paper.

  • Park, C.H. and Irwin, S. (2005b) ‘A Reality Check on Technical Trading Rule Profits in US Futures Markets’, Conference on Applied Commodity Price Analysis, Forecasting, and Market Risk Management, St. Louis, Missouri.

  • Rouwenhorst, K. (1998) International momentum strategies. Journal of Finance 53 (1): 267–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szakmary, A., Shen, Q. and Sharma, S. (2010) Trend-following trading strategies in commodity futures: A re-examination. Journal of Banking and Finance 34 (2): 409–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to an anonymous referee and the editor for instructive insights.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen Thomas.

Additional information

2has a PhD from Southampton University, UK, and has been a Research Fellow at Cass Business School. He is a Director of Solent Systematic Investment Strategies, a creator of Smart Beta indices and an independent consultant specialising in quantitative portfolio strategies.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clare, A., Seaton, J., Smith, P. et al. Breaking into the blackbox: Trend following, stop losses and the frequency of trading – The case of the S&P500. J Asset Manag 14, 182–194 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1057/jam.2013.11

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jam.2013.11

Keywords

Navigation