Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluating the performance of hedge funds using two-stage peer group benchmarks

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Asset Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article proposes a two-stage peer group benchmarking approach to evaluate the performance of hedge funds. We present different ways of orthogonalizing the peer group benchmarks and discuss their general properties. We then orthogonalize the relevant benchmarks against predetermined exogenous factors. For a broad dataset we show that this approach captures much more commonalities in hedge funds returns when compared with the standard methodology of using exogenous factors only. As a consequence, the empirical rankings of hedge funds, on the basis of alphas, change considerably. Therefore, the proposed two-stage peer group benchmark allows us to identify which hedge fund managers outperformed their cohorts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackermann, C., McEnally, R. and Ravenscraft, D. (1999) The performance of hedge funds: Risk, return, and incentives. Journal of Finance 54 (3): 833–874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal, V. and Naik, N.D. (2004) Risks and portfolio decisions involving hedge funds. Review of Financial Studies 17 (1): 63–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amin, G.S. and Kat, H.M. (2001) Welcome to the dark side – Hedge fund attrition and survivorship bias over the period 1994–2001. ICMA Centre Discussion Papers in Finance, Henley Business School. Reading. University of Reading.

  • Amin, G.S. and Kat, H.M. (2003) Hedge fund performance 1990–2000: Do the ‘money machines’ really add value? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 38 (2): 251–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asness, C., Krail, R. and Liew, J. (2001) Do hedge funds hedge? Journal of Portfolio Management 28 (1): 6–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, F. and Scholes, M.S. (1973) The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. The Journal of Political Economy 81 (3): 637–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake, D. and Timmermann, A. (2001) Performance benchmarks for institutional investors: Measuring, monitoring and modifying investor behaviour. Discussion Paper PI-0106, The Pensions Institute. University of London. London.

  • Brown, A. (2013) Hedge fund industry grows to record size amid new investments. IR Magazine 22 April, http://www.insideinvestorrelations.com/articles/buy-side/19439/hedge-fund-industry-grows-record-size-amid-new-investments/, accessed 2 November 2014.

  • Brown, S.J., Goetzmann, W.N. and Ibbotston, R.G. (1999) Offshore hedge funds: Survival and performance 1989–1995. The Journal of Business 72 (1): 91–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capocci, D. (2001) An Analysis of Hedge Fund Performance 1984–2000. Working Paper, University of Liege. Liege.

  • Carhart, M.M. (1997) On persistence in mutual fund performance. Journal of Finance 52 (1): 57–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R.B., Coval, J.D. and Pástor, L. (2005) Judging fund managers by the company they keep. Journal of Finance 60 (3): 1057–1096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connor, G. and Korajczyk, R.A. (1986) Performance measurement with the arbitrage pricing theory: A new framework for analysis. Journal of Financial Economics 15 (3): 373–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, D., Fung, W.B. and Hsieh, D.A. (2013) Exploring uncharted territories of the hedge fund industry: Empirical characteristics of mega hedge fund firms. Journal of Financial Economics 109 (3): 734–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elton, E.J., Gruber, M.J. and Blake, C.R. (1997) Common Factors in Active and Passive Portfolios. Working Paper, Fordham University’s Graduate School of Business Administration. New York.

  • Fung, W.B. and Hsieh, D.A. (1997) Empirical characteristics of dynamic trading strategies: The case of hedge funds. Review of Financial Studies 10 (2): 275–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fung, W.B. and Hsieh, D.A. (2000) Performance characteristics of hedge funds and commodity funds: Natural vs. spurious biases. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 35 (3): 291–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fung, W.B. and Hsieh, D.A. (2001) The risk in hedge fund strategies: Theory and evidence from trend followers. Review of Financial Studies 14 (2): 313–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fung, W.B. and Hsieh, D.A. (2002) Asset-based style factors for hedge funds. Financial Analysts Journal 58 (5): 16–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fung, W.B. and Hsieh, D.A. (2004) Hedge fund benchmarks: A risk-based approach. Financial Analysts Journal 60 (5): 65–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fung, W.B. and Hsieh, D.A. (2011) The risk in hedge fund strategies: Theory and evidence from long/short equity hedge funds. Journal of Empirical Finance 18 (4): 547–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glosten, L.R. and Jagannathan, R. (1994) A contingent claim approach to performance evaluation. Journal of Empirical Finance 1 (2): 133–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregoriou, G. and Rouah, R. (2002) Is size a factor in hedge funds performance? Derivatives Use, Trading and Regulation 7 (4): 301–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, D., Kandel, E., Kandel, S. and Wermers, R. (2014) Mutual fund performance evaluation with active peer benchmarks. Journal of Financial Economics 112 (1): 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jagannathan, R., Malakhov, A. and Novikov, D. (2010) Do hot hands persist among hedge fund managers? An emprical evaluation. Journal of Finance 65 (1): 217–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, B. (2000) Hedge funds: The living and the dead. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 35 (3): 309–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mader, W. (2008) Hedge funds: Alternative investment strategies and portfolio models. Dissertation, Universität Augsburg. Augsburg.

  • Merton, R.C. (1973) Theory of rational option pricing. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 4 (1): 141–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R.C. (1981) On market timing and investment performance. I. An equilibrium theory of value for market forecasts. Journal of Business 54 (3): 363–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, M. and Pulvino, T. (2001) Characteristics of risk and return in risk arbitrage. Journal of Finance 56 (6): 2135–2175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneeweis, T., Kazemi, H. and Martin, G. (2001) Understanding Hedge Fund Performance: Research Results and Rules of Thumb for the Institutional Investor. Center for International Securities and Derivatives Markets (CISDM) and Lehman Brothers, New York and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • The New York Times (2011) Times topics: John Paulson, http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/p/john_paulson/index.html, accessed 12 October 2011.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Wilkens.

Additional information

We are grateful to the Tasmanian School of Business and Economics, University of Tasmania for funding Marco Wilkens’s visit to the Discipline of Economics and Finance, University of Tasmania, Hobart in January 2012 to undertake the collaborative work. We would also like to thank the Discipline of Finance, Business School, University of Sydney for hosting Marco’s follow-on visit to Sydney in February 2012. Additionally, we would like to acknowledge Martin Rohleder, University of Augsburg, for his helpful comments and suggestions. We are solely responsible for any remaining errors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wilkens, M., Yao, J., Oehler, P. et al. Evaluating the performance of hedge funds using two-stage peer group benchmarks. J Asset Manag 16, 272–291 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/jam.2015.3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jam.2015.3

Keywords

Navigation