Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Risk-related disclosure practices in the annual reports of Portuguese credit institutions: An exploratory study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Banking Regulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study assesses the risk-related reporting practices of 190 Portuguese credit institutions based on a content analysis of their individual annual reports for 2006. Risk-related disclosures are found to lack comparability because of different maturity time bands that report exposures to credit, market and liquidity risks; different Value-at-Risk and sensitivity analysis assumptions; and different practices for reporting capital structure and adequacy. The misalignment of quantitatively based disclosures and related narratives led to problems of relevance, reliability and understandability. We assess the extent to which reforms of risk-related reporting practices in 2007 in International Financial Reporting Standards and the Basel II Accord address each of the deficiencies identified. We highlight areas needing further reform, and recommend that Portuguese supervisory authorities adopt more effective enforcement mechanisms to broker compliance with minimum mandatory risk disclosure requirements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES AND NOTES

  • Woods, M. (2007) Significant information gap that required regulators’ attention. Financial Times 26 September:14, London, UK.

  • Financial Stability Forum. (2008) Report of the Financial Stability Forum on Enhancing Market and Institutional Resilience. Follow-up on implementation, October.

  • Heap, A. (2008) Risk transparency in the aftermath of the credit crisis. Corporate Finance Review 12 (4): 30–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avram, K.J. and Skully, M. (2007) Australian banks’ disclosure of operational risk. Monash Business Review 3 (2): 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boussanni, A., Desrochers, J. and Préfontaine, J. (2008) Liquidity risk financial disclosure: The case of large European financial groups. International Business & Economics Research Journal 7 (7): 47–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chipalkatti, N. and Datar, V. (2006) The relevance of value-at-risk disclosures: Evidence from the LTCM crisis. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance 14 (2): 174–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frolov, M. (2006) Bank credit risk disclosure in Japan. Journal of Banking Regulation 7 (3/4): 221–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirtle, B. (2007) Public Disclosure, Risk, and Performance at Bank Holding Companies. Federal Reserve Bank of New York, NY. Staff Report 293, July.

  • Linsley, P.M., Shrives, P.J. and Crumpton, M. (2006) Risk disclosure: An exploratory study of UK and Canadian banks. Journal of Banking Regulation 7 (3/4): 268–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérignon, C., Deng, Z.Y. and Wang, Z.J. (2008) Do banks overstate their value-at-risk? Journal of Banking and Finance 32 (5): 783–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérignon, C. and Smith, D. (2010) The level and quality of value-at-risk disclosure by commercial banks. Journal of Banking and Finance 34 (2): 362–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PriceWaterhouseCoopers. (2006) Accounting for Change: A Survey of Banks’ 2005 IFRS Annual Reports. London.

  • Yong, H.H.A., Chalmers, K. and Faff, R. (2005) Asia Pacific banks’ derivative and risk management disclosures. Asian Review of Accounting 13 (1): 15–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods, M., Dowd, K. and Humphrey, C. (2008a) Market risk reporting by the world's top banks: Evidence on the diversity of reporting practice and the implications for international accounting harmonisation. Spanish Accounting Review 11 (2): 9–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, M., Dowd, K. and Humphrey, C. (2008b) The value of risk reporting: A critical analysis of value-at-risk disclosures in the banking sector. International Journal of Financial Services Management 3 (1): 45–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods, M. and Marginson, D. (2004) Accounting for derivatives: An evaluation of reporting practice by UK banks. European Accounting Review 13 (2): 373–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bischof, J. (2009) The effects of IFRS 7 adoption on bank disclosure in Europe. Accounting in Europe 6 (1–2): 167–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst and Young. (2008a) IFRS 7 in the Banking Industry. London: Ernst and Young.

  • KPMG. (2008) Focus on Transparency: Trends in the Presentation of Financial Statements and Disclosure of Information by European Banks. London: KPMG.

  • KPMG. (2009) Focus on Transparency: Trends in the Presentation of Financial Statements and Disclosure of Information by European Banks: 2009. London: KPMG.

  • PriceWaterhouseCoopers. (2008) Accounting for Change: Transparency in the Midst of Turmoil. A survey of banks’ 2007 annual reports. London.

  • Three quarters of our sample is composed by banks. They are special because of their interconnectedness. A collapse of one institution creates a wave of uncertainty among the others. [The Economist (2008) Paradise lost. Vol. 387, 17 May]. Consequently, other entities that are not classifiable as banks (but which pursue similar activities) were affected also by the GFC. The present study seeks to understand the risk-related reporting practices of credit institutions as a whole.

  • Weil, J. (2009) Next bubble to burst is banks’ big loans values. Bloomberg, 12 August, http://bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=email_en&sid=a04oVutXQybk, accessed 14 August 2009.

  • Laux, C. and Leuz, C. (2009) The crisis of fair value accounting: Making sense of the recent debate. Accounting, Organizations and Society 34 (6/7): 826–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branco, C.B. and Rodrigues, L.L. (2008) Social responsibility disclosure: A study of proxies for public visibility of Portuguese banks. The British Accounting Review 40 (2): 161–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Central Bank. (2010) Structural Indicators for the EU Banking Sector. Frankfurt, Germany: European Central Bank.

  • Information is relevant if it has predictive and confirmatory values. Reliable information must be free from material error and bias and faithfully represent reality. Information is understandable if complex and relevant matters are not excluded from financial statements because they are too difficult for readers to understand. Therefore, efforts to include definitions, glossaries or other forms of detail would improve understandability. Comparability can be assessed over time or across different companies in terms of relative financial position, performance and risk profiles (such as the amount of disclosure, the maturity profile of assets, measurement models and risk management policies).

  • The amendment to IAS 1, adopted by Regulation 108/2006 of the European Parliament (concerning disclosure of information necessary to evaluate an entity's objectives, policies and processes for managing capital), was mandatory for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2007. Earlier application was encouraged.

  • In 2006, IAS 32 included disclosure requirements about financial risks. IFRS 7 superseded IAS 30 and amended IAS 32 concerning disclosures of risk-related issues. IFRS 7 relates only to financial risks and requires a deeper level of disclosure than in the previous IAS 30 and IAS 32.

  • IAS 39 was not considered because this study only explores international accounting requirements related to disclosure.

  • Nier, E. and Baumann, U. (2004) Disclosure, volatility, and transparency: An empirical investigation into the value of bank disclosure. Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Economic Policy Review 10 (2): 31–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nier, E. and Baumann, U. (2006) Market discipline, disclosure and moral hazard in banking. Journal of Financial Intermediation 15 (3): 332–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sensarma, R. and Jayadev, M. (2009) Are bank stocks sensitive to risk management? The Journal of Risk Finance 10 (1): 7–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bliss, R.R. and Flannery, M.J. (2002) Market discipline in the government of US bank holding companies: Monitoring versus influencing. European Finance Review 6 (3): 361–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frolov, M. (2007) Why do we need mandated rules of public disclosure for banks? Journal of Banking Regulation 8 (2): 177–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verrecchia, R.E. (2001) Essays on disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics 32: 97–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, R.H. (1987) Managing the Corporate Social Environment. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bebbington, J., Larrinaga-Gonzalez, C. and Moneva, J.M. (2008) Corporate social reporting and reputation risk management. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 21 (3): 337–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, D.W. (1985) Optimal release of information by firms. Journal of Finance 40 (4): 1071–1094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Credit risk is of particular importance because it is ‘regarded as the main contributor to a bank's overall risk profile’.

  • Khambata, D. and Hirche, S. (2002) Off-balance-sheet credit risk of the top 20 European commercial banks. Journal of International Banking Regulation 4 (2): 107–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risks related to off-balance sheet instruments (where credit risk is important) are a good example of information that would improve transparency. Before the GFC, the complexity of these instruments, their off-balance sheet nature and poor regulation often meant that very little information was disclosed by banks.3

  • Bank for International Settlements. (2001) Public Disclosures by Banks: Results of the 1999 Disclosure Survey. Basel, Switzerland: Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, April.

  • Bank for International Settlements. (2002) Public Disclosures by Banks: Results of the 2000 Disclosure Survey. Basel, Switzerland: Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, May.

  • Bank for International Settlements. (2003) Public Disclosures by Banks: Results of the 2001 Disclosure Survey. Basel, Switzerland: Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, May.

  • Helbok, G. and Wagner, C. (2006) Determinants of operational risk reporting in the banking industry. Journal of Risk 9 (1): 49–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pritsker, M. (2006) The hidden dangers of historical simulation. Journal of Banking and Finance 30 (2): 561–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst and Young. (2008b) Navigating the Crisis: A Survey of the World's Largest Banks. London: Ernst and Young.

  • Fatemi, A. and Fooladi, I. (2006) Credit risk management: A survey of practices. Managerial Finance 32 (3): 227–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toby, A. (2006) Empirical study of the liquidity management practices of Nigerian banks. Journal of Financial Management and Analysis 19 (1): 57–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flores, F., Bónson-Ponte, E. and Escobar-Rodríguez, T. (2006) Operational risk information system: A challenge for the banking sector. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance 14 (4): 383–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst and Young. (2006) Global Basel II Survey: Basel II Business Impact. London: Ernst and Young.

  • Al-Tamini, H.A.H. and Al-Mazrooei, F.M. (2007) Bank's risk management: A comparison study of UAE national and foreign banks. Managerial Finance 32 (3): 227–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, A. (2009) Risk management practices of Islamic banks of Brunei Darussalam. Journal of Risk Finance 10 (1): 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ariffin, N.M., Archer, S. and Karim, R.A.A. (2009) Risk in Islamic banks: Evidence from empirical research. Journal of Banking Regulation 10 (2): 153–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Sullivan, K.P.V. and Kennedy, T. (2010) What caused the Irish banking crisis? Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance 18 (3): 224–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigurjonsson, T.O. (2010) The Icelandic bank collapse: Challenges to governance and risk management. Corporate Governance 10 (1): 33–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashagen, J., Harman, N., Conover, M. and Sharma, J. (2009) Risk management in banking: Beyond the credit crisis. Journal of Structured Finance 15 (1): 92–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • These were largely in terms of disclosure requirements for capital structure and adequacy, operational risk. The Basel II Accord became mandatory for PCIs after January 2007. However, PCIs have been preparing for its adoption since 2004.

  • Krippendorff, K. (2004) Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackston, D. and Milne, M. (1996) Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand companies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 9 (1): 77–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widely used credit risk quality indicators were: past due ratio, coverage ratio, non-performing loans and loan-to-value. Their disclosure levels across the different PCIs are very different.

  • Marcelo, A., Rodríguez, A. and Trucharte, C. (2008) Stress tests and their contribution to financial stability. Journal of Banking Regulation 9 (2): 65–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marini, F. (2008) Financial intermediation, monitoring, and liquidity. Oxford Economic Papers 60 (3): 440–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Basel II Accord proposed the following approaches to assess capital adequacy: standard approach (SA), internal ratings approach ‘IRB – foundation’ or internal ratings approach ‘IRB – advanced’ for credit risk; standard approach (SA) or internal models approach for market risk; and basic indicator approach (BIA), standard approach (SA) or advanced measurement approach (AMA) for operational risk.

  • European Commission. (2009) The De Larosière Report. The high-level group on financial supervision in the EU, Brussels.

  • European Bank Committee. (2009) EU newsletter for the European Banking Committee, 10: 17 March.

  • The Finance Professional's Post. (2010) The G20 agenda for regulatory reform. 14 April, http://post.nyssa.org/nyssa-news/2010/04/the-g20-agenda-for-regulatory-reform.html, accessed 15 August 2010.

  • The Basel Committee is responsible for this task. Target dates range from December 2010 to December 2012.

  • The FSB is responsible for this task. Target dates range from March 2010 to December 2012.

  • The IASB is responsible for this task. The target date is June 2011.

  • After G20 endorsement of 20 recommendations to address information gaps (described in a report The Financial Crisis and Information Gaps), International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) published a report (Asset Backed Securities (ABS) Disclosure Principles) to guide securities regulators who are developing or reviewing their regulatory disclosure regimes with respect to public offerings and listings of ABS. IOSCO is considering further work on collateralized debt obligation. (Financial Stability Board (2010) The financial crisis and information gaps: progress report, action plans and timetables. Switzerland).

  • Recent changes in the IASC Foundation Constitution are intended to improve the involvement of stakeholders (including prudential regulators and emerging markets). A new monitoring board of market regulators was created and more investors and analysts were included in the Standards Advisory Committee.

  • Carlin, T.M. and Finch, N. (2010) Resisting compliance with IFRS goodwill accounting and reporting disclosures: Evidence from Australia. Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change 6 (2): 260–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlin, T.M., Finch, N. and Laili, N.H. (2009) Goodwill accounting in Malaysia and the transition to IFRS: A compliance assessment of large first year adopter. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting 7 (1): 75–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, R., Robin, A. and Wu, J.S. (2003) Incentives versus standards: Properties of accounting income in four East Asian countries. Journal of Accounting and Economics 36 (1/3): 235–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, M.T. and Miller, G.S. (2008) Will harmonizing accounting standards really harmonize accounting? Evidence from non-US firms adopting US GAAP. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 23 (2): 233–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Formal harmonization ‘refers to the way accounting standards are written: that is, to their legal or quasi-legal specification’. Material harmonization ‘refers to the level of concordance exhibited by the actual practices of companies in implementing accounting standards’.

  • Mustata, R. and Matis, D. (2007) Measurement of need for harmonization between national accounting standards and International Financial Reporting Standards. Journal of International Business and Economics 7 (3): 23–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leuz, C., Nanda, D. and Wysocky, P. (2003) Earnings management and investor protection: An international comparison. Journal of Financial Economics 69 (3): 505–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Committee of European Securities Regulators. (2003) Standard No 1 on Financial Information: Enforcement of Standards of Financial Information in Europe. CESR/03-073, March.

  • In May 2010, Commissaire Barnier announced that agreement on the proposal on supervising reform is needed in order to create the European Systemic Risk Board and the European Supervisory Authorities. He also announced the adoption of a Green Paper on Corporate Governance in financial institutions to help address questions about how to manage risk effectively in financial institutions, and how to empower shareholders.

  • Barnier, M. (2010) Effective financial market regulation after Pittsburg: Achievements and challenges. Keynote Speech: Delivering on the EU's G20 commitments. International Conference, Federal Ministry of Finance, Berlin.

  • Solomon, J.F., Solomon, A. and Norton, S.D. (2000) A conceptual framework for risk disclosure emerging from the agenda for corporate governance reform. The British Accounting Review 32 (4): 447–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Higher Learning in Accounting and Administration, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal

    Jonas Oliveira, Lúcia Lima Rodrigues & Russell Craig

Authors
  1. Jonas Oliveira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lúcia Lima Rodrigues
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Russell Craig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonas Oliveira.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oliveira, J., Rodrigues, L. & Craig, R. Risk-related disclosure practices in the annual reports of Portuguese credit institutions: An exploratory study. J Bank Regul 12, 100–118 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1057/jbr.2010.20

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jbr.2010.20

Keywords

Search

Navigation