Abstract
This article examines banks’ positions on the 2014 proposals for EU banking structural reforms. Centralization of authority in banking regulation and supervision has been a legislative priority in the European Union (EU) since 2008 in order to address regulatory shortcomings in the aftermath of the global finanical crisis. European decision makers have introduced more stringent capital adequacy requirements and transferred greater powers to the European Supervisory Authorites. In 2014, the European Commission put forward a proposal for banking structural reforms comprised of two elements: a ban on proprietary trading and mandatory separation of some trading activities from the deposit-taking entity. We refer to ‘regulatory cascading’ in order to conceptualize the rapid and successive introduction of legislative packages designed to fix problems and gaps in the EU banking regulatory framework. Our analysis shows that the majority of European banks and financial services associations are opposed to further banking structural reforms at the EU level. We find evidence that banks domiciled in member states that have already passed reforms prefer those over EU alternatives. Large internationalized banks are most opposed to further EU banking structural reforms.
Similar content being viewed by others
References and notes
See Germain, R. (2012) Governing global finance and banking. Review of International Political Economy 19 (4): 530–535.
Ferran, E., Moloney, N., Hill, J.G. and Coffee Jr, J.C. (2012) The Regulatory Aftermath of the Global Financial Crisis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, Mügge, D. (2014) Europe’s regulatory role in post-crisis global finance. Journal of European Public Policy 21(3): 316–326.
Radaelli, C. and DeFrancesco, F. (2007) Regulatory Quality in Europe, Concepts, Measures, and Policy Processes. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press, Meuwese, A.C.M. (2008) Impact Assessment in EU Lawmaking. The Hague, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International. Alemanno, A. and Meuwese, A.C.M. (2013) What role for impact assessment in non-legislative rule-making? European Law Journal 19(1): 76–92.
See Moschella, M. and Tsingou, E. (eds.) (2013) Great Expectations, Slow Transformations. Incremental Change in Post-crisis Regulation. Colchester, UK: ECPR Press, European Commission (2013b) Capital Requirements – CRD IV/CRR – Frequently Asked Questions. MEMO/13/690, http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-13-690_en.htm, accessed 12 March 2015. Quaglia, L. (2014) The sources of European Union influence in international financial regulatory fora. Journal of European Public Policy 21(3): 327-345.
See Hennessy, A. (2014) Redesigning financial supervision in the European union (2009–2013). Journal of European Public Policy 21 (2): 151–168. Howarth, D. and Quaglia, L. (2013) Banking Union as Holy Grail: Rebuilding the single market in financial services, stabilizing Europe’s banks and ‘completing’ economic and monetary union. Journal of Common Market Studies 51(Annual Review): 103–123. Howarth, D. and Quaglia, L. (2014) The steep road to European Banking Union: Constructing the single resolution mechanism. Journal of Common Market Studies 52(Annual Review): 125–140. See Epstein, R.A. and Rhodes, M. (2014) International in Life, National in Death? Banking Nationalism on the Road to Banking Union. Berlin, Germany: Freie Universität Berlin. KFG The Transformative Power of Europe Working Paper no. 61, December.
See Robinson, D. (2014) Frans timmermans promises to slash EU red tape. Financial Times 7 October.
See Epstein, R.A. and Rhodes, M. This volume.
On the influence of financial industry lobbying see: Pagliari, S. and Young, K. (2014) Leveraged interests: Financial industry power and the role of private sector coalitions. Review of International Political Economy 21 (3): 575–610. Young, K. (2014) Losing abroad but winning at home: European financial industry groups in global financial governance since the crisis. Journal of European Public Policy 21(3): 367–388.
FDIC (2015) Selected sections of the Dodd-Frank wall street reform and consumer protection Act, https://www.fdic.gov/regulations/reform/dfa_selections.html, accessed 4 April 2015.
FTI Consulting (2014) Volcker, Vickers, Liikanen: Structural reforms of the banking sector – Quo Vadit Europe? http://www.fticonsulting.com/insights/white-papers/volcker-vickers-liikanen-structural-reforms-of-the-banking-sector-quo-vadit-europe.
Financial Stability Board (2014) Structural Banking Reforms. Cross-border consistencies and global financial stability implications. Report to G20 Leaders for the November 2014 Summit, 27 October, p. 1, Basel.
European Commission (2014) Proposal on banking structural reform, http://ec.europa.eu/finance/bank/structural-reform/index_en.htm, accessed 12 March 2015.
Liikanen, E. et al (2012) Report of the High-level Expert Group on reforming the structure of the EU banking sector, http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/bank/docs/high-level_expert_group/report_en.pdf.
See Young article, this volume; Macartney and Jones article, this volume; Germain article, this volume.
Data about bank size in terms of total assets taken from ‘The Banker’ database, http://www.thebankerdatabase.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=top50.default&page=1.
PricewaterhouseCoopers (2014) Impact of Bank Structural Reforms in Europe. Report for AFME, November, London.
Barker, A. (2015) EU reforms to break up big banks at risk. Financial Times 29 January.
Barker, A. (2014) Banking groups push Brussels to ditch overhaul of big lenders. Financial Times 23 November.
European Commission (2013) Consultation on reforming the structure of the EU banking sector, http://ec.europa.eu/finance/bank/structural-reform/index_en.htm, accessed 12 March 2015.
Chalmers, A.W. (2014) In over their heads: Public consultation, administrative capacity and legislative duration in the European Union. European Union Politics 15 (4): 595–613. Rasmussen, A. and Toshkov, D. (2013) The effect of stakeholder involvement on legislative duration: Consultation of external actors and legislative duration in the European Union’ European Union Politics 14(3): 366–387. Young, K.L. (2013) Financial industry groups’ adaptation to the post-crisis regulatory environment: Changing approaches to the policy cycle. Regulation & Governance 7(4): 460–480.
Quittkat, C. (2011) The European commission’s online consultations: A success story. Journal of Common Market Studies 49 (3): 653–674.
See Mayring, P. (2000) Qualitative content analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research 1 (2): 1–10.
See Hall, P.A. and Taylor, R. (1996) Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies XLIV: 936-957. Thelen, K. (1999) Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Annual Reviews of Political Science 2:369-404.
Bank of England – Prudential Regulation Authority (2014) The implementation of ring-fencing: Consultation on legal structure, governance and the continuity of services and facilities – CP19/14, http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/pra/Pages/publications/cp/2014/cp1914.aspx, accessed 12 March 2015.
The Independent Commission on Banking (2011) Final report recommendations, http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20131003105424/https:/hmt-sanctions.s3.amazonaws.com/ICB%20final%20report/ICB%2520Final%2520Report%5B1%5D.pdf, accessed 10 October 2013.
German and French banking structural reform report.
Spendzharova, A. (2014) Banking union under construction: The impact of foreign ownership and domestic bank internationalization on European union member states’ regulatory preferences in banking supervision. Review of International Political Economy 21 (4): 949–979.
European Association of Co-operative Banks (2013) EACB response to the Commission consultation on Reforming the structure of EU banking sector, p. 7, http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/consultations/2013/banking-structural-reform/index_en.htm.
Association for Bank Customer Rights in Sweden (2013) Reply to Consultation on Reforming the structure of the EU banking sector, p. 2, http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/consultations/2013/banking-structural-reform/index_en.htm.
Financial Services User Group’s (FSUG) (2013) Reply to the consultation on Reforming the structure of the EU banking sector, http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/consultations/2013/banking-structural-reform/index_en.htm.
La Caixa Group (2013) Consultation by the Commission on the Structural Reform of the Banking Sector. Response by ‘la Caixa’ Group, p. 2, http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/consultations/2013/banking-structural-reform/index_en.htm.
Crédit Agricole (2013) Response of the Crédit agricole group to the European commission consultation on reforming the structure of the EU banking sector, p. 19, http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/consultations/2013/banking-structural-reform/index_en.htm.
Danske Bank (2013) Response to the consultation by the European Commission on Reforming the structure of the EU banking sector, p. 3, http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/consultations/2013/banking-structural-reform/index_en.htm.
Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) (2013) European commission consultation on reforming the structure of the EU banking sector. Response by RBS Group, p. 2, http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/consultations/2013/banking-structural-reform/index_en.htm.
German Banking Industry Committee (2013) Opinion to Directorate General Internal Market and Services: Consultation Paper on Reforming the Structure of the EU Banking Sector.
European Commission (2014) Proposal on banking structural reform, http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/consultations/2013/banking-structural-reform/index_en.htm.
Deutsche Bank (2013) Response to the European Commission Consultation on Reforming the Structure of the EU Banking Sector, p. 2, http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/consultations/2013/banking-structural-reform/index_en.htm.
International Capital Markets Association (2013) Response to the European commission consultation on reforming the structure of the EU banking sector, http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/consultations/2013/banking-structural-reform/index_en.htm.
European Association of Cooperative Banks (2013) Response to the European Commission Consultation on Reforming the Structure of the EU Banking Sector, p. 4, http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/consultations/2013/banking-structural-reform/index_en.htm.
Czech Banking Association (2013) Response to the European Commission Consultation on Reforming the Structure of the EU Banking Sector, p. 3, http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/consultations/2013/banking-structural-reform/index_en.htm.
On the diversity of bank models see also: Bronk, R. and Jacoby, W. (2013) Avoiding monocultures in the European Union: The case for the mutual recognition of difference in conditions of uncertainty. LSE ‘Europe in Question’ Discussion Paper Series, Paper No. 67/2013, London.
Acknowledgements
The authors are very grateful to the organizers of and participants in several conferences and workshops which allowed us to develop our argument: ‘National versus Supranational Banking Supervision’ at the ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops in Salamanca, Spain in 2014; NIG annual conference in Delft, the Netherlands in 2014; workshop on ‘National versus Supranational Banking Regulation after the Crisis: Dilemmas for States’ in Denver, USA in 2015. They would like to thank Rachel Epstein for her invaluable feedback and encouragement.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
4graduated from the Research Master’s European Studies at Maastricht University. Currently, she is a graduate student at Leiden University conducting research within the project ‘When does Government listen to the Public?’ (GovLis). Her research interests are in the areas of European agencies, regulatory governance and interest groups.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Spendzharova, A., Versluis, E., Radulova, E. et al. Too much, too fast? The sources of banks’ opposition to European banking structural reforms. J Bank Regul 17, 133–145 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/jbr.2015.16
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jbr.2015.16