Skip to main content
Log in

Contagion effect of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act: Evidence from Spain

  • Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Disclosure and Governance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This study provides an overview of Spanish regulators’ efforts to strengthen disclosure and governance regulations in capital markets. Disclosure and corporate governance became an increasingly important issue, particularly after the recent wave of corporate scandals and the enactment of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act in 2002. In the post-Sarbanes–Oxley Act era, regulators around the world took different paths to combat scandals and heal the damage corporate scandals incurred on investors’ confidence. This study analyses the path that Spanish regulators took to deal with disclosure and corporate governance concerns and compares and contrasts the Spanish efforts to the Sarbanes–Oxley Act in terms of content and enforcement. As a result of our analysis, we find the Sarbanes–Oxley Act's impact on Spanish regulations to be significant. Substantial effort on behalf of Spanish regulators was put to increase disclosure and governance standards in Spain. Nevertheless, Spanish regulators’ efforts often lacked the enforcement that was established in the US. Spain's growing importance in world markets and its unique approach to dealing with corporate governance issues makes the analysis of Spanish efforts to enhance corporate governance standards highly relevant to a wide audience, which includes but is not confined to (1) executives and managers of global companies that do or seek business in Spain, (2) researchers working in the field of disclosure and corporate governance, (3) regulators concerned with meeting investors’ growing demands for higher disclosure and corporate governance standards, (4) attorneys focused on Spanish corporate governance law, (5) international investors assessing investment opportunities in Spain, and (6) stock exchange officials considering cooperation with Spanish stock exchanges. Last but not least, this paper complements a series of previous papers published in this journal that focus on corporate governance in various countries. With this paper we hope to add on to the efforts of International Journal of Disclosure and Governance to give a full view of new regulations on disclosure and corporate governance around the world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Notes

  • Amihud, Y. and Mendelson, H. (1986) ‘Asset pricing and the bid-ask spread’, Journal of Financial Economics, 17, 223–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, D. and Verrecchia, R. (1991) ‘Disclosure, liquidity and the cost of equity capital’, Journal of Finance, 46, 1325–1359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welker, M. (1995) ‘Disclosure policy, information asymmetry and liquidity in equity markets’, Contemporary Accounting Research, 11, 801–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botosan, C. A. (1997) ‘Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital’, The Accounting Review, 72, 323–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, P., Hutton, A. and Palepu, K. (1999) ‘Stock performance and intermediation changes surrounding sustained increases in disclosure’, Contemporary Accounting Research, 16, 485–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, M. H. and Lundholm, R. J. (2000) ‘Voluntary disclosure and equity offerings: Reducing information asymmetry or hyping the stock?’ Contemporary Accounting Research, 17, 623–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giorno, C. and Camero, E. (2007) ‘Economic survey of Spain’, Policy Brief, OECD.

  • Aldama Commission (2003) Report by the Special Commission to Foster Transparency and Security in the Markets and in Listed Companies (Aldama Report).

  • Olivencia Commission (1998a). Código de Buen Gobierno (The Code of Good Governance). CNMV, Madrid, available at http://www.cnmv.es/delfos/tendencias/espa%F1a3.htm (last accessed on 23rd February, 2008).

  • Olivencia Commission (1998b) Informe sobre el Consejo de Administración (Report on the Board of Directors).

  • McKean, A. (2003–2004) ‘Corporate governance law in Spain: A vibrant transition fueled by the recent reforms of Aldama’, Georgetown Journal of International Law, 35, 105–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firms are selected to be included in the IBEX index based on trading liquidity which is computed as the value of trading (both in € and number of trades).

  • Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, Banco Santander Central Hispano, Endesa, Repsol YPF and Telefonica.

  • After investigating the financial statements of these companies we observed that all companies have chosen to use the 20F report as opposed to re-preparing the financial statements consistent with US GAAP.

  • Ley 44/2002, de 22 de noviembre, de medidas de reforma del sistema financiero.

  • This report titled Informe Aldama in Spanish can be obtained from the following CNMV website: http://www.cnmv.es/publicaciones/informefinal.pdf.

  • The Unified Code of Corporate Governance (in Spanish) is available at the following website of CNMV: http://www.cnmv.es/publicaciones/CUDefinitivo.pdf.

  • Orden ECO 3722/2003, de 26 de diciembre, the Corporate Governance Annual Report and other reports disclosed by listed companies.

  • CNMV, Circular 1/2004, de 17 de Marzo, Corporate Governance Annual Report of Listed Companies.

  • Securities and Exchange Commission (2005). XBRL Voluntary Financial Reporting Program on the Edgar System, Norwalk, CT: Financial Accounting Standards Board, available at www.sec.gov/rules/final/33-8529.htm (last accessed on 29th November, 2007).

  • Securities and Exchange Commission (2005). XBRL Voluntary Financial Reporting Program on the Edgar System, Financial Accounting Standards Board, Norwalk, CT, available at www.sec.gov/rules/final/33-8529.htm (last accessed on 29th November, 2007).

  • For more information about the taxonomies developed by the Spanish Stock and Exchange Commission, please visit: www.cnmv.es/index.htm.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ari Yezegel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cortijo-Gallego, V., Yezegel, A. Contagion effect of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act: Evidence from Spain. Int J Discl Gov 5, 140–152 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1057/jdg.2008.6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jdg.2008.6

Keywords

Navigation