Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The effect of corporate governance and divergence between cash flow and control rights on firm performance: Evidence from Malaysia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Disclosure and Governance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nowadays, separation of ownership from control in business causes the inability of shareholders to have a full control over managerial actions. In this situation, agency theory assumes an opportunistic behavior, that is, individuals want to maximize their own expected interests and are resourceful in doing so. This opportunistic behavior leads to conflict of interest between managers and shareholders on the one hand, and majority and minority shareholders on the other. From the agency theory perspective, the aim of Corporate Governance (CG) is to mitigate these agency conflicts and direct the operations to achieve an appropriate performance. Therefore, the aim of this study is to examine the relationship between CG characteristics and firm performance in Malaysian listed firms where divergence between cash flow and control rights is critical. Based on a randomly selected sample of 400 companies listed on Bursa Malaysia and applying the linear multiple regression, it is found that board independency and CEO duality have respectively positive and negative relationship with firm performance. In addition, audit quality has a significantly positive relationship with firm performance. The contribution of this study is to add a dummy interaction between audit quality and divergence between cash flow and control rights. It is found that high-quality audit firms can mitigate the agency problems in firms with divergence between cash flow and control rights.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdul Rahman, R. and Haniffa, R.M. (2003) Effectiveness of Internal Governance Mechanisms: An Empirical Analysis of Malaysian Listed Companies for the period 1996–2000. Proceedings of the Conference of Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management; 2–5 December, Australia.

  • Abdul Rahman, R. and Mohd Haniffa, R. (2002) CEO Duality and Corporate Performance: Evidence in Malaysia. Proceedings of the International Conference on Corporate Governance: Trends and Challenges in the Millennium; 29–30 October, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

  • Abdullah, S.N. (2004) Board composition, CEO duality and performance among Malaysian listed companies. Corporate Governance 4 (4): 47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, R. and Mehran, H. (2003) Is Corporate Governance Different for Bank Holding Companies? New York: Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amran, N.A. and Ahmad, A.C. (2009) Family business, board dynamics and firm value: Evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Financial Reporting & Accounting 7 (1): 53–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amran, N.A. and Ahmad, A.C. (2010) Corporate governance mechanisms and performance: Analysis of Malaysian family and non-family controlled companies. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing 6 (2): 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beiner, S., Drobetz, W., Schmid, F. and Zimmermann, H. (2004) Is board size an independent corporate governance mechanism? KYKLOS 57 (3): 327–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkman, H., Cole, R.A. and Fu, L.J. (2009) Expropriation through loan guarantees to related parties: Evidence from China. Journal of Banking & Finance 33 (1): 141–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, B.S., Kim, W., Jang, H. and Park, K. (2008) How Corporate Governance Affects Firm Value: Evidence on Channels from Korea. ECGI – Finance Working Paper No. 103/2005; EFA 2009 Bergen Meetings Paper; U of Texas Law, Law and Econ Research Paper No. 51; McCombs Research Paper No. 01-05; KDI School of Pub Policy & Management Paper No. 08/19. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=844744.

  • Brickley, J.A., Coles, J.L. and Terry, R.L. (1994) Outside directors and the adoption of poison pills. Journal of Financial Economics 35 (3): 371–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brickley, J.A. and James, C.M. (1987) The takeover market, corporate board composition and ownership structure: The case of banking. Journal of Law and Economics 30 (3): 161–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y.M. and Chien, C.Y. (2007) Monitoring mechanism, corporate governance and related party transactions, 4 September. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1011861, accessed 20 December 2011.

  • Cheng, S. (2008) Board size and the variability of corporate performance. Journal of Financial Economics 87 (1): 157–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, Y.L., Rau, P.R. and Stouraitis, A. (2006) Tunneling, propping, and expropriation: Evidence from connected party transactions in Hong Kong. Journal of Financial Economics 82 (2): 343–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Fan, J.P.H. and Lang, L.H.P. (1999) Corporate diversification in East Asia: The role of ultimate ownership and group affiliation. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2089. The University of California. http://ssrn.com/abstract=615021, accessed 20 January 2012.

  • Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Fan, J.P.H. and Lang, L.H.P. (2002) Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. Journal of Finance 57 (6): 2741–2771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claessens, S., Djankov, S. and Lang, L.H.P. (2000) The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. Journal of Financial Economics 58 (1&2): 81–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahya, J. and McConnell, J.J. (2005) Outside directors and corporate board decisions. Journal of Corporate Finance 11 (1&2): 2741–2771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Defond, M.L. and Francis, J.R. (2005) Audit quality research after Sarbanes–Oxley. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 24: 5–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFond, M.L., Francis, J.R. and Wong, T.J. (2000) Auditor industry specialization and market segmentation: Evidence from Hong Kong. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 19 (1): 49–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene, A., De Vuyst, V. and Ooghe, H. (2001) Corporate performance and board structure in Belgian companies. Long Range Planning 34 (3): 383–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, S. and Knight, J. (2009) Can the augmented Solow model explain China’s remarkable economic growth? A cross-country panel data analysis. Journal of Comparative Economics 37 (3): 432–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Effiezal, A.A.W., Hasnah, H., Lok, C.L. and Sofri, Y. (2011) Does corporate governance matter? Evidence from related party transactions in Malaysia. Advances in Financial Economics 14: 131–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, T., Sundgren, S. and Wells, M. (1998) Larger board size and decreasing firm value in small firms. Journal of Financial Economics 48 (3): 35–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epps, R.W. and Cereola, S.J. (2008) Do institutional shareholder services (ISS) corporate governance ratings reflect a company’s operating performance? Critical Perspectives on Accounting 19 (8): 1135–1148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faccio, M. and Lang, L.H.P. (2002) The ultimate ownership of Western European corporations. Journal of Financial Economics 65 (3): 365–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, J.P.H. and Wong, T.J. (2002) Corporate ownership structure and the informativeness of accounting earnings in East Asia. Journal of Accounting and Economics 33 (3): 401–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, J.P.H. and Wong, T.J. (2005) Do external auditors perform a corporate governance role in emerging markets? Evidence from East Asia. Journal of Accounting Research 43 (1): 35–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fooladi, M. (2012) Board characteristics and firm performance. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing 8 (5): 688–694.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuerman, R.D. (2004) Audit quality examined one large CPA firm at a time: Mid-1990's empirical evidence of a precursor of Arthur Andersen's collapse. Corporate Ownership & Control 21 (1): 137–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillan, S.L. (2006) Recent developments in corporate governance: An overview. Journal of Corporate Finance 12 (3): 381–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W.H. (2002) Econometric Analysis, 5th edn. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gujarati, D.N. (2003) Basic Econometrics, 4th edn. New Delhi: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haniffa, R.M. and Hudaib, M. (2006) Corporate governance structure and performance of Malaysian listed companies. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 33 (7&8): 1034–1062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, D.T. and Liu, Z.CH. (2010) A study of the relationship between related party transactions and firm value in high technology firms in Taiwan and China. African Journal of Business Management 4 (9): 1924–1931.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, H. and Samad, F.A. (2011) Agency costs, corporate governance mechanisms and performance of public listed family firms in Malaysia. South African Journal of Business Management 42 (3): 17–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. (1993) The modern industrial revolution, exit and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance 48 (4): 831–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M.C. and Meckling, W.H. (1976) Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3 (2): 305–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S., Boone, P., Breach, A. and Friedman, E. (2000) Corporate governance in the Asian financial crisis. Journal of Financial Economics 58 (1&2): 141–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan, J. and Schauer, P.C. (2000) The differentiation of quality among auditors: Evidence from the not-for-profit sector. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 19 (2): 9–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F. and Shleifer, A. (1999) Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance 54 (2): 471–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R.W. (1998) Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy 106 (6): 1113–1155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R.W. (2000) Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics 58 (1&2): 3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R.W. (2002) Investor protection and corporate valuation. Journal of Finance 57 (3): 1147–1170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K.W. (2007) Corporate voluntary disclosure and the separation of cash flow rights from control rights. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 28 (4): 3939–3416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liew, P.K. (2007) Corporate governance reforms in Malaysia: The key leading players’ perspectives. Corporate Governance 15 (5): 724–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lins, K.V. (2003) Equity ownership and firm value in emerging markets. Journal of Financial and Quantitative analysis 38 (1): 159–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, J.H., Wan, D.F. and Cai, D. (2012) The private benefits of control in Chinese listed firms do cash flow rights always reduce controlling shareholders’ tunneling. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 29 (2): 499–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macus, M. (2008) Board capability: An interactions perspective on boards of directors and firm performance. International Studies of Management & Organization 38 (3): 98–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malaysian Code on Corporate Governance (MCCG) (2007) Finance Committee on Corporate Governance. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Securities Commission.

  • Mayer, C.J. (2003) What Can We Learn About The Sensitivity of Investment to Stock Prices With A Better Measure of Tobin's Q? School Working Paper. The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.

  • McCullers, L.D. and Schroeder, R.G. (1982) Accounting Theory: Text and Reading, 2th edn. United States: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minority Shareholder Watchdog Group (MSWG) (2011) About us: Who we are? (online) http://www.mswg.org.my/web/page.php?pid=36&menu=sub.

  • Morck, R., Wolfenzon, D. and Yeung, B. (2005) Corporate governance, economic entrenchment, and growth. Journal of Economic Literature 63 (3): 655–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, R. and Haniffa, R. (2002) CEO duality and corporate performance: Evidence in Malaysia. Paper presented at the International Conference on Corporate Governance; 29–30 October, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

  • Sa'adiah, M. and Norman, M.S. (2009) Related Party Transactions, Family Ownership and Earnings Quality: A Study of Malaysian Firms. Working Paper, Universiti Malaya and Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

  • Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. (1997) A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance 52 (2): 737–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, J. and Solomon, A. (2004) Corporate Governance and Accountability. England: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulong, Z. and Fauzias, M.N. (2010) Corporate governance mechanisms and firm valuation in Malaysian listed firms: A panel data analysis. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing 6 (1): 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tam, O.K. and Tan, M.G. (2007) Ownership, governance and firm performance in Malaysia. Corporate Governance 15 (2): 208–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taufik, M. and Saad, N.M. (2009) The effects of corporate governance compliance on market valuation in Malaysia. Chinese Business Review 8 (3): 46–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen, Y.F (2008) The discriminative effect of ownership structure on stock returns in Taiwan during bear markets. The Journal of International Management Studies 3 (2): 10–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. (1980) A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 48 (4): 817–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willenborg, M. (1999) Empirical analysis of the economic demand for auditing in the initial public offering market. Journal of Accounting Research 37 (1): 225–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • William, Q.J., Naoumova, I. and Koutzevol, N. (2003) Corporate governance and firm performance in Russia: An empirical study. Journal of World Business 38 (4): 385–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yermack, D. (1996) Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics 40 (2): 185–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zubaidah, Z.A., Nurmala, M.K. and Kamaruzaman, J. (2009) Board structure and corporate performance in Malaysia. International Journal of Economic and Finance 1 (1): 150–164.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Accounting, Mobarakeh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mobarakeh, Isfahan, Iran

    Masood Fooladi

Authors
  1. Masood Fooladi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zaleha Abdul Shukor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Norman Mohd Saleh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Romlah Jaffar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masood Fooladi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fooladi, M., Shukor, Z., Saleh, N. et al. The effect of corporate governance and divergence between cash flow and control rights on firm performance: Evidence from Malaysia. Int J Discl Gov 11, 326–340 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/jdg.2013.24

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jdg.2013.24

Keywords

Search

Navigation