Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Whistleblowing laws: Before and after Sarbanes–Oxley

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Disclosure and Governance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The significant contributions of whistleblowers towards the recent unravelling of LIBOR, money laundering and related scandals in various global banks are reminiscent of similar outcomes in the earlier Enron and WorldCom debacles. Employees and employers in the private sector in particular, despite rhetorical assurances by the latter, have not necessarily shared common interests where whistleblowing is concerned. Lawmakers and regulators in the United States, because of this, have designed whistleblowing rules at the state and federal level to provide protection to whistleblowers. To some degree, Sarbanes–Oxley (SOX) and the False Claims Act (FCA) together probably contributed to an enforcement regime combining anti-retaliation protection and financial incentives, which produced some results. The Dodd–Frank whistleblowing initiative that followed, in addition to enhancing internal reporting systems, also institutionalized the Office of the Whistleblower (OWB). Despite the enhanced flow of quality tips from all the US member states and other overseas economies to the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC), the institution has not issued a commensurate significant number of awards. This appears to suggest that the enforcement results may not have improved as intended. The apparent paucity of enforcement relative to tips secured has been attributed to the lack of SEC priority and the hesitation of potential whistleblowers because of lingering doubts and fears and anxieties over award outcomes. The recent US Supreme Court decision that whistleblower protection afforded by SOX extends to employees of contractors of public companies may, however, induce more potential whistleblowers to come forward. On the basis of the empirical studies, the UK’s Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 (PIDA) is found to be grossly ineffective in promoting whistleblowing in the United Kingdom, as well as in affording adequate protection for workers principally because of various gaps and ambiguities located in the PIDA provisions. This article argues that because of the developments in the United States, it might be timely and appropriate for the SEC to consider a qui tam provision resembling that in the FCA, and to allow bounty payments for SEC non-monetary sanctions as further reforms. As courts and tribunals in the United Kingdom begin to interpret the newly enacted provisions of PIDA, further reforms could be envisaged. One good example is the call by the UK Whistleblowing Commission to authorize the Secretary of State to issue a code of practice to be taken into account by courts and tribunals when matters of whistleblowing arise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ACCA (2011) Audit Under Fire: A Review of the Post Financial Crisis Inquiries. London: ACCA.

  • Alessi, C. (2013) Understanding the Libor Scandal. Council on Foreign Relations Paper, 6 February, http://www.cfr.org/uk/understanding-libor-scandal/p28729, accessed 2 April 2013.

  • AmEx (2012) Listed Company Guide, http://wallstreet.cch.com/mkt/companyguide/, accessed 2 April 2013.

  • Ashraf, J. (2011) The accounting Fraud @ WorldCom: The causes, the characteristics, the consequences and the lessons learned. PhD Accounting Thesis, The Burnett Honors College, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida.

  • Bame-Aldred, C., Sweeney, J.T. and Seifert, D. (2007) An examination of the effectiveness of Sarbanes-Oxley whistle-blower protection. Journal of Forensic Accounting 8 (1–2): 105–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banisar, D. (2011) Whistleblowing: International standards and developments. In: I.E. Sandoval (ed.) Contemporary Debates on Corruption and Transparency: Rethinking State, Market and Society. Mexico City; Washington DC: IS-UNAM/World Bank, pp. 7–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banisar, D. (2012) Whistleblower Protection: Encouraging Reporting. Paris, France: OECD, pp. 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, J.W. (2010) Evolutionary enforcement in the securities and exchange commission. University of Pittsburgh Law Review 71 (3): 403–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, T., Cochran, D.S. and Taylor, G.S. (1993) The internal disclosure policies of private sector employers: An initial look at their relationship to employee whistleblowing. Journal of Business Ethics 12 (2): 127–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baruch, D.W. and Barr, N.N. (2011) The SEC’s whistleblower program: What the SEC has learned from the false claims act about avoiding whistleblower abuses. Harvard Business Law Review Online 2 (July 25): 28–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blount, J. and Markel, S. (2012) The end of the internal compliance world as we know IT, or an enhancement of the effectiveness of securities law enforcement? Bounty hunting under the Dodd-Frank’ act’s whistleblower provisions. Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law XVII (2): 1023–1062.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouloy, K. (2012) The public interest disclosure act 1998: Nothing more than a ‘cardboard shield’. The Manchester Review of Law, Crime and Ethics 1 (1): 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowden, P. (2005) A comparative analysis of whistleblower protection. Paper Presented at the Australian Association for Professional and Applied Ethics 12th Annual Conference, 28–30 September, Adelaide.

  • Bowen, R.M., Call, A.C. and Rajgopal, S. (2010) Whistle-blowing: Target firm characteristics and economic consequences. The Accounting Review 85 (4): 1239–1271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brickley, K.F. (2003) From enron to worldcom and beyond: Life and crime after Sarbanes-Oxley. Washington University Law Quarterly 81 (2): 357–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A.J., Latimer, P., McMillan, J. and Wheeler, C. (2008) Best-practice whistleblowing legislation for the public sector. In: A.J. Brown (ed.) Whistleblowing in the Australian Public Sector: Enhancing the Theory and Practice of Internal Witness Management in Public Sector Organisations. Canberra, Australia: ANU E Press, pp. 262–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, T.L., Verdu, M.E. and Wokutch, R.E. (2008) Whistleblowing for profit: An ethical analysis of the federal false claim act. Journal of Business Ethics 77 (3): 361–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, A.D. (2013) Is audit failing the global capital markets? International Journal of Disclosure and Governance 10 (3): 195–212.

  • Chutchian, M. (2012) Rise in Whistleblower Protections Inspires New Firm Practices. Law 360, 01 June 1 2012, http://law360.com/articles/344005/rise-in-whistleblower-protections-inspires-new-firm-practices, http://nysemanual.nyse.com/lcm, accessed 5 February 2013.

  • Clark, C.E. and Newell, S. (2013) Institutional work and complicit decoupling across the U.S. capital markets: The work of crating agencies. Business Ethics Quarterly 23 (1): 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D. (2011) SEC gets more whistleblower tips. Reuters, 4 February, http://www.ibtimes.com/sec-gets-more-whistleblower-tips-452239, accessed 8 January 2012.

  • Clyde & Company (2013) UK Update: Changes to Protection for Whistleblowers. Clyde & Company Guidance, 25 June.

  • Cole, J., Shea, D.F., Tsu, L., Naidoo, L. and Tingir, R. (2014) Whistleblowing regimes in the US and the UK.

  • Dembinski, P.H., Lager, C., Cornfold, A. and Bonvin, J.-M. (eds.) (2006) Enron and World Finance: A Case Study in Ethics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–11.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, T.M. (2007) SOX and whistleblowing. Michigan Law Review 105 (8): 1757–1780.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyck, A., Morse, A. and Zingales, L. (2010) Who blows the whistle on corporate fraud. Journal of Finance 65 (6): 2213–2253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, Y. and Lobel, O. (2010) The incentives matrix: The comparative effectiveness of rewards, liabilities, duties and protections for reporting illegalities. Texas Law Review 88 (6): 1151–1212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, D. (2014) Supreme court extends whistleblower protection to millions of small companies. Forbes, 4 March, http://www.forbes.com/sites/danielfisher/2014/03/04/supreme-court-says-sarbox-whistle, accessed 13 March 2014.

  • Foti, C.M. (2013) Employers beware: Will the SEC be a safety net for terminated whistleblowers. JDSUPRA BUSINESS ADVISOR, http://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/employers-beware-will-the-sec-be-a-safe-06899/, accessed 5 January 2014.

  • Goldschmidt, S.S. (2013) Lessons from the 2013 SEC whistleblower report. Law360, 6 December, http://www.ropesgray.com/news-and-insights/Insights/2013/12/Attorney-Authors-Lessons-From-The-2013, accessed 21 February 2014.

  • Gonzales, J.P. (2010) A pot of gold at the end of the rainbow: An economic incentive-based approach to OSHA whistleblowing. Employment Rights & Employment Policy 14 (2): 325–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodson, R. (2012) The adequacy of whistleblower protection: Is the cost to the individual too high? Houston Business & Tax Law Journal 12 (1): 161–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grider, K. (2012) Employment Law update: US Supreme Court, fifth circuit, and more. State Bar of Texas: 28th Annual Litigation Update Institute Chapter 12 Paper. 19–20 January Conference, Cypress, Austin, Texas.

  • Habbash, M., Sindezingue, C. and Salama, A. (2013) The effect of audit committee characteristics on earnings management: Evidence from the United Kingdom. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance 10 (1): 13–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havian, E.R. (2001) Blowing the whistle on fraud. Contract Management 41 (October): 28–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, A. and Syal, R. (2013) Whistleblowing laws to be Overhauled as New Claims Emerge over NHS Trust. The Guardian, 15 February, http://theguardian.com/politics/2013/feb/15/whistleblowing-laws-to-be-overhauled-as-new-claims-emerged-over-nhs-trust, accessed 11 February 2014.

  • Hobby, C. (2010) Public Interest Whistleblowing: Twelve Years of the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998. London: Institute of Employment Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyos, C. (2013) Law ‘failing to protect’ whistle-blowers. Financial Times, 27 November, http://www.ft.com/intl/cmc/s/0/d91bcd1c-56bd-11e3-8cca-00144feabdc0.html, accessed 11 February 2014.

  • Hunt, Jr I.C. (2001) Accountants as gatekeepers-adding security and value to the financial reporting system. SEC Staff Speech, http://www.sec.gov/news/speech/spch504.htm, accessed 10 December 2012.

  • Johnson, S. (2013) Money-laundering banks still gets a pass from U.S. bloomberg, http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2013-03-31/money-laundering-banks-still-get-a, accessed 2 April 2013.

  • Kirkpatrick, G. (2009) The Corporate Governance Lessons from the Financial Crisis. Paris: OECD: Financial Market Trends.

    Google Scholar 

  • KPMG (2011) Global anti-bribery and corruption survey, http://www.kpmg.comUK/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublication, accessed 10 January 2013.

  • Lander, G.P. (2004) What is Sarbanes-Oxley? New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, A. (2012) SEC gets more than 3000 whistleblower program tips. Reuters, 15 November, http://www.reuters.com/assets/print?aid=USBRE8AE1NL20121115, accessed 18 November 2012.

  • Lebovits, N.S. (2006) Beyond Sarbanes-Oxley: Three best practices to adopt in your organization. Journal of Accountancy 202 (2): 69–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legal Dictionary (2014) ‘Qui tam action’. Legal Dictionary, http://dictionary.law.com/Default.aspx?selected=1709, accessed 11 February 2014.

  • Lewis, D. (2010) Ten years of public interest disclosure legislation in the UK: Are whistleblowers adequately protected? Journal of Business Ethics 82 (2): 497–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (2011) Whistleblowing in a changing legal climate: Is it time to revisit our approach to trust and loyalty in the workplace? Business Ethics: A European Review 20 (1): 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Love, C. (2012) The fraud enforcement and recovery act of 2009 and the expansion of liability under the false claims act. Utah Law Review 2 (2): 1129–1154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macey, J. (2007) Getting the word out about fraud: A theoretical analysis of whistleblowing and insider trading. Michigan Law Review 105: 1899–1940.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, Jr D.K. and Banks, G.Y. (2003) How Sarbanes-Oxley will change the audit process. Journal of Accountancy 196 (3): 49–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R.I. and Pashkoff, P.H. (2002) Regulations under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Journal of Accountancy 194 (4): 33–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moberly, R. (2006) Sarbanes-Oxley’s structural model to encourage corporate whistleblowers. BYU Law Review 1107 (5): 1117–1125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moberly, R. (2007) Unfulfilled expectations: An empirical analysis of why Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblowers rarely win. William and Mary Law Review 49 (1): 65–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moberly, R. (2008) Protecting whistleblowers by contract. Colorado Law Review 79 (4): 975–1402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moberly, R. (2010) The supreme court’s antiretaliation principle. Case Western Reserve Law Review 61 (2): 375–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moberly, R. and Wylie, L.E. (2011) An empirical study of whistleblowing policies in United States corporate code of ethics. In: D. Lewis and W. Vandekerckhove (eds.) Whistleblowing & Democratic Values. London: The International Whistleblowing Research Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moberly, R. (2012) Sarbanes-Oxley’s whistleblower provisions ten years later. South Carolina Law Review 64 (1): 2–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muhl, C.J. (2001) Employment-at-will doctrine: Three major exceptions. Monthly Labor Review 86 (January): 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulford, C.W. and Cominskey, E.E. (2002) The Financial Numbers Game: Detecting Creative Accounting Practices. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • NASDAQ (2013) Interpretative Manual Online Listing Rule 5600 Series, http://nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com/NASDAQTools/TOCChapter.asp?manual=/nasdaq/mai, accessed 10 April 2013.

  • Newberg, J.A. (2005) Corporate codes of ethics, mandatory disclosure, and the market for ethical conduct. Vermont Law Review 29 (2): 253–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • NYSE Listing Company Manual (2012) Section 303A Corporate Governance Standards.

  • O’Leary, T.P. (2000) Silencing the whistleblower: The gap between federal and state retaliatory discharge laws. Iowa Law Review 85 (2): 663–694.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips & Cohen LLP (2013) Qui tam explained: Qui tam lawsuits explained-how does Qui Tam case work, http://www.phillipsandcohen.com/Qui-Tam-Whistleblowers/Qui-Tam-Explained.shtml, accessed 11 December 2013.

  • Public Concern at Work (PCAW) (2010) Where’s whistleblowing now? 10 years of legal protection for whistleblowers. PCAW Survey Research Paper, http://www.pcaw.org.uk/cms/sitecontent/view/id/127/highlight/insight+story, accessed 11 January 2014.

  • Public Concern at Work (PCAW)/University of Greenwich (2013) Whistleblowing-the inside story, PCAW/University of Greenwich Survey Research Paper, http://www.pcaw.org.uk/cms/sitecontent/view/id/127/highlight/inside+story, accessed 18 February 2014.

  • Pyper, D. (2013) Whistleblowing and Gagging Clauses: The Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998. Standard Note SN00248, 29 November. London: House of Commons Library.

  • Rapp, G.C. (2007) Beyond protection: Invigorating incentives for Sarbanes-Oxley corporate and securities fraud whistleblowers. Boston University Law Review 87 (1): 91–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, G.C. (2012a) Mutiny by the bounties? The attempt to reform wall street by the new whistleblower provisions of the Dodd-Frank act. Bringham Young University (BYU) Law Review 2012 (1): 73–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, G.C. (2012b) States of pay: Emerging trends in state whistleblower bounty claims. South Texas Law Review 54: 53–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiter, S.A. and Williams, P.F. (2013) Sarbanes-Oxley and the accounting profession: Public interest implications. Open Journal of Accounting 2 (1): 8–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R.Y., Swanson, R.P. and Dinneen, J. (2004) Spilt milk: Parmalat and Sarbanes-Oxley internal controls reporting. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance 1 (3): 215–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rona, I.J. (2011) The whistleblower perspective: Why they do it and why we need them. Paper Presented at New Frontiers and False Claims Settlements Suffolk University Seminar. 4 April, Boston, MA.

  • Rosenbaum, T. (2005) The Myth of Moral Justice: Why Our Legal System Fails to Do What’s Right. New York: Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savich, R.S. (2006) Cherry-picking Sarbanes-Oxley. Journal of Accountancy 201 (6): 71–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheininger, M.G. and Russell, Jr D.L. (2008) SEC Rules and the ‘Partially Unsealed’ Qui Tam Complaint: Conflicting Obligations of Confidentiality and Disclosure. Mckenna Long & Aldridge LLP Paper, Washington DC.

  • Schmidt, M. (2005) Whistle blowing regulation and accounting standards enforcement in Germany and Europe – An economic perspective. International Review of Law & Economics 25 (2): 143–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M.S. (2002) A code of ethics for corporate code of ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 41 (1–2): 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SEC (2013) 2013 Annual Report to the Congress on the Dodd-Frank Whistleblower Program. Washington DC: SEC.

  • Senate Judiciary Committee Report (2002) The corporate and criminal fraud accountability act of 2002. Washington: US Senate. Senate Report No. 107–146 (2002), pp. 10–11.

  • Shane, S.D. and Rosenthal, W.J. (1999) Employment Law Deskbook. Baltimore, UK: Matthew Bender.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinzdak, G. (2008) An analysis of current whistleblower laws: Defending a more flexible approach to reporting requirements. California Law Review 96 (6): 1643–1669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, C.W. (2000) Employment at will in the United States: The divine rights of employers. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Labor and Employment Law 3 (1): 65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sy, A. (2013) Analysing some issues with SOX. International Journal of Auditing Technology 1 (1): 18–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Institute of Internal Auditors Research Foundation (IIARF) (2009) The Financial Crisis and its Impact on the Internal Audit Profession. Florida: Altamonte Springs.

  • Transparency International (2009) Alternative to Silence: Whistleblowing Protection in 10 European Countries. Berlin, Germany: Transparency International.

  • Treasury Committee (2009) Banking Crisis: Reforming Corporate Governance and Pay in the City: Government, UK Financial Investments Ltd and Financial Services Authority Responses to the Ninth Report from the Committee. London: Stationer Office Books.

  • US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (1999) Enforcement Guidance: Vicarious Employment Liability for Unlawful Harassment by Supervisors. Washington DC: US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

  • US Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations (2011) Wall Street and the Financial Crisis: Anatomy of a Financial Collapse. Washington DC: US Senate.

  • Vinten, G. (2003) Whistleblowing: The UK experience: Part 1. Management Decision 41 (9): 935–943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinten, G. (2004) Whistleblowing: The UK experience: Part 2. Management Decision 42 (1): 139–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, G.R., Trevino, L.K. and Cochrane, P.L. (1999) Corporate ethics practices in the mid-1990s: An empirical study of the fortune 1000. Journal of Business Ethics 18 (3): 283–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, D.M. (2006) Reexamining the SEC’s use of obey-the-law injunctions. U.C. Davis Business Law Journal 7 (1): 239–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westman, D.P. (2005) The significance of the Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblower provisions. The Labor Lawyer 21 (2): 141–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M.J. (2013) Speech Presented by the SEC Chair to the Council of Institutional Investors Fall Conference in Chicago, IL, 26 September.

  • Worth, M. (2013) Whistleblowing in Europe: Legal Protections for Whistleblowers in the EU, Berlin, Germany: Transparency International Paper.

  • Yeoh, P. (2012) External credit assessment institution: Clash of expectations and accountability issues. Journal of Corporate Law Studies 12 (2): 393–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Statutes and Regulations

  • US.

  • Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act 2009 (FERA).

  • Senate Report No. 107–146 (2002).

  • SEC (2011) Final Rule 21F.

  • US Sentencing Manual 1991, Section 8A1.2, Application Note 3(k)(5).

  • Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (DFA), Public Law No. 111–203, 124 Stat. 1376 (2010).

  • False Claim Act (FCA) 31 U.S.C. Sections 3729–3733 (1986).

  • UK.

  • Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA).

  • Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 (ERRA).

  • Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 (PIDA).

  • US Cases.

  • Collier v. Superior Court, 228 Cal. App. 3d 1117, 1121 (1991).

  • Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, 524 US 775 (1998).

  • Garcetti v. Ceballos 547 US 410 (2006).

  • In re Caremark International Incorporated, 698A.2d 959 (Del Ch. Ct. 1996).

  • Lawson v. FMR LLC et al, case number 12–3, 571 US Supreme Court (2014).

  • Mortgages Inc. v. US District Court of Nevada, 934F. 2d 209 (9th Cir. 1991).

  • West v. Lynch, 2013 WL 1111784 (3d Cir. Mar. 19, 2013).

  • UK Cases.

  • Amber Size and Chemical Co v Menzel (1913) 2 Ch 239.

  • Faccenda Chicken v Fowler (1986) IRLR 69.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Law, Social Sciences and Communications, University of Wolverhampton, Millenium City Building, City Campus-South, Wulfruna Street, Wolverhampton, WV1 1LY, UK

    Peter Yeoh

Authors
  1. Peter Yeoh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

1has experience in financial services law and is a law lecturer and researcher at the University of Wolverhampton. He has published in this and other peer-reviewed corporate and financial services law journals. He has first degrees in management, economics and law, and postgraduate degrees in business management and law, including a PhD in corporate financial law.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yeoh, P. Whistleblowing laws: Before and after Sarbanes–Oxley. Int J Discl Gov 12, 254–273 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/jdg.2014.5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jdg.2014.5

Keywords

Search

Navigation