Original Article

Journal of Derivatives & Hedge Funds (2009) 15, 15–50. doi:10.1057/jdhf.2008.27

Commodity price risk management: Valuation of large trading portfolios under adverse and illiquid market settings

Practical Application This paper aims to capture the liquidity risk arising because of illiquid trading positions and to obtain an estimate of liquidity-adjusted Value-at-Risk (L-VaR) of large commodity trading portfolios (of both long and short positions) under the notion of different correlation factors and liquidity horizons. In contrast to all existing published literature pertaining to the application of the VaR method to commodity markets, this paper proposes a re-engineered model for assessing a closed-form parametric L-VaR with explicit treatment of liquidity trading risk. Moreover, the commodities selected for this study provide a realistic alternative portfolio, as well as new data, for studying existing techniques of L-VaR estimation. This research makes advances in understanding L-VaR assessment techniques and their performance in the context of commodity price risk management. The results of this study also provide an incentive for further research in the area of L-VaR and commodity price risk management.

Mazin A M Al Janabi1

Correspondence: Mazin A.M. Al Janabi, Department of Economics and Finance, College of Business and Economics, United Arab Emirates University, PO Box 17555, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates E-mails: m.aljanabi@uaeu.ac.ae, mazinaljanabi@hotmail.com

1is an Associate Professor of Finance and Banking and has several years of real-world experience in financial markets and banking sectors. He has held a number of senior positions, such as Head of Trading of Financial Derivative Products, Head of Trading Risk Management, and Director of Asset and Liability Management and Director of Global Market Risk Management. He has written extensively, in leading scholarly journals, on finance and banking, and contemporary topics in trading, market and credit risk management. His research and consulting activities address practitioner and regulatory issues in finance and banking, financial risk management and derivative securities.

Received 15 October 2008; Revised 15 October 2008.

Top

Abstract

Given the rising need for measuring and controlling commodity price risk exposure, trading risk prediction under illiquid and adverse market conditions plays an increasing role in commodity and financial markets. The aim of this paper is to close the void in commodity trading risk management literature, particularly from the perspective of large trading portfolios, by illustrating how the modified Value-at-Risk (VaR) method can be used by a commodity trading unit in reporting risk exposure, assessing risk reduction alternatives and setting optimised risk limits. In this study we put forward a re-engineered VaR model relevant for commodity trading units that have long- and short-selling trading positions and suggest potential applications of VaR in the context of commodity risk management. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first research paper that addresses the issue of liquidity trading risk management in commodity markets with direct applications to a larger portfolio of distinctive assets. This paper provides real-world techniques and realistic asset allocation strategies that can be applied to commodity trading portfolios in illiquid markets and under adverse market conditions. The modelling technique is based on the renowned concept of liquidity-adjusted VaR (L-VaR), along with the creation of a software tool utilising matrix-algebra techniques. As such, our comprehensive risk model can simultaneously handle market risk analysis under normal and severe market settings as well as take into account the effects of illiquidity of traded commodities. In order to illustrate the proper use of L-VaR under stressed and illiquid market conditions, real-world examples and feasible reports of liquidity trading risk management are presented for a portfolio of 25 distinct commodities, within a multivariate context and under the notion of several correlation factors along with different liquidity horizons. The example and discussions are widely applicable to any commodity end-user, providing potential applications to practitioners and research ideas to academics.

Keywords:

commodity, financial engineering, financial risk management, portfolio management, stress-testing, liquidity-adjusted Value-at-Risk (L-VaR)

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

These links to content published by Palgrave Macmillan are automatically generated.

Extra navigation

.
ADVERTISEMENT