Paper
Journal of Generic Medicines (2004) 1, 212–218; doi:10.1057/palgrave.jgm.4940024
US generic drug litigation update
Eric B Fastiff
Partner, Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, 275 Battery Street, 30th Floor, San Francisco, CA, 94111-3339, USA, Tel: +1 415 956 1000
207, Fax: +1 415 956 1008, Email: EFASTIFF@lchb.com
Revised 26 January 2004.
Abstract
The Hatch–Waxman Act produced the unintended consequence of allowing brand name and generic drug companies to agree, in exchange for substantial payments, for the generic drug companies to drop their patent challenges and not to bring their generic versions to market. This paper summarises three recent court decisions. In each case, the plaintiffs were the purchasers of the generic drugs — both consumers and insurance companies. They challenged the drug companies' agreements not to compete, claiming antitrust violations. The drug companies defended the agreements as legal uses of their patent monopolies. Each court analysed the agreement differently, demonstrating the novel and complex issues that these cases raise.
Keywords:
Hatch-Waxman Act, antitrust, monopoly, patent, agreement not to compete




