Article

Journal of International Business Studies (2007) 38, 430–446. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400267

Institutional theory and MNC subsidiary HRM practices: evidence from a three-country study

Ingmar Björkman1,2, Carl F Fey3,4 and Hyeon Jeong Park5

  1. 1Department of Management and Organisation, Swedish School of Economics, Helsinki, Finland
  2. 2INSEAD Euro-Asia and Comparative Research Centre, Fontainebleau, Texas, USA
  3. 3Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm, Sweden
  4. 4Stockholm School of Economics, St Petersburg, Russia
  5. 5Department of Managerial Sciences, J. Mack Robinson College of Business, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA

Correspondence: Ingmar Björkman, Department of Management and Organisation, Swedish School of Economics (Hanken), Post Box 479, 00101 Helsinki, Finland. Tel: +358 9 9 431 33273; Fax: +358 9 9 431 33275; E-mail: Ingmar.bjorkman@hanken.fi

Received 8 July 2003; Revised 3 January 2006; Accepted 31 August 2006; Published online 5 April 2007.

Top

Abstract

This study sets out to explore human resource management (HRM) practices in multinational corporation (MNC) subsidiaries within an institutional theory framework. Based on a sample of 158 subsidiaries of MNCs operating in the United States, Russia and Finland, the paper examines factors hypothesised to influence the HRM practices adapted in US, Japanese and European MNC subsidiaries located in Russia, Finland and the US. The results indicate significant differences in HRM practices used across host countries. Both the status of the subsidiary human resource department and the degree to which the subsidiary was involved in knowledge transfer with other parts of the MNC had a significant impact on the selection of HRM practices.

Keywords:

human resource management, multinational corporations, institutional theory

Extra navigation

.

JIBS/AIB Services

AIB resources

Partners

ADVERTISEMENT