TABLE 2
FROM:
An interpretive examination of the development of cultural sensitivity in international business
Jon M Shapiro, Julie L Ozanne and Bige Saatcioglu
BACK TO ARTICLETable 2. Stages of cultural sensitivity
| Attitude and cultural depth | Cultural sensitivity (knowledge and skills) | Business relationships and strategies | Forms of trust | Stage reached | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Romantic sojourner | Fascination Shallow, daily contact Tourist | Etic declarative and procedural knowledge Poor scanning Little emic knowledge | Discrete, profit-based transactions Opportunistic | Uncalculated risks Naive trust | All passed through this stage |
| Foreign worker | Immersion in business culture More realistic attitude Ends in disenchantment and culture shock | Begin to develop emic knowledge Initial emergence of scanning skills and enacted procedural knowledge (i.e., mimicry, control, and roleplaying) | Trial-and-error business practices but developing relationships Constructed frames of meaning are tactical and borrowed | Competence, integrity, and reliability trust Trust violations result in relationship dissolution | Deb, Alan, Dan, Sam, Mary |
| Skilled worker | Deeper cultural contact Skillful diplomats Evolution to outsider status | Frustration ends as emic knowledge structures develop Skillful enacted procedural knowledge and scanning | Nurture a few successful relationships Business-bounded relationship but expanding into interpersonal Shared frames of meaning Greater self-efficacy | Reliability, integrity, and competence trust still important Emerging benevolence trust | Kirk, Will, Gail |
| Partner | Very deep immersion within the culture Balanced and respectful yet re-enchanted | Cultural reflexivity Situated knowledge of cultural difference Enacted procedural knowledge is situated | Fosters a few select relationships Negotiated business culture as a third way of knowing Deep commitment to partners Relational, familial High self-efficacy | Benevolence trust Relational trust Other forms of trust (integrity, competence, and reliability) become less important | Leigh, Cal, Red, Jan |

Fascination