TABLE 3
FROM:
The crossvergence perspective: reflections and projections
David A Ralston
BACK TO ARTICLETable 3. Results of the values of the Schwartz values surveya
| Continua | Countries | Group relationships | Hypothesis supported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Individualism–collectivism*** | US | US>Russia>Japan>China | Crossvergence |
| Russia | (Culture dominant) | ||
| China | |||
| Openness-to-change–conservation*** | US | US>(Russia and Japan)>China | Crossvergence |
| Russia | (Neither dominant) | ||
| Japan | |||
| China | |||
| Self-enhancement–self-transendence*** | US | (US and Russia)>(Japan and China) | Divergence |
| Russia | |||
| Japan | |||
| China |
a Ralston et al. (1997).
*** p<0.001.