Skip to main content
Log in

Competitive position, managerial ties, and profitability of foreign firms in China: an interactive perspective

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of International Business Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite the prominence of the competitive strategy perspective, it remains unclear whether foreign firms entering China can still adopt a differentiation or low-cost position to achieve superior performance, given the unique market and institutional environments in China. Alternatively, should foreign firms follow conventional wisdom and actively build managerial ties with government officials and business community to enhance their performance? This study develops and tests an interactive perspective that highlights the moderating effects of managerial ties on competitive position–performance relationships. The results indicate that though both differentiation and low-cost positions foster foreign firm profitability, the benefit of a differentiation position is conditional on political and business ties in different directions: political ties impede and business ties strengthen the positive effect of a differentiation position on foreign firms' profitability. Moreover, foreign firms benefit from their use of business ties, but their profitability suffers when they rely increasingly on the heavy use of political ties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Because Sino-foreign joint ventures usually structure their operations and management in parallel with foreign partners, researchers tend to classify them together with wholly foreign-owned firms within the category “foreign firms” (Ralston et al., 2006).

  2. We also conduct subgroup regressions for joint ventures and wholly foreign-owned firms. The results are similar for both groups.

References

  • Adler, P., & Kwon, S. 2002. Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27 (1): 17–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. 1991. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. W., Fornell, C., & Rust, R. T. 1997. Customer satisfaction, productivity, and profitability: Differences between goods and services. Marketing Science, 16 (2): 129–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. 1988. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review of recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103 (3): 411–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aulakh, P. S., Kotabe, M., & Teegen, H. 2000. Export strategies and performance of firms from emerging economies: Evidence from Brazil, Chile, and Mexico. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (3): 342–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batjargal, B. 2003. Social capital and entrepreneurial performance in Russia: A longitudinal study. Organization Studies, 24 (4): 535–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batjargal, B., & Liu, M. 2004. Entrepreneurs' access to private equity in China: The role of social capital. Organization Science, 15 (2): 159–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boisot, M., & Child, J. 1996. From fiefs to clans and network capitalism: Explaining China's emerging economic order. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41 (12): 600–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brouthers, L. E., & Xu, K. 2002. Product stereotypes, strategy and performance satisfaction: The case of Chinese exporters. Journal of International Business Studies, 33 (4): 657–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. 1992. Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • BusinessWeek. 2006. US-China trade: Too much talk? http://www.businessweek.com/globalbiz/content/apr2006/gb20060404_396047.htm?chan=search.

  • Campbell-Hunt, C. 2000. What have we learned about generic competitive strategy? A meta-analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 21 (2): 127–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C., Chen, Y., & Xin, K. 2004. Guanxi practices and trust in management: A procedural justice perspective. Organization Science, 15 (2): 200–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M. 2001. Inside Chinese business: A guide for managers worldwide. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, G. S. 1994. The capabilities of market-driven organizations. Journal of Marketing, 58 (4): 37–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, J. P. H., Wong, T. J., & Zhang, T. 2007. Politically connected CEOs, corporate governance, and post-IPO performance of China's newly partially privatized firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 84 (2): 330–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Financial Times. 2004. Good “guanxi” is commercial sense in China. October 22: 8.

  • Fornell, C., & Larker, D. F. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1): 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91 (3): 481–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R. 2007. Managing network resources: Alliances, affiliation, and other relational assets. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. W. L. 1988. Differentiation versus low cost or differentiation and low cost: A contingency framework. Academy of Management Journal, 13 (3): 401–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, S. C. C. 2001. Growing consumer power in China: Some lessons for managers. Journal of International Marketing, 9 (1): 64–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoskisson, R. E., Eden, L., Lau, C. M., & Wright, M. 2000. Strategy in emerging economies. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (3): 249–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulland, J., Todino, H. S., & Lecraw, D. J. 1996. Country-of-origin effects on sellers' price premiums in competitive Philippine markets. Journal of International Marketing, 4 (1): 57–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, L. R. 1982. Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67 (2): 219–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. 1997. Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 75 (4): 41–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, J. J. 2005. The formation of managerial networks of foreign firms in China: The effects of strategic orientations. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 22 (4): 423–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, N., Fu, Y., & Hsung, R. 2001. The position generator: Measurement techniques for investigations of social capital. In N. Lin, K. Cook, & R. Burt (Eds), Social capital, theory and research: 57–81. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. 1988. Relating Porter's business strategies to environment and structure. Academy of Management Journal, 31 (2): 280–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. 1986. Porter's (1980) generic strategies and performance: An empirical examination with American data. Organization Studies, 7 (1): 37–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narver, J. C., & Slater, S. F. 1990. The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54 (4): 20–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, P. 2001. China and the global economy. New York: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. 1990. Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Park, S. H., & Luo, Y. 2001. Guanxi and organizational dynamics: Organizational networking in Chinese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22 (5): 455–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelham, A. M., & Wilson, D. T. 1996. A longitudinal study of the impact of market structure, firm structure, strategy, and market orientation culture on dimensions of small-firm performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24 (1): 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W. 2003. Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review, 28 (2): 275–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W., & Luo, Y. 2000. Managerial ties and firm performance in a transition economy: The nature of a micro-macro link. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (3): 486–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, L. W., Chang, D., & Buzzell, R. D. 1983. Product quality, cost position, and business performance: A test of some key hypotheses. Journal of Marketing, 47 (1): 26–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. 1980. Competitive strategy. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. 1985. Competitive advantage. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. 1998. The competitive advantage of nations. New York: The Free Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ralston, D., Terpstra-Tong, J., Terpstra, R., Wang, X., & Egri, C. 2006. Today's state-owned enterprises of China: Are they dying dinosaurs or dynamic dynamos? Strategic Management Journal, 27 (9): 825–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. 1998. The grabbing hand: Government pathologies and their cures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, J. 2007. Contingent political capital and international alliances: Evidence from South Korea. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54 (4): 621–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, M. X., & Perry, M. E. 1997. A cross-national comparative study of new product development processes: Japan and the United States. Journal of Marketing, 61 (2): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spanos, Y. E., Zaralis, G., & Lioukas, S. 2004. Strategy and industry effects on profitability: Evidence from Greece. Strategy Management Journal, 25 (2): 139–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsang, W. K. 1998. Can guanxi be a source of sustained competitive advantage for doing business in China? Academy of Management Executive, 12 (2): 64–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi, B. 1997. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42 (1): 35–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, D. E., Dunfee, T. W., & Li, N. 2004. Social exchange in China: The double-edged sword of guanxi. Journal of Business Ethics, 55 (4): 355–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 2007 PPP GDP 2006. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/DATASTATISTICS/Resources/GDP_PPP.pdf. Accessed 18 January 2008.

  • Xin, K., & Pearce, J. L. 1996. Guanxi: Connections as substitutes for formal institutional support. Academy of Management Journal, 39 (6): 1461–1568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, M. M. 1994. Gifts, favors and banquets: The art of social relationships in China. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, S. 1995. Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38 (2): 341–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, K. Z., & Li, C. B. 2007. How does strategic orientation matter in Chinese firms? Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24 (4): 447–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, K. Z., Su, C., & Bao, Y. 2002. A paradox of price-quality and market efficiency: A comparative study of the US and China markets. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 19 (4): 349–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, K. Z., Tse, D. K., & Li, J. 2006. Organizational changes in emerging economies: Drivers and consequences. Journal of International Business Studies, 37 (2): 248–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, K. Z., Yim, C. K., & Tse, D. K. 2005. The effects of strategic orientations in technology- and market-based breakthrough innovations. Journal of Marketing, 69 (2): 42–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou, S., & Cavusgil, S. T. 2002. The GMS: A broad conceptualization of global marketing strategy and its effect on firm performance. Journal of Marketing, 66 (4): 40–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a Strategic Research Grant from City University of Hong Kong (Grant No. 7002147) and a research grant from the Belk College of Business, University of North Carolina at Charlotte. The authors thank the Departmental Editor, Professor Shaoming Zou, and the anonymous JIBS reviewers for their insightful and constructive comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julie Juan Li.

Additional information

Accepted by Shaoming Zou, Departmental Editor, 19 February 2008. This paper has been with the authors for one revision.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table A1.

Table A1 Measurement items and validity assessment

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, J., Zhou, K. & Shao, A. Competitive position, managerial ties, and profitability of foreign firms in China: an interactive perspective. J Int Bus Stud 40, 339–352 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2008.76

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2008.76

Keywords

Navigation