Skip to main content
Log in

Global account management strategies: Drivers and outcomes

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of International Business Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Global account management (GAM) has become a vital part of many multinational enterprises’ global marketing. Yet little is known about successful GAM strategies. In this study, we conceptualize GAM strategies, and develop and empirically test an integrated theoretical model that links GAM strategies to their drivers and outcomes. We find that: (1) global strategic priority and globalization are significant drivers of four GAM strategies – inter-country coordination, inter-organizational coordination, marketing activities standardization, and global integration; (2) inter-country and inter-organizational coordination have significant main effects on GAM performance, while global customer demand positively moderates the effects of marketing activities standardization and global integration on GAM performance; and (3) GAM performance significantly influences relationship continuity. We discuss the theoretical and managerial implications, and provide suggestions for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Our thanks to an anonymous JIBS reviewer for providing this insight.

References

  • Allen, J. K., Ebrahim, S. S., & Kelly, G. C. 2006. Building a top consumer goods sales force. The McKinsey Quarterly: The McKinsey Quarterly Web Exclusive.

  • Andrews, K. R. 1971. The concept of corporate strategy. Homewook, IL: R.D. Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. 1977. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14 (3): 396–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, D., Birkinshaw, J., & Toulan, O. 2001. Can selling be globalized? The pitfalls of global account management. California Management Review, 44 (1): 8–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. 1990. Trying to consume. Journal of Consumer Research, 17 (2): 127–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. 1988. Organizing for worldwide effectiveness: The transnational solution. California Management Review, 31 (1): 54–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J., Morrison, A. J., & Hulland, J. 1995. Structural and competitive determinants of a global integration strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 16 (8): 637–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J., Toulan, O., & Arnold, D. 2001. Global account management in multinational corporations: Theory and evidence. Journal of International Business Studies, 32 (2): 231–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buvik, A., & John, G. 2000. When does vertical coordination improve industrial purchasing relationships? Journal of Marketing, 64 (3): 52–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. 2003. A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research, 14 (2): 189–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, C. S., & Douglas, S. P. 2000. Configurational advantage in global markets. Journal of international Marketing, 8 (1): 6–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drazin, R., & Van de Ven, A. H. 1985. Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30 (4): 514–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1): 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganesan, S. 1994. Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer–seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 58 (2): 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallen, L., Johanson, J., & Seyed-Mohamed, N. 1991. Interfirm adaptation in business relationships. Journal of Marketing, 55 (2): 29–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harzing, A. W. 1997. Response rates in international mail surveys: Results of a 22-country study. International Business Review, 6 (6): 641–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heide, J. B. 1994. Interorganizational governance in marketing channels. Journal of Marketing, 58 (1): 71–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heide, J. B., & John, G. 1990. Alliances in industrial purchasing: The determinants of joint action in buyer–supplier relationships. Journal of Marketing Research, 27 (1): 24–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homburg, C., Workman Jr., J. P., & Jensen, O. 2000. Fundamental changes in marketing organization: The movement toward a customer-focused organizational structure. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 28 (4): 459–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homburg, C., Workman Jr., J. P., & Jensen, O. 2002. A configurational perspective on key account management. Journal of Marketing, 66 (2): 38–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hout, T., Porter, M., & Rudden, E. 1982. How global companies win out. Harvard Business Review, 60 (5): 98–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulland, J. 1999. Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal, 20 (2): 195–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivens, B. S., & Pardo, C. 2007. Are key account relationships different? Empirical results on supplier strategies and customer reactions. Industrial Marketing Management, 36 (4): 470–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain, S. C. 1989. Standardization of international marketing strategy: Some research hypotheses. Journal of Marketing, 53 (1): 70–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katsikeas, C. S., Samiee, S., & Theodosiou, M. 2006. Strategy fit and performance consequences of international marketing standardization. Strategic Management Journal, 27 (9): 867–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koerner, L. 2004. Executive leadership in transforming account management practices to align with emerging market trends. Velocity, 1 (6): 40–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathias, P. F., & Capon, N. 2003. Managing strategic customer relationships as assets: Developing customer relationship capital, Working Paper, Columbia Business School, New York.

  • McDonald, M., Millman, T., & Rogers, B. 1997. Key account management: Theory, practice and challenges. Journal of Marketing Management, 13 (8): 737–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menon, A., Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. 1997. Product quality: Impact of interdepartmental interactions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25 (3): 187–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, D. B., & Yip, G. S. 2000. The challenge of global customer management. Marketing Management, 9 (4): 22–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, D. B., Yip, G. S., & Villalonga, B. 1999. Demand for and use of global account management, Working Paper, Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA.

  • Moon, M. A., & Gupta, S. F. 1997. Examining the formation of selling centers: A conceptual framework. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 17 (2): 17–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. A., & Hunt, S. D. 1994. The commitment trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58 (3): 20–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noordewier, T., John, G., & Nevin, J. R. 1990. Performance outcomes of purchasing arrangements in industrial buyer–vendor relationships. Journal of Marketing, 54 (4): 80–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmatier, R. W., Dant, R. P., Grewal, D., & Evans, K. R. 2006. Factors influencing the effectiveness of relationship marketing: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing, 70 (4): 136–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. 1986. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12 (4): 531–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. 1980. Competitive strategies. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. 1986. Competition in global industries: A conceptual framework. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riemann, I., & Lapierre, M. 2003. Marriott's globalization of strategic account management. Velocity, 1 (5): 39–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringle, C., Wende, S., & Will, A. 2005. SMART_PLS Version 2.0 M3, http://www.smartpls.de.

  • Roth, K., & Morrison, A. J. 1990. An empirical analysis of the integration responsiveness framework in global industries. Journal of International Business Studies, 21 (4): 541–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samiee, S., & Roth, K. 1992. The influence of global marketing standardization on performance. Journal of Marketing, 56 (2): 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, L. H., Zou, S., & Cavusgil, S. T. 2004. A conceptual framework of global account management capabilities and firm performances. International Business Review, 13 (5): 539–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, L. H., White, J. C., McNally, R. C., Cavusgil, S. T., & Zou, S. 2005. Global account management capability: Insights from leading suppliers. Journal of International Marketing, 13 (2): 93–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toulan, O., Birkinshaw, J., & Arnold, D. 2002. The role of inter-organizational fit in global account management, Working Paper, London Business School.

  • Venkatraman, N. 1989. The concept of fit in strategy research: Toward verbal and statistical correspondence. Academy of Management Review, 14 (3): 423–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, J. C., Varadarajan, P. R., & Dacin, P. A. 2003. Market situation and response: The role of cognitive style, organizational culture, and information use. Journal of Marketing, 67 (3): 63–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Workman, J. P., Homburg, C., & Jensen, O. 2003. Intraorganizational determinants of key account management effectiveness. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31 (1): 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yip, G. S. 1995. Total global strategy: Managing for worldwide competitive advantage. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yip, G. S., & Bink, A. J. M. 2007. Managing global accounts. Harvard Business Review, 85 (9): 102–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yip, G. S., & Madsen, T. L. 1996. Global account management: The new frontier in relationship marketing. International Marketing Review, 13 (3): 24–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaltman, G., Duncan, R., & Holbek, J. 1973. Innovations and organizations. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zou, S., & Cavusgil, S. T. 1996. Global strategy: A review and an integrated conceptual framework. European Journal of Marketing, 30 (1): 52–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou, S., & Cavusgil, S. T. 2002. The GMS: A broad conceptualization of global marketing strategy and its effect on firm performance. Journal of Marketing, 66 (4): 40–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the financial support of Penn State’s Institute for the Study of Business Markets, Teradata Center for Customer Relationship Management at Duke University, Michigan State University-CIBER, the Strategic Account Management Association (SAMA), and University of Victoria Business Research Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Accepted by Daniel Bello, Area Editor. This paper has been with the authors for three revisions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shi, L., White, J., Zou, S. et al. Global account management strategies: Drivers and outcomes. J Int Bus Stud 41, 620–638 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.26

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.26

Keywords

Navigation