Abstract
This is a critical summary review of the debate about the Global Leadership and Organizational Behavior Effectiveness (GLOBE) study in JIBS and other journals between November 2006 and the present issue. Several contributors did not realize that GLOBE used three essential constructs taken from my publications in a sense entirely different from mine: values, practices, and organizational culture. Not recognizing the ensuing confusion, they had no answer for the question in my 2006 review: what did GLOBE really measure? If you do not know what you are talking about, you can continue arguing for ever. Beyond the fuzziness of what is measured, the debate leaves us with an even more fundamental question: what is the use of the GLOBE dimensions?
References
Brewer, P., & Venaik, S. 2010. GLOBE practices and values: A case of diminishing marginal utility? Journal of International Business Studies, 41 (8): 1316–1324.
Brodbeck, F. C., Hanges, P. J., Dickson, M. W., Gupta, V., & Dorfman, P. W. 2004. Societal culture and industrial sector influences on organizational culture. In R. J. House, P. J. Hanges, M. Javidan, P. W. Dorfman & V. Gupta (Eds), Culture, leadership and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies: 654–668. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
De Mooij, M. 2004. Consumer behavior and culture: Consequences for global marketing and advertising. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
De Mooij, M. 2010. Global marketing and advertising: Understanding cultural paradoxes (3rd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Earley, P. C. 2006. Leading cultural research in the future: A matter of paradigms and taste. Journal of International Business Studies, 37 (6): 922–931.
Earley, P. C. 2009. So what kind of atheist are you? Exploring cultural universals and differences. In C. Nakata (Ed.), Beyond Hofstede: Culture frameworks for global marketing and management: 19–39. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gerhart, B. 2008. How much does national culture constrain organizational culture? Management and Organization Review, 5 (2): 241–259.
Harris, M. 1981. America now: The anthropology of a changing culture. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Hofstede, G. 1980. Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Hofstede, G. 1991. Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.
Hofstede, G. 1995. Multilevel research of human systems: Flowers, bouquets and gardens. Human Systems Management, 14 (3): 207–217.
Hofstede, G. 1998. Attitudes, values and organizational culture: Disentangling the concepts. Organization Studies, 19 (3): 477–492.
Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hofstede, G. 2006. What did GLOBE really measure? Researchers’ minds versus respondents’ minds. Journal of International Business Studies, 37 (6): 882–896.
Hofstede, G., & McCrae, R. R. 2004. Personality and culture revisited: Linking traits and dimensions of culture. Cross-Cultural Research, 38 (1): 52–88.
Hofstede, G., Neuijen, B., Ohayv, D. D., & Sanders, G. 1990. Measuring organizational cultures: A qualitative and quantitative study across twenty cases. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (2): 286–316.
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. 2010. Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill.
House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (Eds). 2004. Culture, leadership and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Inkeles, A., & Levinson, D. J. 1954. National character: The study of modal personality and sociocultural systems. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology, Vol. 2. 977–1020. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Javidan, M., House, R. J., Dorfman, P. W., Hanges, P. J., & Sully de Luque, M. 2006. Conceptualizing and measuring cultures and their consequences: A comparative review of GLOBE's and Hofstede's approaches. Journal of International Business Studies, 37 (6): 896–914.
Levitin, T. 1973. Values. In J. P. Robinson & P. R. Shaver (Eds), Measures of social psychological attitudes: 489–502. Ann Arbor MI: Survey Research Center, University of Michigan.
Maseland, R., & van Hoorn, A. 2009. Explaining the negative correlation between values and practices: A note on the Hofstede–GLOBE debate. Journal of International Business Studies, 40 (3): 527–532.
Maseland, R., & van Hoorn, A. 2010. Values and marginal preferences in international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 41 (8): 1325–1329.
McCrae, R. R., Terracciano, A., & 79 members of Personality Profiles of Cultures project. 2005. Personality profiles of countries: Aggregate personality traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89 (3): 407–425.
McCrae, R. R., Terracciano, A., Realo, A., & Allik, J. 2008. Interpreting GLOBE societal practices scales. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39 (6): 805–810.
Smith, P. 2006. When elephants fight, the grass gets trampled: The GLOBE and Hofstede projects. Journal of International Business Studies, 37 (6): 915–921.
Taras, V., Steel, P., & Kirkman, B. L. 2010. Negative practice-value correlations in the GLOBE data: Unexpected findings, questionnaire limitations and research directions. Journal of International Business Studies, 41 (8): 1330–1338.
Terracciano, A., Abdel-Khalak, A. M., Ádám, N., Adamovová, L., Ahn, C.-K., & Ahn, H.-N. et al. 2005. National character does not reflect mean personality trait levels in 49 cultures. Science, 310 (5745): 96–100.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Accepted by Alain Verbeke, Area Editor, 31 May 2010.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hofstede, G. The GLOBE debate: Back to relevance. J Int Bus Stud 41, 1339–1346 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2010.31
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2010.31