Abstract
Studies of political dynamics between multinational enterprise (MNE) parents and subsidiaries during subsidiary role evolution have focused largely on control and resistance. This paper adopts a critical discursive approach to enable an exploration of subtle dynamics in the way that both headquarters and subsidiaries subjectively reconstruct their independent-interdependent relationships with each other during change. We draw from a real-time qualitative study of a revealing case of charter change in an important European subsidiary of an MNE attempting to build closer integration across European country operations. Our results illustrate the role of three discourses – selling, resistance and reconciliation – in the reconstruction of the subsidiary–parent relationship. From this analysis we develop a process framework that elucidates the important role of these three discourses in the reconstruction of subsidiary roles, showing how resistance is not simply subversive but an important part of integration. Our findings contribute to a better understanding of the micro-level political dynamics in subsidiary role evolution, and of how voice is exercised in MNEs. This study also provides a rare example of discourse-based analysis in an MNE context, advancing our knowledge of how discursive methods can help to advance international business research more generally.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alvesson, M., & Kärreman, D. 2000. Varieties of discourse: On the study of organizations through discourse analysis. Human Relations, 53 (9): 1125–1149.
Ambos, B., & Schlegelmilch, B. B. 2007. Innovation and control in the multinational firm: A comparison of political and contingency approaches. Strategic Management Journal, 28 (5): 473–486.
Andersson, U., Forsgren, M., & Holm, U. 2007. Balancing subsidiary influence in the federative MNC: A business network view. Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (5): 802–818.
Bakhtin, M. M. 1981. The dialogic imagination: Four essays, (transl. C. Emerson & M. Holquist). Austin: University of Texas Press.
Balogun, J., & Johnson, G. 2004. Organizational restructuring and middle manager sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 47 (4): 523–549.
Balogun, J., Bartunek, J., & Do, B. 2010. Uncovering relationships and shared emotion beneath senior managers’ resistance to strategic change. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings.
Bartlett, C. A. 2006. Philips versus Matsushita: A new century, a new round, Harvard Business Case 9-302-049.
Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. 1993. Beyond the M-form: Toward a managerial theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 14 (8): 23–46.
Belanger, J., Edwards, P., & Wright, M. 1999. Best HR practice and the multinational company. Human Resource Management Journal, 9 (3): 53–70.
Birkinshaw, J., & Hood, N. 1998a. Multinational subsidiary evolution: Capability and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies. Academy of Management Review, 23 (4): 773–795.
Birkinshaw, J., & Hood, N. 1998b. Multinational corporate evolution and subsidiary development. London: Macmillan.
Birkinshaw, J., & Pedersen, T. 2009. Strategy and management in MNE subsidiaries. In A. Rugman (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of international business, (2nd ed): 380–402. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Birkinshaw, J., Young, S., & Hood, N. 2005. Subsidiary entrepreneurship, internal and external competitive forces and subsidiary performance. International Business Review, 14 (2): 227–248.
Boje, D. M. 2007. Globalization antenarratives. In A. Mills, J. C. Helms-Mills, & C. Forshaw (Eds), Organizational behavior in a global context: 505–549. Toronto: Garamond Press.
Boje, D. M., Oswick, C., & Ford, J. D. 2004. Language and organization: The doing of discourse. Academy of Management Review, 29 (4): 571–577.
Bouquet, C., & Birkinshaw, J. 2008a. Weight versus voice: How foreign subsidiaries gain attention from corporate headquarters. Academy of Management Journal, 51 (3): 577–601.
Bouquet, C., & Birkinshaw, J. 2008b. Managing power in the multinational corporation: How low-power actors gain influence. Journal of Management, 34 (3): 477–508.
Boussebaa, M. 2009. Struggling to organize across national borders: The case of global resource management in professional service firms. Human Relations, 62 (6): 829–850.
Boussebaa, M., & Morgan, G. 2008. Managing talent across national borders: The challenges faced by an international retail group. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 4 (1): 25–41.
Brannen, M. Y. 2004. When Mickey loses face: Recontextualization, semantic fit, and the semiotics of foreignness. Academy of Management Review, 29 (4): 593–616.
Clark, G., & Geppert, M. 2011. Subsidiary integration as identity construction and institution building: A political sensemaking approach. Journal of Management Studies, 48 (2): 395–416.
Czarniawska, B. 2004. Narratives in social science research. London: Sage.
Davies, B., & Harré, R. 1990. Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 20 (1): 44–63.
Dörrenbächer, C., & Gammelgaard, J. 2006. Subsidiary role development: The effect of micro-political headquarters–subsidiary negotiations on the product, market and value-added scope of foreign-owned subsidiaries. Journal of International Management, 12 (3): 266–283.
Dörrenbächer, C., & Geppert, M. 2006. Micro-politics and conflicts in multinational corporations: Current debates, re-framing, and contributions of this special issue. Journal of International Management, 12 (3): 251–265.
Doz, Y., & Prahalad, C. K. 1993. Managing DMNCs: A search for a new paradigm. In S. Ghoshal & D. E. Westney (Eds), Organization theory and the multinational corporation: 24–50. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Eisenhardt, K. E., & Graebner, M. E. 2007. Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50 (1): 25–32.
Fairclough, N. 2003. Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.
Fairclough, N. 2005. Discourse analysis in organization studies: The case for critical realism. Organization Studies, 26 (6): 915–939.
Fairclough, N., & Thomas, P. 2004. The discourse of globalization and the globalization of discourse. In D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick, & L. Putman (Eds), The Sage handbook of organizational discourse: 379–396. London: Sage.
Ferner, A., & Edwards, P. K. 1995. Power and the diffusion of organizational change within multinational enterprises. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 1 (2): 229–257.
Fiss, P. C., & Hirsch, P. M. 2005. The discourse of globalization: Framing and sensemaking of an emerging concept. American Sociological Review, 70 (1): 29–52.
Ford, J. D., Ford, L. W., & D’Amelio, A. 2008. Resistance to change: The rest of the story. Academy of Management Review, 33 (2): 362–377.
Frenkel, M. 2008. The multinational corporation as a third space: Rethinking international management discourse on knowledge transfer through Homi Bhabha. Academy of Management Review, 33 (4): 924–942.
Geppert, M. 2003. Sensemaking and politics in MNCs: A comparative analysis of vocabularies within the global manufacturing discourse in one industrial sector. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12 (4): 312–329.
Geppert, M., & Williams, K. 2006. Global, national and local practices in multinational corporations: Towards a sociopolitical framework. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17 (1): 49–69.
Grant, D., Hardy, C., Oswick, C., & Putnam, L. 2004. The Sage handbook of organizational discourse. London: Sage.
Hardy, C., & Phillips, N. 2004. Discourse and power. In D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick, & L. Putnam (Eds), The Sage handbook of organizational discourse: 229–316. London: Sage.
Hardy, C., Palmer, I., & Phillips, N. 2000. Discourse as a strategic resource. Human Relations, 53 (9): 1227–1248.
Jarzabkowski, P., & Sillince, J. A. A. 2007. A rhetoric-in-context approach to shaping commitment to multiple strategic goals. Organization Studies, 28 (10): 1639–1665.
Jarzabkowski, P., Balogun, J., & Seidl, D. 2007. Strategizing: The challenges of a practice perspective. Human Relations, 60 (1): 5–27.
Jick, T. D. 1979. Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administration Science Quarterly, 24 (4): 602–611.
Langley, A. 1999. Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24 (4): 691–710.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. 1985. Naturalistic inquiry. London: Sage.
Maguire, S., & Hardy, C. 2006. The emergence of new global institutions: A discursive perspective. Organization Studies, 27 (1): 7–29.
Maguire, S., & Hardy, C. 2009. Discourse and deinstitutionalization: The decline of DDT. Academy of Management Journal, 52 (10): 148–178.
Mantere, S., & Vaara, E. 2008. On the problem of participation in strategy: A critical discursive perspective. Organization Science, 19 (2): 341–358.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Mudambi, R., & Navarra, P. 2004. Is knowledge power? Knowledge flows, subsidiary power and rent-seeking within MNCs. Journal of International Business Studies, 35 (5): 385–406.
Mumby, D. K. 2004. Discourse, power and ideology: Unpacking the critical approach. In D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick, N. Phillips, & L. Putnam (Eds), The Sage handbook of organizational discourse: 237–258. London: Sage.
Mumby, D. K. 2005. Theorizing resistance in organization studies: A dialectical approach. Management Communication Quarterly, 19 (1): 19–44.
Nohria, N., & Ghoshal, S. 1997. The differentiated network. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Pentland, B. T. 1999. Building process theory with narrative: From description to explanation. Academy of Management Review, 24 (4): 711–724.
Pettigrew, A. M. 1992. The character and significance of strategy process research. Strategic Management Journal, 13 (S2): 5–16.
Phillips, N., & Hardy, C. 2002. Discourse analysis: Investigating processes of social construction. London: Sage.
Phillips, N., Sewell, G., & Jaynes, S. 2008. Applying critical discourse analysis in strategic management research. Organizational Research Methods, 11 (4): 770–789.
Piekkari, R., Welch, C., & Paavilainen, E. 2009. The case study as disciplinary convention: Evidence from international business journals. Organizational Research Methods, 12 (3): 567–589.
Søderberg, A.-M. 2006. Narrative interviewing and narrative analysis in a study of a cross-border merger. Management International Review, 46 (4): 397–416.
Søderberg, A.-M., & Holden, N. 2002. Rethinking cross cultural management in a globalizing business world. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 2 (1): 103–121.
Spee, A. P., & Jarzabkowski, P. 2010. Strategic planning as communicative process. Organization Studies, 31 (9–10): 1189–1207.
Taplin, I. M. 2006. Strategic change and organizational restructuring: How managers negotiate change initiatives. Journal of International Management, 12 (3): 284–301.
Tempel, A., Edwards, T., Ferner, A., Muller-Camen, M., & Wächter, H. 2006. Subsidiary responses to institutional duality: Collective representation practices of US multinationals in Britain and Germany. Human Relations, 59 (11): 1543–1570.
Thomas, R., Sargent, L. D., & Hardy, C. 2011. Managing organizational change: Negotiating meaning and power-resistance relations. Organization Science, 22: 22–41.
Vaara, E., & Monin, P. 2010. A recursive perspective on discursive legitimation and organizational action in mergers and acquisitions. Organization Science, 21 (1): 3–22.
Vaara, E., & Tienari, J. 2004. Critical discourse analysis as methodology for critical international business studies. In R. Marschan-Piekkari & C. Welch (Eds), Handbook of qualitative research methods for international business: 342–362. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Vaara, E., & Tienari, J. 2008. A discursive perspective on legitimation strategies in MNCs. Academy of Management Review, 33 (4): 985–993.
Vaara, E., & Tienari, J. 2011. On the narrative construction of multinational corporations: An antenarrative analysis of legitimation and resistance in a cross-border merger. Organization Science, 22 (2): 370–390.
Welch, C., Piekkari, R., Plakoyiannak, E., & Paavilainen-Mäntymäki, E. 2010. Theorising from case studies: Towards a pluralist future for international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, advance online publication, 30 November. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0593.
Wodak, R. 2004. Critical discourse analysis. In C. Seale, J. F. Gobrium, & D. Sliverman (Eds), Qualitative research practice: 197–213. London: Sage.
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. 2002. Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: Sage.
Yin, R. K. 1994. Case study research: Design and methods, (2nd edn) London: Sage.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Tomi Laamanen for his thoughts on an early draft of this paper. We would like to thank the editor, Julian Birkinshaw, for his encouragement and insightful comments during the editorial process. We would also like to thank the three anonymous reviewers, whose comments helped greatly with the development of the paper. The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support in the preparation of this manuscript from the UK ESRC/EPSRC/Advanced Institute of Management (AIM) Research: RES-331-25-3014 (Balogun) and RES-331-25-3013 (Jarzabkowski). Also the UK ESRC: RES-000-22-2979 (Balogun).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Accepted by Julian Birkinshaw, Guest Editor, 17 February 2011. This paper has been with the authors for three revisions.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Balogun, J., Jarzabkowski, P. & Vaara, E. Selling, resistance and reconciliation: A critical discursive approach to subsidiary role evolution in MNEs. J Int Bus Stud 42, 765–786 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2011.13
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2011.13