Skip to main content
Log in

Cross-border acquisitions of state-owned enterprises

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of International Business Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examine the decision of private sector enterprises from developed countries to acquire state-owned enterprises (SOEs) abroad. Using a sample of US firms buying targets abroad between 1987 and 2009, we find that bidders of SOE fare worse than bidders of non-SOE both in terms of stock price and operating performance. We also find that the quality of the target country location – as captured by the Economic Freedom of the World (EFW) Index – greatly influences the choice of SOE targets. Interestingly, the quality ranking of the target country location on the EFW Index and the performance of the bidder of a SOE target are inversely related. Our findings imply that the characteristics of the location of the target firm affect bidders’ choice of targets in international mergers and acquisitions; otherwise, acquiring non-SOEs is more lucrative. Furthermore, either limiting conditions in the business environment force managers to work harder to generate more wealth, or in weak legal and business environments buying targets with ties to the government yields extra wealth. Our findings are highly relevant within the international business literature as they influence the choice of foreign market entry mode.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A related target is one that shares the same two-digit SIC code as the bidder.

  2. Source of Fama–French 12-industry portfolio: http://mba.tuck.dartmouth.edu/pages/faculty/ken.french/data_library.html.

  3. Note that from 1970 to 2000 the Economic Freedom of the World Index is available on a 5 year basis only. Therefore for the years that the Index is not available we use the score of the next available year, for example, the score for the year 1995 is used in 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 and 1995.

  4. See the UN list of Least Developed Countries at http://unctad.org.

References

  • Akerlof, G. A. 1970. The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84 (3): 488–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockman, P., Rui, O. M., & Zou, H. 2013. Institutions and the performance of politically connected M&As. Journal of International Business Studies, 44 (8): 833–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, F. L. 2006. Acquisitions of Chinese state-owned enterprises by multinational corporations: Driving forces, barriers and implications for HRM. British Journal of Management, 17 (S1): S105–S121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. 1992. The cross-section of expected stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 47 (2): 427–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gwartney, J. D., Hall, J. C., & Lawson, R. 2010. Economic Freedom of the World: 2010 annual report. Vancouver, BC: The Fraser Institute. Data retrieved from http://www.freetheworld.com.

  • Harrington, S., & Shrider, D. 2007. All events induce variance: Analyzing abnormal returns when effects vary across firms. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 42 (1): 229–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. 1979. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47 (1): 153–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jory, S. R., Madura, J., & Ngo, T. N. 2012. Deal structure decision in the global market for divested assets. International Review of Financial Analysis, 24 (1): 104–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. 1997. Legal determinants of external finance. Journal of Finance, 52 (3): 1131–1150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. 1998. Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106 (6): 1113–1155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. 1999. Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54 (2): 471–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. 2000. Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 58 (1): 3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. 2002. Investor protection and corporate valuation. Journal of Finance, 57 (3): 1147–1170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-de-Silanes, F. 1997. Determinants of privatization prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112 (4): 965–1025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Megginson, W. L., & Netter, J. M. 2001. From state to market a survey of empirical studies on privatization. Journal of Economic Literature, 39 (2): 321–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Megginson, W. L., Nash, R. C., & van Randenborgh, M. 1994. The financial and operating performance of newly privatized firms: An international empirical analysis. Journal of Finance, 49 (2): 403–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Megginson, W. L., Nash, R. C., Netter, J. M., & Poulsen, A. B. 2004. The choice of private versus public capital markets: Evidence from privatizations. Journal of Finance, 59 (6): 2835–2870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K. E. 2002. Management challenges in privatization acquisitions in transition economies. Journal of World Business, 37 (4): 266–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K., & Estrin, S. 1997. Privatisation acquisition and direct foreign investment: Who buys state-owned enterprises? MOCT-MOST, 7 (1): 159–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price Waterhouse. 1989a. Privatization: Learning the lessons from the UK experience. London: Price Waterhouse.

  • Price Waterhouse. 1989b. Privatization: The facts. London: Price Waterhouse.

  • Qin, J. Y. 2004. WTO regulation of subsidies to state-owned enterprises (SOEs) – A critical appraisal of the China Accession Protocol. Journal of International Economic Law, 7 (4): 863–919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J. D. 1991. Accelerating privatization in Eastern Europe: The case of Poland. Working Paper. Helsinki, Finland: World Institute for Development Economics Research of the United Nations University.

  • Uhlenbruck, K., & de Castro, J. 1998. Privatization from the acquirer’s perspective: A mergers and acquisitions based framework. Journal of Management Studies, 35 (5): 619–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uhlenbruck, K., & de Castro, J. 2000. Foreign acquisitions in Central and Eastern Europe: Outcomes of privatization in transitional economies. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (3): 381–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank David Reeb (Area Editor), the two anonymous referees and David Storey for their valuable comments and constructive suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Accepted by David Reeb, Area Editor, 23 April 2014. This article has been with the authors for five revisions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jory, S., Ngo, T. Cross-border acquisitions of state-owned enterprises. J Int Bus Stud 45, 1096–1114 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2014.41

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2014.41

Keywords

Navigation