Abstract
We combine the concept of location derived by economic geographers with theories of the multinational enterprise (MNE) and the liability of foreignness developed by international business scholars, to examine the factors that propel MNEs toward, or away from, “global cities”. We argue that three distinctive characteristics of global cities – global interconnectedness, cosmopolitanism, and abundance of advanced producer services – help MNEs overcome the costs of doing business abroad, and we identify the contingencies under which these characteristics combine with firm attributes to exert their strongest influence. Consistent with these arguments, our analysis of a large sample of MNE location decisions using a multilevel multinomial model suggests not only that MNEs have a strong propensity to locate within global cities, but also that these choices are associated with a nuanced interplay of firm- and subsidiary-level factors, including investment motives, proprietary capabilities, and business strategy. Our study provides important insights for international business scholars by shedding new light on MNE location choices and also contributes to our understanding of economic geography by examining the heterogeneous strategies and capabilities of MNEs – the primary agents of economic globalization – that shape the nature of global cities.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
We found that most studies in this literature stream cite Marshall (1920), who centers on specialized producer communities that diffuse the “secrets” of industry, but do not mention Jacobs (1969, 1984, 2000), who describes a cosmopolitan and haphazard city life.
While we do not apply the demographic tradition in this paper, we distinguish between megacities and global cities in the empirical section.
This can be considered a special case of the more general notion of co-evolution between MNEs and their environments (e.g., Cantwell, Dunning, & Lundan, 2009).
For example, Boeh and Beamish (2012) demonstrate that travel time between headquarters and subsidiary is a more powerful predictor of firm governance and location choices than is geographic distance.
For more information, visit http://www.aeanet.org/Publications/IDMK_definition.asp
Note that the investment motives are not mutually exclusive; this enables us to include all dummies without falling into the “dummy variable trap”.
These cities, which are included for comparison purposes, are Guangzhou, Lagos, Calcutta, Dhaka, Karachi, Delhi, Mumbai, Cairo, Tehran, and Rio de Janeiro. All of these have more than 10 million inhabitants, yet they are not classified as global cities in the Beaverstock et al. (1999) list.
Specifically, we compared the Beaverstock et al. (1999) list with a 2010 version of the same list, a 2008 list from MasterCard, a 2011 list from the Mori foundation, and a 2012 list from AT Kearney. Out of the top 30 cities in the 1999 list, five did not show up in the top 30 of any of the more recent lists (i.e., Caracas, Dusseldorf, Johannesburg, Prague, and Santiago). However, all of these five cities did appear below the top 30 in more recent lists, suggesting that they did not cease to be global cities, but perhaps merely have been relegated by other emerging cities to a lower position in the hierarchy. Similarly, relative to the 1999 top 30, there was only one new “new” city that appeared consistently in the more recent lists – that is, Shanghai – which advanced from the 42nd place to the 7th place in the GaWC hierarchy, following the development of the Chinese economy (Guthrie, 2009). Although not yet in the top tier, change of a similar magnitude could be observed for Vienna, which did not appear at all on the 1999 list but was at 38th place in the 2010 GaWC list, most likely reflecting the Austrian capital's development over the previous decade to become a regional hub by virtue of a de facto position as bridgehead between eastern and western Europe (Musil, 2009).
The term “Matthew effect” was coined by Merton (1968), based on the biblical Gospel of Matthew: “For whoever has will be given more, and they will have an abundance. Whoever does not have, even what they have will be taken from them” (Matthew 25:29, New International Version).
References
Agrawal, A., & Cockburn, I. 2003. The anchor tenant hypothesis: Exploring the role of large, local, R&D-intensive firms in regional innovation systems. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21 (9): 1227–1253.
Alcácer, J. 2006. Location choices across the value chain: How activity and capability influence collocation. Management Science, 52 (10): 1457–1471.
Alcácer, J., & Chung, W. 2007. Location strategies and knowledge spillovers. Management Science, 53 (5): 760–776.
Almeida, P. 1996. Knowledge sourcing by foreign MNEs: Patent citation analysis in the US semiconductor industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17 (Winter Special Issue): 155–165.
Appold, S. 1995. Agglomeration, interorganizational networks, and competitive performance in the US metalworking sector. Economic Geography, 71 (1): 27–54.
Arregle, J.-L., Beamish, P., & Hébert, L. 2009. The regional dimension of MNEs’ foreign subsidiary localization. Journal of International Business Studies, 40 (1): 86–107.
Arrow, K. 1962. The economic implications of learning by doing. Review of Economic Studies, 29 (3): 155–173.
Arzaghi, M., & Henderson, J. 2008. Networking off Madison Avenue. Review of Economic Studies, 75 (4): 1011–1038.
Asmussen, C. 2009. Local, regional, or global? Quantifying MNE geographic scope. Journal of International Business Studies, 40 (7): 1192–1205.
Barkema, H., Bell, J., & Pennings, J. 1996. Foreign entry, cultural barriers, and learning. Strategic Management Journal, 17 (2): 151–166.
Bartlett, C., & Ghoshal, S. 1989. Managing across borders: The transnational solution. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. 2004. Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28 (1): 31–56.
Baum, J., & Haveman, H. 1997. Love thy neighbor? Differentiation and agglomeration in the Manhattan hotel industry, 1898–1990. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42 (2): 304–338.
Beamish, P., & Lupton, N. 2009. Managing joint ventures. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23 (2): 75–94.
Beaverstock, J. 2002. Transnational elites in global cities: British expatriates in Singapore's financial district. Geoforum, 33 (4): 525–538.
Beaverstock, J., Smith, R., & Taylor, P. 1999. A roster of world cities. Cities, 16 (6): 445–458.
Bel, G., & Fageda, X. 2008. Getting there fast: Globalization, intercontinental flights and location of headquarters. Journal of Economic Geography, 8 (4): 471–495.
Belderbos, R., & Heijltjes, M. 2005. The determinants of expatriate staffing by Japanese multinationals in Asia: Control, learning and vertical business groups. Journal of International Business Studies, 36 (3): 341–354.
Bell, G., Filatotchev, I., & Rasheed, A. 2012. The liability of foreignness in capital markets: Sources and remedies. Journal of International Business Studies, 43 (2): 107–122.
Bergen, M., Dutta, S., & Walker, O. 1992. Agency relationships in marketing: A review of the implications and applications of agency and related theories. Journal of Marketing, 56 (3): 1–24.
Beugelsdijk, S., McCann, P., & Mudambi, R. 2010. Place, space and organisation: Economic geography and the multinational enterprise. Journal of Economic Geography, 10 (4): 485–493.
Bhagwati, J., Panagariya, A., & Srinivastan, T. 2004. The muddles over outsourcing. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18 (4): 93–114.
Boeh, K., & Beamish, P. 2012. Travel time and the liability of distance in foreign direct investment: Location choice and entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 43 (5): 525–535.
Brown, E., Derudder, B., Parnreiter, C., Pelupessy, W., Taylor, P., & Witlox, F. 2010. World city networks and global commodity chains: Towards a world-systems’ integration. Global Networks, 10 (1): 12–34.
Cantwell, J., & Mudambi, R. 2005. MNE competence-creating subsidiary mandates. Strategic Management Journal, 26 (12): 1109–1128.
Cantwell, J., & Mudambi, R. 2011. Physical attraction and the geography of knowledge sourcing in multinational enterprises. Global Strategy Journal, 1 (3–4): 206–232.
Cantwell, J., Dunning, J., & Lundan, S. 2009. An evolutionary approach to understanding international business activity: The co-evolution of MNEs and the institutional environment. Journal of International Business Studies, 41 (4): 567–586.
Caves, R. 1996. Multinational enterprise and economic analysis, 2nd edn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Chan, C., Makino, S., & Isobe, T. 2006. Interdependent behavior in foreign direct investment: The multi-level effects of prior entry and prior exit on foreign market entry. Journal of International Business Studies, 37 (5): 642–665.
Coe, N., Dicken, P., Hess, M., & Yeung, H. 2010. Making connections: Global production networks and world city networks. Global Networks, 10 (1): 138–149.
Cohen, R. 1981. The new international division of labour, multinational corporations and urban hierarchy. In M. Dear & A. Scott (Eds), Urbanisation and urban planning in capitalist society: 287–315. London: Methuen.
Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1): 128–152.
Dellestrand, H., & Kappen, P. 2012. The effects of spatial and contextual factors on headquarters resource allocation to MNE subsidiaries. Journal of International Business Studies, 43 (3): 219–243.
Derudder, B., Taylor, P., Ni, P., De Vos, A., Hoyler, M., Hanssens, H., Bassens, D., Huang, J., Witlox, F., Shen, W., & Yang, X. 2010. Pathways of change: Shifting connectivities in the world city network, 2000–2008. Urban Studies, 47 (9): 1861–1877.
Derudder, B., Taylor, P., Witlox, F., & Catalano, G. 2003. Hierarchical tendencies and regional patterns in the world city network: A global urban analysis of 234 cities. Regional Studies, 37 (9): 875–886.
Dess, G., Gupta, A., Hennart, J.-F., & Hill, C. 1995. Conducting and integrating strategy research at the international, corporate, and business levels: Issues and directions. Journal of Management, 21 (2): 357–393.
DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48 (2): 147–157.
Dunning, J. 1993. Multinational enterprises and the global economy. New York: Addison-Wesley.
Dunning, J., & Norman, G. 1983. The theory of the multinational enterprise: An application to the multinational office location. Environment and Planning A, 15 (5): 675–692.
Duranton, G., & Puga, D. 2003. Micro-foundations of urban agglomeration economies, NBER Working Paper Series No. W9931, http://ssrn.com/abstract=439613.
Edström, A., & Galbraith, J. 1977. Transfer of managers as a coordination and control strategy in multinational organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22 (2): 248–263.
Enright, M. 2000. Globalization, regionalization and the knowledge-based economy of Hong Kong. In J. Dunning (Ed), Regions, globalization and the knowledge-based economy: 391–406. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Enright, M. 2009. The location of activities of manufacturing multinationals in the Asia-Pacific. Journal of International Business Studies, 40 (5): 818–839.
Feldman, M., & Audretsch, D. 1999. Innovation in cities: Science-based diversity, specialization, and localized competition. European Economic Review, 43 (2): 409–429.
Feldman, M., & Florida, R. 1994. The geographic sources of innovation: Technological infrastructure and product innovation in the United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 84 (2): 210–229.
Friedmann, J. 1986. The world city hypothesis. Development and Change, 17 (1): 69–83.
Frost, T. 2001. The geographic sources of foreign subsidiaries’ innovations. Strategic Management Journal, 22 (2): 101–123.
Gedajlovic, E., & Shapiro, D. 2002. Ownership structure and firm profitability in Japan. Academy of Management Journal, 45 (3): 565–575.
Geringer, M., & Hebert, L. 1989. Control and performance of international joint ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 20 (2): 235–254.
Gilbert, A. 1996. The mega-city in Latin America. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
Globerman, S., & Nielsen, B. 2007. Equity versus non-equity international strategic alliances involving Danish firms: An empirical investigation of the relative importance of partner and host country determinants. Journal of International Management, 13 (4): 449–471.
Goerzen, A. 2007. Alliance networks and firm performance: The impact of repeated partnerships. Strategic Management Journal, 28 (5): 487–509.
Goerzen, A., & Beamish, P. 2003. Geographic scope and multinational enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 24 (13): 1289–1306.
Goerzen, A., & Beamish, P. 2005. The effect of alliance network diversity on multinational enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26 (4): 333–354.
Gómez-Mejia, L., & Palich, L. 1997. Cultural diversity and the performance of multinational firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 28 (2): 309–336.
Gordon, I., & McCann, P. 2000. Industrial clusters: Complexes, agglomeration and/or social networks? Urban Studies, 37 (3): 513–532.
Guthrie, D. 2009. China and globalization: The social, economic and political transformation of Chinese society. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. 1995. Multivariate data analysis, 4th edn. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hall, P. 1966. The world cities. London: Heinemann.
Harrison, A., & McMillan, M. 2006. Dispelling some myths about offshoring. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20 (4): 6–23.
Henisz, W., & Delios, A. 2001. Uncertainty, imitation and plant location: Japanese multinational corporations, 1990–1996. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46 (3): 443–475.
Henisz, W., & Zelner, B. 2005. Legitimacy, interest group pressures, and change in emergent institutions: The case of foreign investors and host country governments. Academy of Management Review, 30 (2): 361–382.
Hennart, J.-F., & Zeng, M. 2002. Cross-cultural differences and joint venture longevity. Journal of International Business Studies, 33 (4): 669–716.
Hennart, J.-F., Roehl, T., & Zietlow, D. 1999. “Trojan horse” or “workhorse”? The evolution of US–Japanese joint ventures in the United States. Strategic Management Journal, 20 (1): 15–29.
Hymer, S. 1972. The multinational corporation and the law of uneven development. In J. Bhagwati (Ed), Economics and world order from the 1970 s to the 1990 s: 1–17. New York: Collier-Macmillan.
Hymer, S. 1976. The international operations of national firms: A study of direct foreign investment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jacobs, J. 1969. The economy of cities. New York: Vintage.
Jacobs, J. 1984. Cities and the wealth of nations. New York: Random House.
Jacobs, J. 2000. The nature of economics. New York: Vintage.
Jacobs, W., Ducruet, C., & De Langen, P. 2010. Integrating world cities into production networks: The case of port cities. Global Networks, 10 (1): 92–113.
Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. 1993. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108 (3): 577–598.
Kindleberger, C. 1969. American business abroad: Six lectures on direct investment. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Kostova, T., & Zaheer, S. 1999. Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24 (1): 82–98.
Kotabe, M., Srinivasan, S., & Aulakh, P. 2002. Multinationality and firm performance: The moderating role of R&D and marketing capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies, 33 (1): 79–97.
Krugman, P. 1991. Geography and trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kumar, S., & Seth, A. 1998. The design of coordination and control mechanisms for managing joint venture–parent relationships. Strategic Management Journal, 19 (6): 579–599.
Laud, R., Grein, A., & Nachum, L. 2009. Gaining advantage through global learning hubs. Journal of Practical Global Business, January.
Lorenzen, M., & Mudambi, R. 2013. Clusters, connectivity, and catch-up: Bollywood and Bangalore in the global economy. Journal of Economic Geography 13 (3): 501–534.
Luo, Y. 2001. Antecedents and consequences of personal attachment in cross-cultural cooperative ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46 (2): 177–201.
Lüthi, S., Thierstein, A., & Goebel, V. 2010. Intra-firm and extra-firm linkages in the knowledge economy: The case of the emerging mega-city region of Munich. Global Networks, 10 (1): 114–137.
Ma, X., Tong, T., & Fitza, M. 2012. How much does subnational region matter to foreign subsidiary performance? Evidence from Fortune Global 500 Corporations’ investment in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 44 (1): 66–87.
Makino, S., & Neupert, K. 2000. National culture, transaction costs, and the choice between joint venture and wholly owned subsidiary. Journal of International Business Studies, 31 (4): 705–713.
Malecki, E. 1984. High technology and local economic development. Journal of the American Planning Association, 50 (3): 262–269.
Markusen, A. 1996. Sticky places in slippery space: A typology of industrial districts. Economic Geography, 72 (3): 293–313.
Marshall, A. 1920. Principles of economics, 8th edn. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Martin, R., & Sunley, P. 2003. Deconstructing clusters: Chaotic concept or policy panacea? Journal of Economic Geography, 3 (1): 5–35.
Martinez, J., & Jarillo, C. 1989. The evolution of research on coordination mechanisms in multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 20 (3): 489–514.
McCallum, J. 1995. National borders matter: Canada–US regional trade patterns. American Economic Review, 85 (3): 615–623.
McCann, P. 2011. International business and economic geography: Knowledge, time and transactions costs. Journal of Economic Geography, 11 (2): 309–317.
McCann, P., & Mudambi, R. 2005. Analytical differences in the economics of geography: The case of the multinational firm. Environment and Planning, 37 (10): 1857–1876.
Merton, R. 1968. The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159 (3810): 56–63.
Mezias, J. 2002. Identifying liabilities of foreignness and strategies to minimize their effects: The case of labor lawsuit judgments in the United States. Strategic Management Journal, 23 (3): 229–244.
Montgomery, C., & Wernerfelt, B. 1988. Diversification, Ricardian rents, and Tobin's q. RAND Journal of Economics, 19 (4): 623–632.
Mudambi, R., & Swift, T. 2011. Leveraging knowledge and competencies across space: The next frontier in international business. Journal of International Management, 17 (3): 186–189.
Musil, R. 2009. Global capital control and city hierarchies: An attempt to reposition Vienna in a world city network. Cities, 26 (5): 255–265.
Nachum, L. 2003. Liability of foreignness in global competition? Financial service affiliates in the city of London. Strategic Management Journal, 24 (12): 1187–1208.
Nachum, L., & Wymbs, C. 2005. Product differentiation, external economies and MNE location choices: M&A in global cities. Journal of International Business Studies, 36 (4): 415–434.
Nachum, L., & Zaheer, S. 2005. The persistence of distance? The impact of technology on MNE motivations for foreign investment. Strategic Management Journal, 26 (8): 747–767.
Nohria, N., & Ghoshal, S. 1994. Differentiated fit and shared values: Alternatives for managing headquarters-subsidiary relations. Strategic Management Journal, 15 (6): 491–502.
Nohria, N., & Ghoshal, S. 1997. The differentiated network: Organizing multinational corporations for value creation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Porter, M. 1990. The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press.
Porter, M. 1998. Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76 (6): 77–90.
Porter, M. 2001. Regions and the new economics of competition. In A. Scott (Ed), Global city-regions: Trends, theory, policy: 139–152. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pouder, R., & St John, C. 1996. Hot spots and blind spots: Geographic clusters of firms and innovation. Academy of Management Review, 21 (4): 1192–1225.
Prahalad, C., & Doz, Y. 1987. The multinational mission: Balancing local demands and global vision. New York: The Free Press.
Raudenbush, S. 2004. HLM 6: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
Raudenbush, S., & Bryk, A. 2002. Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Ricart, J., Enright, M., Ghemawat, P., Hart, S., & Khanna, T. 2004. New frontiers in international strategy. Journal of International Business Studies, 35 (3): 175–200.
Riefler, P., Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, J. 2011. Cosmopolitan consumers as a target group for segmentation. Journal of International Business Studies, 43 (3): 285–305.
Romer, P. 1986. Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94 (5): 1002–1037.
Roth, K., & Morrison, A. 1992. Implementing global strategy: Characteristics of global subsidiary mandates. Journal of International Business Studies, 23 (4): 715–735.
Saito, A. 2003. Global city formation in a capitalist developmental state: Tokyo and the waterfront sub-centre project. Urban Studies, 40 (2): 283–308.
Sassen, S. 1991. The global city: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Sassen, S. 1994. Cities in a world economy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge/Sage.
Sassen, S. 1997. Global cities: A challenge for urban scholarship. http://www.columbia.edu/cu/21stC/issue-2.4/sassen.html, accessed on 18 May 2005.
Sassen, S. 2001. Global cities and global city-regions: A comparison. In A. Scott (Ed), Global city-regions: Trends, theory, policy: 78–95. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sassen, S. 2002. Global cities and diasporic networks: Microsites in global civil society. In H. Anheier, M. Glasius, & M. Kaldor (Eds), Global civil society: 217–240. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sassen, S. 2010. Global inter-city networks and commodity chains: Any intersections? Global Networks, 10 (1): 150–163.
Sassen, S. 2012. Cities in a world economy. Los Angeles: Sage.
Schilke, O., & Goerzen, A. 2010. Alliance management capability: An investigation of the construct and its measurement. Journal of Management, 36 (5): 1192–1219.
Scott, A. 1992. The role of large producers in industrial districts: A case study of high technology systems houses in Southern California. Regional Studies, 26 (3): 265–275.
Scott, A. 2001. Global city-regions: Trends, theory, policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Scott, A., Agnew, J., Soja, E., & Storper, M. 2001. Global city-regions. In A. Scott (Ed), Global city-regions: Trends, theory, policy: 11–30. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shaver, J.M., & Flyer, F. 2000. Agglomeration economies, firm heterogeneity, and foreign direct investment in the United States. Strategic Management Journal, 21 (12): 1175–1193.
Short, J., Breitbach, C., Buckman, S., & Essex, J. 2000. From world cities to gateway cities: Extending the boundaries of globalization theory. City, 4 (3): 317–340.
Short, J., Ketchen, D., Bennett, N., & du Toit, M. 2006. An examination of firm, industry, and time effects on performance using random coefficients modeling. Organizational Research Methods, 9 (3): 259.
Snijders, T., & Bosker, R. 1999. Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Steele, F., & Goldstein, H. 2004. A general multilevel multistate competing risks model for event history data with an application to a study of contraceptive use dynamics. Statistical Modelling, 4 (2): 145–159.
Storper, M. 1991. The limits to globalization: Technology districts and international trade. Economic Geography, 68 (1): 60–93.
Storper, M., & Scott, A. 2009. Rethinking human capital, creativity and urban growth. Journal of Economic Geography, 9 (2): 147–167.
Storper, M., & Venables, A. 2004. Buzz: Face-to-face contact and the urban economy. Journal of Economic Geography, 4 (4): 351–370.
Stuart, T., & Sorenson, O. 2003. The geography of opportunity: Spatial heterogeneity in founding rates and the performance of biotechnology firms. Research Policy, 32 (2): 229–253.
Suire, R., & Vicente, J. 2009. Why do some places succeed when others decline? A social interaction model of cluster viability. Journal of Economic Geography, 9 (3): 381–404.
Taylor, P., Walker, D., & Beaverstock, J. 2002. Firms and their global service networks. In S. Sassen (Ed), Global networks, linked cities: 93–116. New York: Routledge.
Teece, D. 1982. Towards an economic theory of the multiproduct firm. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3 (1): 39–63.
Tihanyi, L., Griffith, D., & Russell, C. 2005. The effect of cultural distance on entry mode choice, international diversification, and MNE performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 36 (3): 270–283.
Toyo Keizai Shinposha. 2001. Kaigai shinshutsu kigyou souran-kuni betsu. Tokyo: Toyo Keizai Ltd.
UNCTAD. 2012. World investment report. Geneva: United Nations.
Wall, R., & van der Knaap, G. 2011. Sectoral differentiation and network structure within contemporary worldwide corporate networks. Economic Geography, 87 (3): 267–308.
Wei, Y., & Leung, C. 2005. Development zones, foreign investment, and global city formation in Shanghai. Growth and Change, 36 (1): 16–40.
Wu, F. 2000. The global and local dimensions of place-making: Remaking Shanghai as a world city. Urban Studies, 37 (8): 1359–1377.
Yip, G. 1995. Total global strategy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Zaheer, S. 1995. Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38 (2): 341–363.
Zaheer, S., & Manrakhan, S. 2001. Concentration and dispersion in global industries: Remote electronic access and the location of economic activities. Journal of International Business Studies, 32 (4): 667–686.
Zaheer, S., & Mosakowski, E. 1997. The dynamics of the liability of foreignness: A global study of survival in financial services. Strategic Management Journal, 18 (6): 439–463.
Zaheer, S., Schomaker, M., & Nachum, L. 2012. Distance without direction: Restoring credibility to a much-loved construct. Journal of International Business Studies, 43 (1): 18–27.
Zollo, M., Reuer, J., & Singh, H. 2002. Interorganizational routines and performance in strategic alliances. Organization Science, 13 (6): 701–713.
Acknowledgements
Our thanks go to the seminar participants at Queen's University, the University of Leeds, Tilburg University, and the University of Leuven for guidance and support on earlier drafts of this paper, and to Claus Vistesen and Zijun Zhang for excellent research assistance. We also acknowledge Mark Lorenzen, Steve Tallman, and the participants at the JIBS Special Issue Conference at Temple University, who provided valuable input, as well as the three anonymous JIBS reviewers. Finally, we are grateful to Guest Editors Ram Mudambi and Sjoerd Beugelsdijk for their guidance during the review process, and for organizing this Special Issue. All remaining errors and omissions are our own.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Accepted by Ram Mudambi and Sjoerd Beugelsdijk, Guest Editors, February 2013. This paper has been with the authors for three revisions.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goerzen, A., Asmussen, C. & Nielsen, B. Global cities and multinational enterprise location strategy. J Int Bus Stud 44, 427–450 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2013.11
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2013.11