Skip to main content
Log in

Solving the single-country sample problem in cultural distance studies

  • Perspective
  • Published:
Journal of International Business Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Selecting appropriate samples in cultural distance research is vital to producing valid empirical results. Over 80% of empirical cultural distance studies use a sample comprised of either a single home country with varying host countries or a single host country with varying home countries. When difference scores are used in the calculation of cultural distance based on single-country samples the resulting cultural distance measures typically are highly correlated with one or more of the varying countries’ underlying national culture dimensions, making it impossible to determine whether findings are due to cultural distance or to varying countries’ national culture effects. This is referred to as a confounded variables problem and means that for an overwhelming number of cultural distance studies, we cannot with certainty have confidence in the verity of their findings. To resolve this uncertainty we propose that cultural distance scholars select samples comprised of at least two home/host countries. We empirically demonstrate that two-country samples where most of the national culture dimensions for the two countries differ create certitude with respect to results, eliminating the cultural distance confounded variables problem. We describe the single-country sample problem, illustrate the proposed a priori two-country solution, and suggest avenues for future research.

Abstract

La sélection d’échantillons appropriés pour la recherche sur la distance culturelle est fondamentale pour produire des résultats empiriques valables. Plus de 80 % des études empiriques sur la distance culturelle utilisent un échantillon composé d’un seul pays d’origine avec différents pays d’accueil ou d’un seul pays d’accueil avec différents pays d’origine. Lorsque des scores différents sont utilisés pour le calcul de la distance culturelle fondé sur des échantillons mono-pays les mesures de la distance culturelle qui en résultent sont généralement fortement corrélées avec une ou plusieurs dimensions de culture nationale variant selon les pays, ce qui rend impossible de déterminer si les résultats sont dus à la distance culturelle ou aux effets liés aux différences de culture nationale. Ceci est dénommé le problème des variables confondantes et signifie que pour un grand nombre d’études sur la distance culturelle, nous ne pouvons pas avoir confiance avec certitude dans la véracité des résultats. Afin de résoudre cette incertitude, nous recommandons aux chercheurs qui travaillent sur la distance culturelle de sélectionner des échantillons comprenant au moins deux pays d’origine/d’accueil. Nous démontrons de manière empirique que des échantillons couvrant deux pays où la plupart des dimensions de culture nationale diffèrent créent une certitude au niveau des résultats, en éliminant le problème des variables confondantes lié à la distance culturelle. Nous décrivons le problème de l’échantillon mono-pays, nous illustrons la solution proposée a priori concernant deux pays et nous proposons des perspectives pour la recherche future.

Abstract

Seleccionar las muestras adecuadas para la investigación en distancia cultural es vital para producir resultados empíricos válidos. Más del 80% de los estudios empíricos de distancia cultural usan una muestra compuesta ya sea de un sólo país de origen con diferentes países de destino; o un solo país anfitrión con diferentes países de origen. Cuando los puntajes de diferencia son usados para calcular la distancia cultural con base en muestras de un solo país de origen las medidas resultantes de distancia cultural típicamente son correlacionadas con uno o más de los diferentes países resaltando las dimensiones culturales nacionales, haciendo imposible determinar si los hallazgos son debidos a la distancia cultural, o los efectos de la cultura nacional de los diferentes países. Esto se refiere al problema de variables confundidas, y significa que para un número abrumador de estudios de distancia cultural, no podemos con certeza tener la seguridad de la veracidad de sus hallazgos. Para resolver esta incertidumbre proponemos que los estudios de distancia cultural seleccionen muestras que estén compuestas al menos de dos países de origen/destino. Describimos el problema de las muestras de un solo país, ilustramos la solución propuesta anteriormente de dos países, y sugerimos avenidas para futuras investigaciones.

Abstract

A seleção de amostras adequadas na pesquisa sobre distância cultural é vital para produzir resultados empíricos válidos. Mais de 80% dos estudos empíricos a respeito de distância cultural utilizam uma amostra composta por um único país de origem com os países de acolhimento diferentes ou de um país anfitrião único com diferentes países de origem. Quando diferenças de indicadores são utilizadas no cálculo da distância cultural com base em amostras de um único país, as medidas de distância cultural resultantes geralmente são altamente correlacionadas com um ou mais das subjacentes dimensões nacionais de cultura dos países utilizados, o que torna impossível determinar se resultados se devem à distância cultural ou a diferentes efeitos nacional de cultura dos países. Isto é referenciado como um problema de variáveis confundidas e significa que, para um número esmagador de estudos sobre distância cultural, não podemos ter confiança na veracidade de suas descobertas. Para resolver essa incerteza, propomos que os estudiosos da distância cultural selecionem amostras compostas de pelo menos dois países de origem/acolhimento. Nós demonstramos empiricamente que amostras de dois países em que a maioria das dimensões de cultura nacional dos dois países difere criam confiança no que diz respeito a resultados, eliminando o problema das variáveis de distância cultural confundidas. Nós descrevemos o problema da amostra de um único país, indicamos a solução de dois países sugerida a priori, e sugerimos caminhos para a investigação futura.

Abstract

在文化距离研究中选择适当的样本对于产生有效的实证结果是至关重要的。超过80%文化距离的实证研究使用的样本要么是一个单一的母国与多个东道国, 要么是一个单一的东道国与多个母国。当基于单一国家样本来计算文化距离的差异值时, 所得出的文化距离测量通常与一个或者多个其他国家的根本的民族文化维度高度相关, 从而无法确定结果是由于文化距离还是是由于不同国家的民族文化的影响。这被称作是混淆变量问题, 意味着对于绝大多数文化距离的研究, 我们对它们结果的真理性不能确定有信心。为解决这种不确定性, 我们提出文化距离学者选择样本应包括至少两个母/东道国国家。我们实证证明 : 两国的样本在两国大多数的民族文化维度不同时对于结果具有确定性, 从而消除了文化距离混淆变量的问题。我们描述了单一国家样本的问题, 阐明了提出的一个先验的两国解决方案, 并建议未来研究的途径。

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A comprehensive search of 13 top management and international business journals selected based on prior meta-analyses and literature reviews identified 990 articles published between 1988 and 2012 referencing ‘cultural distance.’ Of these, 388 used empirical difference score-based measures of cultural distance. The journals examined included: Academy of Management Journal, Administrative Science Quarterly, International Business Review, Journal of Business Research, Journal of International Business Studies, Journal of International Management, Journal of International Marketing, Journal of Management, Journal of Management Studies, Journal of World Business, Management International Review, Management Science, and Strategic Management Journal.

  2. The derivation of these condition requirements is available from the authors upon request.

References

  • Berry, H., Guillén, M. F., & Zhou, N. 2010. An institutional approach to cross-national distance. Journal of International Business Studies, 41 (9): 1460–1480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. R. 2001. Ten difference score myths. Organizational Research Methods, 4 (3): 265–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. R., & Parry, M. E. 1993. On the use of polynomial regression equations as an alternative to difference scores in organizational research. Academy of Management Journal, 36 (6): 1577–1613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estrin, S., Baghdasaryan, D., & Meyer, K. E. 2009. The impact of institutional and human resource distance on international entry strategies. Journal of Management Studies, 46 (7): 1171–1196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franke, G., Hill, J., Ramsey, J., & Richey, R. G. 2011. Difference scores, analysis levels, and the (mis) interpretation of cultural distance. Advances in International Marketing, 10 (22): 31–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franke, G. R., & Richey, R. G. 2010. Improving generalizations from multi-country comparisons in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 41 (8): 1275–1293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, P. H., & Cooper, W. H. 2010. Pursuing failure. Organizational Research Methods, 13 (4): 620–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. 1980. Culture’s consequences: National differences in thinking and organizing. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. 2010. Culture and organizations: Software of the mind, 3rd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, R., Hanges, P., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P., & Gupta, V. 2004. Leadership, culture, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. 1977. The internationalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8 (1): 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johns, G. 1981. Difference score measures of organizational behavior variables: A critique. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 27 (3): 443–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B., & Singh, H. 1988. The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19 (3): 411–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostova, T. 1999. Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices: A contextual perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24 (2): 308–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, L. 2006. The relationship between cultural distance and performance in international joint ventures: A critique and ideas for further research. International Journal of Management, 23 (3): 436–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenkar, O. 2001. Cultural distance revisited: Towards a more rigorous conceptualization and measurement of cultural differences. Journal of International Business Studies, 32 (3): 519–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shenkar, O. 2012. Beyond cultural distance: Switching to a friction lens in the study of cultural differences. Journal of International Business Studies, 43 (1): 12–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tisak, J., & Smith, C. S. 1994. Defending and extending difference score methods. Journal of Management, 20 (3): 675–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatraman, N. 1989. The concept of fit in strategy research: Toward verbal and statistical correspondence. Academy of Management Review, 14 (3): 423–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, T., & McBurney, D. 2013. Research methods, 9th edn. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, S., Schomaker, M. S., & Nachum, L. 2012. Distance without direction: Restoring credibility to a much-loved construct. Journal of International Business Studies, 43 (1): 18–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

All three authors contributed equally.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dawn L Keig.

Additional information

Accepted by David C Thomas, Area Editor, 6 November 2015. This article has been with the authors for two revisions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brouthers, L., Marshall, V. & Keig, D. Solving the single-country sample problem in cultural distance studies. J Int Bus Stud 47, 471–479 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2016.15

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2016.15

Keywords

Navigation