Skip to main content
Log in

How ‘new’ is the ‘New Regionalism’ in the Americas? The case of MERCOSUR

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of International Relations and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

‘New Regionalism’ (NR) approaches have emphasized the qualitative differences between the more recent wave of regionalism and regional integration attempts in the post-World War II period. This article assesses the extent to which these claims to newness are empirically justified in the specific case of MERCOSUR, the largest regional trade bloc in Latin America. It argues that, consistent with NR perspectives, regionalism in South America since the 1990s has been part of a broader process of national and global economic transformation, which has influenced the character of the process of integration itself. Yet, a careful examination of MERCOSUR suggests that the extent of its newness should not be overstated. MERCOSUR remains a state-led, primarily commercial initiative, and its evolution and sustainability have been fundamentally linked to strategic factors and power configurations at the regional and hemispheric levels. Based on these empirical findings, the article challenges the usefulness of the analytical and theoretical separation between NR and mainstream international relations approaches and illustrates the ways in which their insights can be combined and complemented in the explanation of contemporary regionalism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. According to a recent report by the World Trade Organization, of the total number of notified regional trade agreements (RTAs), 27 per cent are North–South agreements, and 25 per cent are South–South (Fiorentino et al. 2007).

  2. A distinction must be made between the ‘new regionalism’ as the empirical manifestation of the most recent wave of regional integration and the ‘New Regionalism’ literature or scholarly approach. The latter must be seen as the scholarly investigation of the former.

  3. Axline, quoted in Hout (1999: 23).

  4. See also Hettne (1999).

  5. More recently, Hettne (2003) has emphasized the importance of complementing the focus which his earlier formulation of the new regionalism approach placed on the global context with a focus on the endogenous dimensions of regionalism. The ‘New Regionalism Theory’ thus underlines the importance of agency while capturing the multidimensional nature of the process of regionalization within a particular geographical area.

  6. While emphasizing the importance of non-state actors, Hettne (2005: 554) recognizes the enduring relevance of states: ‘[This] is by no means equivalent to rejecting the state. States and intergovernmental organisations are often crucial actors and objects of analysis in the process of regionalization’.

  7. See Hurrell (1998) for a more detailed description of the origins of cooperation between Argentina and Brazil.

  8. Cardoso, quoted in Solingen (1998: 151).

  9. Gudynas and da Cruz (2002) also stress the ‘individualistic’ responses of MERCOSUR partners during the 1990s.

  10. Interview with Roque Fernandez, Argentine Minister of Finance, 1997–1999.

  11. This argument is further developed in Gomez-Mera (2005b).

  12. In the words of Jorge Litzman, Executive Director of the Argentine Footwear Chamber, Jorge Litzman, ‘Campbell seemed to be working for the Brazilians’ (Interview, Buenos Aires, October 2002).

  13. Interview with Nestor de Paula, President of Abicalçados, Novo Hamburgo, October 2002. According to de Paula, ‘The footwear dispute made the two governments very uncomfortable. So the Brazilian government pressed us to sign an agreement’.

  14. Interviews with Guido Di Tella, Argentine Foreign Minister, 1991–1999 (July 2000); Samuel Pinheiro Guimarães, Brazilian diplomat (August 2000); and Felix Peña, Argentine Under-Secretary of Foreign Trade, 1998–1999 (November 2002), all of them actively involved in the early stages of Argentine-Brazilian negotiations.

  15. Interview with Luis Felipe Lampreia, Brazilian Foreign Minister 1995–2001 (November 2002).

  16. For example, in ‘El mercosur de Lula’ La Nación (18 November, 2002), Brazilian Foreign Minister Celso Amorim was quoted as saying ‘The policy of integration with the neighbours is crucial to make Brazil's interests prevail […] a real project of integration, a mercosur with its own identity, to negotiate joint entry to the ftaa proposed by the us’. Similarly, soon after becoming president, Kirchner stated his intention to ‘give priority to the policy of South American integration in order to strengthen [Argentina's] negotiating power vis-à-vis developed countries’ (La Nación, 27 May, 2003).

  17. For a more detailed discussion on MERCOSUR's institutional structure, see Bouzas and Soltz (2001).

References

  • Acharya, Amitav and Alastair Johnston, eds (2007) Crafting Cooperation: Regional Institutions in Comparative Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axline, Andrew (1994) ‘Cross-Regional Comparisons and the Theory of Regional Cooperation’, in Andrew Axline, ed., The Political Economy of Regional Integration: Comparative Case Studies, 178–224, Madison: Farleigh Dickinson University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, Michael and Etel Solingen (2007) ‘Designed to Fail or Failure of Design? The Origins and Legacy of the Arab League’, in Amitav Acharya and Alastair Johnston, eds, Crafting Cooperation: Regional Institutions in Comparative Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bermudez, Ismael (1999) ‘Mercosur en la Crisis Internacional’, in Atilio Boron and Julio Gambina y Naum Minsburg, eds, Tiempos Violentos: Neoliberalismo, Globalización y Desigualdad en América Latina, 121–128, Buenos Aires: CLACSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bøås, Morten, Marianne Marchand and Timothy Shaw (1999) ‘The Weave-world: Regionalisms in the South in the New Millennium’, in Morten Bøås, Marianne Marchand and Timothy Shaw, eds, New Regionalisms in the New Millennium, Special Issue of Third World Quarterly 20(5): 1061–70, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouzas, Roberto (2001) ‘MERCOSUR Diez Años Después: Proceso de Aprendizaje o Déjà vu?’, Desarrollo Económico 41 (1): 179–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouzas, Roberto and Hernán Soltz (2001) ‘Institutions and Regional Integration: The Case of MERCOSUR’, in Victor Bulmer-Thomas, ed., Regional Integration in Latin America and the Caribbean: The Political Economy of Open Regionalism, 98–118, London: Institute of Latin American Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, Paul (2002) ‘Regionalism and Development (?) after the Global Financial Crises’, in Shaun Breslin, Richard Higgott and Ben Rosamond, eds, New Regionalisms in the Global Political Economy: Theories and Cases, 81–103, London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Breslin, Shaun and Richard Higgott (2000) ‘Studying Regions: Learning from the Old, Constructing the New’, New Political Economy 5 (3): 333–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breslin, Shaun, Richard Higgott and Ben Rosamond (2002) ‘Regions in Comparative Perspective’, in Shaun Breslin, Richard Higgott and Ben Rosamond, eds, New Regionalisms in the Global Political Economy: Theories and Cases, 1–19, London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Burges, Sean (2007) ‘Building a Global Southern Coalition: the Competing Approaches of Brazil's Lula and Venezuela's Chavez’, Third World Quarterly 28 (7): 1343–1358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrell, Jennifer and Jeffrey Cason (2002) ‘Turning the Tables: State and Society in South America's Economic Integration’, Polity 34 (4): 457–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bustelo, Pablo (1999) ‘Globalización Económica, Crisis Financieras e Integración Regional: Enseñanzas de Asia Oriental para América Latina’, Revista de Economía Mundial 1 (1): 55–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carranza, Mario (2003) ‘Can Mercosur Survive? Domestic and International Constraints on Mercosur’, Latin American Politics and Society 45 (2): 67–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cason, Jeffrey (2000) ‘On the Road to Southern Cone Economic Integration’, Journal of Inter-American Studies and World Affairs 42 (1): 23–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEI (2002) Cuadros Estadisticos MERCOSUR, available at http://www.cei.gov.ar/html/estadisticas.htm#mer (15 June, 2006).

  • Chudnovsky, Daniel and Andrés Lopez (2007) ‘Inversión Extranjera Directa y Desarrollo: La Experiencia del Mercosur’, Revista de la CEPAL 92: 7–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa Vaz, Alcides (2002) Cooperação, Integração e Proceso Negociador: A Construção do Mercosul, Brasilia: IBRI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Da Motta Veiga, Pedro (1999) ‘Brazil in Mercosur: Reciprocal Influence’, in Riordan Roett, ed., MERCOSUR: Regional Integration and World Markets, 25–34, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, Karl, Sidney Burrell and Robert Kann (1958) Political Community in the North Atlantic, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devlin, Robert and Antoni Estevadeordal (2001) ‘What's New about the New Regionalism in the Americas?’, in Victor Bulmer-Thomas, ed., The Political Economy of Regionalism in Latin America, 17–44, London: Institute of Latin American Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichengreen, Barry and Jeffrey Frankel (1995) ‘Economic Regionalism: Evidence from Two Twentieth Century Episodes’, North American Journal of Economics and Finance 6 (2): 89–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estevadeordal, Antoni, Junichi Goto and Raul Saez (2000) ‘The New Regionalism in the Americas’, INTAL/ITD Working Paper No. 5.

  • Farrell, Mary (2005) ‘The Global Politics of Regionalism: An Introduction’, in Mary Farrell, Björn Hettne and Luk Van Langenhove, eds, Global Politics of Regionalism: Theory and Practice, 1–20, London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Arias, Eduardo, Ugo Panizza and Ernesto Stein (2004) ‘Trade Agreements, Exchange Rate Disagreements’, Monetary Unions and Hard Pegs 17: 135–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiorentino, Roberto, Luis Verdeja and Christelle Toqueboeuf (2007) ‘The Changing Landscape of Regional Trade Agreements: 2006 Update’, WTO Discussion Paper No. 12.

  • Fonseca Jr., Gelson and Sergio Nabuco de Castro (1994) Temas de Politica Externa Brasileira II, Vol. I, Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foot, Rosemary (1995) ‘Pacific Asia: The Development of Regional Dialogue’, in Andrew Hurrell and Louise Fawcett, eds, Regionalism in World Politics, 228–249, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamble, Andrew and Anthony Payne (1996) Regionalism and World Order, Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gardini, Gian Luca (2006) ‘Government-Business Relations in the Construction of Mercosur’, Business and Politics 8 (1): 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Mera, Laura (2005a) ‘Explaining MERCOSUR's Survival: Strategic Sources of Argentine-Brazilian Convergence’, Journal of Latin American Studies 37 (1): 109–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Mera, Laura (2005b) ‘Power, States and Interests in MERCOSUR: Explaining Patterns of Conflict and Cooperation between Argentina and Brazil, 1995–2001’, Unpublished DPhil. Dissertation, Oxford University.

  • Gowa, Joanne (1994) Allies, Adversaries, and International Trade, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grieco, Joseph (1996) ‘State Interests and Institutional Rule Trajectories: A Neorealist Interpretation of the Maastricht Treaty and European Economic and Monetary Union’, Security Studies 5 (2): 176–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grieco, Joseph (1997) ‘Systemic Sources of Variation in Regional Institutionalization in Western Europe, East Asia and the Americas’, in Edward Mansfield and Helen Milner, eds, The Political Economy of Regionalism, 164–187, New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grugel, Jean (2006) ‘Regionalist Governance and Transnational Collective Action in Latin America’, Economy and Society 35 (2): 209–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gudynas, Eduardo and José da Cruz (2002) ‘Mercosur: Irrelevancia Internacional, Desconfianza Regional’, La Insignia (Julio).

  • Guilhon de Albuquerque, José A. (2000) ‘A Integração Regional e a Agenda Multilateral post-Seattle’, in Pedro Da Motta Veiga, ed., O Brasil e os Desafios da Globalização, 229–236, Rio de Janeiro: Relume-Dumará.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, Ernst (1958) The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social and Economic Forces, 1950–1957, Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggard, Stephan (1997) ‘Regionalism in Asia and the Americas’, in Edward Mansfield and Helen Milner, eds, The Political Economy of Regionalism, 20–49, New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggard, Stephan and Robert Kaufman, eds (1992) The Politics of Economic Adjustment, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Richard (2005) ‘Resistance and Alternatives to Washington's Agenda for the Americas: The Prospects for Regional versus Hemispheric Integration’, Journal of Developing Societies 21 (3/4): 403–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herbst, Jeffrey (2007) ‘Crafting Regional Cooperation in Africa’, in Amitav Acharya and Alastair Johnston, eds, Crafting Regional Cooperation, 129–144, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hettne, Björn (1999) ‘Globalization and the New Regionalism: The Second Great Transformation’, in Björn Hettne, András Intoai and Osvaldo Sunkel, eds, Globalism and the New Regionalism, 1–24, Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hettne, Björn (2003) ‘The New Regionalism Revisited’, in Fredrik Söderbaum and Timothy Shaw, eds, Theories of New Regionalism, 22–44, London: Palgrave.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hettne, Björn (2005) ‘Beyond the ‘New’ Regionalism’, New Political Economy, 10 (4): 543–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hettne, Björn and András Inotai, eds (1998) Globalism and the New Regionalism, London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hettne, Björn, Anthony Payne and Fredrik Söderbaum, eds (1999) ‘Rethinking the Development Theory’, Special Issue of Journal of International Relations and Development 2 (4): 354–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgott, Robert and Nicola Phillips (1999) ‘The Limits of Global Liberalisation: Lessons from Asia and Latin America’, CSGR Working Paper No. 22/98.

  • Hirschman, Albert (1945) National Power and the Structure of Foreign Trade, Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hout, Wil (1999) ‘Theories of International Relations and the New Regionalism’, in Jean Grugel and Wil Hout, eds, Regionalism across the North-South Divide: State Strategies and Globalization, 14–27, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurrell, Andrew (1995a) ‘Regionalism in Theoretical Perspective’, in Louise Fawcett and Andrew Hurrell, eds, Regionalism in World Politics: Regional Organization and World Order, 37–73, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurrell, Andrew (1995b) ‘Regionalism in the Americas’, in Louise Fawcett and Andrew Hurrell, eds, Regionalism in World Politics, 250–282, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurrell, Andrew (1998) ‘An Emerging Security Community in South America?’, in Emanuel Adler and Michael Barnett, eds, Security Communities, 228–264, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hurrell, Andrew (2005) ‘Hegemony and Regional Governance in the Americas’, in Louise Fawcett and Mónica Serrano, eds, Regionalism and Governance in the Americas: Continental Drift, 185–208, London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hveem, Helge (2000) ‘Explaining the Regional Phenomena in an Era of Globalization’, in Richard Stubbs and Geoffrey Underhill, eds, Political Economy and the Changing Global Order, 2nd edition, 70–81, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • IDB (2002) MERCOSUR Report, No. 6, Buenos Aires: Institute for the Integration of Latin America and the Caribbean.

  • IDB (2006) MERCOSUR Report, No. 10, Buenos Aires: Institute for the Integration of Latin America and the Caribbean.

  • Jacobs, Jamie E. and Martin Maldonado (2005) ‘Civil Society in Argentina: Opportunities and Challenges for National and Transnational Organisation’, Journal of Latin American Studies 37 (1): 141–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, Robert (1984) After Hegemony: Co-operation and Discord in World Political Economy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khong, Yueng F. and Helen Nesadurai (2007) ‘Hanging Together, Institutional Design and Cooperation in Southeast Asia: AFTA and the ARF’, in Amitav Acharya and Alastair Johnston, eds, Crafting Cooperation, 32–82, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafer, Celso (2000) ‘Brazilian International Identity and Foreign Policy: Past, Present Future’, Daedalus 129 (2): 207–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malamud, Andrés (2005) ‘Presidential Diplomacy and the Institutional Underpinnings of MERCOSUR: An Empirical Examination’, Latin American Research Review 40 (1): 138–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, Edward and Helen Milner, eds (1997) The Political Economy of Regionalism, New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, Edward and Helen Milner (1999) ‘The New Wave of Regionalism’, International Organization 53 (3): 589–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattli, Walter (1999) The Logic of Regional Integration: Europe and Beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mistry, Percy (2003) ‘New Regionalism and Economic Development’, in Fredrik Söderbaum and Timothy Shaw, eds, Theories of New Regionalism, 117–139, London: Palgrave.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mitrany, David (1943) A Working Peace System, London: Royal Institute of International Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narine, Shaun (2003) Explaining ASEAN: Regionalism in Southeast Asia, Boulder; CO: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olarreaga, Marcelo and Isidro Soloaga (1998) ‘Endogenous Tariff Formation: The Case of Mercosur’, The World Bank Economic Review 12 (2): 297–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer, Andrés (2007) ‘Mercosur Trade Bloc in Limbo’, Miami Herald (14 June).

  • Patomäki, Heikki and Teivo Teivainen (2002) ‘Critical Responses to Neoliberal Globalization in the Mercosur Region: Roads towards Cosmopolitan Democracy?’, Review of International Political Economy 9 (1): 37–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peña, Alejandro (2001a) ‘La Institucionalidad del MERCOSUR: Realidades, Avances y Desafíos en la Lógica del Proceso de Integración’, Boletín Informativo Techint 305: 81–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peña, Felix (2001b) ‘Mercosur: Analise de uma decada e tendencias para o futuro’, Política Externa 10 (1): 5–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perales, José (2000) ‘La Economía Política del MERCOSUR y la Coordinación Macroeconómica: Propuestas para el Análisis’, Escenarios Alternativos 9.

  • Phillips, Nicola (2000) ‘The Future of the Political Economy of Latin America’, in Richard Stubbs and Geoffrey Underhill, eds, Political Economy and the Changing Global Order, 2nd edn, 284–293, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Nicola (2002) ‘Governance after Financial Crisis: South American Perspectives on the Reformulation of Regionalism’, in Shaun Breslin, Richard Higgott and Ben Rosamond, eds, New Regionalisms in the Global Political Economy: Theories and Cases, 66–80, London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Nicola (2003) ‘The Rise and Fall of Open Regionalism? Comparative Reflections on Regional Governance in the Southern Cone of Latin America’, Third World Quarterly 24 (2): 217–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Nicola (2005) ‘U.S. Power and the Politics of Economic Governance in the Americas’, Latin American Politics and Society 47 (4): 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, Mark (2001) ‘International Relations Theory and European Integration’, Journal of Common Market Studies 39 (2): 221–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redrado, Martin (2000) ‘De la Institucionalidad a la Convergencia’, in Felipe De la Balze, ed., El Futuro del MERCOSUR: Entre la Retórica y el Realismo, Buenos Aires: Consejo Argentino de Relaciones Internacionales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, Ben Ross (2001) ‘Business Politics and Regional Integration: The Advantages of Organisation in NAFTA and MERCOSUR’, in Victor Bulmer-Thomas, ed., The Political Economy of Regionalism in Latin America, 167–193, London: Institute of Latin American Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, Michael, Fredrik Söderbaum and Joakim Ojendal, eds (2001) Regionalization in a Globalizing World: A Comparative Perspective on Actors, Forms and Processes, London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, James M. (2000) ‘The Politics of Dispute Settlement Design: Explaining Legalism in Regional Trade Pacts’, International Organization 54 (1): 73–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soares de Lima, María R. (1996) ‘Brazil's Response to the New Regionalism’, in Gordon Mace and Jean P. Thérien, eds, Foreign Policy and Regionalism in the Americas, 137–158, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Söderbaum, Fredrik (2003) ‘Introduction: Theories of New Regionalism’, in Fredrik Söderbaum and Timothy Shaw, eds, Theories of New Regionalism, 1–21, London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Söderbaum, Fredrik (2005) ‘The International Political Economy of Regionalism’, in Nicola Phillips, ed., Globalizing International Political Economy, 221–245, London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Söderbaum, Fredrik and Björn Hettne (2005) ‘Regional Cooperation and the Provision of Regional and Global Public Goods’, Paper presented at the seminar on Competition and Complementarity between Global and Regional Public Goods, UN, New York, 13 May.

  • Solingen, Etel (1998) Regional Orders at Century's Dawn: Global and Domestic Influences on Grand Strategy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solingen, Etel (2005) ‘ASEAN Cooperation: The Legacy of the Economic Crisis’, International Relations of Asia Pacific 5 (1): 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tripp, Charles (1995) ‘Regional Organizations in the Arab Middle East’, in Louise Fawcett and Andrew Hurrell, eds, Regionalism in World Politics, 283–308, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tussie, Diana (2003) ‘Regionalism: Providing Substance to Multilateralism?’, in Fredrik Söderbaum and Timothy Shaw, eds, Theories of New Regionalism, 99–116, London: Palgrave.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Warleigh-Lack, Alex (2006) ‘Towards a Conceptual Framework for Regionalisation: Bridging “New Regionalism” and “Integration Theory”’, Review of International Political Economy 13 (5): 750–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gómez-Mera, L. How ‘new’ is the ‘New Regionalism’ in the Americas? The case of MERCOSUR. J Int Relat Dev 11, 279–308 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2008.14

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2008.14

Keywords

Navigation