Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

This article explores a new perspective on Georgia's politics after 1991. Employing the critical political ontology of Carl Schmitt, Walter Benjamin and Giorgio Agamben, it argues that Georgia as a political community has, since its modern inception, been (in) a state of permanent exception. Successive regimes of Gamsakhurdia, Shevardnadze and Saakashvili have operated as effective sovereign dictatorships striving to bring to existence a new order. The utopia of this order was described in various ways, but typically it included restoration of the territorial sovereignty, thereby relating to the boundaries of the political community; overcoming internal disorder; and more recently, emulating the Western Liberal State. That the realisation of the order as a Western Liberal Utopia defined by the sovereign power perpetuates the very state of exception, including the reduction of individuals to ‘bare life’, is finally argued to constitute the tragedy of Georgia's contemporary politics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Analysis of the state of exception in Russia is beyond the scope of this article. Other enemies, both absolute and real, determined by the sovereign power/dictatorship realising the order of the new empire (the outside dimension) and ‘sovereign democracy’ (the inside dimension), would likely include the political opposition including business tycoons, human rights and other NGOs seen as ‘foreign agents’, as well as, recently, NATO and the US.

  2. Quoted in Toft (2005).

  3. At the 2006 Munich Conference on Security Policy, Saakashvili stated that Georgia ‘suffers from the cancer of separatism’.

  4. Commenting on the audience granted to de facto government leaders of South Ossetia and Abkhazia by Russia's Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, Saakashvili denounced Eduard Kokoity and Sergei Bagapsh as ‘engaged in encouraging illegal terrorist acts and ethnic cleansing’ (RFE/RL Newsline, 19 February, 2008). Several years earlier, Shevardnadze's Foreign Minister Irakli Menagarishvili also spoke at the UN about Abkhazia as a ‘safe haven for criminals, human and drug traffickers, illegal arm dealers and terrorist groups’ (UN General Assembly, 2 October, 2003).

  5. Quoted in Jones (1993).

  6. Social capital was translated in rather unusual ways in the post-Soviet Caucasus politics. Gamsakhurdia was originally an English literature scholar and translator of Shakespeare or T.S. Eliot into modern Georgian; Ioseliani was a playwright and a film critic; Kitovani was a sculptor; a longtime head of the Abkhaz separatist government, Vladislav Ardzimba, used to research proto-Hittite mythology; and the former Armenian President Levon Ter-Petrosian was formerly a keeper of medieval manuscripts. In the North Caucasus, Musa Shanib, the hero of Derluguian's book and ‘Bourdieu's secret admirer’ was a sociologist; and the former Chechen President Yandarbyiev a poet.

  7. Quoted in the New York Times, 25 September, 1991.

  8. Transcaucasus Chronology, Armenian National Committee of America (April 1992).

  9. In what was claimed to be his suicide note, Gamsakhurdia explained that it was his inability to ‘normalize the situation’ and restore law and order that was the reason for his act. In a telegram previously sent to the U.S. Secretary of State from his Chechen exile, he called Shevardnadze's regime ‘criminal and terrorist’ (Gamsakhurdia 1997).

  10. The Speaker of the Parliament was elected directly by the people, whereas the Parliament itself, upon beginning its session, chose the Head of State. Shevardnadze was chosen for both these posts. This practice was abolished when the new constitution was passed in 1995.

  11. Reuters, 11 September, 1993.

  12. BBC Monitoring Former Soviet Union, 4 November, 1993.

  13. Transcaucasus Chronology, August 1995.

  14. Reuters, 29 August, 1995; Dow Jones, 30 August, 1995; BBC Monitoring Former Soviet Union, 31 August, 1995.

  15. BBC Monitoring Former Soviet Union, 19 October, 1995.

  16. The Independent, 10 February, 1998.

  17. Dow Jones, 10 February, 1998; Seattle Times, 10 February, 1998.

  18. BBC Monitoring Former Soviet Union, 22 October, 1998.

  19. RFE/RL Newsline, 22 November, 2003.

  20. Civil Georgia, 5 February, 2004.

  21. Cf. 24 Saati [24 Hours], 10 November, 2003.

  22. Speech delivered by the President Saakashvili at the meeting with members of Supreme Council of Abkhazia, press release by President's Office, 10 October, 2004.

  23. Civil Georgia, 9 November, 2005.

  24. Agenda for Reform, Human Rights Priorities after the Georgian Revolution, Human Rights Watch (2004, http://www.hrw.org/english/docs/2004/02/24/georgi7650.htm).

  25. President Saakashvili Address Young Patriots at the Youth Forum, press release by President's Office, 11 September, 2005; ‘Georgia Pursues Campaign against Espionage,’ Eurasianet.org, 31 March, 2006.

  26. President Saakashvili Chairs Special Cabinet Meeting, press release by President's Office, 4 October, 2007.

  27. Quoted in Civil Georgia, 7 November, 2007.

  28. Quoted in Civil Georgia, 5 November, 2007.

  29. Patarkatsishvili was once a close business associate of Boris Berezovsky and Andrei Lugovoi, presently a Russian State Duma representative wanted in the UK in relation to the murder of former FSB officer Alexander Litvinenko.

References

  • Agamben, Giorgio (1998) Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life, Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agamben, Georgio (2005) State of Exception, in Kevin Attell, trans., Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, Walter (1978) ‘The Critique of Violence’, in Edmund Jephcott, trans., Reflections: Essays, Aphorisms and Autobiographical Writings, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Judith (2002) ‘Guantanamo Limbo’, The Nation 14 March, 2002.

  • Campbell, David (1998) National Deconstruction, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chanturia, Giorgi (1989) ‘Budem lechit bolezni [We Shall Heal the Disease]’, Strana i mir 5: 55–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constantinou, Costas (2004) States of Political Discourse: Words, Regimes, Seditions, London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Derluguian, Georgi (2005) Bourdieu's Secret Admirer, Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques (1994) Force de lois, Paris: Galilée.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel (1994) The Birth of the Clinic, New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel (2002) Archaeology of Knowledge, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamsakhurdia, Zviad (1990) ‘The Spiritual Mission of Georgia’, http://rustaveli.tripod.com/mission.html, retrieved on 14 March, 2008.

  • Gamsakhurdia, Zviad (1997) ‘The Revenge of the Nomenclature in Georgia’, in Antero Leitzinger, ed., The Caucasus and an Unholy Alliance, 109–122, Vantaa: Leitzinger Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genocida Osetin (2008) ‘Kem byl Zviad Gamsakhurdia [Who Was Zviad Gamsakhurdia]’, http://osgenocide.ru/2007/05/20/kem_byl_zviad_gamsakhurdija.html, retrieved on 5 May, 2008.

  • Glonti, Georgi and Givi Lobdzhanidze (2004) Profesionalnaya prestupnost v Gruzii [Organized Crime in Georgia], Tbilisi: TCCC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzig, Edmund (1988) New Caucasus: Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia. London: Chatham House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huysmans, Jef (2006) ‘International Politics of Exception: Competing Visions of International Political Order between Law and Politics’, Alternatives 31: 135–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Stephen (1993) ‘Georgia: A Failed Democratic Transition’, in Ian Bremmer and Ray Taras, eds, Nations and Politics in the Soviet Successor States, 288–310, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Stephen and Robert Parsons (1996) ‘Georgia and the Georgians’, in Graham Smith, ed., The Nationalities Question in the Post-Soviet States, 291–313, Harlow: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neal, Andrew (2006) ‘Foucault in Guantánamo: Towards an Archaeology of Exception’, Security Dialogue 37 (1): 31–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Negri, Antonio and Michael Hardt (2001) Empire, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neocleous, Mark (2005) ‘The Problem with Normality: Taking Exception to Permanent Emergency’, Alternatives 31: 191–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nodia, Ghia (2005) ‘Georgia: Dimensions of Insecurity’, in Bruno Coppieters and Robert Longvold, eds, Statehood and Security, 39–82, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prazauskas, Algimantas (1994) ‘The Influence of Ethnicity on the Foreign Policies of the Western Littoral States’, in Roman Szporluk, ed., National Identity and Ethnicity in Russia and the New States of Eurasia, 150–184, Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prozorov, Sergei (2005) ‘X/Xs: Toward a General Theory of Exception’, Alternatives 30: 81–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ram, Harsha (1999) Literary Myths and Media Representations of the Chechen Conflict Berkeley Program in Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies Working Paper Series, Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, James (2005) ‘Terrorists, Bandits, Spooks and Thieves: Russian Demonisation of the Chechens Before and Since 9/11’, Third World Quarterly 26 (1): 101–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, Carl (1996) The Concept of the Political, Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, Carl (2003) The Nomos of the Earth, New York: Telos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, Carl (2004) ‘Theory of the Partisan’, Telos 127: 11–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, Carl (2005) Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty, Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, Carl (2008) Political Theology II, Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, George (1970) The Challenge of the Exception, Berlin: Dunckler and Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, George (1987) ‘Enemy or Foe: A Conflict of Modern Politics’, Telos 72: 194–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, Jack (1993) ‘Nationalism and the Crisis of the Post-Soviet State’, Survival 35 (1): 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souleimanov, Emil (2007) An Endless War: The Russian-Chechen Conflict in Perspective, Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Souleimanov, Emil and Ondrej Ditrych (2008) ‘The Internationalisation of the Russian-Chechen Conflict: Myths and Reality’, Europe-Asia Studies 60 (7): 1199–1222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toft, Monica (2005) The Geography of Ethnic Violence, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulmen, G.L. (1987) ‘Return of the Foe’, Telos 72: 187–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R.B.J. (2002) ‘Polis, Cosmopolis, Politics’, Alternatives 28: 267–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R.B.J. (2006) ‘Lines of Insecurity: International, Imperial, Exceptional’, Security Dialogue 37 (1): 65–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelmsen, Julie (2004) When Separatists become Islamists: The Case of Chechnya, Kjeller: Forsvarets Foskinginstitut.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ditrych, O. Georgia: a state of flux. J Int Relat Dev 13, 3–25 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2009.29

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2009.29

Keywords

Navigation