Notes
This idea of ‘main’ rather than ‘sole’ language is crucial since there is indeed an intellectual IR production in languages other than English in some of the aforementioned countries. For 2011–2012, the TRIP team decided for the first time to translate the survey in other languages, so it will be interesting to see the results of this translation exercise.
For an excellent critical overview contrasting the uses of the term ‘practices’ in IR, see Büger and Gadinger (2007).
I am referring here to IR works produced/published in French in Canada, not to IR scholars whose mother tongue is French.
New exciting research on the state of Francophone IR literature in Canada focused on foreign policy might nuance these positions though. See Cornut and Roussel (2011a, 2011b).
For a discussion on the (ir)relevance of postcolonial theory to the case of French-Canadians (and Québécois, more precisely), see notably Schwartzwald (2005) and Cardinal et al. (1999).
References
Agarwala, Rina and Emmanuel Teitelbaum (2010) ‘Trends in Funding for Dissertation Field Research: Why Do Political Science and Sociology Students Win So Few Awards?’, PS: Political Science & Politics 43 (2): 283–289.
Bell, Duncan S.A. (2009) ‘Writing the World: Disciplinary History and Beyond’, International Affairs 85 (1): 3–22.
Blouin-Genest, Gabriel and David Grondin (2010) ‘“This is Africa.” L’empire au coeur des Relations internationales et l’anglais comme langue imperial: le silence postcolonial à travers le cas d’Achille Mbembe’, in Hélène Pellerin, ed., La perspective impériale en Relations internationales, 217–250, Outremont: Athéna éditions.
Büger, Christian and Frank Gadinger (2007) ‘Culture, Terror and Practice in International Relations: An Invitation to Practice Theory’, Paper presented at the workshop ‘The (Re-)turn to Practice: Thinking Practices in International Relations and Security Studies’, 18−19 May, European University Institute, Florence.
Cardinal, Linda, Claude Couture and Claude Denis (1999) ‘La révolution tranquille à l’épreuve de la “nouvelle” historiographie et de l’approche post-coloniale’, GLOBE: Revue internationale d’études québécoises 2 (1): 75–95.
Cornut, Jérémie and Stéphane Roussel (2011a) ‘Un champ et deux univers? Les francophones dans l’étude de la politique étrangère canadienne’, Politiques et sociétés 30 (1): 139–164.
Cornut, Jérémie and Stéphane Roussel (2011b) ‘Canadian Foreign Policy: A Linguistically Divided Field’, Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique 44 (3): 1–26.
Cox, Wayne S. and Kim Richard Nossal (2009) ‘The “Crimson World”: The Anglo Core, the Post-Imperial Non-Core, and the Hegemony of American IR’, in Arlene B. Tickner and Ole Wæver, eds, International Relations Scholarship Around the World, 287–307, London and New York: Routledge.
Deitelhoff, Nicole and Klaus Dieter Wolf (2009) ‘Der Widerspenstigen Selbst-Zähmung? Zur Professionalisierung der Internationalen Beziehungen in Deutschland’, Politische Vierteljahresschrift 50 (3): 451–475.
Dunn, Kevin C. and Timothy M. Shaw, eds (2001) Africa's Challenge to International Relations Theory, Houndmills: Palgrave.
García Segura, Caterina (2006) ‘Spain’, in Knud Erik Jørgensen and Tonny Brems Knudsen, eds, International Relations in Europe: Traditions, Perspectives and Destinations, 100–124, Milton Park and New York: Routledge.
Giesen, Klaus-Gerd (2006) ‘France and Other French-Speaking Countries (1945–1994)’, in Knud Erik Jørgensen and Tonny Brems Knudsen, eds, International Relations in Europe: Traditions, Perspectives and Destinations, 19–46, Milton Park and New York: Routledge.
Gingras, Yves (1984) ‘La valeur d’une langue dans un champ scientifique’, Recherches sociographiques 25 (2): 285–296.
Gingras, Yves and Sébastien Mosbah-Natanson (2010) ‘Where Are Social Sciences Produced?’, in World Social Science Report: Knowledge Divides, 149–153, Paris: UNESCO Publishing and International Social Science Council.
Huysmans, Jef (2006) The Politics of Insecurity: Fear, Migration and Asylum in the EU, Milton Park and New York: Routledge.
Ives, Peter (2006) ‘“Global English”: Linguistic Imperialism or Practical Lingua Franca’, Studies in Language and Capitalism 1 (1): 121–141.
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus (2011) The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of Science and Its Implications for the Study of World Politics, New York: Routledge.
Jordan, Richard, Daniel Maliniak, Amy Oakes, Susan Peterson and Michael J. Tierney (2009) One Discipline or Many? TRIP Survey of International Relations Faculty in Ten Countries, Williamsburg: Institute for the Theory and Practice of International Relations, College of William and Mary.
Jørgensen, Knud Erik and Tonny Brems Knudsen (2006) ‘Introduction’, in Knud Erik Jørgensen and Tonny Brems Knudsen, eds, International Relations in Europe: Traditions, Perspectives and Destinations, 1–16, Milton Park and New York: Routledge.
Kacowicz, Arie M. (2009) ‘Israel: The Development of a Discipline in a Unique Setting’, in Arlene B. Tickner and Ole Wæver, eds, International Relations Scholarship Around the World, 191–207, London and New York: Routledge.
Ling, L.H.M. (2010) ‘Journeys Beyond the West: World Orders and a 7th Century Buddhist Monk’, International Affairs at the New School Working Papers 2010-02, January, http://www.gpia.info/files/u16/Ling_2010-02a.pdf (accessed 1 September, 2011).
Lipson, Michael, Daniel Maliniak, Amy Oakes, Susan Peterson and Michael J. Tierney (2007) ‘Divided Discipline? Comparing Views of US and Canadian IR Scholars’, International Journal 62 (2): 327–343.
Macleod, Alex and Dan O’Meara, eds (2010) Contestations et résistances: les théories des relations internationales depuis la fin de la guerre froide, 2nd edn., Outremont: Athéna éditions.
Mignolo, Walter (2000) Local Histories/Global Designs: Coloniality, Subaltern Knowledges, and Border Thinking, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Neufeld, Mark and Teresa Healy (2001) ‘Critical Reflections on a Discipline: A View from North of the 49th Parallel’, in Robert Crawford and D.S.L. Jarvis, eds, International Relations — Still an American Social Science?, 243–253, Albany: State University of New York Press.
Nossal, Kim Richard (2000) ‘Home-Grown IR: The Canadianization of International Relations’, Journal of Canadian Studies/Revue d’études canadiennes 35 (1): 95–114.
Pennycook, Alastair (1994) The Cultural Politics of English as an International Language, Harlow and New York: Longman Publishers.
Porter, Tony (2001) ‘Can There Be National Perspectives on Inter(National) Relations?’, in Robert Crawford and D.S.L. Jarvis, eds, International Relations — Still an American Social Science? 131–147, Albany: State University of New York Press.
Pouliot, Vincent (2010) International Security in Practice: The Politics of NATO-Russia Diplomacy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schwartzwald, Robert (2005) ‘Rush to Judgement? Postcolonial Criticism and Quebec’, Revista Mexicana de Estudios Canadienses (nueva época) 10: 85–108.
van Parijs, Philippe (2004) ‘Europe's Linguistic Challenge’, European Journal of Sociology 45 (1): 113–145.
van Parijs, Philippe (2010) ‘Linguistic Justice and the Territorial Imperative’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 13 (1): 181–202.
Wæver, Ole (1998) ‘The Sociology of a Not so International Discipline: American and European Developments in International Relations’, International Organization 52 (4): 687–727.
Walt, Stephen (2011) ‘Is IR Still “An American Social Science”?’, Foreign Policy, 6 June, http://walt.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2011/06/06/is_ir_still_an_american_social_science (accessed 16 September, 2011).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
D'Aoust, AM. Accounting for the politics of language in the sociology of IR. J Int Relat Dev 15, 120–131 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2011.30
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2011.30