Abstract
Constructivist scholars have largely limited their view of how state action is socially constructed to the concepts of norms and identity. As for individuals, however, role-playing is also a core aspect of state activity. I demonstrate the potential of this concept for constructivists on the basis of a reconsideration of the roles states play in international politics — drawing on symbolic interactionism and in particular the thought of G.H. Mead. From a Meadian perspective, roles are sets of appropriate behaviours, not bundles of fixed duties; they emerge in interaction and give the actor a sense of its structure and the scope of possible action. Roles are thus the necessary social vehicle for action in its meaning-creating, identity-affirming sense. Using the illustration of the Suez Crisis of 1956, I develop a ‘Meadian interactionist’ conceptual approach that builds on previous attempts to harness the potential of the role concept in International Relations (IR) and sharpens constructivist understandings of the links between role, identity, norms, and action in IR.
References
Adler, Emanuel and Michael N. Barnett (1998) Security Communities, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Aggestam, Lisbeth (1999) ‘Role Conceptions and the Politics of Identity in Foreign Policy’, ARENA Working Papers 99/8, Oslo.
Banton, Michael (1965) Roles, London: Tavistock.
Barnett, Michael N. (1993) ‘Institutions, Roles, and Disorder: The Case of the Arab States System’, International Studies Quarterly 37 (3): 271–296.
Bially Mattern, Janice (2001) ‘The Power Politics of Identity’, European Journal of International Relations 7 (3): 349–397.
Bially Mattern, Janice (2003) ‘The Difference that Language-Power Makes: Solving the Puzzle of the Suez Crisis’, in François Debrix, ed., Language, Agency, and Politics in a Constructed World, Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.
Bially Mattern, Janice (2005) Ordering International Politics, New York: Routledge.
Blumer, Herbert (1969) Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bukovansky, Mlada (1997) ‘American Identity and Neutral Rights from Independence to the War of 1812’, International Organization 51 (2): 209–243.
Bull, Hedley (1977) The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, Houndmills: Macmillan.
Burkitt, Ian (1991) Social Selves, London: Sage.
Cederman, Lars-Erik and Christopher Daase (2006) ‘Endogenizing Corporate Identities: The Next Step in Constructivist IR Theory’, in Stefano Guzzini and Anna Leander, eds, Constructivism and International Relations: Alexander Wendt and His Critics, 118–139, London: Routledge.
Charon, Joel M. (1998) Symbolic Interactionism, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Darby, Phillip (1973) British Defence Policy East of Suez, 1947–1968, London: Oxford University Press.
Durkheim, Emile (1895) The Rules of Sociological Method, New York: Free Press.
Eden, Anthony (1960) Full Circle, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Fearon, James (1999) ‘What is Identity (As We Now Use the Word)?’, unpublished manuscript, Stanford University.
Fierke, Karin M. (1998) Changing Games, Changing Strategies, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Finnemore, Martha (2003) The Purpose of Intervention, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Freiberger, Steven Z. (1992) Dawn Over Suez, Chicago: Ivan R. Dee.
Friedrichs, Jörg and Friedrich V. Kratochwil (2009) ‘On Acting and Knowing: How Pragmatism Can Advance International Relations Research and Methodology’, International Organization 63 (4): 701–731.
Garfinkel, Harold (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
George, Alexander and Andrew Bennett (2005) Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences, Cambridge: MIT Press.
Glaser, Charles (2010) Rational Theory of International Politics, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Goffman, Erving (1990) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, London: Penguin.
Goldstein, Judith and Robert O. Keohane, eds (1993) Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Gurowitz, Amy (2006) ‘The Diffusion of International Norms: Why Identity Matters’, International Politics 43: 305–341.
Guzzini, Stefano and Anna Leander, eds (2006) Constructivism and International Relations: Alexander Wendt and His Critics, London: Routledge.
Hall, Rodney Bruce (1999) National Collective Identity: Social Constructs and International Systems, New York: Columbia University Press.
Hewitt, John P. (1997) Self and Society, Needham Heights: Allyn and Bacon.
Holsti, Kal J. (1970) ‘National Role Conceptions in the Study of Foreign Policy’, International Studies Quarterly 14 (3): 233–309.
Hopf, Ted (2002) Social Construction of International Politics, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Hopf, Ted (2010) ‘The Logic of Habit in International Relations’, European Journal of International Relations 16 (4): 539–561.
Jackson, John A. (1972) Role, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jackson, Patrick T. (2010) The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations, New York: Routledge.
Jackson, Patrick T. and Daniel H. Nexon (1999) ‘Relations Before States: Substance, Process and the Study of World Politics’, European Journal of International Relations 5 (3): 291–332.
Jackson, Patrick T. and Daniel H. Nexon (2009) ‘Paradigmatic Faults in International Relations Theory’, International Studies Quarterly 53: 907–930.
Joas, Hans (1980) G.H. Mead: A Contemporary Reassessment of His Thought, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Joas, Hans (1993) Pragmatism and Social Theory, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Kampfner, John (2004) Blair's Wars, London: Simon and Schuster.
Katzenstein, Peter J. (1996) The Culture of National Security, New York: Columbia University Press.
Klotz, Audie (1995) Norms in International Relations, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Klotz, Audie and Cecilia Lynch (2007) Strategies for Research in Constructivist International Relations, Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.
Kratochwil, Friedrich V. (1989) Rules, Norms, and Decisions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kratochwil, Friedrich V. (1993) ‘The Embarrassment of Changes: Neo-Realism as the Science of Realpolitik without Politics’, Review of International Studies 19 (1): 63–80.
Kratochwil, Friedrich V. (2006) ‘History, Action, and Identity: Revisiting the “Second” Great Debate and Assessing Its Importance for Social Theory’, European Journal of International Relations 12 (1): 5–29.
Kratochwil, Friedrich V. (2007) ‘Of False Prophets and Good Bets: A Plea for a Pragmatic Approach to Theory Building’, Journal of International Relations and Development 10 (2): 1–15.
Kunz, Diane (1991) The Economic Diplomacy of the Suez Crisis, Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
Kyle, Keith (1991) Suez, London: I.B. Tauris.
Lapid, Yosef and Friedrich V. Kratochwil (1996) The Return of Culture and Identity in IR Theory, Boulder: Lynne Reiner.
Larson, Deborah Welch (1994) ‘The Role of Belief Systems and Schemas in Foreign Policy Decision-Making’, Political Psychology 15 (1): 17–33.
Le Prestre, Phillippe G., ed. (1997) Role Quests in the Post-Cold War Era, Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
Legro, Jeffrey W. (1996) ‘Culture and Preferences in the International Cooperation Two-Step’, American Political Science Review 90: 118–137.
Legro, Jeffrey W. (2009) ‘The Plasticity of Identity under Anarchy’, European Journal of International Relations 15 (1): 37–65.
Linton, Ralph (1936) The Study of Man, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Little, Richard and Steve Smith (1988) Belief Systems and International Relations, Oxford: Blackwell.
Lloyd, Selwyn (1978) Suez 1956, New York: Mayflower.
Louis, W.M. Roger and Roger Owen, eds (1989) Suez 1956: The Crisis and Its Consequences, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Lucas, Scott (1996) Britain and Suez, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Lucas, W.Scott (1991) Divided We Stand, London: Hodder and Stoughton.
Magid, Alvin (1980) ‘“Role Theory”, Political Science, and African Studies’, World Politics 32 (2): 311–330.
March, James G. and Johan P. Olsen (2004) The Logic of Appropriateness, Oslo: ARENA.
Mead, George Herbert (1934) Mind, Self and Society, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Miller, J.D. Bruce (1989) ‘Australia and the Crisis’, in W.M. Roger Louis and Roger Owen, eds, Suez 1956, 131–143, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Mitzen, Jennifer (2006) ‘Anchoring Europe's Civilizing Identity: Habits, Capabilities and Ontological Security’, Journal of European Public Policy 13 (2): 270–285.
Morrow, James D. (1994) Game Theory for Political Scientists, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Natanson, Maurice (1970) The Journeying Self: A Study in Philosophy and Social Role, Reading: Addision-Wesley.
Nutting, Anthony (1967) No End of a Lesson, New York: Potter.
Parsons, Talcott (1951) The Social System, Glencoe: Free Press.
Pouliot, Vincent (2004) ‘The Essence of Constructivism’, Journal of International Relations and Development 7: 319–336.
Pouliot, Vincent (2008) ‘The Logic of Practicality: A Theory of Practice of Security Communities’, International Organization 62: 257–288.
Ringmar, Erik (1996) Identity, Interest and Action, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Salter, Mark B. (2008) ‘Securitization and Desecuritization: A Dramaturgical Analysis of the Canadian Air Transport Security Authority’, Journal of International Relations and Development 11: 321–349.
Sanders, David (1990) Losing an Empire, Finding a Role, Houndmills: Macmillan.
Sartori, Giovanni (1970) ‘Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics’, American Political Science Review 64 (4): 1033–1053.
Searle, John R. (1995) The Construction of Social Reality, New York: Free Press.
Shih, Chih-Yu (1988) ‘National Role Conceptions as Foreign Policy Motivation: The Psychocultural Bases of Chinese Diplomacy’, Political Psychology 9 (4): 599–631.
Shorter Oxford English Dictionary (2002) Shorter Oxford English Dictionary, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Steele, Brent (2008) Ontological Security in International Relations: Self-Identity and the IR State, London: Routledge.
Stryker, Sheldon and Anne Statham (1985) ‘Symbolic Interaction and Role Theory’, in Gardner Lindzay and Elliot Aronson, eds, Handbook of Social Psychology, 311–378, New York: Random House.
Tugendhat, Ernst (1986) Self-Consciousness and Self-Determination, Cambridge: MIT Press.
Turner, Jonathan H. (1988) A Theory of Social Interaction, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Turner, Ralph (1956) ‘Role-Taking, Role Standpoint, and Reference-Group Behavior’, The American Journal of Sociology 61 (4): 316–328.
Vaïsse, Maurice (1989) ‘France and the Suez Crisis’, in W.M. Roger Louis and Roger Owen, eds, Suez 1956: The Crisis and Its Consequences, 275–283, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Walker, Stephen G., ed. (1987) Role Theory and Foreign Policy Analysis, Durham: Duke University Press.
Walsh, James I. (2007) ‘Do States Play Signaling Games?’ Cooperation and Conflict 42 (4): 441–459.
Waltz, Kenneth N. (1979) Theory of International Politics, New York: Random House.
Weber, Max (1997) The Methodology of the Social Sciences, in Edward A. Shils and Henry A Finch, eds and trans, New York: Free Press.
Weinstein, Eugene and Paul Deustchberger (1963) ‘Some Dimensions of Altercasting’, Sociometry 2 (4): 454–466.
Wendt, Alexander (1992) ‘Anarchy is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics’, International Organization 46 (2): 391–425.
Wendt, Alexander (1999) Social Theory of International Politics, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wight, Martin (1991) International Theory: The Three Traditions, Leicester: Leicester University Press.
Wish, Naomi Bailin (1980) ‘Foreign Policy Makers and Their National Role Conceptions’, International Studies Quarterly 24 (4): 532–554.
Wrong, Dennis (1961) ‘The Oversocialized Conception of Man in Modern Sociology’, American Sociological Review 26 (2): 183–193.
Yanow, Dvora and Peregrine Schwatz-Shea, eds (2006) Interpretation and Method, Armonk: ME Sharpe.
Youde, Jeremy (2008) ‘Is Universal Access to Antiretroviral Drugs an Emerging International Norm?’ Journal of International Relations and Development 11 (4): 415–440.
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank Friedrich Kratochwil, Stephanie Mudge, Dan Nexon, Brent Steele, and three anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments on this paper, in addition to Patrick Thaddeus Jackson and the editors of JIRD. Thanks are also due to Chris Brown, Alun Gibbs, Richard Little, and Fernando Veliz for useful thoughts on earlier versions of the argument.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McCourt, D. The roles states play: a Meadian interactionist approach. J Int Relat Dev 15, 370–392 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2011.26
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2011.26