Skip to main content
Log in

Imperialism or globalisation? … Or imperialism and globalisation: Theorising the international after Rosenberg's ‘post-mortem’

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of International Relations and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article examines the concepts of globalisation and imperialism, both in terms of their explanatory status, and in the light of changes in the international order since the end of the Cold War. It does so both through detailed theoretical and empirical analysis, and in part through focusing on a key contributor to this debate, Justin Rosenberg. It is argued that Rosenberg's theoretical post-mortem for globalisation is correct. However, it is also argued that Rosenberg's historical post-mortem is far less convincing, not least when related to his subsequent attempts to draw on the concept of uneven and combined development in order to explain the reality of geopolitical conflict in the international order. It is here that the concept of imperialism enters the picture, and the article suggests that attempts to update theories of geopolitical competition based on Lenin and Bukharin's work on imperialism are unconvincing, as they fail to take full account of the changes in the international order since 1945. These changes — the internationalisation of capital and rise of global production networks, the rise of manufacturing in the developing world, the internationalisation of the state, cooperation between developed capitalist powers, and US hegemony — are well described, if not necessarily explained by the concept of globalisation. However, this does not mean that the concept of imperialism is no longer of use, and the idea is defended through a discussion of the hierarchies associated with the globalisation of production. It is further illustrated by relating liberal military intervention to this continued reality of global hierarchy and inequality in the international order. The article concludes by defending the ideas of imperialism and uneven and combined development, but argues that these cannot be used to explain the nature of the international state system (or geo-politics), but rather the hierarchies associated with the international capitalist order (or political economy).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amin, Samir (1976) Unequal Development, New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayers, Alison (2008) ‘Introduction’, in Alison Ayers, ed., Gramsci, Political Economy and International Relations, 1–21, London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Dean, Gerald Epstein and Robert Pollin (1998) ‘Introduction’, in Dean Baker, Gerald Epstein and Robert Pollin, eds, Globalization and Progressive Economic Policy, 1–34, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri, Katherine (2002) The Liberal Illusion, Detroit: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, Thomas (2005) The Pentagon's New Map, Berkley: Berkley Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, David and Robert Sklar (1987) ‘Why Postimperialism?’, in David Becker, Jeffery Freiden, Stuart Schatz, Richard Sklar, eds, Postimperialism: International Capitalism and Development in the Late Twentieth Century, Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy Foster, John (2003) ‘The New Age of Imperialism’, Monthly Review 55 (3): 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhalla, Surjit (2010) ‘Raising the Standard: The War on Global Poverty’, in Sudhir Anand, Paul Segal and Joseph Stiglitz, eds, Debates on the Measurement of Global Poverty, 115–42, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre (1999) Acts of Resistance, Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breslin, Shaun (2007) China in the Global Political Economy, London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Breslin, Shaun (2010) ‘China's Emerging Global Role: Dissatisfied Responsible Great Power’, Politics 30 (S.1): 52–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bukharin, Nikolai (1914/2003) Imperialism and World Economy, London: Bookmarks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burbach, Roger and Bill Robinson (1999) ‘The Fin de Siecle Debate: Globalization as Epochal Shift’, Science and Society 63 (1): 10–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cafruny, Alan and Magnus Ryner (2007) Europe at Bay, Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callinicos, Alex (2003) The New Mandarins of American Power, Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callinicos, Alex (2005) ‘Imperialism and Global Political Economy’, International Socialism 108: 109–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callinicos, Alex (2009) Imperialism and Global Political Economy, Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callinicos, Alex (2010) The Bonfire of Illusions, Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso, Fernando and Enzo Falletto (1974) Dependency and Development in Latin America, Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, William (2010) The Making of a Transnational Capitalist Class, London: Zed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Steve (2008) China, the US and the Power Transition Theory, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Ha Joon (2002) Kicking Away the Ladder, London: Anthem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Shaohua and Martin Ravallion (2004) ‘How Have the World's Poorest Fared since the Early 1980s’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, no. 3341, http://econ.worldbank.org, (accessed 3 March, 2007).

  • Collier, Paul (2008) The Bottom Billion, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Robert (2002) ‘Why We Still Need Empires’, The Observer, 7 April.

  • Cox, R. (1981) ‘Social Forces, States and World Orders’, Millennium 10 (2): 126–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, R. (1992) ‘Global Perestroika’, in Ralph Miliband and Leo Panitch, eds., The Socialist Register 1992, 26–43, London: Merlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushman, Thomas (2005) ‘Introduction: the Liberal Humanitarian Case for War in Iraq’, in Thomas Cushman, ed., A Matter of Principle, 1–26, Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, Neil (2009) ‘Putting the Nation Back into International’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs 22 (1): 9–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Mike (2004) ‘The Urbanization of Empire: Megacities and the Laws of Chaos’, Social Text 22 (4): 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffield, Mark (2005) ‘Getting Savages to Fight Barbarians’, Conflict, Security and Development 5 (2): 141–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumbrell, John (2010) ‘American Power: Crisis or Renewal?’ Politics 30 (S.1): 15–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, James (2006) Dark Shadows, Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, Andre Gunder (1969) Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America, New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamble, Andrew (2005) ‘Globalization: Getting the Big Picture Right’, International Politics 42 (2): 364–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, Anthony (2002) Which Way for New Labour?, Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, Stephen (1995) ‘Globalisation, Market Civilisation and Disciplinary Neoliberalism’, Millennium 24 (3): 399–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glyn, Andrew, A. Hughes, Alain Lipietz and Ajit Singh (1992) ‘The Rise and Fall of the Golden Age’, in Stephen Marglin and Juliet Schor, eds, The Golden Age of Capitalism, 39–125, Oxford: Clarendon.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, Stephen (2010) Cities under Siege, London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, Peter (2002) ‘The Passage from Imperialism to Empire’, Historical Materialism 10 (1): 29–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, Michael and Toni Negri (2004) Multitude, New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart-Landsberg, Martin and Paul Burkett (2005) China and Socialism: Market Reforms and Class Struggle, New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, Colin (2011) ‘Pathology without Crisis: The Strange Demise of the Anglo-liberal Growth Model’, Government and Opposition 46 (1): 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Held, David and Tony McGrew (2007) Globalization/Anti-globalization, Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, David, Anthony McGrew, David Goldblatt and Jonathan Perraton (1999) Global Transformations, Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hung, Ho-fung (2009) ‘America's Head Servant?’ New Left Review II (64): 97–108.

  • Hung, Ho-fung (2011) ‘Sinomana: Global Crisis, China's Crisis?’ in Leo Panitch, Greg Albo and Vivek Chibber, eds, The Socialist Register 2012, 217–34, London: Merlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, Jonathan (2008) ‘On the Limits of Neo-Gramscian International Relations: A Scientific Realist Account of Hegemony’, in Alison Ayers, ed., Gramsci, Political Economy and International Relations Theory, 67–88, London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel (1957) Perpetual Peace and Other Essays on Politics, History and Morals, Indianapolis: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplinsky, Raphael (2005) Globalization, Poverty and Inequality, Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kautsky, Karl (1914/1970) ‘Ultra-imperialism’, New Left Review I/59: 41–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, Cristobal (1991) Latin American Theories of Development and Underdevelopment, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keen, David (2005) ‘Liberalization and Conflict’, International Political Science Review 26 (1): 73–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keen, David (2006) Endless War?, London: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiely, Ray (2005) The Clash of Globalisations, Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiely, Ray (2007) The New Political Economy of Development, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozul Wright, Richard and Paul Rayment (2004) ‘Globalization Reloaded: An UNCTAD Perspective’, UNCTAD Discussion Papers no. 167: 1–50.

  • Larrain, Jorge (1989) Theories of Development, Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenin, Vladmir (1916/1977) ‘Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism’, in Selected Works, Moscow: Progress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leys, Colin and John Saul (2006) ‘Dependency’, in John Saul, ed., Development after Globalization, 9–17, London: Zed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mearsheimer, John (2001) The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, John Stuart (1859/1984) ‘A Few Words on Non-intervention’, in J. Robson, ed., Collected Works Vol. 18, 109–24, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, Peter and Jin Zhang (2010) ‘Global Competition after the Financial Crisis’, New Left Review II (64): 97–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • NSS (2002) ‘The National Security Strategy of the United States of America, http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss.html, (accessed 6 June, 2009).

  • Palma, Gabriel (1978) ‘Dependency and Development: A Formal Theory of Underdevelopment or a Methodology for the Analysis of Concrete Situations of Underdevelopment?’ World Development 6 (10): 881–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panitch, Leo and Martijn Konings (2008) ‘US Financial Power in Crisis’, Historical Materialism 16 (4): 3–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitts, Jennifer (2007) ‘Boundaries of Victorian International Law’, in Duncan Bell, ed., Victorian Visions of Global Order, 67–88, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, Sanjay and Thomas Pogge (2003) ‘How Not to Count the Poor’, http://www.socialanalysis.org, (accessed 3 March, 2007).

  • Reinert, E. (2007) How Rich Countries Got Rich and Why Poor Countries Stay Poor, London: Constable.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Susan, Anna Secor and Matthew Sparke (2003) ‘Neoliberal Geopolitics’, Antipode 35 (5): 886–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, Bill (2002) ‘Capitalist Globalization and the Transnationalization of the State’, in Mark Rupert and Hazel Smith, eds, Historical Materialism and Globalization, 210–9, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, Bill (2004) A Theory of Global Capitalism, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, Bill (2005) ‘Gramsci and Globalization: From Nation-state to Transnational Hegemony’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (4): 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, Bill (2010) ‘Beyond the Theory of Imperialism: Global Capitalism and the Transnational State’, in Alex Anievas, ed., Marxism and World Politics, 61–76, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodney, Walter (1972) How Europe Underdeveloped Africa, London: Bogle L’Ouverture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, Justin (2000) The Follies of Globalisation Theory, London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, Justin (2005) ‘Globalization Theory: A Postmortem’, International Politics 42 (1): 2–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, Justin (2006) ‘Why Is There No Historical Sociology of International Relations?’ European Journal of International Relations 12 (3): 307–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, Justin (2009) ‘Problems in the Theory of Uneven and Combined Development. Part I: Introduction’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs 22 (1): 107–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, Justin (2010) ‘Basic Problems in the Theory of Uneven and Combined Development. Part II: Unevenness and Political Multiplicity’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs 23 (1): 165–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rugraff, Eric, Diego Sanchez-Anchocea and Andrew Sumner (2008) ‘How Have TNCs Changed in the Last 50 Years’, in Eric Rugraff, D. Sanchez-Anchocea, and Andrew Sumner, eds, Transnational Corporations and Development Policy, 9–28, London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runciman, David (2005) The Politics of Good Intentions, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholte, Jan Art (2000) Globalization: A Critical Introduction, London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, Herman (2009) Sub-prime Nation, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, Herman (2010) ‘Structured Finance for Financed Structures: American Economic Power Before and After the Global Financial Crisis’, in Martin Konings, ed., The Great Credit Crash, 173–97, London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scruton, Roger (2005) ‘National Interest and International Law’, in Thomas Cushman, ed., A Matter of Principle, 95–105, Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, Martin (2005) The New Western Way of War, Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinfeld, Edward (2010) Playing Our Game, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, Eileen (1983) ‘Liberalism and Imperialism: JS Mill's Defense of the British Empire’, Journal of the History of Ideas 44 (4): 599–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sumner, Andrew (2005) ‘Epistemology and ‘Evidence’ in Development Studies: A Review of Dollar and Kraay’, Third World Quarterly 25 (6): 1167–1177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sumner, Andrew (2010) ‘Global Poverty and the New Bottom Billion’, Brighton: IDS Working Paper, no.349.

  • Thompson, Helen (2010) China and the Mortgaging of America, London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Trotsky, Leon (1936/1970) The Third International after Lenin, New York: Pathfinder.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD (1998) World Investment Report 1998, Geneva: UNCTAD.

  • UNCTAD (2002a) Trade and Development Report 2002, Geneva: UNCTAD.

  • UNCTAD (2002b) World Investment Report 2002, Geneva: UNCTAD.

  • UNCTAD (2004) Trade and Development Report 2004, Geneva: UNCTAD.

  • UNCTAD (2007) World Investment Report 2007, Geneva: UNCTAD.

  • UNCTAD (2010) World Investment Report 2010, Geneva: UNCTAD.

  • Wacquant, Loic (2009) Punishing the Poor, Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, Robert (2004a) ‘Is Globalization Reducing Poverty and Inequality?’ World Development 32 (4): 163–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, Robert (2004b) ‘On the Causes of Increasing World Poverty and Inequality, or Why the Matthew Effect Prevails’, New Political Economy 9 (2): 163–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, Robert (2005) ‘Failing States and Cumulative Causation in the World System’, International Political Science Review 26 (1): 17–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, Kenneth (1979) Theory of International Politics, New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, Kenneth (2000) ‘Structural Realism after the Cold War’, International Security 25 (1): 5–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, Bill (1980) Imperialism: Pioneer of Capitalism, London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max (1919/1984) ‘The Profession and Vocation of Politics’, in P. Lassman and R. Speirs, eds, Max Weber: Political Writings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, Alexander (1992) ‘Anarchy Is What States Make of It’, International Organisation 46 (2): 391–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Went, Robert (2002/3) ‘Globalisation in the Perspective of Imperialism’, Science and Society 66 (4): 473–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, Nick (2000) Saving Strangers, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlforth, William and Stephen Brooks (2008) World out of Balance, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1999) World Development Report 1999, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • World Bank (2002) Globalization, Growth and Poverty, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Young, Alisdair (2010) ‘Perspectives on the Changing Global Distribution of Power: Concepts and Context’, Politics 30 (S.1): 2–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kiely, R. Imperialism or globalisation? … Or imperialism and globalisation: Theorising the international after Rosenberg's ‘post-mortem’. J Int Relat Dev 17, 274–300 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2013.2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2013.2

Keywords

Navigation