Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Opening the black box: A multi-method analysis of an enterprise resource planning implementation

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Information Technology

Abstract

This paper presents a multi-method analysis of the implementation of an enterprise resource planning system. It argues the majority of research treats these systems as having essential technical properties that enable them to bring about positive organisational effects. In contrast, we adopt a post-essentialist perspective that understands discourse as constructing ERP systems, rather than reflecting their essential properties. Discourse analysis of interviews and focus groups was used to compare justifications for the implementation produced by members of the ERP project team with end users' reactions to the system. In contrast to previous studies, this opens the ERP black box by illustrating how the capabilities of these systems, and their organisational effects, are constructed through language. Moreover, it demonstrates the important function these constructions perform in legitimising or undermining ERP implementation. Statistical analysis of post-implementation questionnaires identified the predictors of established measures of users' reactions to IT systems. By comparing these data with end users' discursive reactions to the project, we identify several constructs for inclusion in future studies of users' reactions to ERP systems. The paper concludes by summarising the contributions and limitations of the study and its implications for future research and practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdinnour-Helm, S., Lengnick-Hall, M.L. and Lengnick-Hall, C.A. (2003). Pre-implementation Attitudes and Organizational Readiness for Implementing an Enterprise Resource Planning system, European Journal of Operational Research 146 (2): 258–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adam, F. and O'Doherty, P. (2000). Lessons from Enterprise Resource Planning Implementations in Ireland – Towards Smaller and Shorter ERP Projects, Journal of Information Technology 15 (4): 305–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amoako-Gyampah, K. and Salam, A.F. (2004). An Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model in an ERP Implementation Environment, Information & Management 41 (6): 731–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amoako-Gyampah, K. (2007). Perceived Usefulness, User Involvement and Behavioral Intention: An empirical study of ERP implementation, Computers in Human Behavior 23 (3): 1232–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avital, M. and Vandenbosch, B. (2000). SAP Implementation at Metalica: An organizational drama in two acts, Journal of Information Technology 15 (3): 183–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagchi, S., Kanungo, S. and Dasgupta, S. (2003). Modeling Use of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems: A path analytic study, European Journal of Information Systems 12 (2): 142–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, B.R. (2004). The Challenges of Complex IT Projects – The Report of a Working Group from The Royal Academy of Engineering and The British Computer Society.

  • Clegg, C.W., Carey, N., Dean, G., Hornby, P. and Bolden, R. (1997). Users' Reactions to Information Technology: Some multivariate models and their implications, Journal of Information Technology 12 (1): 15–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, C.W. and Shepherd, C. (2007). The Biggest Computer Programme in the World … Ever!' – Time for a Change in Mindset? Journal of Information Technology: Organisation, Management, Information and Systems 22: 212–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, J.M. and Huffcutt, A.I. (2003). A Review and Evaluation of Exploratory Factor Analysis Practices in Organizational Research, Organizational Research Methods 6: 147–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T.H. (1998). Putting the Enterprise into the Enterprise System, Harvard Business Review 76 (4): 121–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deetz, S. (1996). Describing Differences in Approaches to Organization Science: Rethinking Burrell and Morgan and their legacy, Organization Science 7 (2): 191–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dery, K., Grant, D., Harley, B. and Wright, C. (2006a). Work, Organisation and Enterprise Resource Planning Systems: An alternative research agenda, New Technology Work and Employment 21 (3): 199–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dery, K., Hall, R. and Wailes, N. (2006b). ERPs as ‘Technologies-in-Practice’: Social construction, materiality and the role of organisational factors, New Technology Work and Employment 21 (3): 229–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dick, P. and Cassell, C. (2002). Barriers to Managing Diversity in a UK Constabulary: The role of discourse, Journal of Management Studies 39 (5): 953–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, S. and Tizner, A. (1988). Implementing Computer Based Automation in the Office: A study of experienced stress, Journal of Organizational Behaviour 9: 183–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elbanna, A.R. (2006). The Validity of the Improvisation Argument in the Implementation of Rigid Technology: The case of ERP systems, Journal of Information Technology 21 (3): 165–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabrigar, L.R., Wegener, D.T., MacCallum, R.C. and Strahan, E.J. (1999). Evaluating the Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Psychological Research, Psychological methods 4 (3): 272–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, A. (1974). Beyond Contract: Work power and trust relations, London: Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gattiker, T.F. and Goodhue, D.L. (2002). Software-Driven Changes to Business Processes: An empirical study of impacts of enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems at the local level, International Journal of Production Research 40 (18): 4799–4814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, D., Hall, R., Wailes, N. and Wright, C. (2006). The False Promise of Technological Determinism: The case of enterprise resource planning systems, New Technology Work and Employment 21 (1): 2–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grint, K. and Woolgar, S. (1995). On Some Failures of Nerve in Constructivist and Feminist Analyses of Technology, Science Technology & Human Values 20 (3): 286–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grint, K. and Woolgar, S. (1997). The Machine at Work: Technology, work and organization, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. (2002). Enterprise Resource Planning Systems and Organizational Change: Transforming the work organization, Strategic Change 11 (5): 263–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirt, S.G. and Swanson, E.B. (1999). Adopting SAP at Siemens Power Corporation, Journal of Information Technology 14 (3): 243–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holman, D., Axtell, C., Clegg, C., Pepper, K., Waterson, P., Cantista, I. and Older-Gray, M. (2000). Change and Innovation in Modern Manufacturing Practices: An expert panel survey of UK companies, Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing 10 (2): 121–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horton, R.P., Buck, T., Waterson, P.E. and Clegg, C.W. (2001). Explaining Intranet Use with the Technology Acceptance Model, Journal of Information Technology 16 (4): 237–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Igbaria, M. and Parasuraman, S. (1991). Attitudes Towards Microcomputers: Development and construct validation of a measure, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 35: 553–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen, S., Shepherd, J., D'Aquila, M. and Carter, C. (2007). The ERP Market Sizing Report, 2006–2011: AMR research.

  • Jones, M. (1999). Structuration Theory, in W. Currie and B. Galliers (eds.) Rethinking Management Information Systems, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 103–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kling, R. (1992). Audiences, Narratives, and Human-Values in Social-Studies of Technology, Science Technology & Human Values 17 (3): 349–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch, C. (2001). Enterprise Resource Planning – Information Technology as a Steamroller for Management Politics? Journal of Organizational Change Management 14 (1): 64–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krumbholz, M., Galliers, J., Coulianos, N. and Maiden, N.A.M. (2000). Implementing Enterprise Resource Planning Packages in Different Corporate and National Cultures, Journal of Information Technology 15 (4): 267–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, E.T.K., Pan, S.L. and Tan, C.W. (2005). Managing User Acceptance Towards Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Systems – Understanding the Dissonance Between User Expectations and Managerial Policies, European Journal of Information Systems 14 (2): 135–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majchrzak, A. (1990). Effect of CAD on the Jobs of Drafters and Engineers: A quantitative case study, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 32: 245–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majchrzak, A. and Borys, B. (1998). Computer-Aided Technology and Work: Moving the field forward, in C.L. Cooper and I.T. Robertson (eds.) International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, London: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 305–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, M.L., Axline, S., Petrie, D. and Tanis, C. (2000). Learning from Adopters' Experiences with ERP: Problems encountered and success achieved, Journal of Information Technology 15 (4): 245–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLoughlin, I. (1999). Creative Technological Change: The shaping of technology and organizations, London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, D. and Romm, C. (2002). Justifying Enterprise Resource Planning Adoption, Journal of Information Technology 17 (4): 199–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parr, A. and Shanks, G. (2000). A Model of ERP Implementation, Journal of Information Technology 15: 289–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Podsakoff, N.P. and Lee, J.Y. (2003). Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies, Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (5): 879–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomerantz, A.M. (1986). Extreme Case Formations, A New Way of Legitimating Claims, Human Studies 9: 219–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J. (1996). Representing Reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction, London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ragowsky, A. and Somers, T.M. (2002). Special Section: Enterprise resource planning, Journal of Management Information Systems 19 (1): 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robey, D., Ross, J.W. and Boudreau, M.C. (2002). Learning to Implement Enterprise Systems: An exploratory study of the dialectics of change, Journal of Management Information Systems 19 (1): 17–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. (1999). Dow Corning Corporation: Business processes and information technology, Journal of Information Technology 14: 253–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J.A. and Kaindl, L. (2000). Enhancing Functionality in an Enterprise Software Package, Information & Management 37 (3): 111–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, C. (2006). Constructing Enterprise Resource Planning: A thoroughgoing interpretivist perspective on technological change, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 79: 357–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sumner, M. (2000). Risk Factors in Enterprise-Wide/ERP Projects, Journal of Information Technology 15 (4): 317–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Symon, G. (2005). Exploring Resistance From a Rhetorical Perspective, Organization Studies 26: 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Stijn, E. and Wensley, A. (2001). Organizational Memory and the Completeness of Process Modeling in ERP Systems: Some concerns, methods and directions for future research, Business Process Management Journal 7 (3): 181–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies, Management Science 46 (2): 186–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooffitt, R. (1992). Telling Tales of the Unexpected: The organization of factual discourse, London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yen, D.C., Chou, D.C. and Chang, J. (2002). A Synergic Analysis for Web-Based Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, Computer Standards & Interfaces 24 (4): 337–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Catherine Cassell, Mark Robinson, Kate Shepherd, and Catherine Congreve, for their advice and assistance with this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Nottingham University Business School, Jubilee Campus, Nottingham, NG8 1BB, UK

    Craig Shepherd

  2. Leeds University Business School, Maurice Keyworth Building, The University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK

    Chris Clegg

  3. Institute of Work Psychology, Mushroom Lane, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK

    Chris Stride

Authors
  1. Craig Shepherd
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chris Clegg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chris Stride
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Craig Shepherd.

Appendix A

Appendix A

See Table A1

Table a1 Matrix illustrating the 15 factor structure and factor loadings
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shepherd, C., Clegg, C. & Stride, C. Opening the black box: A multi-method analysis of an enterprise resource planning implementation. J Inf Technol 24, 81–102 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2008.32

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2008.32

Keywords

Search

Navigation