Skip to main content
Log in

The diffusion of IP telephony and vendors’ commercialisation strategies

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Information Technology

Abstract

The Internet telephony (IP telephony) has been presented as a technology that can replace existing fixed-line services and disrupt the telecommunications industry by offering new low-priced services. This study investigates the diffusion of IP telephony in Denmark by focusing on vendors’ commercialisation strategies. The theory of disruptive innovation is introduced to investigate vendors’ perceptions about IP telephony and explore their strategies that affect the diffusion process in the residential market. The analysis is based on interview data collected from the key market players. The study's findings suggest that IP telephony is treated as a sustaining innovation that goes beyond the typical voice transmission and enables provision of advanced services such as video telephony.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adner, R. (2002). When are Technologies Disruptive? A Demand-based View of the Emergence of Competition, Strategic Management Journal 23 (8): 687–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal, R. and Prasad, J. (1997). The Role of Innovation Characteristics and Perceived Voluntariness in the Adoption of Information Technologies, Decision Sciences 28 (3): 557–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahuja, S.R. and Ensor, R. (2004). VoIP: What is it good for? Queue 21 (6): 49–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, S.D. (2005). Do You Really Know What You’re Talking About? Strategy & Innovation, (May/June), Harvard Business School Publishing Product #S0505A: 1–4.

  • Barrett, M. and Walsham, G. (1999). Electronic Trading and Work Transformation in the London Insurance Market, Information Systems Research 10 (1): 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barthold, J. (2008). Vonage Shifts Product Strategy Focus. Telecommunications Magazine, [www document] http://www.telecoms-mag.com/magazine/article.asp?HH_ID=AR_4218 (accessed 30th September 2008).

  • Baskerville, R. and Pries-Heje, J. (2001). A Multiple Theory Analysis of a Diffusion of Information Technology Case, Information Systems Journal 11 (1): 181–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyatzis, R. (1998). Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic analysis and code development, London, UK: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology, Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (1): 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cawley, R.A. (1997). Internet, Lies and Telephony, Telecommunications Policy 21 (6): 513–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C.M. (1997). The Innovator's Dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C.M. (2006). The Ongoing Process of Building a Theory of Disruption, Journal of Product Innovation Management 23: 29–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C.M., Anthony, S.D. and Roth, E.A. (2004). Seeing What's Next: Using the theories of innovation to predict industry change, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, J.K. and Vendelø, M.T. (2003). The Role of Reputation Building in International R&D Project Collaboration, Corporate Reputation Review 5 (4): 304–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constantiou, I.D. and Kautz, K. (2008). Economic Factors and Diffusion of IP Telephony: Empirical evidence from an advanced market, Telecommunications Policy 32 (3/4): 197–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, R. (2003). The Cook Report on Internet Protocol, XI (10–11): 1–103.

  • Cooper, R.B. and Zmud, R.W. (1990). Information Technology Implementation Research: A technological diffusion approach, Management Science 36 (2): 123–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corrocher, N. (2003). The Diffusion of Internet Telephony among Consumers and Firms: Current issues and future prospects, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 70: 525–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danneels, E. (2004). Disruptive Technology Reconsidered: A critique and research Agenda, Journal of Innovation Management 21 (1): 246–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (2000). The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research, in Y. Lincoln (ed.) Handbook of Qualitative Research, London, UK: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economist Intelligence Unit (2008). E-readiness Rankings 2008. London: EUI and IBM Institute for Business Value.

  • Edquist, C. (ed.) (1997). Systems of Innovation: Technologies, institutions and organisations, London, UK: Pinter Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foo, S. and Cheung Hiu, S. (1998). A Framework for Evaluating Internet Telephony Systems, Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy 8 (1): 14–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Murillo, M. and McKnight, L. (2005). Internet Telephony: Effects on the universal service program in the United States, Review of Network Economics 4 (3): 205–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govindarajan, V. and Kopalle, P.K. (2006). The Usefulness of Measuring Disruptiveness of Innovations Ex Post in Making Ex Ante Predictions, Journal of Product Innovation Management 23: 12–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, T. and Ure, J. (2005). IP Telephony and Voice over Broadband, INFO 7 (4): 8–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, N. (1997). Theory-led Thematic Analysis: Social identification in small companies, in N. Hayes (ed.) Doing Qualitative Analysis in Psychology, Hove: Psychology Press, pp. 93–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, R. (2006). The Innovator's Dilemma as a Problem of Organizational Competence, Journal of Product Innovation Management 23: 5–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hovell, P., Briscoe, R. and Corliano, G. (2005). Guaranteed QoS Synthesis – An example of a scalable core IP quality of service solution, BT Technology Journal 23 (2): 160–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, N. and Myers, M.D. (2001). Assessing Three Theories of Information Systems Innovation: An interpretive case study of a funds management company, in the Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (Seoul, Korea), 1005–1019.

  • Katz, M.L. and Shapiro, C. (1994). Systems Competition and Network Effects, Journal of Economic Perspectives 8 (2): 93–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klemperer, P. (1987). Markets with Consumer Switching Costs, Quarterly Journal of Economics 102 (2): 375–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacity, M.C. and Janson, M.A. (1994). Understanding Qualitative Data: A framework of text analysis methods, Journal of Management Information Systems 11 (2): 137–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linton, J.D. (2002). Forecasting the Market Diffusion of Disruptive and Discontinuous Innovation, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 49 (4): 365–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyytinen, K.J. and Damsgaard, J. (2001). What's Wrong with the Diffusion of Innovation Theory, in the Diffusing Software Product and Process Innovations (Banff, Canada, 7–10th April 2001). Kluwer.

  • Lyytinen, K.J. and Rose, G.M. (2003). The Disruptive Nature of Information Technology Innovations: The case of Internet computing in systems development organizations, MIS Quarterly 27 (4): 557–595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahler, A. and Rogers, E.M. (1999). The Diffusion of Interactive Communication Innovations and the Critical Mass: The adoption of telecommunications services by German banks, Telecommunications Policy 23: 719–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R. (1998). Internet Telephony and International Accounting Rate System, Telecommunications Policy 22 (11): 931–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matutes, C. and Regibeau, P. (1988). “Mix and Match”: Product compatibility without network externalities, RAND Journal of Economics 19 (2): 221–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKnight, L.W. and Leida, B. (1998). Internet Telephony: Costs, pricing and policy, Telecommunications Policy 22 (7): 555–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. (1999). Crossing the Chasm, New York: Harper Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G.C. and Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation, Information Systems Research 2 (3): 192–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, D.R., Sumpter, C.W., Walsh, S.T. and Kirchhoff, B.A. (2002). A Practitioner's View: Evolutionary stages of disruptive technologies, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 49 (4): 322–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NITTA (2007). Second Half 2007 – Telecom Statistics. Copenhagen: National IT and Telecommunications Agency.

  • Ono, R. and Aoki, K. (1998). Convergence and New Regulatory Frameworks: A comparative study of regulatory approaches to Internet telephony, Telecommunications Policy 22 (10): 817–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, 2nd edn, London, UK: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, B., Angelov, B. and Nov, O. (2006). Fusion of Disruptive Technologies: Lessons from the Skype case, European Management Journal 24 (2/3): 174–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E.M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations, 4th edn, New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E.M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations, 5th edn, New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, H. and Richardson, R. (1998). Cheaper International Calls, Better Competition? Computer Law & Security Report 14 (5): 334–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, G.M. and Druehl, C.T. (2008). When is a Disruptive Innovation Disruptive? Journal of Product Innovation Management 25: 347–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, C. and Varian, H.R. (1999). Information Rules: A strategic guide to the network economy, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater, S.F. and Mohr, J.J. (2006). Successful Development and Commercialization of Technological Innovation: Insights based on strategy type, Journal of Product Innovation Management 23: 26–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tellis, G.J. (2006). Disruptive Technology or Visionary Leadership? Journal of Product Innovation Management 23: 34–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varshney, U., Snow, A., McGivern, M. and Howard, C. (2002). Voice over IP, Communications of the ACM 45 (1): 89–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vonage (2008). Vonage and Covad Communications announce strategic relationship to deliver Vonage broadband, [www document] http://pr.vonage.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=308993 (accessed 19th September 2008).

  • Walsh, S.T., Kirchhoff, B.A. and Newbert, S. (2002). Differentiating Market Strategies for Disruptive Technologies, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 49 (4): 341–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsham, G. (2002). Cross-cultural Software Production and Use: A structurational analysis, MIS Quarterly 26 (4): 359–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, L. and Swatman, P. (2006). Evolutionary Diffusion Theory and the Exdoc Community: Greater explanatory power for e-commerce diffusion? in the European Conference on Information Systems (Göteborg, Sweden).

  • Zubey, M.L., Wagner, W. and Otto, J.R. (2002). A Conjoint Analysis of Voice over IP Attributes, Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy 12 (1): 7–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ioanna D Constantiou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Constantiou, I., Papazafeiropoulou, A. & Dwivedi, Y. The diffusion of IP telephony and vendors’ commercialisation strategies. J Inf Technol 24, 25–34 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2008.29

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2008.29

Keywords

Navigation