Abstract
Based on Fligstein's (1990) work on ‘conceptions of control’ (broad managerial paradigms), this paper provides an analysis of the ways in which information technology (IT) artefacts shape and are shaped by institutional contexts. Specifically, we report on primary and secondary empirical data that spans a 44-year period pertaining to the uses made of the Amazon rainforest monitoring system (a set of satellite-based geographic information systems). This paper argues that: (1) the process of institutional change is conflictual, emergent and contested; (2) the design and use of IT artefacts tend to reflect the currently dominant conceptions of control; (3) that IT artefacts that emerge within a specific conception of control can be later reconfigured to serve the interests of other conceptions of control; (4) and finally, IT artefacts might unintentionally reinforce alternate conceptions of control and lead to institutional change.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In the context of this paper, IT artefacts are understood as ‘bundles of material and cultural properties packaged in some socially recognizable form such as hardware and/or software’ (Orlikowski and Iacono, 2001: 121). In this context, IT artefacts comprise both material affordances (i.e. design features) and established and envisaged uses or organizing visions (i.e. ideal and actual work practices related to the artefact) (Swanson and Ramiller, 1997; Orlikowski and Barley, 2001).
INPE's PRODES Digital and DETER, and IBAMA's SisCom can be accessed at http://www.obt.inpe.br/prodesdigital; http://www.obt.inpe.br/deter and http://siscom.ibama.gov.br/website/SisCom, respectively.
References
Abrucio, F.L. (2007). Trajetória recente da gestão pública brasileira: Um balanço crítico e a renovação da agenda de reformas, Revista de Adminstração Pública 41 (1): 67–86.
Adler, P.S. (2005). The Evolving Object of Software Development, Organization 12 (3): 401–436.
Akrich, M. (1992). The De-Scription of Technical Objects, in W. Bijker and J. Law (eds.) Shaping Technology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 205–224.
Avgerou, C. (2000). IT and Organizational Change: An institutionalist perspective, Information Technology & People 13 (4): 234–262.
Avgerou, C. (2003). IT as an Institutional Actor in Developing Countries, in S. Madon and S. Krishna (eds.) The Digital Challenge: Information technology in the development context, Aldershot: Ashgate.
Barley, S.R. (1986). Technology as an Occasion for Structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments, Administrative Science Quarterly 31 (1): 78–108.
Barley, S.R. and Tolbert, P.S. (1997). Institutionalization and Structuration: Studying the links between action and institution, Organization Studies 18 (1): 93–117.
Barrett, M. and Walsham, G. (1999). Electronic trading and work transformation in the London insurance market, Information Systems Research 10 (1): 1–22.
Barrett, M., Sahay, S. and Walsham, G. (2001). Information Technology and Social Transformation: GIS for forestry management in India, The Information Society 17 (1): 5–20.
Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a new modernity, London: Sage.
Berger, P.L. and Luckmann, T. (1967). The Social Construction of Reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge, London: Penguin.
Blackler, F. and Regan, S. (2006). Institutional Reform and the Reorganization of Family Support Services, Organization Studies 27 (12): 1843–1861.
Butler, T. (2003). An Institutional Perspective on Developing and Implementing Intranet- and Internet-Based Information Systems, Information Systems Journal 13 (3): 209–231.
Chatterjee, D., Grewal, R. and Sambamurthy, V. (2002). Shaping up for E-commerce: Institutional enablers of the organizational assimilation of web technologies, MIS Quarterly 26 (2): 65–89.
Choo, C.W. (1996). The Knowing Organization: How organizations use information to construct meaning, create knowledge and make decisions, International Journal of Information Management 16 (5): 329–340.
Ciborra, C.U. (2000). A Critical Review of the Literature on the Management of Corporate Information Infrastructure, in C.U. Ciborra (ed.) From Control to Drift: The dynamics of corporate information infrastructures, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 15–40.
Currie, W.L. (2004). The Organizing Vision of Application Service Provision: A process-oriented analysis, Information & Organization 14 (4): 237–267.
Currie, W.L. and Guah, M.W. (2007). Conflicting Institutional Logics: A national programme for IT in the organisational field of healthcare, Journal of Information Technology 22 (3): 235–247.
Czarniawska, B. (2004). Narratives in Social Science Research, London: Sage.
Dacin, M.T., Goodstein, J. and Scott, W.R. (2002). Institutional Theory and Institutional Change: Introduction to the special research forum, Academy of Management Journal 45 (1): 45–57.
DiMaggio, P.J. and Powell, W.W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields, American Sociological Review 48 (2): 147–160.
Fearnside, P.M. (1982). Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon: How fast is it occurring? Interciencia 7 (2): 82–85.
Fearnside, P.M. (2003). Deforestation Control in Mato Grosso: A new model for slowing the loss of Brazil's Amazon forest, AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment 32 (5): 343–345.
Fearnside, P.M. (2005). Deforestation in Brazilian Amazonia: History, rates, and consequences, Conservation Biology 19 (3): 680–688.
Fligstein, N. (1990). The Transformation of Corporate Control, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Fligstein, N. (2001). Social Skill and the Theory of Fields, Sociological Theory 19: 105–125.
Fligstein, N. and Brantley, P. (1992). Bank Control, Owner Control, or Organizational Dynamics: Who controls the large modern corporation? The American Journal of Sociology 98 (2): 280–307.
Fountain, J.E. (2001). Building the Virtual State: Information technology and institutional change, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Fountain, J.E. (2006). Central Issues in the Political Development of the Virtual State, in M. Castells and G. Cardoso (eds.) The Network Society: From knowledge to policy, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, pp. 149–181.
Friedland, R. and Alford, R.R. (1991). Bringing Society Back, in W.W. Powell and P.J. DiMaggio (eds.) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Giddens, A. (1986). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the theory of structuration, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Gosain, S. (2004). Enterprise Information Systems as Objects and Carriers of Institutional Forces: The new iron cage? Journal of the Association for Information Systems 5 (4): 151–182.
Greenpeace (2008). Desmatamento na Amazônia: o leão acordou, São Paulo: Greenpeace Brasil.
Greenwood, R. and Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutional Entrepreneurship in Mature Fields: The big five accounting firms, Academy of Management Journal 59 (1): 27–48.
Guha, R. (2000). Environmentalism: A global history, New York: Longman.
Hasselbladh, H. and Kallinikos, J. (2000). The Project of Rationalization: A critique and reappraisal of neo-institutionalism in organization studies, Organization Studies 21 (4): 697–720.
Hayes, N. (2008). Institutionalising Change in a High-Technology Optronics Company: The role of information and communication technologies, Human Relations 61 (2): 245–271.
Kallinikos, J. (2004). The Social Foundations of the Bureaucratic Order, Organization 11 (1): 13–36.
Kallinikos, J. (2006). The Consequences of Information: Institutional implications of technological change, Cheltenham, UK: Elgar Publishing Company.
Keck, M.E. (2001). Dilemmas for Conservation in the Brazilian Amazon, Environmental Change and Security Program Report 7: 32–46.
King, J.L., Gurbaxani, V., Kraemer, K.L., McFarlan, F.W., Raman, K.S. and Yap, C.S. (1994). Institutional Factors in Information Technology Innovation, Information Systems Research 5 (2): 139–169.
Kling, R. and Iacono, C.S. (1989). The Institutional Character of Computerized Information Systems, Office: Technology and People 5 (1): 7–28.
Kolk, A. (1998). From Conflict to Cooperation: International policies to protect the Brazilian Amazon, World Development 26 (8): 1481–1493.
Lamb, R. and Kling, R. (2003). Reconceptualizing Users as Social Actors in Information Systems Research, MIS Quarterly 27 (2): 197–235.
Laurance, W.F., Fearnside, P.M., Albernaz, A.K.M., Vasconcelos, H.L. and Ferreira, L.V. (2004). Deforestation in Amazonia, Science 304 (5674): 1109.
McNeill, J.R. (2000). Something New Under the Sun: An environmental history of the twentieth-century world, New York: Norton & Company.
Meyer, J.W. and Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony, The American Journal of Sociology 83 (2): 340–363.
Nicolaou, A. (1999). Social Control in Information Systems Development, Information Technology & People 12 (2): 130–150.
Noir, C. and Walsham, G. (2007). The Great Legitimizer: ICT as myth and ceremony in the Indian healthcare sector, Information Technology & People 20 (4): 313–333.
Orlikowski, W.J. and Barley, S.R. (2001). Technology and Institutions: What can research on information technology and research on organizations learn from each other? MIS Quarterly 25 (2): 145–165.
Orlikowski, W.J. and Iacono, C.S. (2001). Research Commentary: Desperately seeking the ‘IT’ in IT research – a call to theorizing the IT artifact, Information Systems Research 12 (2): 121–134.
Orlikowski, W.J. and Robey, D. (1991). Information Technology and the Structuring of Organizations, Information Systems Research 2 (2): 143–169.
Page, E.A. and Redclift, M.R. (2002). Human Security and the Environment: International comparisons, Northampton, MA.: Edward Elgar.
Powell, W.W. and DiMaggio, P.J. (eds.) (1991). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rajão, R.G.L. and Hayes, N. (2007). Sistema de monitoramento da Amazônia: questão de segurança nacional, in A.J. Balloni (ed.) Por que GESITI? Segurança, Inovação e Sociedade, Campinas, Brazil: Komedi, pp. 53–86.
Reis, A.C.F. (1965). A Amazônia e a cobiça internacional, Rio de Janeiro: Edinova Limitada.
Robey, D. and Boudreau, M.-C. (1999). Accounting for the Contradictory Organizational Consequences of Information Technology: Theoretical directions and methodological implications, Information Systems Research 10 (2): 167–185.
Robey, D. and Holmstrom, J. (2001). Transforming Municipal Governance in Global Context: A case study of the dialectics of social change, Journal of Global Information Technology Management 4 (4): 19–32.
Scott, W.R. (1995). Institutions and Organizations, Thousand Oak, CA: Sage Publications.
Scott, W.R. (2001). Institutions and Organizations, Thousand Oak, CA: Sage Publications.
Scott, W.R. (2003). Institutional Carriers: Reviewing modes of transporting ideas over time and space and considering their consequences, Industrial and Corporate Change 12 (4): 879–894.
Seo, M.-G. and Creed, W.E.D. (2002). Institutional Contradictions, Praxis, and Institutional Change: A dialectical perspective, Academy of Management Review 27 (2): 222–247.
Shrivastava, P. (1995). Ecocentric Management for a Risk Society, The Academy of Management Review 20 (1): 118–137.
Silva, L. and Figueroa, E.B. (2002). Institutional Intervention and the Expansion of ICTs in Latin America: The case of chile, Information Technology & People 15 (1): 8–25.
Suddaby, R. and Greenwood, R. (2009). Methodological Issues in Researching Institutions and Institutional Change, in D. Buchanan and A. Bryman (eds.) Handbook of Organizational Research Methods, London: Sage, pp. 176–195.
Swanson, E.B. and Ramiller, N.C. (1997). The Organizing Vision in Information Systems Innovation, Organization Science 8 (5): 458–474.
Tsoukas, H. and Papoulias, D.B. (2005). Managing Third-order Change: The case of the public power corporation in Greece, Long Range Planning 38 (1): 79–95.
Walsham, G. (1993). Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Walsham, G. (2006). Doing Interpretive Research, European Journal of Information Systems 15 (3): 320–330.
Walsham, G. and Sahay, S. (1999). GIS for District-Level Administration in India: Problems and opportunities, MIS Quarterly 23 (1): 39–65.
Zuboff, S. (1988). In the Age of the Smart Machine: The future of work and power, New York: Basic Books.
Zucker, L.G. (1977). The Role of Institutionalization in Cultural Persistence, American Sociological Review 42 (5): 726–743.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rajão, R., Hayes, N. Conceptions of control and IT artefacts: an institutional account of the Amazon rainforest monitoring system. J Inf Technol 24, 320–331 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2009.12
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2009.12