Skip to main content
Log in

The diffusion and use of institutional theory: a cross-disciplinary longitudinal literature survey

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Information Technology

Abstract

There is a plethora of theories to explore the disciplines of business, management and sociology, with institutional theory being widely used to explore a range of research challenges. In the area of Information Systems (IS), the use of institutional theory remains in its infancy, with much potential for adoption. Much of the rationale underpinning the proposed research is that a systematic review and synthesis of the normative literature may support the direction of further research and the use of institutional theory in exploring pertinent research challenges facing the IS community. This study also serves to signpost cross-disciplinary research, and thus opens up a whole new research paradigm. Therefore, this article seeks to provide a bibliometric analysis and a comprehensive and systematic review of the literature pertaining to institutional theory to ascertain the current ‘state of play’ of the theory. Information on a series of variables was extracted after conducting a review of 511 articles across various disciplines that have utilised institutional theory, published in 210 peer-reviewed journals between 1978 and 2008. The findings suggest that the positivist paradigm, empirical and quantitative research, the survey method and organisation/firm as a unit of analysis was used predominantly in combination with institutional theory. The results of this study may have implications for researchers, journal editors, reviewers and universities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alavi, M. and Carlson, P. (1992). A Review of MIS Research and Disciplinary Development, Journal of Management Information Systems 8 (4): 45–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avgerou, C. (2000). IT and Organizational Change: An institutionalist perspective, Information Technology & People 13 (4): 234–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avison, D., Dwivedi, Y.K., Fitzgerald, G. and Powell, P. (2008). The Beginnings of a New Era: Time to reflect on 17 years of the ISJ, Information Systems Journal 18 (1): 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bala, H. and Venkatesh, V. (2007). Assimilation of Inter Organizational Business Process Standards, Information Systems Research 18 (3): 340–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barley, S.R. and Tolbert, P.S. (1997). Institutionalization and Structuration: Studying the links between action and institution, Organization Studies 18 (1): 93–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, T. (2003). An Institutional Perspective on Developing and Implementing Intranet- and Internet-Based Information Systems, Information Systems Journal 13 (3): 209–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, A.R. and Woszczynski, A.B. (2002). Crises and Revolutions in Information Technology: Lessons learned from Y2K, Industrial Management & Data Systems 102 (5/6): 318–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavalluzzo, K.S. and Ittner, C.D. (2004). Implementing Performance Measurement Innovations: Evidence from government, Accounting Organizations and Society 29 (3–4): 243–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, D., Grewal, R. and Sambamurthy, V. (2002). Shaping up for E-commerce: Institutional enablers of the organizational assimilation of web technologies, MIS Quarterly 26 (2): 65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chao, C.-C., Yang, J.-M. and Jen, W.-Y. (2007). Determining Technology Trends and Forecasts of RFID by a Historical Review and Bibliometric Analysis from 1991 to 2005, Technovation 27: 268–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiasson, M.W. and Davidson, E. (2005). Taking Industry Seriously in Information Systems Research, MIS Quarterly 29 (4): 591–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, W.L. (2004). The Organizing Vision of Application Service Provision: A process-oriented analysis, Information & Organization 14 (4): 237–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currie, W.L. and Guah, M.W. (2007). Conflicting Institutional Logics: A national programme for information technology in the organizational field of healthcare, Journal of Information Technology 22 (3): 235–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damsgaard, J. and Lyytinen, K. (1998). Contours of Diffusion of Electronic Data Interchange in Finland Overcoming Technological Barriers and Collaborating to make it Happen, Journal of Strategic Information Systems 7 (4): 275–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damsgaard, J. and Lyytinen, K. (2001). The Role of Intermediating Institutions in the Diffusion of Electronic Data Interchange (EDI): How industry associations intervened in Denmark, Finland, and Hong Kong, Information Society 17 (3): 195–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, E.J. and Chismar, W.G. (2007). The Interaction of Institutionally Triggered and Technology-Triggered Social Structure Change: An investigation of computerized physician order entry, MIS Quarterly 31 (4): 739–758.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, L. and North, D. (1971). Institutional Change and American Economic Growth, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dill, B.J. and Anderson, R.E. (2003). Ethics-Related Technology Policies in Schools, Social Science Computer Review 21 (3): 326–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P.J. and Powell, W.W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields, American Sociological Review 48 (2): 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwivedi, Y.K. and Kuljis, J. (2008). Profiling IS Research Published in the European Journal of Information Systems (EJIS), European Journal of Information Systems 17 (6): 678–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwivedi, Y.K., Kiang, M., Williams, M.D. and Lal, B. (2008). Profiling Electronic Commerce Research Published in Journal of Electronic Commerce Research (JECR), Journal of Electronic Commerce Research 8 (2): 77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwivedi, Y.K, Lal, B., Mustafi, N. and Williams, M.D. (2009). Profiling a Decade of Information Systems Frontiers’ Research, Information Systems Frontiers 11 (1): 87–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F.W. (2004). From Sectoral Systems of Innovation to Socio-Technical Systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology, Research Policy 33: 897–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosain, S. (2004). Enterprise Information Systems as Objects and Carriers of Institutional Forces: The new iron cage? Journal of the Association of Information Systems 5 (4): 151–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haughton, M.A. (2006). Information Technology Projects by International Logistics Services Providers: The case of Canada's small customs brokers, Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences 23 (1): 17–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, N. (2008). Institutionalizing Change in a High-Technology Optronics Company: The role of information and communication technologies, Human Relations 61 (2): 243–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G.M. (1998). The Approach of Institutional Economics, Journal of Economic Literature 36: 166–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Q. and Quan, J. (2006). The Institutionalization of IT Budgeting: Evidence from the financial sector, Information Resources Management Journal 19 (1): 84–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Q., Hart, P. and Cooke, D. (2007). The Role of External and Internal Influences on Information Systems Security – A neo-institutional perspective, Journal of Strategic Information Systems 16 (2): 153–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ituma, A. and Simpson, R. (2007). Moving Beyond Schein's Typology: Individual career anchors in the context of Nigeria, Personnel Review 36 (6): 978–995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jepperson, R. (1991). Institutions, Institutional Effects, and Institutionalism, in W. Powell and P. DiMaggio (eds.) The New Institutionalism in Organisational Analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 143–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, J., Gurbaxani, V., Kraemer, K., McFarlan, F., Raman, K. and Yap, C. (1994). Institutional Factors in Information Technology Innovation, Information Systems Research 5 (2): 139–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kondra, A.Z. and Hinings, C.R. (1999). Organizational Diversity and Change in Institutional Theory, Organisation Studies 19 (5): 743–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, O. and Martin, L.L. (1995). The Promise of Institutionalist Theory, International Security 20 (1): 39–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, T.S. and Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and institutional work, In: S.R. Clegg et al (eds.) Handbook of Organisation Studies, 2nd edn. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, H.G., Saraf, N., Hu, Q. and Xue, Y.J. (2007). Assimilation of Enterprise Systems: The effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management, MIS Quarterly 31 (1): 59–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. (1989). Rediscovering Institutions: The organizational basis of politics, New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mark, A.L. (2007). Modernising Healthcare – is the NPfIT for purpose? Journal of Information Technology 22: 248–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. and Rowan, B. (1977). Institutional Organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony, The American Journal of Sociology 83: 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miscione, G. (2007). Telemedicine in the Upper Amazon: Interplay with local health care practices, MIS Quarterly 31 (2): 403–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizruchi, M. and Fein, L. (1999). The Social Construction of Organizational Knowledge: A study of the uses of coercive, mimetic, and normative isomorphism, Administrative Science Quarterly 44: 653–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mignerat, M. and Rivard, S. (2005). Positioning the institutional perspective in information technology research, HEC montreal [WWW document] http://neumann.hec.ca/chairegestionti/cahiers/cahier0501.pdf (accessed 17th December 2008).

  • Miranda, S.M. and Kim, Y.M. (2006). Professional Versus Political Contexts: Institutional mitigation and the transaction cost heuristic in information systems outsourcing, MIS Quarterly 30 (3): 725–753.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevo, S., Wade, M.R. and Cook, W.D. (2007). An Examination of the Trade-off between Internal and External IT Capabilities, Journal of Strategic Information Systems 16 (1): 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, D.C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W.J. and Barley, S.R. (2001). Technology and Institutions: What can research on information technology and research on organisations learn from each other? MIS Quarterly 25 (2): 145–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palvia, P., Pinjani, P. and Sibley, E.H. (2007). A profile of Information Systems Research Published in the Information & Management, Information & Management 44: 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W.W. and DiMaggio, P.J. (1991). The New Institutionalism in Organisational Analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramiller, N.C. and Swanson, E.B. (2003). Organizing Visions for Information Technology and the Information Systems Executive Response, Journal of Management Information Systems 20 (1): 13–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robey, D. and Boudreau, M.C. (1999). Accounting for the Contradictory Organizational Consequences of Information Technology: Theoretical directions and methodological implications, Information Systems Research 10 (2): 167–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmeron, J.L. and Bueno, S. (2006). An Information Technologies and Information Systems Industry-Based Classification in Small and Medium-sized Enterprises: An institutional view, European Journal of Operational Research 173 (3): 1012–1025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg, M. (2001). IT Diffusion in Swedish Organisations from an Institutional-Evolutionary Perspective: Results from a web survey in 1999, Ekonomiska Samfundets Tidskrift 54 (1): 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, S., Wigand, R.T. and Crowston, K. (2005). Redefining Access: Uses and roles of information and communication technologies in the US residential real estate industry from 1995 to 2005, Journal of Information Technology 20 (4): 213–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, R.W. (1995). Institutions and Organizations, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.R. (2005). Institutional Theory: Contributing to a theoretical research programme, in M.A. Hitt and K.G. Smith (eds.) Great Minds in Management: The Process of Theory Development, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soares-Aguiar, A. and Palma-Dos-Reis, A. (2008). Why do Firms Adopt E-Procurement Systems? Using logistic regression to empirically test a conceptual model, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 55 (1): 120–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, E.B. and Ramilier, N.C. (1997). The Organising Vision in Information Systems Innovation, Organisational Science 8 (5): 458–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teo, H.H., Wei, K.K. and Benbasat, I. (2003). Predicting Intention to Adopt Interorganizational Linkages: An institutional perspective, MIS Quarterly 27 (1): 19–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tingling, P. and Parent, M. (2004). An Exploration of Enterprise Technology Selection and Evaluation, Journal of Strategic Information Systems 13 (4): 329–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolbert, P.S. and Zucker, L.G. (1996). The Institutionalization of Institutional Theory, in S. Clegg, C. Hardy and W.R. Nord (eds.) Handbook of Organization Studies, London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage Publications, pp. 175–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M.D., Dwivedi, Y.K., Lal, B. and Schwarz, A. (2009). Contemporary Trends and Issues in IT Adoption and Diffusion Research, Journal of Information Technology 24 (1): 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. (1981). The Economics of Organization: The transaction cost approach, American Journal of Sociology 87 (3): 548–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L.G. (1977). The Role of Institutionalization in Cultural Persistence, American Sociological Review 42: 726–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L.G. (1987). Institutional Theory of Organization, Annual Review of Sociology 13: 443–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vishanth Weerakkody.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weerakkody, V., Dwivedi, Y. & Irani, Z. The diffusion and use of institutional theory: a cross-disciplinary longitudinal literature survey. J Inf Technol 24, 354–368 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2009.16

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2009.16

Keywords

Navigation