Abstract
The impact of a discipline's research is constrained by its ability to articulate compelling problems. Well-crafted problems are the foundation for mobilizing the effort, resources, and attention essential to scientific progress and broader impact. We argue that Information Systems (IS) scholars, individually and collectively, must develop the practice of articulating and engaging large-scale, broad scope problems – or grand challenges. To support this position, we examine the role and value of grand challenge efforts in science and engineering based on a theory of grand challenges as socially constructed boundary objects. Conceptualizing grand challenges in these terms implies strategies and approaches for magnifying the impact of IS research by engaging these types of problems.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2007). Science and Society: Grand Challenges, [www document] http://cstsp.aaas.org/content.html?contentid=1230 (accessed 15th February 2010).
Baskerville, R.L. and Myers, M.D. (2009). Fashion Waves in Information Systems Research and Practice, MIS Quarterly 33 (4): 647–662.
Benbasat, I. and Zmud, R.W. (2003). The Identity Crisis within the IS Discipline: Defining and communicating the discipline's core properties, MIS Quarterly 27 (2): 183–194.
Bergman, M., Lyytinen, K. and Marks, G. (2007). Boundary Objects in Design: An ecological view of design artifacts, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 8 (11): 546–568.
Brancheau, J.C., Janz, B.D. and Wetherbee, J.C. (1996). Key Issues in Information Systems Management: 1994–95 SIM Delphi results, MIS Quarterly 20 (2): 225–242.
Carson, R. (1962). Silent Spring, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Collins, F.S., Morgan, M. and Patrinos, A. (2003). The Human Genome Project: Lessons from large-scale biology, Science 300: 286.
Computing Research Association (2003). Grand Research Challenges in Information Systems, A Conference Series on Grand Research Challenges in Computer Science and Engineering, [www document] http://www.cra.org/Activities/grand.challenges (accessed 15th February 2010).
Fuller, S.H. and Millett, L.I. (2011). The Future of Computing Performance: Game over or next level? Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Gomolski, B., Grigg, J. and Potter, K. (2001). IT Spending and Staffing Survey Results, Stamford, CT: Gartner Group.
Hoare, T. and Milner, R. (2005). Grand Challenges for Computing Research, The Computer Journal 48 (1): 49–52.
King, J.L. and Lyytinen, K. (2006). The Future of the IS Field: Drawing directions from multiple maps, in J.L. King and K. Lyytinen (eds.) Information Systems: The state of the field, Chichester, England: Wiley, pp. 345–354.
Levinia, N. and Vaast, E. (2005). The Emergence of Boundary Spanning Competence in Practice: Implications for implementation and use of information systems, MIS Quarterly 29 (2): 335–363.
Luftman, J. and Kempaiah, R. (2009). Key Issues for IT Executives 2008, MIS Quarterly Executive 8 (3): 151–159.
Lyytinen, K. and King, J.L. (2004). Nothing in the Center?: Academic legitimacy in the information systems field, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 5 (6): 220–246.
National Academy of Engineering (2008). Grand Challenges for Engineering, [www document] http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/ (accessed 15th February 2010).
National Ecological Observatory Network, Inc. (2010). NEON Design, [www document] http://www.neoninc.org/science/strategy (accessed 15th February 2010).
National Science and Technology Council Subcommittee on Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences Research Opportunities and Priorities (2009). Social, Behavioral, and Economic Research in the Federal Context, [www document] http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/prospectus_v10_3_17_09.pdf.
Oakridge National Lab. (2008). History of the Human Genome Project, [www document] http://www.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human-Genome/project/hgp.shtml (accessed 18th May 2010).
Star, S.L. and Griesemer, J.R. (1989). Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39, Social Studies of Science 19: 387–420.
Swales, J.M. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in academic and research settings, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J.M. (2004). Research Genres: Exploration and applications, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
UK Computer Research Committee (2009). Grand Challenges in Computing Research, [www document] http://www.ukcrc.org.uk/grand-challenge/index.cfm (accessed 15th February 2010).
Varmus, H., Klausner, R., Zerhouni, E., Acharya, T., Daar, A.S. and Singer, P.A. (2003). Public Health: Enhanced: Grand challenges in global health, Science 302 (5644): 398.
Wang, P. (2010). Chasing the Hottest IT: Effects of information technology fashion on organizations, MIS Quarterly 34 (1): 63–85.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Disclaimer Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Winter, S., Butler, B. Creating bigger problems: grand challenges as boundary objects and the legitimacy of the information systems field. J Inf Technol 26, 99–108 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2011.6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2011.6