Skip to main content
Log in

Customer relationship management and firm performance

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Information Technology

Abstract

In this paper, we examine the impact of customer relationship management (CRM) on firm performance using a hierarchical construct model. Following the resource-based view of the firm, strategic CRM is conceptualized as an endogenously determined function of the organization's ability to harness and orchestrate lower-order capabilities that comprise physical assets, such as IT infrastructure, and organizational capabilities, such as human analytics (HA) and business architecture (BA). Our results reveal a positive and significant path between a superior CRM capability and firm performance. In turn, superior CRM capability is positively associated with HA and BA. However, our results suggest that the impact of IT infrastructure on superior CRM capability is indirect and fully mediated by HA and BA. We also find that CRM initiatives jointly emphasizing customer intimacy and cost reduction outperform those taking a less balanced approach. Overall, this paper helps explain why some CRM programs are more successful than others and what capabilities are required to support success.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aberdeen Group (2007). Customer Value Management: Keeping profitable customers on board [www document] http://www.aberdeen.com/Research (accessed 17 April 2008).

  • Amburgey, T.L. and Rao, H. (1996). Organizational Ecology: Past, present, and future directions, Academy of Management Journal 39 (5): 1265–1286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amit, R. and Shoemaker, P.J.H. (1993). Strategic Assets and Organizational Rent, Strategic Management Journal 14 (1): 33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aral, S. and Weill, P. (2007). IT Assets, Organizational Capabilities, and Firm Performance: How resource allocations and organizational differences explain performance variation, Organization Science 18 (5): 763–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J.S. and Overton, T.S. (1977). Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys, Journal of Marketing Research 16 (8): 396–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J.B. and Mackey, T.B. (2005). Testing Resource-based Theory, in D.J. Ketchen and D.D. Bergh (eds.) Research Methodology in Strategy and Management, Greenwich, CT: Elsevier, pp. 1–13.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R.M. and Kenny, D.A. (1986). The Moderator-mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (6): 1173–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barua, A., Konana, P., Whinston, A.B. and Yin, F. (2004). Empirical Investigation of Net-enabled Business Value, MIS Quarterly 28 (4): 585–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bharadwaj, A.S. (2000). A Resource-based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An empirical investigation, MIS Quarterly 24 (1): 169–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bharadwaj, A.S., Sambamurthy, V. and Zmud, R.W. (1999). IT Capabilities: Theoretical perspectives and empirical operationalization, in Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Information Systems, Charlotte, North Carolina: AIS Electronic Library, pp. 378–385.

  • Bhatt, G.D. and Grover, V. (2005). Types of Information Technology Capabilities and Their Role in Competitive Advantage: An empirical study, Journal of Management Information Systems 22 (2): 253–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bligh, P. and Turk, D. (2004). CRM Unplugged: Releasing CRM's strategic value Hoboken, New Jersey, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohling, T., Bowman, D., LaValle, S., Mittal, V., Narayandas, D., Ramani, G. and Varadarajan, R. (2006). CRM Implementation: Effectiveness issues and insights, Journal of Services Research 9 (2): 184–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, W., Staelin, R., Ehret, M. and Johnston, W. (2005). A Customer Relationship Management Roadmap: What is known, potential pitfalls, and where to go, Journal of Marketing 69 (4): 155–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson, E. and Hitt, L.M. (1996). Paradox Lost? Firm-level Evidence on the Returns to Information Systems Spending, Management Science 42 (4): 541–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buttle, F. (2004). Customer Relationship Management: Concepts and tools, Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, N.G. (2003). IT Doesn’t Matter, Harvard Business Review 81 (5): 41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, N.G. (2004). Does IT Matter?: Information technology and the corrosion of competitive advantage, Boston, USA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carte, T.A. and Russell, C.J. (2003). In Pursuit of Moderation: Nice common errors and their solutions, MIS Quarterly 27 (3): 479–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W.W. (1998). The Partial Least Squares Approach for Structural Equation Modelling, in G.A. Marcoulides (ed.) Modern Methods for Business Research, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 295–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, G.A. (1979). A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs, Journal of Marketing Research 26 (2): 64–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clemons, E.K. and Row, M.C. (1991). Sustaining IT Advantage: The Role of Structural Differences, MIS Quarterly 15 (3): 275–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danaher, P.J., Conroy, D.M. and McColl-Kennedy, J.R. (2008). Who Wants a Relationship Anyway?: Conditions when consumers expect a relationship with their service provider, Journal of Service Research 11 (1): 43–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T.H., Harris, J.G., Long, D.W.D. and Jacobson, A.L. (2001). Data to Knowledge to Results: Building and analytic capability, California Management Review 43 (2): 117–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, G.S. (2003). Creating a Superior Customer-relating Capability, MIT Sloan Management Review 44 (3): 77–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, G.S. and Van den Bulte, C. (2002). Superiority in Customer Relationship Management: Consequences for competitive advantage and performance, Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dess, G.G. and Robinson, R.B. (1984). Measuring Organizational Performance: The case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit, Strategic Management Journal (5): 265–273.

  • Devaraj, S. and Kohli, R. (2003). Performance Impacts of Information Technology: Is actual usage the missing link? Management Science 49 (3): 273–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewan, S. and Min, C. (1997). The Substitution of Information Technology for Other Factors of Production: A firm level analysis, Management Science 43 (12): 1660–1675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dierickx, I. and Cool, K. (1989). Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability of Competitive Advantage, Management Science (35): 1504–1511.

  • Dowling, G.R. (2002). Customer Relationship Management: In B2C markets, often less is more, California Management Review 44 (3): 87–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G. and Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences, Behavior Research Methods 39: 175–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francalanci, C. and Morabito, V. (2008). IS Integration and Business Performance: The mediation effect of organizational absorptive capacity in SMEs, Journal of Information Technology 23 (4): 297–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error, Journal of Marketing Research 18 (3): 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fryxell, G.E. and Wang, J. (1994). The Fortune Corporate ‘Reputation Index’: Reputation for what? Journal of Management 20 (1): 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R.M. (1996). Toward a Knowledge-based Theory of the Firm, Strategic Management Journal 38 (5): 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, P. (2001). CRM at the Speed of Light, Berkeley, CA: Osborne/McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helfat, C.E., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M.A., Singh, H., Teece, D.J. and Winter, S.G. (2007). Dynamic Capabilities, Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homburg, C., Droll, M. and Totzek, D. (2008). Customer Prioritization: Does it pay off, and how should it be implemented? Journal of Marketing 72 (9): 110–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iriana, R. and Buttle, F. (2006). Strategic, Operational, and Analytical Customer Relationship Management: Attributes and measures, Journal of Relationship Marketing 5 (4): 23–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, C.B., MacKenzie, S.B. and Podsakoff, P.M. (2003). A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research 30 (2): 199–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D.A., Kashy, D.A. and Bolger, N. (1998). Data Analysis in Social Psychology, in D. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske and G. Lindzey (eds.) Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th edn, Vol 1, New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 233–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J.I. (1990). Feasibility Theory: A resource-munificence model of work motivation and behavior, The Academy of Management Review 15 (4): 646–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, R. and Gover, V. (2008). Business Value of IT: An essay on expanding research directions to keep up with the times, Journal of the Association of Information Systems 9 (2): 23–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, N., Stern, L.W. and Anderson, J.C. (1993). Conducting Interorganizational Research Using Key Informants, Academy of Management Journal 36 (6): 1633–1651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lado, A.A. and Wilson, M.C. (1994). Human Resource Systems and Sustained Competitive Advantage: A competency-based perspective, The Academy of Management Review 19 (4): 699–718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, D. (1998). Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and sustaining the sources of innovation, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maoz, M., Collins, K., Davies, J., Kolsky, E., Mertz, S.A., Kaila, I., Dunne, M., Thompson, E., Radcliffe, J., Alvarez, G. and Desisto, R.P. (2007). The Gartner CRM Vendor Guide, http://www.gartner.com/ (accessed 17 April 2007).

  • Marchand, D.A., Kettinger, W.J. and Rollins, J.D. (2000). Information Orientation: People, technology and the bottom line, Sloan Management Review 41 (4): 69–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcoulides, G.A. and Saunders, C. (2006). PLS: A silver bullet? Editor's comments, MIS Quarterly 30 (2): iii–ix.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marketing UK (2003). The Problem of CRM Under-delivery, Marketing UK, [www document] http://www.marketinguk.co.uk/ (accessed online 15 January 2004).

  • Markus, M.L. and Robey, D. (1988). Information Technology and Organizational Change, Management Science 34 (5): 583–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mata, F.J., Fuerst, W.L. and Barney, J.B. (1995). Information Technology and Sustainable Competitive Advantage: A resource based analysis, MIS Quarterly 19 (4): 487–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinnon, D.P., Krull, J.L. and Lockwood, C.M. (2000). Equivalence of the Mediation, Confounding, and Suppression Effect, Prevention Science 1: 173–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melville, N., Kraemer, K. and Gurbaxani, V. (2004). Information Technology and Organizational Performance: An integrative model of IT business value, MIS Quarterly 28 (2): 283–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendelson, H. and Pillai, R.R. (1998). Clockspeed and Information Response: Evidence from the Information Technology Industry, Information Systems Research 9 (4): 415–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, A.N., Konana, P. and Barua, A. (2007). Antecedents and Consequences of Internet Use in Procurement: An empirical investigation of U.S. manufacturing firms, Information Systems Research 18 (1): 103–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mithas, S., Ramasubbu, N. and Sambamurthy, V. (forthcoming). How Information Management Capability Influences Firm Performance, MIS Quarterly, (in press).

  • Mittal, V., Anderson, E.W., Sayrak, A. and Tadikamalla, P. (2005). Dual Emphasis and the Long-term Financial Impact of Customer Satisfaction, Marketing Science 24 (4): 544–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newbert, S.L. (2007). Empirical Research on the Resource-based View of the Firm: An assessment and suggestions for future research, Strategic Management Journal 28 (2): 127–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh, W. and Pinsonneault, A. (2007). On the Assessment of the Strategic Value of Information Technologies: Conceptual and analytical approaches, MIS Quarterly 31 (2): 239–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, A. and Frow, P. (2005). A Strategic Framework for Customer Relationship Management, Journal of Marketing 69 (4): 167–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piccoli, G. and Ives, B. (2005). IT-dependent Strategic Initiatives and Sustained Competitive Advantage: A review and synthesis of the literature, MIS Quarterly 29 (4): 747–777.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podasakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B. and Lee, J.-Y. (2003). Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies, Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (5): 879–896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. and Organ, D. (1986). Self Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and prospects, Journal of Management 12 (4): 531–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, T. and Dent-Medcalfe, A. (1997). Information Technology as Competitive Advantage: The role of human, business, and technology resources, Strategic Management Journal 18 (5): 375–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K.J. and Hayes, A.F. (2004). SPSS and SAS Procedures for Estimating Indirect Effects in Simple Mediation Models, Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers 36 (4): 717–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray, G., Muhanna, W.A. and Barney, J.B. (2005). Information Technology and the Performance of the Customer Service Process: A resource-based analysis, MIS Quarterly 29 (4): 625–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinartz, W., Krafft, M. and Hoyer, W.D. (2004). The Customer Relationship Management Process: Its measurement and impact on performance, Journal of Marketing Research 41 (3): 293–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ringle, C., Wende, S. and Will, A. (2005). SmartPLS 2.0 (beta), [www document] http://www.smartpls.de.

  • Ross, J.W. and Beath, C.M. (2002). Beyond the Business Case: New approaches to IT investment, MIT Sloan Management Review 43 (2): 51–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rust, R., Moorman, C. and Dickson, P.R. (2002). Getting Return on Quality: Revenue expansion, cost reduction, or both? Journal of Marketing 66 (10): 7–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryals, L. (2005). Making Customer Relationship Management Work: The measurement and profitable management of customer relationships, Journal of Marketing 69 (4): 252–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santhanam, R. and Hartono, E. (2003). Issues in Linking IT Capability to Firm Performance, MIS Quarterly 27 (1): 125–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seddon, P.B. (1997). A Respecification and Extension of DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success, Information Systems Research 8 (3): 240–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, R., Yetton, P. and Crawford, J. (2009). Estimating the Effect of Common Method Variance: The Method-Method Pair Technique with an Illustration from TAM Research, MIS Quarterly 33 (3): 473–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, D. and Klein, T. (2003). Enterprise Marketing Management, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, E.B. and Ramiller, N.C. (1997). The Organizing Vision in Information Systems Innovation, Organization Science 8 (5): 458–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tippins, M.J. and Sohi, R.S. (2003). IT Competency and Firm Performance: Is organizational learning a missing link? Strategic Management Journal 24: 745–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Bruggen, G.H., Lilien, G.L. and Kacker, M. (2002). Informants in Organizational Marketing Research: Why use multiple informants and how to aggregate responses, Journal of Marketing Research 39 (4): 469–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, M. and Hulland, J. (2004). The RBV and IS Research: Review, extension and suggestions for future research, MIS Quarterly 28 (1): 107–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weill, P. (1992). The Relationship between Investment in Information Technology and Firm Performance: A study of the valve manufacturing sector, Information Systems Research 3 (4): 301–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weill, P. and Aral, S. (2006). Generating Premium Returns on Your IT Investments, MIT Sloan Management Review 47 (2): 39–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weill, P. and Ross, J. (2005). A Matrixed Approach to Designing IT Governance, MIT Sloan Management Review 46 (2): 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weill, P. and Vitale, M. (2002). What IT Infrastructure Capabilities are Needed to Implement e-Business Models? MIS Quarterly 1 (1): 17–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schroder, G. and van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS Path Modelling for Assessing Hierarchical Construct Models: Guidelines and empirical illustration, MIS Quarterly 33 (1): 177–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woszczynski, A.B. and Whitman, M.E. (2004). The Problem of Common Method Variance in IS Research, in A.B. Woszczynski and M.E. Whitman (eds.) The Handbook of Information Systems Research, Idea Publishing Group: Hershey, PA, pp. 66–77.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, X., Lynch Jr., J.G. and Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis, Journal Consumer Research 37: 197–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuboff, S. (1988). The Panopticon and the Social Text, in Zuboff, S. (ed.) In the Age of the Smart Machine, New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coltman, T., Devinney, T. & Midgley, D. Customer relationship management and firm performance. J Inf Technol 26, 205–219 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2010.39

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2010.39

Keywords

Navigation