Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Methodological practice and policy for organisationally and socially relevant IS research: an inclusive–exclusive perspective

  • Debates and Perspectives
  • Published:
Journal of Information Technology

Abstract

In this research paper, we argue that the tendency of Information Systems (IS) researchers to work with a rather parsimonious set of research methods, notably those that follow the positivist tradition, demonstrates a significant degree of methodological exclusiveness. We contend that such an exclusive practice is both counterproductive to good IS research and unethical. Further, it severely and unreasonably limits the extent to which IS research and researchers can contribute to both pressing organisational problems and the scholarly literature. We synthesise our position in a set of four arguments that guide our discussion of the nature and consequences of methodological exclusiveness, as well as possible solutions. We end the paper with an exposition of steps that could be taken to address the current situation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Avison, D.E. and Myers, M.D. (1995). Information Systems and Anthropology: An anthropological perspective on IT and organizational culture, Information Technology & People 8 (3): 43–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baskerville, R. (1999). Investigating Information Systems with Action Research, Communications of the AIS 2 (19): 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boland, R.J. and Day, W.F. (1989). The Experience of System Design: A hermeneutic of organizational action, Scandinavian Journal of Management 5 (2): 87–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davison, R.M., Martinsons, M.G. and Kock, N. (2004). Principles of Canonical Action Research, Information Systems Journal 14 (1): 65–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davison, R.M., Martinsons, M.G. and Ou, C.X.J. (2010). Knowledge Sharing in Professional Services Firms in China, in M.C. Lacity, L.P. Willcocks, and Y.Q. Zheng (eds.) China's Emerging Outsourcing Capabilities: The services challenge London & New York: Palgrave-Macmillan, Chapter 7, pp. 165–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, A.R., Hilmer, K.M. and Taylor, N.J. (1998). Information exchange and use in GSS and verbal group decision making: effects of minority influence, Journal of Management Information Systems 14: 61–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galliers, R.D. (1991). Choosing information systems research approaches, in R.D. Galliers (ed.) Information Systems Research: Issues, methods and practical guidelines, Henley-on-Thames, UK: Alfred Waller, pp. 144–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B.C.Y. and Wei, K.K. (2005). Contributing Knowledge to Electronic Knowledge Repositories: An empirical investigation, MIS Quarterly 29 (1): 113–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. and Norton, D. (1992). The Balanced Scorecard – Measures that drive performance, Harvard Business Review 70 (1): 71–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, R. and Kettinger, W.J. (2004). Informating the Clan: Controlling physicians’ costs and outcomes, MIS Quarterly 28 (3): 363–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landry, M. and Banville, C. (1992). A Disciplined Methodological Pluralism for MIS Research, Accounting, Management and Information Technologies 2 (2): 77–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A.S. (1989). A Scientific Methodology for Case Studies, MIS Quarterly 13 (1): 33–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A.S. (1991). Integrating Positivist and Interpretivist Approaches to Organizational Research, Organization Science 2 (4): 342–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A.S. (1994). Electronic Mail as a Medium for Rich Communication: An empirical investigation using hermeneutic interpretation, MIS Quarterly 18 (2): 143–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A.S. (2010). Retrospect and Prospect: Information systems in the last and next twenty five years, Journal of Information Technology 25 (4): 336–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A.S. and Dennis, A.R. (2012). A Hermeneutic Interpretation of a Controlled Laboratory Experiment: A case study of decision making with a group support system, Information Systems Journal, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2010.00365.x.

  • Mårtensson, P. and Lee, A.S. (2004). Dialogical Action Research at Omega Corporation, MIS Quarterly 28 (3): 507–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maznevski, M. and Chudoba, K. (2000). Bridging Space Over Time: Global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness, Organization Science 11 (5): 473–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, M.D. (1995). Dialectical Hermeneutics: A theoretical framework for the implementation of information systems, Information Systems Journal 5 (1): 51–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, M.D. (1999). Investigating Information Systems with Ethnographic Research, Communications of the AIS 2 (23): 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W.J. (1993). Organizational Change: Investigating incremental and radical changes in system development, MIS Quarterly 17 (3): 309–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W.J. and Baroudi, J.J. (1991). Studying Information Technology in Organisations: Research approaches and assumptions, Information Systems Research 2 (1): 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. (1981). The Model of the Text: Meaningful action considered as text, in J.B. Thompson (ed.) Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 197–221.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Robey, D. (1996). Diversity in Information Systems Research: Threat, promise and respectability, Information Systems Research 7 (4): 400–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2000). Social Exclusion: Concept, applications, and scrutiny, Social Development Papers No. 1, Office of Environment and Social Development, Asian Development Bank.

  • Stabell, C.B. and Fjelstad, O.D. (1998). Configuring Value for Competitive Advantage: On chains, shops and networks, Strategic Management Journal 19 (5): 413–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, D.R., Martz, W.N., Nunamaker, J.F., Grohowski, R.B. and McGoff, C. (1990). Electronic Meeting System Experience at IBM, Journal of Management Information Systems 6 (3): 25–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsham, G. (1995). The Emergence of Interpretivism in IS Research, Information Systems Research 6 (4): 376–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, K.J. (1999). Cyber-Ethnography and the Emergence of the Virtually New Community, Journal of Information Technology 14 (1): 95–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, Y. and Walsham, G. (2008). Inequality of What? Social Exclusion in the E-Society as Capability Deprivation, Information Technology and People 21 (3): 222–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zmud, R. (1996). Editor's Comments: On rigor and relevancy, MIS Quarterly 20 (3): xxxvii–xxxviii.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Information Systems, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong

    Robert M Davison

  2. Department of Management, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong

    Maris G Martinsons

Authors
  1. Robert M Davison
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maris G Martinsons
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert M Davison.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davison, R., Martinsons, M. Methodological practice and policy for organisationally and socially relevant IS research: an inclusive–exclusive perspective. J Inf Technol 26, 288–293 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2011.19

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2011.19

Keywords

Search

Navigation