Skip to main content
Log in

IT resources, organizational capabilities, and value creation in public-sector organizations: a public-value management perspective

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Information Technology

Abstract

What value does information technology (IT) create in governments and how does it do so? While business value of IT has been extensively studied in the information systems field, this has not been the case for public value. This is in part due to a lack of theoretical bases for investigating IT value in the public sector. To address this issue, we present a conceptual model on the mechanism by which IT resources contribute to value creation in the public-sector organizations. We propose that the relationship between IT resources and organizational performance in governments is mediated by organizational capabilities and develop a theoretical model that delineates the paths from IT resources to organizational performance, drawing upon public-value management theory. This theory asserts that public managers, on behalf of the public, should actively strive to generate greater public value, as managers in the private sector seek to achieve greater private business value. On the basis of the review of public-value management literature, we suggest that the following five organizational capabilities mediate the relationship between IT resources and public value – public service delivery capability, public engagement capability, co-production capability, resource-building capability, and public-sector innovation capability. We argue that IT resources in public organizations can enable public managers to advance public-value frontiers by cultivating these five organizational capabilities and to overcome conflicts among competing values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The journal was accessed on 16 October 2013, at the following URL: http://start.aisnet.org/default.asp?page=SeniorScholarBasket.

References

  • Agranoff, R. (2004). Leveraging Networks: A guide for public managers working across organizations, in J.M. Kamensky and T.J. Burlin (eds.) Collaboration: Using Networks and Partnerships, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, pp. 61–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alford, J. (2002). Defining the Client in the Public Sector, Public Administration Review 62 (3): 337–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alford, J. and Hughes, O. (2008). Public Value Pragmatism as the Next Phase of Public Management, American Review of Public Management 38 (2): 130–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alford, J. and O’Flynn, J. (2009). Making Sense of Public Value: Concepts, critiques and emergent meanings, International Journal of Public Administration 32 (3): 171–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, K.N., Henriksen, H.Z., Medaglia, R., Danziger, J.N., Sannarnes, M.K. and Enemærke, M. (2010). Fads and Facts of E-Government: A review of impacts of e-government (2003–2009), International Journal of Public Administration 33 (11): 564–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, M.C., Banker, R.D. and Ravindran, S. (2006). Value Implications of Investments in Information Technology, Management Science 52 (9): 1359–1376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, C.P. and Sambamurthy, V. (1999). Information Technology Assimilation in Firms: The influence of senior leadership and IT infrastructures, Information Systems Research 10 (4): 304–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R.D., Bardhan, I.R., Chang, H. and Lin, S. (2006). Plant Information Systems, Manufacturing Capabilities, and Plant Performance, MIS Quarterly 30 (2): 315–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannister, F. (2001). Dismantling the Silos: Extracting new value from IT investments in public administration, Information Systems Journal 11 (1): 65–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barua, A., Konana, P. and Whiston, A.B. (2004). An Empirical Investigation of Net-Enabled Business Value, MIS Quarterly 28 (4): 585–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck Jørgensen, T. and Bozeman, B. (2007). Public Values: An inventory, Administration & Society 39 (3): 354–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benington, J. (2011). From Private Choice to Public Value?, in J. Benington and M.H. Moore (eds.) Public Value Theory and Practice, Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 31–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beynon-Davies, P. and Williams, M.D. (2003). Evaluating Electronic Local Governments in the UK, Journal of Information Technology 18 (2): 137–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bharadwaj, A.S. (2000). A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An empirical investigation, MIS Quarterly 24 (1): 169–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bharadwaj, A.S., Bharadwaj, S.G. and Konsynski, B.R. (1999). Information Technology Effects on Firm Performance as Measured by Tobin’s q, Management Science 45 (7): 1008–1024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bharadwaj, A.S., Sambamurthy, V. and Zmud, R.W. (1998). IT Capablities: Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Operationalization, in R. Hirchheim, M. Newman, and J.I. DeGross (eds.) Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Information Systems, Association for Information Systems, Helsinki, Finland.

  • Bharadwaj, S., Bharadwaj, A. and Bendoly, E. (2007). The Performance Effects of Complementarities between Information Systems, Marketing, Manufacturing, and Supply Chain Processes, Information Systems Research 18 (4): 437–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borins, S. (2002). Leadership and Innovation in the Public Sector, Leadership & Organization Development Journal 28 (8): 467–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman, B. and Bretschneider, S. (1986). Public Management Information Systems: Theory and prescription, Public Administration Review 46 (1): 475–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bretschneider, S. (1990). Management Information Systems in Public and Private Organizations: An empirical test, Public Administration Review 50 (5): 536–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broussine, M. (2003). Public Leadership, in T. Bovarid and E. Loffler (eds.) Public Management and Governance, London, UK: Routledge, pp. 175–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson, E. (1993). The Productivity Paradox of Information Technology, Communication of the ACM 36 (12): 67–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson, E. and Hitt, L. (1996). Paradox Lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending, Management Science 42 (4): 541–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson, E., Hitt, L.M. and Yang, S. (2002). Intangible Assets: Computers and organizational capital, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1 (1): 137–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caudle, S.L. (1991). Key Information Systems Management Issues for the Public Sector, MIS Quarterly 15 (2): 171–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordella, A. (2007). E-Government: Towards the e-bureaucratic form? Journal of Information Technology 22 (3): 265–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordella, A. and Bonina, C.M. (2012). A Public Value Perspective for ICT Enabled Public Sector Reforms: A theoretical reflection, Government Information Quarterly 29 (4): 512–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordella, A. and Iannacci, F. (2010). Information Systems in the Public Sector: The e-government enactment framework, Journal of Strategic Information Systems 19 (1): 52–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, B. and Ghoneim, S. (1998). Strategic Use of EDI in the Public Sector: The HMSO case study, Journal of Strategic Information Systems 7 (1): 37–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, J.N. and Andersen, K.V. (2002). The Impact of Information Technology on Public Administration: An analysis of empirical research from the ‘golden age’ of transformation, International Journal of Public Administration 25 (5): 591–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, P. and West, K. (2009). What Do Public Values Mean for Public Action? Putting public values in their plural place, American Review of Public Management 39 (6): 602–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewan, S. and Min, C. (1997). The Substitution of Information Technology for Other Factors of Production: A firm level analysis, Management Science 43 (12): 1660–1675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Digital Communities (2010a). Franklin County, Ohio, Uses Address Verification Software to Collect Millions in Unpaid Taxes, http://www.digitalcommunities.com/articles/Franklin-County-Ohio-Uses-Address-Verification.html (accessed 24 July 2013).

  • Digital Communities (2010b). Manor, Texas, Crowdsources Ideas for Running the Town, http://www.digitalcommunities.com/articles/102472519.html (accessed 23 July 2013).

  • Donahue, J.D. and Zeckhauser, R.J. (2011). Collaborative Governance: Private Roles for Public Goals in Turbulent Times, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S. and Tinker, J. (2006). New Public Management Is Dead – Long live digital-era governance, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16 (3): 467–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El Sawy, O.A., Malhotra, A., Park, Y. and Pavlou, P.A. (2010). Seeking the Configurations of Digital Ecodynamics: It takes three to tango, Information Systems Research 21 (4): 835–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fountain, J.E. (2001). Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change. Brookings Institution Press, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government Technology (2011). Apps Contest Winners Need Better Government Data to Sustain Innovative Services, http://www.govtech.com/e-government/Apps-Contest-Winners-Need-Better-Government-Data.html (accessed 23 July 2013).

  • Government Technology (2012a). Chicago Crowdsources Gun Violence Solutions Via Twitter, http://www.govtech.com/e-government/Chicago-Crowdsources-Gun-Violence-Solutions-Via-Twitter.html (accessed 23 July 2013).

  • Government Technology (2012b). How to Fix Voter Registration, http://www.govtech.com/e-government/How-to-Fix-Voter-Registration.html (accessed 24 July 2013).

  • Government Technology (2013). Predicting Crime Using Analytics and Big Data, http://www.govtech.com/public-safety/Predicting-Crime-Using-Analytics-and-Big-Data.html (accessed 23 July 2013).

  • Grimsley, M. and Meehan, A. (2007). E-Government Information Systems: Evaluation-led design for public value and client trust, European Journal of Information Systems 16 (2): 134–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackney, R., Jones, S. and Losch, A. (2007). Towards an e-Government Efficiency Agenda: The impact of information and communication behavior on e-reserve auctions in public sector procurement, European Journal of Information Systems 16 (2): 178–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, J. (2011). Public Value through Innovation and Improvement, in J. Benington and M.H. Moore (eds.) Public Value Theory and Practice, Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 171–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heeks, R. and Bailur, S. (2007). Analyzing E-Government Research: Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice, Government Information Quarterly 24 (2): 243–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henriksen, H.Z. and Damsgaard, J. (2007). Dawn of E-Government – An institutional analysis of seven initiatives and their impact, Journal of Information Technology 22 (1): 13–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, L. and Brynjolfsson, E. (1996). Productivity, Business Profitability, and Consumer Surplus: Three different measures of information technology value, MIS Quarterly 20 (2): 121–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, A.T.-K. (2002). Reinventing Local Governments and the E-Government Initiatives, Public Administration Review 64 (4): 434–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hui, G. and Hayllar, M.R. (2010). Creating Public Value in E-Government: A public-private-citizen collaboration framework in web 2.0, Australian Journal of Public Management 69 (S1): S120–S131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G., Mulgan, G. and Muers, S. (2002). Creating Public Value: An Analytic Framework for Public Service Reform, Strategy Unit, UK Cabinet Office, http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100416132449/http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/strategy/seminars/public_value.aspx (accessed 3 September 2010).

  • Kim, S. and Lee, J. (2012). E-Participation, Transparency, and Trust in Local Government, Public Administration Review 72 (6): 819–828.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klijn, E.-H. and Teisman, G.R. (2003). Institutional and Strategic Barriers to Public–Private Partnership: An analysis of Dutch cases, Public Money & Management 23 (3): 137–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klitgaard, R. and Treverton, G.F. (2004). Assessing Partnerships: New forms of collaboration, in J.M. Kamensky and T.J. Burlin (eds.) Collaboration: Using Networks and Partnerships, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, pp. 21–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, R. and Grover, V. (2008). Business Value of IT: An essay on expanding research directions to keep up with the times, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 9 (2): 23–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraemer, K.L. and Dedrick, J. (1997). Computing and Public Organization, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 7 (1): 89–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraemer, K. and King, J. (2003). Information Technology and Administrative Reform: Will the Time After E-Government Be Different? Irvine, CA: Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, G. and Kwak, Y.H. (2012). An Open Government Maturity Model for Social Media-Based Public Engagement, Government Information Quarterly 29 (4): 492–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, G. and Perry, J.L. (2002). Are Computers Boosting Productivity? A test of the paradox in state governments, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 12 (1): 77–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehr, W. and Lichtenberg, F.R. (1998). Computer Use and Productivity Growth in US Federal Government Agencies, 1987–1992, Journal of Industrial Economics 46 (2): 257–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, J.H. and Tang, S.-Y. (2008). Urban E-Government Initiatives and Environmental Decision Performance in Korea, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (1): 109–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, E.T.K., Tan, C.-W., Cyr, D., Pan, S.L. and Xiao, B. (2012). Advancing Public Trust Relationships in Electronic Government: The Singapore e-filing journey, Information Systems Research 23 (4): 1110–1130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowry, P., Romans, D. and Curtis, A. (2004). Global Journal Prestige and Supporting Disciplines: A scientometric study of information systems journals, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 5 (2): 29–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luna-Reyes, L.F., Pardo, T.A., Ochoategui, F.B. and Sanabria, R.M. (2007). Bureau of Housing Service (BHS), in B. Rocheleau (ed.) Case Studies on Digital Government, Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing, pp. 247–255.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Majchrzak, A., Rice, R.E., King, N., Malhotra, A. and Ba, S. (2000). Computer-Mediated Inter-Organizational Knowledge-Sharing: Insights from a virtual team innovating using a collaboration tool, Information Resource Management Journal 13 (1): 44–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melville, N., Kraemer, K.L. and Gurbaxani, V. (2004). Review: Information Technology and Organizational Performance: An integrative model of it business value, MIS Quarterly 28 (2): 283–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mithas, S., Ramasubbu, N. and Sambamurthy, V. (2011). How Information Management Capability Influences Firm Performance, MIS Quarterly 35 (1): 237–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molina, A.D. and Spicer, M.W. (2004). Aristotelian Rhetoric, Pluralism, and Public Administration, Administration & Society 36 (3): 282–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon, M.J. (2002). The Evolution of E-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or reality? Public Administration Review 62 (4): 424–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon, M.J. and Norris, D.F. (2005). Does Managerial Orientation Matter? The adoption of reinventing government and e-government at the municipal level, Information Systems Journal 15 (1): 43–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M.H. (1995). Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M.H. and Benington, J. (2011). Conclusions: Looking ahead, in J. Benington and M.H. Moore. (eds.) Public Value Theory and Practice, Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 256–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M.H. and Khagram, S. (2004). On Creating Public Value: What business might learn from government about strategic management, Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative Working Paper no. 3, Cambridge, MA: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.

  • Morgeson, F.V., VanAmburg, D. and Mithas, S. (2011). Misplaced Trust? Exploring the structure of the e-government-citizen trust relationship, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21 (2): 257–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay, T., Javier Lerch, F. and Mangal, V. (1997). Assessing the Impact of Information Technology on Labor Productivity: A field study, Decision Support Systems 19 (2): 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nabatchi, T. (2011). Exploring the Public Value Universe: Understanding values in public administration, presented at Public Value Management Conference, http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/uploadedFiles/conferences/pmrc/Files/Nabatchi%20_Exploring%20the%20Public%20Values%20Universe.pdf (accessed 16 September 2013).

  • NASCIO (2005a). NASCIO 2004–2005 Compendium of Digital Government in the States, http://www.nascio.org/publications/compendium.cfm (accessed 20 September 2010).

  • NASCIO (2005b). 2005 Best Practices in the Use of Information Technology in State Government, http://www.nascio.org/publications/documents/NASCIO-2005NASCIOAwards.pdf (accessed 20 September 2010).

  • NASCIO (2006). 2006 Best Practices in the Use of Information Technology in State Government, http://www.nascio.org/publications/documents/NASCIO-2006Awards.pdf (accessed 15 March 2014).

  • NASCIO (2007). 2007 Best Practices in the Use of Information Technology in State Government, http://www.nascio.org/publications/documents/NASCIO-2007Awards.pdf (accessed 15 March 2011).

  • NASCIO (2009). 2009 Best Practices in the Use of Information Technology in State Government, http://www.nascio.org/publications/documents/NASCIO-2009Awards.pdf (accessed 20 September 2010).

  • Neo, B.S. (1992). The Implementation of an Electronic Market for Pig Trading in Singapore, Journal of Strategic Information Systems 1 (5): 278–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newcomer, K.E. and Caudle, S.L. (1991). Evaluating Public Sector Information Systems: More than meets the eye, Public Administration Review 51 (5): 377–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The New York Times (2012). For Some New Yorkers, a Grand Experiment in Participatory Budgeting, http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/01/nyregion/for-some-new-yorkers-a-grand-experiment-in-participatory-budgeting.html (accessed 23 July 2013).

  • NextGov (2013). Open Data is Re-Defining Government in the 21st Century, http://www.nextgov.com/big-data/2013/06/open-data-re-defining-government-21st-century/64847/ (accessed 23 July 2013).

  • Norris, D.F. and Kraemer, K.L. (1996). Mainframe and PC Computing in American Cities: Myths and realities, Public Administration Review 56 (6): 568–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, D.F. and Moon, M.J. (2005). Advancing E-Government at the Grassroots: Tortoise or hare? Public Administration Review 65 (1): 64–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunn, S. (2001). Police Information Technology: Assessing the effects of computerization on urban police functions, Public Administration Review 61 (2): 221–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlou, P.A. and El Sawy, O.A. (2006). From IT Leveraging Competence to Competitive Advantage in Turbulent Environments: The case of new product development, Information Systems Research 17 (3): 198–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pemberton, J.D., Stonehouse, G.H. and Barber, C.E. (2001). Competing with CRS-Generated Information in the Airline Industry, Journal of Strategic Information Systems 20 (1): 59–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piccoli, G. and Ives, B. (2005). Review: IT-dependent strategic initiatives and sustained competitive advantage: A review and synthesis of the literature, MIS Quarterly 29 (4): 747–776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. and Kramer, M. (2011). Creating Shared Value, Harvard Business Review 89 (1/2): 62–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rai, A., Patnayakuni, R. and Seth, N. (2006). Firm Performance Impacts of Digitally Enabled Supply Chain Integration Capabilities, MIS Quarterly 30 (2): 225–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rai, A. and Tang, X. (2010). Leveraging IT Capabilities and Competitive Process Capabilities for the Management of Interorganizational Relationship Portfolios, Information Systems Researcsh 21 (3): 516–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rainer, K. and Miller, M. (2005). Explaining Differences across Journal Rankings, Communications of the ACM 48 (2): 91–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray, G., Muhanna, W.A. and Barney, J.B. (2005). Information Technology and the Performance of the Customer Service Process: A resource-based analysis, MIS Quarterly 29 (4): 625–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R.A.W. and Wanna, J. (2007). The Limits to Public Value, or Rescuing Responsible Government from the Platonic Guardians, Australasian Journal of Public Administration 66 (4): 406–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R.A.W. and Wanna, J. (2009). Bringing the Politics Back in: Public value in Westminster parliamentary government, Public Administration 87 (2): 161–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez Bolívar, M.P., Perez, C.C. and Hernandez, A.M.L. (2007). E-Government and Public Financial Reporting, American Review of Public Administration 37 (2): 142–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruuska, I. and Teigland, R. (2009). Ensuring Project Success through Collective Competence and Creative Conflict in Public-Private Partnership – A case study of Bygga Villa, a Swedish triple helix e-government initiative, International Journal of Public Management 27 (4): 323–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A. and Grover, V. (2003). Shaping Agility through Digital Options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms, MIS Quarterly 27 (2): 237–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, J.A. and Tuma, R. (2007). A Collaborative Communications Center and Public Safety Data Systems, in B. Rocheleau (ed.) Case Studies on Digital Government, Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing, pp. 256–280.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Seltsikas, P. and O’Keefe, R.M. (2010). Expectation and Outcomes in Electronic Identity Management: The role of trust and public value, European Journal of Information Systems 19 (1): 93–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M.L. (2011). Limitations to Building Institutional Trustworthiness through E-Government: A comparative study of two e-services in Chile, Journal of Information Technology 26 (1): 78–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R.F.I. (2004). Focusing on Public Value: Something new and something old, Australian Journal of Public Management 63 (4): 68–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoker, G. (2006). Public Value Management: A new narrative for networked governance? American Review of Public Administration 36 (1): 47–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straub, D. (2010). A Midterm MIS Quarterly Progress Report, MIS Quarterly 34 (2): iii–xii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swilling, M. (2011). Greening Public Value: The sustainability challenge, in J. Benington and M.H. Moore (eds.) Public Value Theory and Practice, Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 89–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanriverdi, H. (2005). Information Technology Relatedness, Knowledge Management Capability, and Performance of Multibusiness Firms, MIS Quarterly 29 (2): 311–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teo, H.-H., Tan, B.C.Y. and Wei, K.-K. (1997). Organizational Transformation Using Electronic Data Interchange: The case of tradenet in Singapore, Journal of Management Information Systems 13 (4): 139–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J.C. and Streib, G. (2005). E-Democracy, E-Commerce, and E-Research: Examining the electronic ties between citizens and governments, Administration & Society 37 (3): 259–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolbert, C.J. and Mossberger, K. (2006). The Effects of E-Government on Trust and Confidence in Government, Public Administration Review 66 (3): 354–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trkman, P., McCormack, K., de Oliveira, M.P.V. and Ladeira, M.B. (2010). The Impact of Business Analytics on Supply Chain Performance, Decision Support Systems 49 (3): 318–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsouhlou, A. and Mylonakis, J. (2011). Public Expenditure, Public Sector Size and Growth: The European Union marked structural differences, Review of European Studies 3 (2): 33–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, M. and Hulland, J. (2004). Review: The resource-based view and information systems research: Review, extension, and suggests for future research, MIS Quarterly 28 (1): 107–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, J.A. and Tschirhart, M. (1994). Public Information Campaigns as Policy Instruments, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 13 (1): 82–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch, E.W., Hinnant, C.C. and Moon, M.J. (2004). Linking Citizen Satisfaction with E-Government and Trust in Government, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15 (3): 371–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, D. (2004). E-Government and the Transformation of Service Delivery and Citizen Attitudes, Public Administration Review 64 (1): 15–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, I. and Shearer, H. (2011). Appraising Public Value: Past, present, and futures, Public Administration 89 (4): 1367–1384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, T.A. (1994). Government Regulation through Voluntary Cooperation: The strategic impact of information technology, Journal of Strategic Information Systems 3 (2): 107–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yes Magazine (2010). Chicago’s $1.3 Million Experiment in Democracy, http://www.yesmagazine.org/people-power/chicagos-1.3-million-experiment-in-democracy (accessed 23 July 2013).

  • Yildiz, M. (2007). E-Government Research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward, Government Information Quarterly 24 (3): 646–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Correction

This paper has been amended, the title was incorrect in the publication of an earlier version.

Appendix

Appendix

Table A1

Table A1 The Journal List in the Literature Search (Public-sector IT-value research)

About this article

Cite this article

Pang, MS., Lee, G. & DeLone, W. IT resources, organizational capabilities, and value creation in public-sector organizations: a public-value management perspective. J Inf Technol 29, 187–205 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2014.2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2014.2

Keywords

Navigation