This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Agarwal, R. and Lucas, H.C. (2005). The Information Systems Identity Crises: Focusing on high-visibility and high-impact research, MIS Quarterly 29 (3): 381–398.
Barley, S.R. (2006). When I Write My Masterpiece: Thoughts on what makes a paper interesting, Academy of Management Journal 49 (1): 16–20.
Klein, H.K. and Myers, M.D. (1999). A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems, MIS Quarterly 23 (1): 67–93.
Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data, Academy of Management Review 24 (4): 691–710.
Langley, A., Smallman, C., Tsoukas, H. and Van de Ven, A.H. (2013). Process Studies of Change in Organization and Management: Unveiling temporality, activity, and flow, Academy of Management Journal 56 (1): 1–13.
Pentland, B.T. (1999). Building Process Theory with Narrative: From description to explanation, Academy of Management Review 24 (4): 711–724.
Sarker, S., Xiao, X. and Beaulieu, T. (2013). Qualitative Studies in Information Systems: A critical review and some guiding principles, MIS Quarterly 37 (4): iii–xviii.
Weick, K.E. (1989). Theory Construction as Disciplined Imagination, Academy of Management Review 14 (4): 516–531.
Weick, K.E. (1995). What Theory Is Not, Theorizing Is, Administrative Science Quarterly 40 (3): 385–390.
Yoo, Y. (2010). Computing in Everyday Life: A call for research on experiential computing, MIS Quarterly 34 (2): 213–231.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Commentary on Is Theory King? Questioning The Theory Fetish in Information Systems By David Avison and Julien Malaurent
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Henfridsson, O. The power of an intellectual account: developing stories of the digital age. J Inf Technol 29, 356–357 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2014.18
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2014.18