Abstract
Dramatic changes in context have occurred over the last 25 years for those of us working in the information systems (IS) field, with ICTs becoming pervasive in many areas of human activity and in all countries of the world. It is ironic that the success of ICTs has led to concerns that the distinct research contribution of the IS field could become lost and that the field itself may decline. The literature over the last decade or so has offered different and sometimes opposing suggestions as to how the field should respond to these concerns. In this paper, I discuss these debates and I use the discussion as a basis for putting forward a skeleton future agenda for the IS field as a whole. This agenda emphasises the need for a focus on ethical goals, increased use of critical approaches, welcoming other disciplines with open arms, widening our field of study to many non-traditional settings and rejecting a dominant methodological paradigm.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Avgerou, C. (2010). Comments on Allen Lee's Article: ‘Information systems research in the last and next 25 years’ from a socio-theoretical IS research perspective, Journal of Information Technology 25 (4): 355–357.
Baskerville, R., Lyytinen, K., Sambamurthy, V. and Straub, D. (2011). A Response to the Design-oriented Information Systems Research Memorandum, European Journal of Information Systems 20 (1): 11–15.
Benbasat, I. and Zmud, R.W. (2003). The Identity Crisis Within the IS Discipline: Defining and communicating the discipline's core properties, MIS Quarterly 27 (2): 183–194.
Bhatnagar, S.C. and Bjørn-Andersen, N. (eds.) (1990). Information Technology in Developing Countries, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Braa, J., Hanseth, O., Heywood, A., Mohammed, W. and Shaw, V. (2007). Developing Health Information Systems in Developing Countries: The flexible standards strategy, MIS Quarterly 31 (2): 381–402.
Bryant, A. (2008). The Future of Information Systems – Thinking Informatically, European Journal of Information Systems 17 (6): 695–698.
Bryant, A., Land, F. and King, J.L. (2009). Editors’ Introduction – Special Issue on Ethical Issues in IS Research, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 10 (11): 782–786.
Buskens, I. and Webb, A. (eds.) (2009). African Women and ICTs, Pretoria: Unisa Press.
Choudhury, V., Lopes, A.B. and Arthur, D. (2010). IT Careers Camp: An early intervention strategy to increase IS enrolments, Information Systems Research 21 (1): 1–14.
Davidson, E.J. (2011). ‘Hey Professor, Why are You Teaching This Class?’ Reflection on the Relevance of IS Research for Undergraduate Students, European Journal of Information Systems 20 (2): 133–138.
Davison, R.M. and Martinsons, M.G. (2011). Methodological Practice and Policy for Organisationally and Socially Relevant IS Research: An inclusive-exclusive perspective, Journal of Information Technology 26 (4): 288–293.
DeSanctis, G. (2003). The Social Life of Information Systems Research, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 4 (7): 360–376.
Donner, J. (2008). Research Approaches to Mobile Use in the Developing World: A review of the literature, The Information Society 24 (3): 140–159.
Ekine, S. (ed.) (2010). SMS Uprising: Mobile Activism in Africa, Cape Town: Pamzabuka Press.
Galliers, R.D. (2003). Change as Crisis or Growth? Towards a Trans-disciplinary View of Information Systems as a Field of Study, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 4 (6): 337–351.
Gill, G. and Bhattacherjee, A. (2009). Whom Are We Informing? Issues and Recommendations for MIS Research from an Informing Sciences Perspective, MIS Quarterly 33 (2): 217–235.
Grover, V., Straub, D. and Galluch, P. (2009). Turning the Corner: The influence of positive thinking on the information systems field, MIS Quarterly 32 (1): iii–viii.
Klein, H.K. and Hirschheim, R. (2008). The Structure of the IS Discipline Reconsidered: Implications and reflections from a community of practice perspective, Information and Organization 18 (4): 280–302.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An introduction to actor-network-theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lee, A.S. (2011). IS Research Methods: Inclusive or exclusive? Journal of Information Technology 26 (4): 296–298.
Lyytinen, K. and King, J.L. (2004). Nothing at the Center?: Academic legitimacy in the information systems field, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 5 (6): 220–246.
Moraczynski, O. (2009). Exploring the Usage and Impact of ‘Transformational’ Mobile Financial Services: The case of M-PESA in Kenya, Journal of East African Studies 3 (3): 509–525.
Myers, M.D. (2011). Is There a Methodological Crisis? Journal of Information Technology 26 (4): 294–295.
Myers, M.D. and Baskerville, R.L. (2009). Commentary on Gill and Bhattacherjee: Is there an informing crisis? MIS Quarterly 33 (4): 663–665.
Nandhakumar, J. and Scarbrough, H. (2011). Open Sources? A commentary on ‘IS Research Methods: Inclusive or exclusive?’ Journal of Information Technology 26 (4): 302–303.
Orlikowski, W.J. (2007). Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring technology at work, Organization Studies 28 (9): 1435–1448.
Orlikowski, W.J. and Iacono, C.S. (2001). Research Commentary: Desperately seeking the ‘IT’ in IT research – a call to theorizing the IT artifact, Information Systems Research 12 (2): 121–134.
Orlikowski, W.J. and Scott, S.V. (2008). Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization, The Academy of Management Annals 2 (1): 433–474.
Österle, H., Becker, J., Frank, U., Hess, T., Karagiannis, D., Krcmar, H., Loos, P., Mertens, P., Oberweis, A. and Sinz, E.J. (2011). Memorandum on Design-Oriented Information Systems Research, European Journal of Information Systems 20 (1): 7–10.
Prahalad, C.K. (2004). The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School Publishing.
Robey, D. (2003). Identity, Legitimacy and the Dominant Research Paradigm: An alternative prescription for the IS discipline, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 4 (7): 352–359.
Rowe, F. (2010). Valuing Worldwide Diversity in a European Spirit: Being more critical and open, European Journal of Information Systems 19 (5): 495–500.
Sawyer, S., Griffiths, M., Light, B. and Lincoln, S. (2011). Guest Editorial: Constructing, deconstructing and negotiating the boundaries of digital cultures, Information Technology and People 24 (1): 5–9.
Sawyer, S. and Winter, S.J. (2011). Special Issue on Futures for Research on Information Systems: Prometheus unbound? Journal of Information Technology 26 (2): 95–98.
Unwin, T. (ed.) (2009). ICT4D: Information and communication technology for development, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Walsham, G. (1993). Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations, Chichester: Wiley.
Walsham, G. (2001). Making a World of Difference: IT in a global context, Chichester: Wiley.
Walsham, G. (2005). Learning About Being Critical, Information Systems Journal 15 (2): 111–117.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Walsham, G. Are we making a better world with ICTs? Reflections on a future agenda for the IS field. J Inf Technol 27, 87–93 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2012.4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2012.4