General Paper

Journal of the Operational Research Society (1993) 44, 867–881. doi:10.1057/jors.1993.156

After OR: An Agenda for Postmodernism and Poststructuralism in OR

Ann Taket1 and Leroy White2

  1. 1Queen Mary and Westfield College and London Hospital Medical College, Univerity of London, UK
  2. 2University of Greenwich, UK

Correspondence: A. Taket, Department of Georgraphy, Queen Mary and Westfield College, University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK.

Top

Abstract

Postmodernism and poststructuralism have only been mentioned in passing within this journal. There is much more to be said, and this paper aims to open up the debate, to begin to explore the vast terrain and to present one/some agenda/s for the future, introducing some of the ideas that have inspired O(u)R practice. The paper is in four episodes. We begin by exploring the differences between modernism and postmodernism and introducing some of our sources (episode 1), moving on to the study of language through structuralism and into poststructuralism (episode 2). This section introduces some key concepts and approaches which we illustrate in a short case study (episode 3) of the language of OR. The final section (episode 4) sketches in the outlines of our future agenda. A warning is in order for people unfamiliar with postmodernism: the terminologies and style may seem unusual and untraditional for the journal.

Keywords:

Methodology, Philosophy of OR, Postmodernism, Poststructuralism, Practice of OR

Extra navigation

.

Society resources

ADVERTISEMENT
Schmalenbach Business Review E-Alert