Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of compatibility between interdependent matrices in ANP

  • Theoretical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

Analytic network process (ANP) addresses multi-attribute decision-making where attributes exhibit dependencies. A principal characteristic of such problems is that pairwise comparisons are needed for attributes that have interdependencies. We propose that before such comparison matrices are used—in addition to a test that assesses the consistency of a pairwise comparison matrix—a test must also be conducted to assess ‘consistency’ across interdependent matrices. We call such a cross-matrix consistency test as a compatibility test. In this paper, we design a compatibility test for interdependent matrices between two clusters of attributes. We motivate our exposition by addressing compatibility in Sinarchy, a special form of ANP where interdependency exists between the last and next-to-last level. The developed compatibility test is applicable to any pair of interdependent matrices that are a part of an ANP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Saaty TL (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1996). The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications; Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamenetzky RD (1982). The relationship between the analytic hierarchy process and the additive value function. Decis Sci 13: 702–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson SR and Freeling ANS (1982). Assessing attribute weights. OMEGA 10(6): 582–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belton V and Gear T (1983). On a short-coming of Saaty's method of analytic hierarchies. OMEGA 11(3): 228–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belton V and Gear T (1985). The legitimacy of rank reversal—a comment. OMEGA 13(3): 143–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoner B and Wedley WC (1989). Ambiguous criteria weights in AHP: consequences and solution. Decision Sci 20: 462–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer JS (1990). Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process. Mngt Sci 36(3): 249–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoner B, Wedley WC and Choo EU (1993). A unified approach to AHP with linking pins. Eur J Oper Res 64: 384–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez J (1995). Some comments on Saaty's AHP. Mngt Sci 41(6): 1091–1095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung LC and Cao D (2001). On the efficacy of modeling multi-attribute problems using AHP and Sinarchy. Eur J Oper Res 132: 39–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harker PT and Vargas LG (1987). The theory of ratio scale estimation: Saaty's analytic hierarchy process. Mngt Sci 33(11): 1383–1403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schenkerman S (1997). Inducement of nonexistent order by the analytic hierarchy process. Decision Sci 28(2): 475–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargas LG (1994). Reply to Schenkerman's avoiding rank reversal in AHP decision support models. Eur J Oper Res 74: 420–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1994). How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Interface 24(6): 19–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang M and Stam A (1994). PAHAP: a pairwise aggregated hierarchical analysis of ration-scale preferences. Decision Sci 25(4): 607–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schenkerman S (1994). Avoiding rank reversal in AHP decision-support models. Eur J Oper Res 74: 407–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a Hong Kong RGC Competitive Earmarked Research Grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Appendix

Appendix

As stated earlier, for uniform and lognormal errors, 95 percentile of r-values for different σ 2 and L are shown in Table 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13.

Table 6 95 percentile of r-values (L=1)
Table 7 95 percentile of r-values (L=2)
Table 8 95 percentile of r-values (L=4)
Table 9 95 percentile of r-values (L=5)
Table 10 95 percentile of r-values (lognormal, σ 2=0.0033)
Table 11 95 percentile of r-values (lognormal, σ 2=0.0131)
Table 12 95 percentile of r-values (lognormal, σ 2=0.0495)
Table 13 95 percentile of r-values (lognormal, σ 2=0.0745)

(See Table 7 below)

(See Table 8 below)

(See Table 9 below)

(See Table 10 below)

(See Table 11 below)

(See Table 12 below)

(See Table 13 below)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leung, L., Hui, Y. & Zheng, M. Analysis of compatibility between interdependent matrices in ANP. J Oper Res Soc 54, 758–768 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601569

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601569

Keywords

Navigation