Abstract
We present an adjustment rule for interrupted cricket matches that equalizes the probability of winning before and after the interruption, which we claim is both fair and free of incentive effects. We give several examples of how our rule could have been applied in past matches, including some in which the ultimate result might have been different.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Preston IP and Thomas JM (2002). Rain rules for limited overs cricket and probabilities of victory. J R Stat Soc Ser D 51: 189–202.
Duckworth FC and Lewis AJ (1998). A fair method for resetting the target in interrupted one-day cricket matches. J Opl Res Soc 49: 220–227.
Clark SR (1988). Dynamic programming in one-day cricket—optimal scoring rates. J Opl Res Soc 39: 331–337.
Carter MG and Guthrie GA (2003). Cricket Interruptus: Fairness and Incentives in Interrupted Cricket Matches. New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation: Victoria University of Wellington.
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge the helpful comments of Glenn Boyle. Sanghamitra Das, Frank Duckworth, John Howells, Tony Lewis, Paul Walker and two anonymous referees, and the research assistance of Gareth Stiven and Steen Videbeck.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carter, M., Guthrie, G. Cricket interruptus: fairness and incentive in limited overs cricket matches. J Oper Res Soc 55, 822–829 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601744
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601744