Abstract
This paper reflects an attempt to rethink the process of analysis of energy efficiency initiatives using soft systems methodology (SSM) as a problem structuring tool. The aim of the work is to provide public and private initiative promoters or evaluators with a structured support for a more informed decision regarding the implementation of energy efficiency measures. The SSM approach contributed with the identification of all market players and their relations, as well as the insight into the deficiencies of current methodologies. Some future work directions are also proposed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Daellenbach HG (1997). Multiple criteria decision making within Checkland's Soft Systems Methodology. In: Climaco J (ed). Multicriteria Analysis — Proceedings of the XI International Conference on Multiple Criteria Decision Making. Springer; Berlin, pp 51–60.
Belton V, Ackerman F and Shepherd I (1997). Integrated support from problem structuring through to alternative evaluation using COPE and VISA. J Multi-Crit Decis Anal 6: 115–130.
Bana e Costa CA, Ensslin L, Corrêa ÉC and Vansnick JC (1999). Decision support systems in action: integrated application in a multicriteria decision aid process. Eur J Opl Res 113: 315–335.
California Public Utilities Commission and California Energy Commission (1983). Standard Practice for Cost–Benefit Analysis of Conservation and Load Management Programs. The California Public Utilities Commission and The California Energy Commission, San Francisco & Sacramento, USA..
California Public Utilities Commission and California Energy Commission (1987). Standard Practice Manual: Economic Analysis of Demand-Side Management Programs. The California Public Utilities Commission and The California Energy Commission, San Francisco & Sacramento, USA..
Hirst E (1992). Definitions and tradeoffs: cost-effectiveness of utility DSM programs. In: Piette MA and Pratt (RG) (eds). Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings. American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy: ACEEE: USA, pp 8.89–8.97.
ELSAM (ed.) (1993). Decision Criteria on the Demand side: Integrated Resource Planning in the Danish Electric Utilities. The IRP project. ELSAM, Frederico, Denmark. ISBN 87-87090-17-1.
A Project Advisory Commitee and SRC International ApS (1996). European B/C Analysis Methodology (EUBC) — A Guidebook For B/C Evaluation of DSM and Energy Efficiency Services Programs. Prepared for the European Commission (DG XIIV).Src International, APS, Kopenhagen, Denmark.
Checkland P and Scholes J (2000). Soft Systems Methodology in Action. Wiley: Chichester.
Checkland P (2001). Soft systems methodology. In: Rosenhead J, Mingers J (eds). Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited. Wiley: Chichester, pp 61–89.
Checkland P (1990). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. Wiley: Chichester.
Yu W (1992). Aide multicritére à la decision dans le cadre de la problématique du tri: concepts, méthodes et applications. PhD thesis, Université Paris-Dauphine.
Mousseau V, Slowinski R and Zielniewicz P (1999). A user-oriented implementation of the ELECTRE-TRI method integrating preference elicitation support. Comput Opns Res 27: 757–777.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) under Grant POCTI/ESE/38422/2001.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Neves, L., Martins, A., Antunes, C. et al. Using SSM to rethink the analysis of energy efficiency initiatives. J Oper Res Soc 55, 968–975 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601763
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601763