Skip to main content
Log in

Comment on Carter M and Guthrie G (2004). Cricket interruptus: fairness and incentive in limited overs cricket matches

  • Viewpoint
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Carter M and Guthrie G (2004). Cricket interruptus: fairness and incentive in limited overs cricket matches. J Opl Res Soc 55: 822–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duckworth FC and Lewis AJ (1998). A fair method for resetting the target in interrupted one-day cricket matches. J Opl Res Soc 29: 220–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duckworth FC and Lewis AJ (2004). A successful operational research intervention in one-day cricket. J Opl Res Soc 55: 749–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duckworth F and Lewis T (2002). Can the probability of winning a one-day cricket match be maintained across a stoppage? In: Cohen G and Langtree T (eds). Proceedings of the Sixth Australian Conference on Mathematics and Computers in Sport, Bond University, Queensland, Australia, pp 141–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston IP and Thomas JM (2002). Rain rules for limited overs cricket and probabilities of victory. J Roy Stat Soc Ser D 51: 189–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Duckworth, F., Lewis, A. Comment on Carter M and Guthrie G (2004). Cricket interruptus: fairness and incentive in limited overs cricket matches. J Oper Res Soc 56, 1333–1337 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601994

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601994

Navigation