Skip to main content
Log in

Programmatic efficiency comparisons between unequally sized groups of DMUs in DEA

  • Theoretical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a popular non-parametric technique for determining the efficiency of a homogeneous set of decision-making units (DMUs). In many practical cases, there is some doubt if the all the DMUs form a single group with a common efficiency distribution. The Mann–Whitney rank statistic has been used in DEA both to test if two groups of DMUs come from a common efficiency distribution and also to test if the two groups have a common frontier, each of which are likely to have important but different policy implications for the management of the groups. In this paper it is demonstrated that where the Mann–Whitney rank statistic is used for the second of these it is likely to overestimate programmatic inefficiency, particularly of the smaller group. A new non-parametric statistic is proposed for the case of comparing the efficient frontiers of two groups, which overcomes the problems we identify in the use of the Mann–Whitney rank statistic for this purpose.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Charnes A, Cooper WW and Rhodes E (1981). Evaluating program and managerial efficiency: an application of data envelopment analysis to program follow through. Manage Sci 27: 668–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockett PL and Golany B (1996). Using rank statistics for determining programmatic efficiency differences in data envelopment analysis. Manage Sci 42: 466–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sueyoshi T and Aoki S (2001). A use of a nonparametric statistic for DEA frontier shift: the Kruskal and Wallis rank test. Omega Int J Manage Sci 29: 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowlin WF, Renner CJ and Rives JM (2003). A DEA study of gender equity in executive compensation. J Opl Res Soci 54: 751–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neave HR and Worthington PL (1988). Distribution-Free Tests. Unwin Hyman: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simar L and Wilson PW (2000). A general methodology for bootstrapping in nonparametric frontier models. J Appl Statist 27: 779–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simar L and Wilson PW (1998). Sensitivity analysis of efficiency scores: how to bootstrap in nonparametric frontier models. Manage Sci 22: 49–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson PW (2003). Testing independence in Models of productive Efficiency. J Product Anal 20: 361–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G Simpson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Simpson, G. Programmatic efficiency comparisons between unequally sized groups of DMUs in DEA. J Oper Res Soc 56, 1431–1438 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601961

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601961

Keywords

Navigation