Skip to main content
Log in

Proposing a systems vision of knowledge management in emergency care

  • Special Features
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

This paper makes a case for taking a systems view of knowledge management within health-care provision, concentrating on the emergency care process in the UK National Health Service. It draws upon research in two case-study organizations (a hospital and an ambulance service). The case-study organizations appear to be approaching knowledge (and information) management in a somewhat fragmented way. They are trying to think more holistically, but (perhaps) because of the ways their organizations and their work are structured, they cannot ‘see’ the whole of the care process. The paper explores the complexity of knowledge management in emergency health care and draws the distinction for knowledge management between managing local and operational knowledge, and global and clinical knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

References

  • Fawcett SE and Cooper MB (2001). Process integration for competitive success: benchmarking barriers and bridges. Benchmarking 8: 396–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morash EA and Clinton SR (1998). Supply chain integration: customer value through collaborative closeness versus operational excellence. J Marketing Theory Prac 6: 104–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minnick A, Young WB and Roberts MJ (1995). 2,000 patients relate their hospital experiences. Nurs Mngt 26: 25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman K (1994). The single visit clinic: a case study in process re-engineering. Bus Change Re-eng 2: 10–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bence V (1995). St James's Hospital and Lucas Engineering Systems: a BPR collaboration. Bus Change Re-eng 2: 30–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnott S (2003). National buying to slash NHS costs. Computing, 26 February. http://www.computing.co.uk/news/1139071, last accessed 27 September 2004.

  • Rubenstein-Montano B, et al and The Knowledge Management Methodology Team (2001). A systems thinking framework for knowledge management. Decision Support Syst 31: 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyris C and Schön DA (1978). Organizational Learning, A Theory of Action Perspective. Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuthbertson C and Farrington J (2002). Methods for knowledge management strategy formulation: a case study. In: Coakes E, Willis D and Clarke S (eds). Knowledge Management in the SocioTechnical World: The Graffiti Continues. Springer-Verlag, London, pp 139–152.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari FM, Fares CB and Martinelli DP (2002). The systemic approach of SSM: the case of a Brazilian company. Syst Prac Action Res 15: 51–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Karaghouli W, Fitzgerald G and Alshawi S (2002). Knowledge requirements systems (KRS): an approach to improving and understanding requirements. In: Coakes E, Willis D and Clarke S (eds). Knowledge Management in the Sociotechnical World: The Graffiti Continues. Springer-Verlag, London, pp 170–184.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Senge PM (1990). The Fifth Discipline, The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. Doubleday: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coakes E, Willis D and Clarke S (2002). Knowledge Management in the SocioTechnical World: The Graffiti Continues. Springer-Verlag: London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reuthe E and Allee V (1999). Knowledge management: moving the care model from a ‘snapshot’ to a ‘story’. Health Forum J 42: 26–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desouza KC (2002). Knowledge management in hospitals: a process oriented view and staged look at managerial issues. Int J Healthcare Technol Mngt 4: 478–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell S et al (2003). ‘Best practice’ development and transfer in the NHS: the importance of process as well as product knowledge. Health Services Mngt Res 16: 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P and Scholes J (1990). Soft Systems Methodology in Action. John Wiley: Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P (1999). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. John Wiley: Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P and Holwell S (1998). Information, Systems and Information Systems—Making Sense of the Field. John Wiley: Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehaney B and Paul RJ (1996). The use of soft systems methodology in the development of a simulation of out-patient services at Watford General Hospital. J Opl Res Soc 47: 864–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehaney B, Clarke SA and Paul RJ (1999). A case of intervention in an outpatients department. J Opl Res Soc 50: 877–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batalden P and Splaine M (2002). What will it take to lead the continual improvement and innovation of health care in the twenty-first century? Qual Mngt Health Care 11: 45–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Beveren J (2003). Does health care for knowledge management? J Knowledge Mngt 7: 90–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport TH and Glaser J (2002). Just-in-time-delivery comes to knowledge management. Harvard Bus Rev 80: 107–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melymuka K (2002). Knowledge management helps cut errors by half. Computerworld 36: 44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen MK and Larsen MH (2001). Distributed knowledge management based on product state models—the case of decision support in health care administration. Decision Support Syst 31: 139–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashburner L and Fitzgerald L (1996). Beleaguered professionals: clinicians and institutional change in the NHS. In: Scarbrough H (ed). The Management of Expertise. Macmillan Press, Basingstoke, pp 190–216.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen MT, Nohria N and Tierney T (1999). What's your strategy for managing knowledge? Harvard Bus Rev 77: 106–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter B (2000). The expert's opinion: knowledge management. J Database Mngt 11: 42–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarbrough H and Swan J (2001). Explaining the diffusion of knowledge management: the role of fashion. Br J Mngt 12: 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earl M (2001). Knowledge management strategies: toward a taxonomy. J Mngt Inform Syst 18: 215–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alavi M and Leidner DE (2001). Review: knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Q 25: 107–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forgionne GA and Kohli R (1995). Integrated MSS effects: an empirical health care investigation. Inform Process Mngt 31: 879–896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slipy SM (1995). Boston hospital using seven telemedicine systems within facility. Health Mngt Technol 16: 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno L et al (2001). Using KADS methodology in a simulation assisted knowledge based system: application to hospital management. Expert Syst Appl 20: 235–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moseley L and Mead D (2001). Explaining the low penetration of decision support systems into clinical practice. Expert Update 3: 30–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standridge CR and Steward D (2000). Using expert systems for simulation modeling of patient scheduling. Simulation 75: 148–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eden C and Ackermann F (1989). Strategic options development and analysis (SODA)—using a computer to help with the management of strategic vision. In: Doukidis GI, Land F and Miller G (eds). Knowledge-based Management Support Systems. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, pp 198–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden C and Ackermann F (1998). Making Strategy: The Journey of Strategic Management. Sage: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roginski C (1995). Applying SODA in the NHS—a facilitator's story. OR Insight 8: 28–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw D (2003). Evaluating electronic brainstorms using new techniques to analyse the brainstormed ideas. J Opl Res Soc 54: 692–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosik JJ, Avolio BJ and Kahai SS (1998). Inspiring group creativity—comparing anonymous and identified electronic brainstorming. Small Group Res 29: 3–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis AR, Haley BJ and Vandenberg RJ (1996). A meta-analysis of effectiveness, efficiency, and participant satisfaction in group support systems. In: DeGross JI, Jarvenpaa SL and Srinivasan A (eds). Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, Cleveland, Ohio. Association of Information Systems, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, pp 278–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw D (2003). Evaluating electronic workshops through analysing the ‘brainstormed’ ideas. J Opl Res Soc 54: 692–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw D, Ackermann F and Eden C (2003). Sharing knowledge in group problem structuring. J Opl Res Soc 54: 936–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards JS, Collier PM and Shaw D (2003). Management Accounting and Knowledge Management. CIMA: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarbrough H (1996). Strategic IT in financial services: the social construction of strategic knowledge. In: Scarbrough H (ed). The Management of Expertise. Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp 150–173.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for the very helpful comments of two anonymous referees.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J S Edwards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Edwards, J., Hall, M. & Shaw, D. Proposing a systems vision of knowledge management in emergency care. J Oper Res Soc 56, 180–192 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601897

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601897

Keywords

Navigation