Abstract
The shift in the balance of health care, bringing services ‘closer to home’, is a well-established trend, which has been motivated by the desire to improve the provision of services. However, these efforts may be undermined by the improvements in access stimulating demand. Existing analyses of this trend have been limited to isolated parts of the system with calls to control demand with stricter clinical guidelines or to meet demand with capacity increases. By failing to appreciate the underlying feedback mechanisms, these interventions may only have a limited effect. We demonstrate the contribution offered by system dynamics modelling by presenting a study of two cases of the shift in cardiac catheterization services in the UK. We hypothesize the effects of the shifts in services and produce model output that is not inconsistent with real world data. Our model encompasses several mechanisms by which demand is stimulated. We use the model to clarify the roles for stricter clinical guidelines and capacity increases, and to demonstrate the potential benefits of changing the goals that drive activity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Coulter A (1995). Shifting the balance from secondary to primary care: needs investment and cultural change. BMJ 311: 1447–1448.
Hensher M, Fulop N, Coast J and Jefferys E (1999). Better out than in?: alternatives to acute hospital care. BMJ 319: 1127–1130.
Hay J and Leahy MJ (1982). Physician-induced demand: an empirical analysis of the consumer information gap. J Health Econ 1: 231–244.
Rice T (1984). Physician initiated demand for medical services. J Health Politics Pol. Law 14: 587–600.
Roland M and Morris R (1988). Are referrals by general practitioners influenced by the availability of consultants? BMJ 297: 599–600.
Newton JN, Henderson J and Goldacre MJ (1995). Waiting list dynamics and the impact of earmarked funding. BMJ 311: 783–785.
Goddard JA and Tavakoli M (1998). Referral rates and waiting lists: some empirical evidence. Health Econ 7: 545–549.
Hamblin R, Harrison A and Boyle S (1998). Access to Elective Care: Why Waiting Lists Grow. King's Fund: London.
Yates J (1987). Why are We Waiting?. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
Harrison A and New B (2000). Access to Elective Care: What Should Really be Done about Waiting Lists?. King's Fund: London.
Hamblin R, Harrison A and Boyle S (1998). The wrong target. Health Serv J 108: 28–31.
Scott A (1996). Primary or secondary care? What can economics contribute to evaluation at the interface? J Public Health Med 18: 19–26.
Godber E, Robinson R and Steiner A (1997). Economic evaluation and the shifting of balance towards primary care: definitions, evidence and methodological issues. Health Econ 6: 275–294.
Miller P et al (1999). Measuring progress towards primary care-led NHS. Br J Gen Pract 49: 541–545.
Forrester JW (1961). Industrial Dynamics. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
Taylor K and Lane D (1998). Simulation applied to health services: opportunities for applying the system dynamics approach. J Health Serv Res Policy 3: 226–232.
Jun JB, Jacobson SH and Swisher JR (1999). Application of discrete-event simulation in health care clinics: a survey. J Opl Res Soc 50: 109–123.
Taylor K (2002). A system dynamics model for planning and evaluating shifts in health services: the case of cardiac catheterisation procedures in the NHS. PhD thesis, London School of Economics and Political Science.
High Performance Systems (1985). STELLA Software Manuals 1985. High Performance Systems: Hanover, NH, USA.
Homer JB (1987). A diffusion model with application to evolving medical technologies. Technol Forecast Soc 31: 197–218.
Wolstenholme EF and Coyle RG (1980). Modelling discrete events in system dynamics models: a case study. Dynamica 6: 21–27.
Crawford CM (1991). Endogenous safety processes: a model of regulation and safety in industrial firms. Sys Dyn Rev 7: 20–40.
Scholl GJ (1995). Benchmarking the system dynamics community: research results. Sys Dyn Rev 11: 139–155.
Coyle RG (1996). System Dynamics Modelling. Chapman & Hall: London.
Homer JB (1997). Structure, data and compelling conclusions: notes from the field. Sys Dyn Rev 13: 293–309.
Sterman JD (2000). Business Dynamics. Irwin McGraw Hill: New York.
Forrester JW and Senge PM (1980). Tests for building confidence in system dynamics models. In: Legasto AA, Forrester JW and Lyneis JM (eds). System Dynamics. TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences, Vol. 14. North-Holland: New York, pp 209–228.
Richardson GP (1991). Feedback Thought in Social Science and Systems Theory. University of Pennsylvania Press: Philadelphia, PA.
Sterman JD (1984). Appropriate summary statistics for evaluating the historical fit of system dynamics models. Dynamica 10: 51–66.
Spurgeon P (2001). Development of clinical care networks. In: Merry P (ed). NHS Handbook 2001/2002, 16th edn. JMH Publishing: East Sussex, UK, pp 191–193.
Smith R (1999). Reconfiguring acute hospital services. BMJ 319: 797–798.
Wolstenholme EF (1999). A patient flow perspective of UK Health Services: exploring the case for new ‘intermediate care’ initiatives. Sys Dyn Rev 15: 253–271.
Kassirer JP (1983). Adding insult to injury: usurping patients’ prerogatives. N Engl J Med 308: 898–901.
Hornberger JC, Habraken H and Bloch DA (1995). Minimum data needed on patient preferences for accurate, efficient medical decision-making. Med Care 33: 297–310.
Ryan M and Mooney G (1992). Supplier induced demand: where are we and where should be go? Discussion paper 05/92. Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen.
Evans RG (1974). Supplier-induced demand: some empirical evidence and implications. In: M Perlman (ed). The Economics of Health and Medical Care. John Wiley & Sons: New York, pp 162–173.
Acknowledgements
We thank all those who collaborated in this study, for their time and input. The Wellcome Trust for their sponsorship of this research (Reference Number 041243) and the two anonymous referees for their helpful comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Taylor, K., Dangerfield, B. Modelling the feedback effects of reconfiguring health services. J Oper Res Soc 56, 659–675 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601862
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601862